Comments on: This is just not right

By: alan t.

alan t. — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:04:05 +0000

I couldn't contain my curiosity, I just had to find out what the fuss is about.

Bottom line, I really don't know why lawyers got involved and admitted it was her, they could have just as easily denied it was her. It is really difficult to tell, the director certainly was not Martin Scorsese. Although, the really creepy voyeurism thing sure does have a Hitchcockian feel to it. But it is definitely not going to win an Academy Award for cinematography. The best way I can describe it, the grainy quality of the video is such that if John Kennedy had long hair and boobs and was missing his package, it might as well be the Zapruder film. (Make your own grassy knoll and magic bullet jokes.)

By: alan t.

alan t. — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:11:05 +0000

terje, there's a considerable difference between a little junk in the trunk and the storage of the Elephant Man and his brothers and sisters inside that trunk.

By: terje

terje — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:37:52 +0000

nothing wrong with a little junk in the trunk.

(cue joyce's obsession with me)

By: jack

jack — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:12:34 +0000

touche, alan.

By: alan t.

alan t. — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:04:38 +0000

Thank God it wasn't a naked video of Dana Jacobson. That gal has a caboose on her the size of an RTA bus.

By: jack

jack — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:50:24 +0000

always thought she was a bimbo and that her sideline "insights" were a joke—hollow and packaged—but she clearly didn't deserve this. also, ironic that there is a "trojan" virus on the link to the video.