Who is Niagara?
Posted November 25th, 2006 by mrasor
Football
Akron will play Niagara tonight at 7.
There are a lot of storylines surrounding the Purple Eagles, whom the Zips beat at Rhodes Arena in 2005's Bracket Buster game.
- The team's best player, junior guard Charron Fisher, won't play. Nor will he for another five games after that. Fisher, who averaged 18.3 points and 7.9 rebounds last season, is suspended for beating the hell out of a Niagara baseball player. Fisher was rehabbing from a torn ACL before the incident occurred Aug. 31 outside a Niagara Falls bar.
- The team suspended a total of seven players from the incident. Their suspensions are staggered. I'm not really sure who is set to sit out tonight. With all this turmoil, it should be no surprise, Niagara is 0-2.
- Binghamton, a future Zips opponent, beat Niagara 74-66. The Eagles lost another home game to Valparaiso last Saturday, 70-58. They have a pretty decent out-of-conference schedule. Unfortunately, it looks really bad losing these games at home.
- There have been some bright spots for Niagara. A trio of freshmen guards, whom coach Joe Mihalich said need to step up, have done so. Tyrone Lewis averages 13.5 points, 3 rebounds and 3 assists. Javonte Clanton has played 16 minutes per game.
- You may recognize the third freshman, Rydell Brooks. He is a Buchtel High School product whom Akron recruited heavily with its final scholarship. Brooks was the City Series Player of the Year as a junior and senior. Once Brooks committed to Akron, that spot went to Steve McNees. Brooks has scored 7 points in 16 minutes per game.
- Without Fisher tonight, Niagara will rely on 6-foot-7 senior forward Clif Brown, who is averaging 15.5 points and 14.5 rebounds. He pulled down 21 boards against Binghamton. Because of Brown's presence, this team reminds me a bit of Arkansas-Little Rock.
- J.R. Duffey, a 6-8 senior forward, also will provide points and rebounds.
- Before the series of suspensions, ESPN expected depth to be a problem for Niagara. The site also said the Eagles probably would finish in the middle of the pack in the Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference.
- The problem so far has been shooting at just 32 percent from the field. From 3-point land, Niagara has made only 12 percent. They even struggle with foul shots at 57 percent.
It's pretty obvious that Akron needs to pack in its defense and allow Niagara some space on the perimeter. Rebounding has been a problem for the Zips, but they might mitigate that issue by laying off the Eagles on the perimeter.
Oddsmakers are saying Akron will win by eight. That is a fair spread.
Football
Terry Pluto covered the game for the ABJ.
One nugget interested me: J.D. Brookhart will ask John Mackey to step up into a leadership role next year. Maybe his staff is learning that you can't always expect leaders to emerge; sometimes you have to give them a boost.
As I consider what went wrong last night, I think a lot about the offensive line. But coming in, we knew Western Michigan's defensive front was its strength and that Akron's o-line was a weakness.
I suppose it's a broken record to attack the line. And maybe, you have to fault the coaching staff for not putting more blockers in the backfield. You can't just use a lack of talent as an excuse. Obviously, you must adjust for it. I did, however, see fullback Joe McDaniel on the field more than usual.
I still contend the 3-3-5 defense must go. Akron needs to analyze its personnel on the defensive line to see if such a switch is feasible. Looking at the roster, it's probably a close call. With a 4-3, however, a linebacker, such as Doug Williams, may be able to make a transition, sort of the opposite of what the Browns asked Kamerion Wimbley to do with their 3-4 scheme.
Brookhart told me the defense would stay. I still think he's going to look at some tapes and see his current scheme simply puts defenders in the wrong position to make tackles in rushing situations. It also hindered the pass rush.
A lot of your have commented that you wanted to see Carlton Jackson take over the offense in the second half once it became obvious WMU was taking a wrecking ball to the Luke Getsy statue in Akron's backfield. I agree with that.
However, I also see Brookhart's point of view. If you pull your seniors in their final game, with nothing really riding on the game, you lose trust. Younger players will see that and wonder if the staff will stab them in the back someday, too. Would Jackson have allowed Akron to win? Probably not. Would he have made the game more entertaining for fans? Definitely.
Another thing to keep in mind is that Jackson seems to have character problems. There have been whispers about the Florida product. Brookhart himself admitted Jackson didn't play one game because of an off-the-field problem.
Getsy, on the other hand, is an honor student and a good kid. Looking back, by leading the team to its first bowl game in decades, he probably earned a chance to finish out his career on the field. As a coach, what would you do?



November 25th, 2006 at 10:08 am
again, there comes a point where you just have to man up and say "coach play the kids, im dying out there"
players don't see the coach pulling someone on senior day as stabbing them in the back. They mostly see it as "if you suck like this and the season is tanked, expect to ride the bench"
This team needs to grow some sack for next year.
November 25th, 2006 at 12:19 pm
By "sack," I think you mean the team needs an attitude. Agreed.
This team also had no identity. What can you really say Akron football was all about this year?
November 25th, 2006 at 1:45 pm
Rasor,
Yo dogg… Calvin Murphy isn't a coach at Niagara. He was an All-time great there, but not a coach.
http://www.hoophall.com/halloffamers/MurphyCalvin.htm
November 25th, 2006 at 2:22 pm
One thing I DO know: Mr. Jackson should IN NO WAY be handed the QB job next year. Esp. if he's got character problems. Brookhart recruited so many QBs the same age it's absolutely ridiculous. They'll all want the ONE BALL, as Romeo speaks of. From the videotape of Sean Hakes available on the net, it sure looks to me like HE's the man for the Zips next season. Let's hope JD has learned his lesson and isn't just giving the key jobs to lesser-talent upperclassmen. Been there, seen that.
November 25th, 2006 at 2:47 pm
Dang. You're right, Bob. Thanks for pointing that out.
RC, I agree about CJ. Sean Hakes seems to be a really good kid. If I had to give out the starting job today, he'd get it.
I'm glad you saw those videos too. He's friggin' amazing. Reminds me a lot of Charlie Frye.
November 25th, 2006 at 9:07 pm
You say Carlton Jackson may have "character Issues". I saw hime on the punt return team take a cheap shot at a player an awful long way away from the ball and had absolutely nothing to do with the punt return. I thought the ref would, and probably should have, thrown a flag. Instead the offical walked him all the way back to the bench talking to him in a no nonsence way.
November 26th, 2006 at 9:11 am
Please,no more starting all over with a freshman QB. Hakes may be the future but he hasn't seen a 'real' snap.
Carlton Jackson with 'character' issues?! How about a developing 'charcater' issue in David Harvey? He 'tanks' plays.
I was sitting near a guy on Friday who was talking about Jackson wanting out? Maybe true…maybe frustration.. but Brookhart has apparently created an 'atmosphere' with the players he is bringing in and the way he handles the team. Maybe he is trying to be too much of a 'players' coach and not just a coach.
November 26th, 2006 at 12:15 pm
Sorry Oldtimer Lee. All 3 returning Zips QBs are listed as "freshmen," so there's no choice but to start young. However, choosing the right one of those three is imperative, and if CJ is a potential problem, the other 2 deserve close scrutiny, since this critical choice may be a 3-year starter. Age really doesn't seem to matter, as this Coach couldn't win the MAC with seniors Frye or Getsy.
November 26th, 2006 at 1:00 pm
Eric: OK, I just want to see a QB play 3 years. Jackson will be a soph. next year. Hakes hasn't played so if he redshirts next year… if he can…did he this year?
I just think Jackson showed enough that if he stays he gets a chance to play.
If Brookhart doesn't change HIS perspective it won't matter who plays when.
If the kid has an attitude you challenge him. This is football not parole!
Good job folks…keep it up.
akron oldtimer
November 26th, 2006 at 5:33 pm
OK the off the field problem with CJ was that his grandmother passed away during the football season and he had to home for the funeral and to be with his family.
Mike have you been to any of the practices recently to watch hakes run the scout team. He hasnt looked very good. He thows terribly on the run. And even in the pocket he looks suspect. If I had to pick a starter right now i would definatly go with CJ, but the good this is that the coaches have all spring and summer to pick who the start will be. By that time it could be anyone including Chris Jacquamain. Who knows.
Oh and to our boy Ed; there are two number 7's on the team and CJ is not on ant of the special teams the person you saw make a so called cheap shot was Parris MCNeal. And by the way it is special teams you are supposed to light people up no matter where they are on the field.
November 26th, 2006 at 6:05 pm
To be honest, I haven't seen Hakes this year. From those videos (and I know they're only the highlights), he looked agile, fast and accurate.
But of course, the U bans media from practices. What a brilliant move from a publicity standpoint.