Sources familiar with negotiations said that the Big Ten Network and Time Warner Cable have reached an agreement in principle for carriage of the year-old cable network in time for this weekend’s Ohio State Buckeyes season opener against Youngstown State Saturday.
The deal calls for Time Warner to carry the channel on expanded basic on all of its systems in the eight-states where Big Ten schools operate. As recently as Friday, it looked as if an agreement wouldn’t be reached in time to broadcast the game.
‘’We have a handshake deal with Fox (the Big Ten Network’s partner) that will ensure that Time Warner customers will be able to watch the game this weekend,’’ said Bill Jasso, Time Warner’s vice president for government affairs and media relations. ‘’And ware are confident that we’ll reach a deal for carriage shortly.’’
BTN and Time Warner have been locked in a battle over the station since the network began. When Comcast, the nation’s top video provider reached a deal last spring, an agreement with Time Warner seemed to be a foregone conclusion.
That’s not been the case and in recent days negotiations had grown a bit contentious with both sides taking their respective cases to the media. In fact, Ohio State University athletic director Gene Smith sent an open letter to Buckeyes fans advising them to switch video providers.
No details of the deal were available.

I promised not to opine about the state of negotiations or non-negotiations between the NFL Network and cable companies in the paper any longer. Well, that leaves me with this space.

With the Patriots on the verge of making history with the first 16-0 undefeated season, only a few flies on the proverbial wall will get to see it. By the way, if there are flies on the wall of your favorite sports bar while you are watching this game this time if year, here's a tip: you may want to leave.

The NFL Network will have the Patriots-Giants game this coming weekend and all the ranting, raving and rumbling has begun. "How could the NFL do this? Money grubbing weasels. These were always free games before!!"

Yeah, yeah, yeah. I've heard them all. I've read them all in my emails and I've been snapped at by more than a few readers. This is two multi-billion dollar industries battling it out to see which has the most power.

Until the advent of the NFLN, the league has been virtually beyond reproach with respect to business dealings. The cable companies who aren't carrying the network…ummmm…well, I don't know about you guys, but until I switched a few months ago, I could always count on a substantive increase in my bill every year. It got to the point where I was paying $130 a month for cable alone. And don't say I could reduce my packages. In my line of work, everything I had was essential do performing my job.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell must have a screw loose if he thinks the likes of Time Warner will budge from its current stance. Personally, I think the NFLN's placement demand (carriage on a digital basic tier) is reasonable. Although it's per subscriber fee (over a buck) may be a bit less so. But you'd think there could be some middle ground reached here.

I don't think so before 2010. Why then? Well, the NFL still has a crown jewel that the cable companies would LOVE to get their miserly, grubby little paws on - the NFL Sunday Ticket. That's the ONE. And DirecTV has the exclusive on that package of out-of-market games until - you guessed it - 2010.

So where's that leave the loyal football fan and consumers? Well, you can join the flies in the local watering hole, pray your buddy invites you over or, like numerous individuals, just switch. Customers will have to decide the worth of pro football in their lives.

As for me, I will be able to relax in comfort and warmth Saturday just to see if these Patriots make history in the way that other New Englanders did some 231 years ago.

No, there isn't going to be a lot of game analysis here, primarily because I don't think there's much of a point to dissecting something that's likely already been sliced and diced to death today.

A lot of people have asked me what it's like to cover the Eastern Conference Finals, so what the heck.  I figured I'd offer some insight (as if the rest of you really care).

-  I've heard some people complain about the pyrotechnics the Cavs use before games.  Here's a piece of advice:  do not go to The Palace of Auburn Hills to watch one.  During their pre-game festivities they use the fireworks and spewing flames.  By the time it was done I felt as if I should have had an apple in my mouth, been garnished with pineapple and pineapple juice and roasted over an open pit.  Fun. Fun. Fun.

- I've been to a few arenas in my lifetime, but I've yet to meet ushers the caliber of the ones in Motown.  Ushers?  Who the hell am I kidding?  Some of them acted as if they worked with Tony Soprano.  Some of the badges don't even give them the title of "usher".  They actually read "crowd control."  How welcoming.  But on at least two occasions the crowd control folks crossed the line.  One grabbed me without permission and by the time he was done I wanted to ask him if it was good for him and whether he wanted a smoke.  Such fun.  And the biggest crime of all, he didn't even ask for my number.  I feel so cheap and used.

- Then there's always the irrationality that follows losses such as the one Thursday night.  I get home from Detroit and this gem waits in my mailbox.  Please note that as sloppy as I can be on this blog occasionally, the spelling and grammatical errors are not mine:

"i am sending in this preemptive email, before everybody starts bashing lebron.  why is it that everybody except maybe dan gilbert, see that mike brown is the problem.  he could get away with ineptitude against terrible teams, but the pistons bring out what many die hard cavs fans have been seeing all year."

Now everyone out there raise your hand if you think that the Cavaliers have a championship caliber team.  Go stand over there and the folks from your local mental health institution will be by shortly.

- Then there was this gem of an email that came in response to a column of mine that ran today:

After reading your article about the guy who doesn't have cable, I thought you might offer up better solutions. There are plenty of places to go and enjoy a game that are fan friendly. How about going to watch the game at a Damon's Grill??? They are family friendly

with four 12 FOOT Big Screen televisions. Personally I am sick of people whining about cable tv. This isn't 1979, its 2007! This person wasn't complaining the Cavs weren't on television when they were they were only winning 17 games a short time ago?!?!
Tell the guy to quit whining and do something about it!  He is probably the same guy who called Mark "Munch" Bishops show the other day complaining the game wasn't on TV.  It was on TV, its called CABLE TV and no one wants to hear his whining.

Ahhh such intelligence.  Such compassion.  Such questionable taste in dining choices.  Damon's?  As Rodney Dangerfield said so eloquently about the country club cuisine in Caddyshack - "Tell the chef this was low grade dog food."

As for getting cable because it's 2007, please.  He's a parent who doesn't want to put temptation in his house in the form of unwanted channels.  Being a parent, I get that.  Secondly, any league that wants to please its fans will want to make sure its post-season games are easily accessible.  Selling the rights to cable networks who do not intend to sell the feed to over-the-air stations doesn't exactly fall into that category.  This is why the NFL continues to dominate and the NBA and MLB continue to eat football's turf.