<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Point in time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/ledger/2007/05/03/point-in-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/ledger/2007/05/03/point-in-time/</link>
	<description>RON LEDGARD, the Beacon Journal deputy sports editor, ON SPORTS ... AND OTHER STUFF</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nitrojeff</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/ledger/2007/05/03/point-in-time/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitrojeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/ledger/?p=51#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure this will be a good thing. It may hurt mid-major programs like Akron and Kent. The 3 pointer is an equalizer when playing against BCS type schools who have an advantage in the paint typically. Also, why would the NCAA choose some random distance different from the NBA and the International 3 point lines? Either use one of those distances or leave it as it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not so sure this will be a good thing. It may hurt mid-major programs like Akron and Kent. The 3 pointer is an equalizer when playing against BCS type schools who have an advantage in the paint typically. Also, why would the NCAA choose some random distance different from the NBA and the International 3 point lines? Either use one of those distances or leave it as it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.286 seconds -->
