<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The HeldenFiles Online &#187; Academy Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/category/academy-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles</link>
	<description>Movies, TV and Popular Culture with Rich Heldenfels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Wrap-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/25/oscar-telecast-wrap-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I was off writing for the paper during the last big wave of Oscar winners, filing after Day-Lewis and then again with a revision following &#039;No Country&#034; getting best picture.
A few thoughts:
&#8211; Very efficient telecast. Ran only 20 minutes past its scheduled conclusion (and no sane person believes they&#039;re going to do it all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Well, I was off writing for the paper during the last big wave of Oscar winners, filing after Day-Lewis and then again with a revision following &#039;No Country&#034; getting best picture.</p>
<p>A few thoughts:</p>
<p>&#8211; Very efficient telecast. Ran only 20 minutes past its scheduled conclusion (and no sane person believes they&#039;re going to do it all in their scheduled three hours anyway). But the determination to keep acceptance speeches short was at times cruel, and I appreciated Jon Stewart&#039;s bringing back Marketa Irglova so she could talk.</p>
<p>&#8211; International night, wasn&#039;t it? Day-Lewis and Swinton are native Londoners, Bardem is Spanish, Cotillard French. I&#039;ll have more about that in tomorrow&#039;s Beacon Journal column. </p>
<p>&#8211; I can live with &#034;No Country&#034; as best picture, although I would have been just as satisfied with &#034;There Will Be Blood&#034; or &#034;Juno&#034; (and probably a bit more gleeful about &#034;Juno&#034;). Nice that &#034;Juno&#034; at least got best original screenplay.</p>
<p>&#8211; Day-Lewis was indeed deserving, and in the best-actor clips, they used that baptism scene which is really an &#034;oh, give him the Oscar&#034; moment in the movie. Still, Tommy Lee Jones was unbelievable in &#034;In the Valley of Elah,&#034; and I would have easily accepted his winning.</p>
<p>&#8211; Javier Bardem, really good. No problem with the win, although my sentimental side would have liked to see Hal Holbrook up there, because he was terrific in &#034;Into the Wild,&#034; and he has had a long distinguished career. Nor would I have objected to Casey Affleck, except that he&#039;s really the lead in his movie.</p>
<p>And now for some grumping.</p>
<p>&#8211; You&#039;ve heard me about Marion Cotillard, but I&#039;m going to say it again. Not remotely deserving. Mannered performance, labored film. Can&#039;t wait to see how high this is next year in the worst-best-actress-winner polls.</p>
<p>&#8211;Tilda Swinton? Tilda Swinton? Twitchy performance. Not in a league with Amy Ryan or Cate Blanchett. And I&#039;d have put Taraji P. Henson in the nominees&#039; list before Swinton, and probably some others whom I cannot think of at the moment.</p>
<p>Let me leave this post with a link to my piece in today&#039;s Beacon Journal about<a href="http://www.ohio.com/entertainment/movies/15916972.html"> worthwhile movies overlooked by the Oscars this year.</a></p>
<p>And a reminder to watch &#034;A Raisin in the Sun&#034; Monday night. Fine production. My review is <a href="http://www.ohio.com/entertainment/15866262.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Part 8</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-telecast-part-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron Diaz for cinematography, a word that she has trouble saying..

Winner: &#034;There Will Be Blood.&#034; Robert Elswit says it belongs to Paul Thomas Anderson &#8212; and that they are standing on the shoulders of Daniel Day-Lewis.
Hilary Swank introduces the &#034;in memoriam&#034; piece.
Amy Adams for original score. Winner: Dario Marianelli for &#034;Atonement.&#034; Who says it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Cameron Diaz for cinematography, a word that she has trouble saying..</p>
<p><span id="more-1698"></span></p>
<p>Winner: &#034;There Will Be Blood.&#034; Robert Elswit says it belongs to Paul Thomas Anderson &#8212; and that they are standing on the shoulders of Daniel Day-Lewis.</p>
<p>Hilary Swank introduces the &#034;in memoriam&#034; piece.</p>
<p>Amy Adams for original score. Winner: Dario Marianelli for &#034;Atonement.&#034; Who says it was very long walk to the stage.</p>
<p>Soldiers in Iraq announce documentary short-subject winner. Cleveland soldier among them. Winner: &#034;Freeheld.&#034;</p>
<p>Tom Hanks does documentary feature. Winner: &#034;Taxi to the Dark Side.&#034;</p>
<p>I&#039;m taking a break for a bit. Will return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch, Part 7: Best Song Winner, &quot;Falling Slowly,&quot; Yes!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-watch-part-7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More stuff, after the jump, and after I finish gagging over Marion Cotillard&#039;s win &#8230;

Stewart, decent bit about playing video game on the big Oscar screen.
Colin Farrell, to introduce another best-song nominee. From &#034;Once,&#034; yes, it is &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034; Performed by Hansard and Irglova, with a big string section. Haven&#039;t I mentioned that I love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>More stuff, after the jump, and after I finish gagging over Marion Cotillard&#039;s win &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1697"></span></p>
<p>Stewart, decent bit about playing video game on the big Oscar screen.</p>
<p>Colin Farrell, to introduce another best-song nominee. From &#034;Once,&#034; yes, it is &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034; Performed by Hansard and Irglova, with a big string section. Haven&#039;t I mentioned that I love this song? (Movie&#039;s swell, too.) Nice performance generally, although it appears that Hansard is having trouble staying in sync with Irglova, since he keeps looking back at her.</p>
<p>Still love the song, but the big orchestral finish is a mistake.</p>
<p>Nicholson introduces clips from best-picture winners over the years.</p>
<p>Renee Zellweger for editing award. Winner: &#034;The Bourne Ultimatum.&#034; Stewart: &#034;Someone just took the lead in their Oscar pool based on a guess.&#034;</p>
<p>Nicole Kidman. Necklace is off center. She appears in praise of production designer Robert Boyle, who is 98 and still doing things. Taped piece with him explaining production design, &#034;a physical interpretation of the script.&#034; Receiving honorary Oscar, helped to the lectern. Standing ovation from people who hope they might still have a career at the age of 98. Or 58. Boyle takes his time, and they don&#039;t dare put up music on him. He&#039;s living history, and shows it as he recalls the people he&#039;s worked with. </p>
<p>Penelope Cruz. Foreign-language film award. Winner: &#034;The Counterfeiters&#034; (Austria). </p>
<p>Patrick Dempsey of &#034;Enchanted&#034; to introduce the third nominated song from &#034;Enchanted.&#034; &#034;So Close.&#034; I didn&#039;t catch the name of the singer, but he doesn&#039;t sound good. Sounds almost as if he&#039;s shaking off a case of the flu, or is badly undermiked. Improves in the latter stages &#8212; well, not consistently &#8212; so maybe there is a mike issue.</p>
<p>John Travolta to present best-song Oscar. Winner: &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034; I just yelled. A lot.<br />
And see the movie. Hansard: &#034;Make art! Make art!&#034; Irglova gets cut off by the music.</p>
<p>After the break, Stewart brings Irglova back out to give her acceptance speech. Nice move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch, Part 6: Best Actress, Marion Cotillard, Bleh</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-6-best-actress-marion-cotillard-bleh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-6-best-actress-marion-cotillard-bleh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-watch-part-6-best-actress-marion-cotillard-bleh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another parade of previous-winner clips. Forest Whitaker presents.
Marion Cotillard wins. Ick. Yuck. As I have said before, I would give this to anyone else in the category, including Laura Linney, and I haven&#039;t even seen her performance. Cotillard is way excited. &#034;Thank you, life, thank you, love. It is true there are angels in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Another parade of previous-winner clips. Forest Whitaker presents.</p>
<p>Marion Cotillard wins. Ick. Yuck. As I have said before, I would give this to anyone else in the category, including Laura Linney, and I haven&#039;t even seen her performance. Cotillard is way excited. &#034;Thank you, life, thank you, love. It is true there are angels in this city.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-6-best-actress-marion-cotillard-bleh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch, Part 5: &quot;No Country&quot; Wins Adapted Screenplay</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-watch-part-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jessica Alba and more after the jump &#8230;

Alba does the technical awards recap. Stewart notes that Alba and Blanchett are pregnant, making two pregnant women at the ceremony. &#034;Then again, the night is still young, and Jack is here.&#034;
Josh Brolin and James McAvoy, quoting famous lines from movies. Best adapted screenplay. Brolin does what he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Jessica Alba and more after the jump &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1695"></span></p>
<p>Alba does the technical awards recap. Stewart notes that Alba and Blanchett are pregnant, making two pregnant women at the ceremony. &#034;Then again, the night is still young, and Jack is here.&#034;</p>
<p>Josh Brolin and James McAvoy, quoting famous lines from movies. Best adapted screenplay. Brolin does what he admits is the worst Nicholson impression ever, apologizes to Nicholson (who doesn&#039;t appear to have listened), and offers to buy Jack a drink after. Winners: The Coen brothers for &#034;No Country.&#034; Their excitement is, um, understated. Kind of the way I&#039;d expect the Black Keys to accept an Oscar.</p>
<p>MPAA honcho reviews the Oscars process, with some whimsical clips of people deciding to vote. Stewart says, &#034;I always thought it was superdelegates.&#034;</p>
<p>Miley Cyrus, wearing the shade of red that is a recurring dress theme tonight. Introduces another &#034;Enchanted&#034; song, &#034;That&#039;s How You Know.&#034;Sung by the adorable Kristin Chenoweth! (But still, &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034;) Most elaborate number so far. Not very interesting outside the movie, though.</p>
<p>Stewart revisits the pregnant-actress joke: adds Nicole Kidman, announces &#034;the baby goes to &#8230;&#034; and awards it to Angelina Jolie. Then introduces Halle Berry (who is also pregnant) and Judi Dench, but they don&#039;t appear. Replaced by Jonah Hill and Seth Rogen, who will supposedly do the Berry-Dench lines. But first argue about which should get to be Berry, until it&#039;s time to announce the winner for sound editing. Winner: &#034;The Bourne Ultimatum.&#034; Very rambling and muddle acceptance speech leading into the go-away music. Back to Jonah and Seth, doing more of the Halle-Judi bit, before the Oscar for sound mixing. Winner: &#034;The Bourne Ultimatum.&#034; One of the winning guys is a little wobbly onstage, and doesn&#039;t get to say anything before the microphone is cut off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-part-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Part 4: Best Supporting Actress, Tilda (Gag) Swinton</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-4-best-supporting-actress-tilda-gag-swinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-4-best-supporting-actress-tilda-gag-swinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-telecast-part-4-best-supporting-actress-tilda-gag-swinton/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clips from previous winners. Alan Arkin to present.
Tilda Swinton wins. Akh. She&#039;s in some Harry Potter-ish dress. As you know from my &#034;Oscar Watch&#034; posts, she&#039;s not my choice. Not even close. I&#039;ve got some people I would have nominated before her. And among the nominees, I would have gone with two or three before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Clips from previous winners. Alan Arkin to present.</p>
<p>Tilda Swinton wins. Akh. She&#039;s in some Harry Potter-ish dress. As you know from my &#034;Oscar Watch&#034; posts, she&#039;s not my choice. Not even close. I&#039;ve got some people I would have nominated before her. And among the nominees, I would have gone with two or three before her. Fun acceptance speech, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-4-best-supporting-actress-tilda-gag-swinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-telecast-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to the show. Stewart jokes about Bardem&#039;s Spanish. Intros a montage we might have seen if the writers strike continued &#8230;

&#034;Oscar&#039;s salute to binoculars and periscopes.&#034; Kind of funny. Then &#034;Bad dreams: An Oscar Salute.&#034; &#034;Wow, that really would have been a waste of your time.&#034;
Keri Russell. (The bride approves of her dress.) Introduces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Back to the show. Stewart jokes about Bardem&#039;s Spanish. Intros a montage we might have seen if the writers strike continued &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1693"></span></p>
<p>&#034;Oscar&#039;s salute to binoculars and periscopes.&#034; Kind of funny. Then &#034;Bad dreams: An Oscar Salute.&#034; &#034;Wow, that really would have been a waste of your time.&#034;</p>
<p>Keri Russell. (The bride approves of her dress.) Introduces the next song, from &#034;August Rush,&#034; a movie with &#8230; Keri Russell. Big treatment, including choir. But kind of tepid overall. I&#039;m still cheering for &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034; </p>
<p>Owen Wilson. Live-action short film. Winner: &#034;Le Mozart des Pickpockets.&#034; Owen has a little trouble with the title. Winner says, &#034;I don&#039;t really speak English&#034; but he is &#034;very &#039;appy.&#034; And speaks French. Oscars are a global village tonight, aren&#039;t they?</p>
<p>Jerry Seinfeld as his Bee Movie character, with amusing bit about his &#034;earlier work&#034; &#8212; bee scenes in other movies. Animated short films. Considering the titles&#039; challenging his pronunciation ability, Seinfeld is fortunate that the winner is &#034;Peter &#038; The Wolf.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Part 2: Best Supporting Actor, Javier Bardem</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-2-best-supporting-actor-javier-bardem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-2-best-supporting-actor-javier-bardem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-telecast-part-2-best-supporting-actor-javier-bardem/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clips of former winners, capped by Cuba Gooding Jr. shouting off his finish-up music.
Presenter: Jennifer Hudson. Reads her lines with little emotion.
Clips of nominees. Hal Holbrook is killing me in his clip.
Javier Bardem wins. (Or &#034;Harvier,&#034; as Hudson says it.) No upset here.
Bardem says &#034;this is pretty amazing&#034; and &#034;I have to speak fast, man.&#034; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Clips of former winners, capped by Cuba Gooding Jr. shouting off his finish-up music.<br />
Presenter: Jennifer Hudson. Reads her lines with little emotion.</p>
<p>Clips of nominees. Hal Holbrook is killing me in his clip.</p>
<p>Javier Bardem wins. (Or &#034;Harvier,&#034; as Hudson says it.) No upset here.</p>
<p>Bardem says &#034;this is pretty amazing&#034; and &#034;I have to speak fast, man.&#034; Acknowledges his bad haircut in the movie. Speaks in Spanish to his mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast-part-2-best-supporting-actor-javier-bardem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Telecast, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-telecast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s 8:30 and we&#039;re in the fancy opening, &#8230;

I kind of like the use of all the different images from movies, although the pace makes it feel a little like a theme-park ride. Roll call of sponsors, then Jon Stewart.
Stewart brings up the writers strike and it being over. &#034;Tonight, welcome to the makeup sex.&#034; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It&#039;s 8:30 and we&#039;re in the fancy opening, &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1691"></span></p>
<p>I kind of like the use of all the different images from movies, although the pace makes it feel a little like a theme-park ride. Roll call of sponsors, then Jon Stewart.</p>
<p>Stewart brings up the writers strike and it being over. &#034;Tonight, welcome to the makeup sex.&#034; Vanity Fair joke, not bad. Reference to a &#034;four or five&#034; hour ceremony. Grim movie recap; &#034;thank God for teen pregnancy.&#034; Javier Bardem hair joke; OK if there hadn&#039;t been a few zillion Bardem hair jokes already. Good line about &#034;Away From Her&#034; and Hillary Clinton. Excellent line about &#034;Norbit&#034; being nominated &#8212; that the academy too often overlooks &#034;movies that aren&#039;t good.&#034; Hoary Dennis Hopper joke. Decent line about keeping Iraq war movies in theaters &#8212; and a nasty little one about Oscar and John McCain. Best line so far: Normally, when you see a woman or a black man as president, &#034;an asteroid is about to hit the Statue of Liberty.&#034;</p>
<p>Wesley Snipes in the house. With Spike Lee. </p>
<p>Jennifer Garner as first presenter. Costume design. Winner: &#034;Elizabeth: The Golden Age.&#034;<br />
Alexandra Byrne accepts, concisely.</p>
<p>Flashback, of Barbra Streisand&#039;s tie win, with taped reminiscence by Streisand. Because, you know, the ceremony just isn&#039;t long enough with the presentations and acceptances.<br />
And commercials.</p>
<p>Clooney. Struggling a bit with his lines. Clips and photos of &#034;80 years of Oscars.&#034; The use of &#034;My Heart Will Go On&#034; is a bit much, especially since there&#039;s a lot of real emotion here without it.</p>
<p>Stewart, watching &#034;Lawrence of Arabia&#034; on his iPhone. Good gag.</p>
<p>Anne Hathaway and Steve Carell. Animated features. Nice piece with Carell acting as if these are documentaries. Carell drops one, two s-words. You think the Parents Television Council is scrambling to get out an outraged e-mail?</p>
<p>Winner: &#034;Ratatouille.&#034; Brad Bird thanks his junior-high guidance counselor, for &#034;perfect training in the movie business.&#034; Gets the wrap-it-up warning, and then the finish-up music.</p>
<p>Katherine Heigl. Nervoiiouos, and with really bad makeup, especially when you&#039;re giving out the makeup Oscar. Winner: &#034;La Vie en Rose.&#034; One winner is brief, the other not, and she gets the finish-up music before being done.</p>
<p>First best-song performance. &#034;Happy Working Song,&#034; from &#034;Enchanted.&#034; Stewart starts to sing it &#8212; then introduces Amy Adams. I would see her in any Broadway musical I can think of. And it&#039;s a nicely simple presentation: just her onstage. Very well done, even though it&#039;s not my best-song fave. (&#034;Falling Slowly,&#034; please.)</p>
<p>Flashback: Catherine Zeta-Jones, with reminiscences by her and hubby Michael Douglas, and a clip of him winning an Oscar.</p>
<p>Commercials, including one for Channel 5&#039;s news. They really like hidden-camera stories.</p>
<p>Dwayne Johnson (no &#034;The Rock&#034; tonight). Best visual effects. Not bad with a line about thinking the face-melting scene in &#034;Raiders&#034; was real. Winner: &#034;The Golden Compass.&#034; The effects were good in that film, but the movie was bad, much worse than &#034;Transformers&#034; or &#034;Pirates of the Caribbean.&#034; But the winning guys are quite euphoric. And beat the finish-up music.</p>
<p>Cate Blanchett. Art direction. Winner: &#034;Sweeney Todd, The Demon Barber of Fleet Street.&#034; Well deserved. They get finish-up music.</p>
<p>Good Stewart riff on Cate Blanchett.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-telecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Pre-Show</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-pre-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-pre-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-pre-show/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s how it will work tonight: I&#039;ll be posting notes here while the Oscars telecasts are in progress. I&#039;ll take a break around 11 to write something for tomorrow&#039;s Beacon Journal, then return here until the telecast is over, when I&#039;ll have to write an update for the paper. Then I&#039;ll sum up here. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Here&#039;s how it will work tonight: I&#039;ll be posting notes here while the Oscars telecasts are in progress. I&#039;ll take a break around 11 to write something for tomorrow&#039;s Beacon Journal, then return here until the telecast is over, when I&#039;ll have to write an update for the paper. Then I&#039;ll sum up here. So follow along, if you want, after the jump. &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1690"></span></p>
<p>&#034;The stars are arriving for a night to remember,&#034; announcer declares. Recap of best-pic nominees. Intro of host: Regis Philbin. With Shaun Robinson and Samantha Harris.</p>
<p>First interview: George Clooney. Clip from &#034;Michael Clayton.&#034; The bride is grumbling about not seeing gowns. Mollified at seeing the outfit on Clooney&#039;s girlfriend. Regis sucks up to Clooney by reminding him of how he sucked up to him earlier. There is no point to any of this.</p>
<p>Clip of Marion Cotillard in &#034;La Vie en Rose.&#034; Then interviewed by Robinson, who delights over her gown &#8212; and reminds her that &#034;Edith Piaf died (awkward pause) before you were even born.&#034; Cotillard&#039;s English is accented but OK. Robinson declares her &#034;absolutely fantastic&#034; in her movie.</p>
<p>Harris with John Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. Not nominated, but they chat about &#034;Hairspray&#034; anyway.</p>
<p>Laura Linney, best actress nominee, clip from &#034;The Savages.&#034; She gets to talk to Regis. She&#039;s great, her movie&#039;s great, the rest of the cast is great, says Regis, and Linney gets about 10 words.</p>
<p>Javier Bardem, with Robinson. They talk hair. Bardem&#039;s Spanish accent pronounced, especially in comparison to the clip from &#034;No Country.&#034; He gets to say hello to people in Spain.</p>
<p>Miley Cyrus. Again. She also got Walters, and she&#039;s not nominated for anything except A Way To Get Kids To Watch.</p>
<p>Shots: Mickey Rooney, Helen Mirren, Katherine Heigl, Faye Dunaway&#8230;</p>
<p>Harris with Jennifer Garner. After some chatter about &#034;Juno,&#034; they talk about Garner&#039;s gown.</p>
<p>Regis with Mirren. He asks if she&#039;s seen the movies with the best-actor noms, since she&#039;s giving that award. She says &#034;most of them,&#034; and indicates some unhappiness with the roles for women.</p>
<p>Robinson with Daniel Day-Lewis. The bride groans over Day-Lewis&#039;s wife&#039;s gown. &#034;Everybody just loved your performance,&#034; Robinson says.</p>
<p>Regis with Cameron Diaz. She&#039;s excited to be there. Regis brings up her working with Day-Lewis on &#034;Gangs of New York.&#034; She discusses. We&#039;re about 16 minutes into the pre-show and I am worn out, jaded, bored, impatient.</p>
<p>Harris with Amy Adams. Harris brings up that Adams will be performing for a billion people. &#034;Trying to make me nervous?&#034; she says. She seems very nice.</p>
<p>Regis with Sarah Golden, who has been in the bleachers for more than 20 years and knows how to talk. Regis talks with contest winners.</p>
<p>Shots: Tilda Swinton, Bardem, Steve Carell&#8230; Commercial. </p>
<p>More celeb shots. Robinson talks to Ellen Page. Nothing interesting. Harris with Hilary Swank. More gown talk. Regis backstage with singers and dancers from the &#034;Enchanted&#034; number. (At least he notes that it&#039;s a Disney movie.) He tries to terrify and inspire them. </p>
<p>Harris notes &#034;the red carpet is beginning to thin out&#034; then throws to Regis with Oscars musical director Bill Conti. Who, amusingly, launches into an extended anecdote that proves to be all he gets to say. The show keeps moving. Back to Robinson and Harris, who have no one to talk to, so back to Regis, who offers a look at the theater, and heads down to the front row. Points to actors but says &#034;I know a lot of people are standing in front of them.&#034; I think he refered to &#034;Xavier&#034; Bardem. But he gets a sound bite from Jack Nicholson, in his shades.</p>
<p>And for all this we lose a half-hour of sleep tonight. Couldn&#039;t we leave this nonsense to cable and start the ceremony sooner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-pre-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Warm-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-warm-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-warm-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/24/oscar-warm-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect to write steadily here at 8 p.m. when the official pre-show begins, and have been taking care of some other business and other TV since. (Tiger Woods strikes again!) Besides, the early coverage is so excruciating. Ryan Seacrest, dressed like hip young priest who talks to youth, talking about rain and another red-carpet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I expect to write steadily here at 8 p.m. when the official pre-show begins, and have been taking care of some other business and other TV since. (Tiger Woods strikes again!) Besides, the early coverage is so excruciating. Ryan Seacrest, dressed like hip young priest who talks to youth, talking about rain and another red-carpet denizen leaning into him. Barbara Walters, seeming soooooooo old and stuffy and out of it. (I don&#039;t care whether she gets the Moldy Peaches, and I don&#039;t want to hear her singing with Ellen Page.) Back for serious business in a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-warm-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;Once&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-once/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-once/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Once]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/17/oscar-watch-once/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Overview: One nomination, best song for &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034;
I have this odd fantasy involving &#034;Once&#034; and &#034;Juno&#034; &#8230;

In this fantasy, &#034;Juno&#034; does not exist. (Hey, relax. I like the movie a lot, as I said in an earlier post.) In that world, Oscar nominators looking for a quirky little independent film, a successor to &#034;Little Miss [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/i/E/P/oncepic2.jpg" alt="Once" /></p>
<p>Overview: One nomination, best song for &#034;Falling Slowly.&#034;</p>
<p>I have this odd fantasy involving &#034;Once&#034; and &#034;Juno&#034; &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1676"></span></p>
<p>In this fantasy, &#034;Juno&#034; does not exist. (Hey, relax. I like the movie a lot, as I said in an earlier post.) In that world, Oscar nominators looking for a quirky little independent film, a successor to &#034;Little Miss Sunshine&#034; if you will, don&#039;t have a &#034;Juno&#034; to be drawn to. So, instead, they discover &#034;Once,&#034; and it becomes an Oscar darling.</p>
<p>Now, I know that there are numerous reasons why this would not happen, other than the way &#034;Juno&#034; really does exist. &#034;Once&#034; does not have any recognizable American actors, and it hasn&#039;t made more than $100 million at the U.S. box office, and the accents at times are even harder to understand than some of &#034;Juno&#039;s&#034; slang. But &#034;Once&#034; remains a fine film, and one that deserves far more than its measly single nomination for best song.</p>
<p>Not that I object to that nomination. &#034;Falling Slowly&#034; has been stuck in my head ever since I finally saw the movie. I know many people discovered the song before the movie, via the Frames. But I heard the soundtrack before I saw the film, and was far less entertained than I was after I saw &#034;Once.&#034; The songs are a sublime fit within the movie, and their place in my memory now is based on how touching they were in context. (Even then, not all the songs work. But most do.)</p>
<p>For those of you tuning in late, &#034;Once&#034; involves a Dublin musician (Glen Hansard) who is drifting musically and emotionally. Then he meets a Czech woman (Marketa Irglova) who brings out both his creativity and his ability to feel love again. His idea of love, and of their relationship, is different from hers. But they both find their way to a place where, if romance is not possible, then at least the joy of making music is. (As I watched, I kept thinking that a more Hollywood approach to the same story would get us, well, &#034;Music and Lyrics&#034; &#8212; cute in its way but nowhere near as thoughtful or touching as &#034;Once.&#034;)</p>
<p>While Hansard is good enough as an actor (and fine as the real-life musician that he is), it&#039;s Irglova who takes over the picture with her charm and her intelligence. But both of them work because of a smart script and a look that is scruffily realistic. Check out the movie on DVD, then get the soundtrack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-once/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-the-assassination-of-jesse-james-by-the-coward-robert-ford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-the-assassination-of-jesse-james-by-the-coward-robert-ford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/11/oscar-watch-the-assassination-of-jesse-james-by-the-coward-robert-ford/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Photo from Variety)
Overview: Two nominations, for cinematography and for best supporting actor (Casey Affleck as Robert Ford).
In my last post, I mentioned the tough luck Tommy Lee Jones has had when it comes to the Oscars. It could also be a tough year for Casey Affleck, who will have to crawl over the scary frame [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://www.variety.com/rbidata/photogallery/variety/3749.jpg" alt="CAffleck" /><br />
(Photo from Variety)</p>
<p>Overview: Two nominations, for cinematography and for best supporting actor (Casey Affleck as Robert Ford).</p>
<p>In my last post, I mentioned the tough luck Tommy Lee Jones has had when it comes to the Oscars. It could also be a tough year for Casey Affleck, who will have to crawl over the scary frame of Javier Bardem to get an award.</p>
<p>But, as with Jones, I wouldn&#039;t mind if he did. &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1658"></span></p>
<p>I should mention that I watched &#034;Jesse James&#034; on DVD, and not all in one sitting. I concede that because much criticism has been leveled at its length (2 hours, 40 minutes). With the watching spread out the way I did it, the length does not seem as onerous, and the rich visual details can be lingered over, the nuances of the performances by Affleck and Brad Pitt (as Jesse James) appreciated without a lot of watch-checking. Not all of it is that good &#8212; the tone of Sam Rockwell&#039;s performance really throws me &#8212; but there are plenty of positive things about it.</p>
<p>And before I get to Affleck, I have to say that Pitt is as good as I have ever seen him, making use of the cool screen-idol image but giving it layers of weariness and near-madness. He&#039;s sort of like Gregory Peck in &#034;The Gunfighter&#034; if you stripped away all the preachiness. Very good, and good overall.</p>
<p>But Affleck is the revelation, especially when I consider his much blander performance in &#034;Gone Baby Gone.&#034; If we&#039;re being realistic, he is also the movie&#039;s lead, regardless of what Pitt&#039;s status or the motion picture academy indicates. It is his obsession with celebrity, James&#039; and his own, that drives the movie. In the end, it is what happens to Ford after he gains his fame that gives the movie its enduring impact.</p>
<p>That, and it looks great, of course.</p>
<p>Never fear, I think Bardem was marvelous in &#034;No Country for Old Men,&#034; too. So was Hal Holbrook in &#034;Into the Wild.&#034; This is a tough category. But Affleck deserves to be standing smack in the middle of it; he&#039;s not just some also-ran filling a space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-the-assassination-of-jesse-james-by-the-coward-robert-ford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;Atonement&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-atonement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-atonement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atonement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/05/oscar-watch-atonement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I used my theoretical day off to squeeze in the one best-picture nominee I had not seen. Thoughts after the jump (including some spoilers if you have not seen it).
Overview: Seven Oscar nominations. Best picture, art direction, cinematography, costume design, adapted screenplay, original music score and best supporting actress (Saoirse Ronan). &#8230;

&#034;Atonement&#034; reeks of what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://www.filminfocus.com/focus-movies/atonement/images/atone-poster.jpg" alt="Atonement" /></p>
<p>I used my theoretical day off to squeeze in the one best-picture nominee I had not seen. Thoughts after the jump (including some spoilers if you have not seen it).</p>
<p>Overview: Seven Oscar nominations. Best picture, art direction, cinematography, costume design, adapted screenplay, original music score and best supporting actress (Saoirse Ronan). &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1631"></span></p>
<p>&#034;Atonement&#034; reeks of what Oscar so often likes &#8212; the grand scale, the literate dialogue (and literary background), the British accents. It is all supposed to feel meaningful and serious, especially as a contemplation of the power of words. If at times it seems more than a little dull, then we are supposed to believe that&#039;s our fault for being such oafs.</p>
<p>But it is too calculating a piece for my taste, a movie that seeks redemption through its final scenes, a trick ending.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t have a problem with trick endings (I love &#034;The Usual Suspects.&#034; for one, and liked the trick in &#034;The Sixth Sense.&#034;). But the trick in &#034;Atonement&#034; came painfully late in the process. If the bulk of the movie is indeed Briony&#039;s last novel, then it is not a good one, with its disjointed narration and wooden dialogue. (The concocted post-Dunkirk scene with Briony, Cecelia and Robbie felt unwieldy and false even before the novel&#039;s revelation.) Even if the revelation is supposed to explain away the flaws preceding it, the flaws are still tough to sit through.</p>
<p>The movie is, in short, a hash. Scenes leading up to Robbie&#039;s arrest are from one film. The overlong wartime sequences belong in a different one (and the change from the arrest to wartime is abrupt.) Then, of course, there is the tragic real-life tale buried by the novel&#039;s attempt at happiness.</p>
<p>But instead of continuing to complain, let me turn to the Oscar-worthiness of the piece. With three grand contenders for best picture (&#034;Juno,&#034; &#034;No Country for Old Men,&#034; &#034;There Will Be Blood&#034;), &#034;Atonement&#034; is an also-ran. As I said, it has a lot of things that Oscar voters like. But where I could stand it if any of the big three won, a win by &#034;Atonement&#034; or &#034;Michael Clayton&#034; would be a big Oscar misstep.</p>
<p>Supporting actress: Ronan as the young Briony was impressive. But not as much as Amy Ryan and Cate Blanchett. (And, when we&#039;re considering young up and comers, I would give Dakota Blue Richards of &#034;The Golden Compass&#034; a nod over Ronan. Only Richards was in an even worse movie, and would have had to contend in the best-actress category to boot. But, as usual, I digress.)</p>
<p>Adapted screeplay: I have been bad about reading source material, not that that matters a lot. After all, I have skimmed &#034;Oil,&#034; the Upton Sinclair novel that inspired &#034;There Will Be Blood,&#034; and the connection between book and film is minimal. (And the movie is better than the book.) So I will just say that &#034;Blood&#034; and &#034;No Country&#034; &#8212; and &#034;Away From Her,&#034; for that matter &#8212; are better movies than &#034;Atonement.&#034; </p>
<p>Art direction: To the extent that I understand such things, I&#039;d go first to &#034;There Will Be Blood&#034; or &#034;Sweeney Todd.&#034; Cinematography: I prefer &#034;There Will Be Blood,&#034; &#034;No Country for Old Men&#034; and &#034;The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford.&#034; Costume design: If you want to give &#034;Atonement&#034; something, I suppose this is as good a place as any. Music score, ditto.</p>
<p>In other words, I&#039;m not going to be worrying much about those categories on Oscar night. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-atonement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;Juno&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-juno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-juno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 02:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juno]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/03/oscar-watch-juno/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Overview: Four nominations: best picture, director (Jason Reitman), lead actress (Ellen Page), original screenplay (Diablo Cody). Comments after the jump. 

Going into &#034;Juno,&#034; I was suspecting it was this year&#039;s &#034;Little Miss Sunshine&#034; (which I liked a lot), a seemingly modest little indie with a capable but hardly star-laden ensemble cast, some laughs and some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://a.oscar.abc.com/media/2008/images/nominees/nominations/Juno_PageE.jpg" alt="Ellen Page" /></p>
<p>Overview: Four nominations: best picture, director (Jason Reitman), lead actress (Ellen Page), original screenplay (Diablo Cody). Comments after the jump. </p>
<p><span id="more-1623"></span></p>
<p>Going into &#034;Juno,&#034; I was suspecting it was this year&#039;s &#034;Little Miss Sunshine&#034; (which I liked a lot), a seemingly modest little indie with a capable but hardly star-laden ensemble cast, some laughs and some smarts.</p>
<p>And &#034;Juno&#034; proved to be all those things and much, much more.</p>
<p>We can start, of course, with the cast, which demonstrates (as if we had to be reminded) that a lot of people with healthy TV careers are still effective on the big screen &#8212; even if Hollywood snobbery looks down on them. J.K. Simmons, Allison Janney, Jason Bateman, Jennifer Garner, Michael Cera &#8212; all game on, and Simmons, Bateman and Garner all would have made reasonable choices for Oscar nominations.</p>
<p>(OK, you&#039;re asking, how do I make room for them. Well, in supporting actor, I dump Tom Wilkinson from &#034;Michael Clayton&#034; &#8230; and then it gets tough. Seeming favorite Javier Bardem, Hal Holbrook, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Casey Affleck, all really good, too. But let&#039;s say Affleck should have been in the lead-actor category given how much he&#039;s the focus of &#034;The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford&#034; and, since the academy thinks this way, too, Hoffman already has an Oscar. So I could elbow them aside for Simmons and Bateman.</p>
<p>(As for supporting actress, I dump Tilda Swinton from &#034;Michael Clayton.&#034; But I have this other problem: I have been thinking a lot about how very good Taraji P. Henson was in &#034;Talk to Me&#034; (shown below with the also-overlooked Don Cheadle) and would have put her ahead of Swinton and probably Ruby Dee. Amy Ryan and Cate Blanchett stay in the pack, and I haven&#039;t seen &#034;Atonement&#034; yet. Maybe tomorrow. So I might move Dee along with Swinton to make room for Henson and Garner. Not that this makes any difference in anything other than my version of Fantasy Oscars. This is just my way of indicating preferences.)</p>
<p><img src="http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/_/E/P/talktomepic2.jpg" alt="Henson" /></p>
<p>Getting back to &#034;Juno&#034; where it is actually nominated, as much as I like &#034;There Will Be Blood&#034; and &#034;No Country for Old Men,&#034; &#034;Juno&#034; has now elbowed into my top three and &#8212; depending on my mood &#8212; top one or two. It was that good.</p>
<p>Not to everyone&#039;s taste, to be sure. I laughed quite often, and got some heart tugs to boot. On the other hand, a reader called me a couple of weeks ago to discuss how much she disliked the movie, how unfunny she thought it was, how (according to her) no one in the theater was laughing. There were laughs at the daytime screening the bride and I attended, but they were a little scattershot.</p>
<p>Still, I&#039;m on board with it. Downloaded the soundtrack after seeing it, too, and am considering downloading &#034;If I Were a Carpenter,&#034; the weird Carpenters tribute that the Sonic Youth song in &#034;Juno&#034; came from. (Also Cranberries, others.)</p>
<p>OK, best actress: Cate Blanchett is fine in &#034;Elizabeth: The Golden Age&#034; (as she is fine in so many things), but if I&#039;m giving her an Oscar this year, it&#039;s for &#034;I&#039;m Not There.&#034; Also, this &#034;Elizabeth&#034; isn&#039;t that good a movie, and &#034;Juno&#034; overall is very good, so Page gets the nod over Blanchett. Julie Christie is fine in &#034;Away From Her,&#034; but Page is better. Haven&#039;t seen Marion Cotillard in &#034;La Vie en Rose&#034; or Laura Linney in &#034;The Savages,&#034; so I can&#039;t say how they match up. (My one qualifier about Page is that I don&#039;t remember seeing her in anything else, so I can&#039;t say if this was a big stretch for her. But I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s necessary to win an acting Oscar; I didn&#039;t feel that Jennifer Hudson was stepping way out of character in &#034;Dreamgirls,&#034; but she was a dominating screen presence.)</p>
<p>Best director: Much tougher, since I have already indicated that I have three best pictures closely matched, and I love the work of the Coen brothers generally, and a lot of what Paul Thomas Anderson has done. And I haven&#039;t seen &#034;The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.&#034; Stiil, Jason Reitman is definitely ahead of &#034;Michael Clayton&#039;s&#034; Tony Gilroy. So this one is a head-scratcher.</p>
<p>Original screenplay: Again, haven&#039;t seen &#034;The Savages,&#034; or &#034;Lars and the Real Girl.&#034; Am working my way through &#034;Ratatouille,&#034; and based on what I have seen, &#034;Juno&#034; gets the nod. And I have made my lack of enthusiasm for &#034;Michael Clayton&#034; quite clear. So &#034;Juno&#034; is ahead of it, too.</p>
<p>I know, I need to see more movies. Working on it. In any case, right now I feel very happy about &#034;Juno&#034; and want it to get some kind of Oscar love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/02/oscar-watch-juno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;American Gangster&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-american-gangster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-american-gangster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Gangster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/30/oscar-watch-american-gangster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Overview: Two nominations, for best supporting actress (Ruby Dee) and art direction. Notes, with possible plot spoilers, after the jump &#8230;

Overview continued: &#034;American Gangster&#034; is a rather fictionalized version of the story of drug kingpin Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) and of Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe), an honest cop battling the New York drug trade and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://www.moviegoods.com/affiliate2/adView.asp?affiliateID=1647&#038;adID=39750" alt="AG" /></p>
<p>Overview: Two nominations, for best supporting actress (Ruby Dee) and art direction. Notes, with possible plot spoilers, after the jump &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-1612"></span></p>
<p>Overview continued: &#034;American Gangster&#034; is a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/22/film.american.gangster.ap/index.html">rather fictionalized </a>version of the story of drug kingpin Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) and of Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe), an honest cop battling the New York drug trade and its attendant corruption.</p>
<p>In another year, I could see this doing much better than two Oscar nominations.</p>
<p>Not only does it star two previous winners, it was a sizable commercial success; its $130 million box-office take was bigger than that of any best-picture nominee (although &#034;Juno&#034; is at $100 million and still selling tickets). Indeed, according to Box Office Mojo, &#034;Gangster&#039;s&#034; gross means that Ruby Dee by herself gets credit for almost as much money as the other four nominees combined. After Dee, the next most commercial supporting-actress nominee is Tilda Swinton in &#034;Michael Clayton,&#034; which has taken in about $42 million.</p>
<p>And you could go beyond Washington, Crowe and Dee for potential nominees; Josh Brolin has a showy supporting role in &#034;Gangster,&#034; which with his turn in &#034;No Country for Old Men&#034; should have made him seem more award-worthy to the Oscar folks.</p>
<p>Moreover, &#034;American Gangster&#034; has echoes of many fine movies, including &#034;The Godfather,&#034; &#034;Scarface,&#034; &#034;New Jack City&#034; and other films about this period, like &#034;Serpico&#034; and &#034;Prince of the City.&#034; Unfortunately, in spite of a promising first hour, the movie fails to maintain its momentum for its full 2 1/2-hour length. Nor does the movie always appear to be certain about what it is. The title suggests that it is about Lucas, but Roberts gets considerable screen time; I have to wonder if this is a matter of increasing the part to allow for an actor of Crowe&#039;s stature, or a commercial calculation offering a major white character as an audience draw when an African-American is at center stage. In any case, it doesn&#039;t work; the Roberts story takes away from the far more interesting account of Washington. When the two actors finally intersect late in the film, there are few sparks &#8212; and the ending feels too hasty.</p>
<p>(By the way, all this is based on my viewing &#034;American Gangster&#034; on DVD, much as I did with &#034;Michael Clayton.&#034; Although the DVD release includes an extended, unrated version, I watched the theatrical version, to gauge the movie as the academy would have.)</p>
<p>So, I can see where the movie got brushed aside by some formidable contenders. (Well, mostly formidable contenders. See my tepid reaction to &#034;Michael Clayton&#034; in a previous Oscar post.) Why, then, did Ruby Dee, as Lucas&#039;s mother, get nominated?</p>
<p>She is good. She has been consistently good over her long career. And while she has relatively little screen time, she does get one of those big Oscar-telecast-excerpt scenes, where she slaps Washington and makes you feel it. And, for people who believe in cheering their hometown heroes, she was born in Cleveland. (As I have pointed out elsewhere, Cleveland has two acting nominees this year, the other being Hal Holbrook.)</p>
<p>But, having seen four of the five contenders in this category, I think any award going to Dee would be largely sentimental or a career-achievement award, since this is her first nomination.</p>
<p>I would not put Swinton ahead of Dee, but neither would I put Dee ahead of Cate Blanchett (&#034;I&#039;m Not There&#034;) or Amy Ryan (&#034;Gone Baby Gone&#034;). Since I have not yet seen &#034;Atonment,&#034; I can&#039;t yet rate Saoirse Ronan. But with Blanchett and Ryan giving scary-good performances, this is a tough category to turn over to Dee.</p>
<p>As for the art-direction nomination, I will pretend no expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-american-gangster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Watch: &quot;Michael Clayton&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-michael-clayton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-michael-clayton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Clayton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/28/oscar-watch-michael-clayton/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Overview: Seven nominations -- best picture, director (Tony Gilroy), actor (George Clooney), supporting actor (Tom Wilkinson), supporting actress (Tilda Swinton), original screenplay (Gilroy), music score (James Newton Howard). Discussion, including plot spoilers, after the jump.

Overview continued: Michael Clayton (Clooney) is a "janitor" for a big law firm, a guy who cleans up messes made by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><code><img src="http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/michaelclayton.gif" alt="Clooney" /></p>
<p>Overview: Seven nominations -- best picture, director (Tony Gilroy), actor (George Clooney), supporting actor (Tom Wilkinson), supporting actress (Tilda Swinton), original screenplay (Gilroy), music score (James Newton Howard). Discussion, including plot spoilers, after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-1604"></span></p>
<p>Overview continued: Michael Clayton (Clooney) is a "janitor" for a big law firm, a guy who cleans up messes made by clients and by people in the firm. His own life is messy, but he's good at his job. So, when one of those lawyers (Tom Wilkinson) has an apparent breakdown in the middle of a huge case, it's Clayton's job to fix things before the case falls apart. Only that drops Clayton, too, into the middle of the case -- and a mess that may spill back on him.</p>
<p>One part bleak character piece, one part urban paranoia in the tradition of films like "The Parallax View," but not completely faithful to either form. It could be seen as an understated variation on "And Justice for All." "Michael Clayton" is a melancholy journey that can't resist the urge to make Clayton have a heroic moment. I might have been more satisfied with the movie -- which becomes more effective in its second hour after an almost sluggish first -- if it had kept its ending in the spirit of Clayton's potent speech about being a guy who can be bought. But that was probably asking too much.</p>
<p>While it has some good bits, I would not give it a best picture nod ahead of "No Country for Old Men" or "There Will Be Blood," both bravura pieces. And that would indicate some of my preference re writing and directing, since I'm not one of those folks who believes a movie can be the best of the year without also having a best director or writer.</p>
<p>Clooney is a solid actor, and he has some good stuff in "Clayton"; loved the look on his face when he encounters the deadbeat brother he has been seeking. I might put him on a par with best-actor nominee Viggo Mortensen ("Eastern Promises"), but he's not close to Daniel Day-Lewis ("There Will Be Blood"), who is the gold standard among the four best-actor nominees I have seen. (Tommy Lee Jones is the one I need to catch.) For that matter, I would have given Don Cheadle ("Talk to Me") a nomination before Clooney in "Clayton."</p>
<p>Both Wilkinson and Swinton are watchable, but they also give mannered, over-the-top performances that didn't impress me as much as some in their respective categories. Among best supporting actor contenders, I would turn first to Hal Holbrook ("Into the Wild") or Philip Seymour Hoffman ("Charlie Wilson's War") or Javier Bardem ("No Country for Old Men").</p>
<p>I should pause here to note that these are all personal preferences and not some attempt to be an Oscar guru. For instance, I've heard plenty of noise about Bardem being a shoo-in for best supporting actor, but that wouldn't necessarily be my choice; for one thing, you could argue that he's the real leading man in the movie. And Holbrook, a Cleveland guy, was awfully good in "Into the Wild," a movie Oscar mostly overlooked.</p>
<p>Anyway, to Swinton. Her competitors include Amy Ryan, who was fabulous in "Gone Baby Gone" and Cate Blanchett, mesmerizing in "I'm Not There," so Swinton is third chair even before I consider the other nominees (Ruby Dee for "American Gangster" and Saoirse Ronan for "Atonement"). </p>
<p>So, as admirable as "Michael Clayton" is in spots, I didn't see it as a big Oscar winner this year. But that, again, is personal preference. The motion picture academy has its own preferences and quirks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-watch-michael-clayton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon: Oscar Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/coming-soon-oscar-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/coming-soon-oscar-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/27/coming-soon-oscar-watch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Regular blog readers have seen my notes on some of the Oscar nominees, including &#034;No Country for Old Men&#034; and &#034;There Will Be Blood.&#034; But there were quite a few nominees I have not seen yet. So my plan over the coming weeks is to see them and post notes, especially about whether they strike [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img src="http://www.oscars.org/publications/poster80/80thposter.jpg" alt="Oscars poster" /></p>
<p>Regular blog readers have seen my notes on some of the Oscar nominees, including &#034;No Country for Old Men&#034; and &#034;There Will Be Blood.&#034; But there were quite a few nominees I have not seen yet. So my plan over the coming weeks is to see them and post notes, especially about whether they strike me as the best in their nominated categories. Last night, for example, I watched &#034;Michael Clayton&#034; and I expect to have comments here soon, possibly as early as tonight. I have set aside my DVDs of nominees, and plan some trips back to theaters as well. If time permits, I will revisit movies I have already seen. Anything in particular you folks are curious about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/coming-soon-oscar-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar, Oscar, Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-oscar-oscar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-oscar-oscar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/22/oscar-oscar-oscar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can find the nominees list here. I&#039;ve just begun looking and may post some more thoughts later. On the local side, good times for Cleveland&#039;s own Hal Holbrook, nominated for &#034;Into the Wild,&#034; and for Cleveland&#039;s Ruby Dee, nominated for &#034;American Gangster.&#034;
Paul Thomas Anderson, son of Cleveland legend Ernie &#034;Ghoulardi&#034; Anderson, is also looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>You can find the nominees list <a href="http://www.oscars.org/80academyawards/nominees/index.html">here.</a> I&#039;ve just begun looking and may post some more thoughts later. On the local side, good times for Cleveland&#039;s own Hal Holbrook, nominated for &#034;Into the Wild,&#034; and for Cleveland&#039;s Ruby Dee, nominated for &#034;American Gangster.&#034;<br />
Paul Thomas Anderson, son of Cleveland legend Ernie &#034;Ghoulardi&#034; Anderson, is also looking at a good night since &#034;There Will Be Blood&#034; is up for a bunch of major awards.</p>
<p>I wrote a long column on Oscars odds &#038; ends for tomorrow&#039;s Beacon Journal, and thought it was going to be posted today over at Ohio.com. Haven&#039;t seen it yet but will add a link here once it&#039;s up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2008/01/oscar-oscar-oscar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Oscar, with Some Wrapping-Up Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/more-oscar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/more-oscar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 04:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/25/more-oscar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since my notes from earlier appear to have disappeared &#8212; and thanks for the tip, George, but I haven&#039;t found anything &#8212; I&#039;m just going to post from here on (just after Little Miss Sunshine got original screenplay) and revisit the earlier stuff later.

Jennifer Lopez&#039;s introduction includes her being &#034;an excellent reason for high-definition television.&#034; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Since my notes from earlier appear to have disappeared &#8212; and thanks for the tip, George, but I haven&#039;t found anything &#8212; I&#039;m just going to post from here on (just after <em>Little Miss Sunshine</em> got original screenplay) and revisit the earlier stuff later.</p>
<p><span id="more-981"></span></p>
<p>Jennifer Lopez&#039;s introduction includes her being &#034;an excellent reason for high-definition television.&#034; How &#8230; patronizing.</p>
<p>&#034;Dreamgirls&#034; movie cast for the nominated songs. J-Hud&#039;s trying a little too hard. Still glad about her Oscar, still wondering what she&#039;s going to do for a follow-up role.</p>
<p>Enter Beyonce. She&#039;s playing nice. Then she performs &#034;Listen.&#034; Her big song in the movie, but Hudson&#039;s singing it with her. And I&#039;d take a CD of Hudson doing it right now. But Beyonce gets to finish it solo.</p>
<p>Then we get &#034;Patience.&#034; But not from Eddie.</p>
<p>Travolta and Queen Latifah. Original song. Melissa Etheridge wins for the song from &#034;An Inconvenient Truth.&#034; &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; can&#039;t win in spite of three nominations in the category. Of course, the best song in the movie wasn&#039;t eligible for an Oscar.</p>
<p>Etheridge is probably glad she figured out that rhyme for &#034;inconvenient truth.&#034; And is this Al Gore&#039;s night or what? Too bad the academy voters weren&#039;t on the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Nicely done piece about politics and movies, although I have to wonder how <em>American Dreamz</em> was considered worthy.</p>
<p><em>The Departed</em> wins for film editing.</p>
<p>Jodie Foster kind of moving in introducing the Parade Of Moviemakers Who Are Now Deceased.</p>
<p>Helen Mirren wins best actress. Not a surprise, and she&#039;s a class act.</p>
<p>Best actor. Forest Whitaker. Another no-surprise. Whitaker has prepared his speech, but it&#039;s a good one. A very good one. </p>
<p>Spielberg, Lucas and Coppola present best director. Sure feels like Scorsese&#039;s night. And &#8230;. it is, at last. <em>The Departed</em> is not my favorite Scorsese by a long shot, but I&#039;m glad he won&#039;t have to listen to any more never-won stuff.</p>
<p><em>The Departed</em> also takes best picture. And it&#039;s already on DVD.</p>
<p>Overall assessment: The thing is still too long. As I said in my piece for tomorrow&#039;s Beacon Journal, Hollywood just refuses to do a TV-friendly telecast. That&#039;s especially weird in a year like this when the TV ties to the winners are so strong: Whitaker was just on &#034;ER,&#034; Mirren had &#034;Elizabeth I,&#034; Hudson came from &#034;American Idol,&#034; Arkin had &#034;100 Centre Street.&#034; Not to mention that your host, Ellen DeGeneres, is fundamentally a TV personality. (Yes, she has done movies. But TV is her best medium.) And I liked Jerry Seinfeld making clear that he was NOT there because of his movie history.</p>
<p>But as long as things like costume design have to get air time, as long as there&#039;s a sense that even minor categories need credibility-reinforcing essays during the telecast, this is not going to be a short show. Or a good one. The greedheads rule.</p>
<p>As for winners right and wrong, I just haven&#039;t seen enough movies to say that justice was or wasn&#039;t served. Whitaker&#039;s been a really good actor forever. Ditto Mirren. Arkin was indeed fine in &#034;Sunshine,&#034; but Eddie was really good in &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; &#8212; and now has been told by the academy not to bother. Fine, he&#039;ll go make a pile for &#034;Norbit 2&#034; instead. And Jennifer Hudson just tore it up in &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; &#8212; one of those performances where I kept muttering &#034;Oh, just give her the Oscar.&#034; But, as I&#039;ve said before, her challenge is going to be finding another good role. And then a third one, because people will be gunning for her in her immediate follow-up to an Oscar. &#034;The Departed,&#034; as I said, was not my favorite Scorsese, and I&#039;d like to see the makers of &#034;Infernal Affairs&#034; share in that Oscar in some way other than a couple of lines in Oscar history.</p>
<p>Ellen was OK. Much better as she went along. The opening monologue was a little too nicey-nicey. The stuff with Scorsese and Eastwood was priceless, and there was good big laugh in the vacuum-cleaner segment.</p>
<p>And, since I mentioned the issue of what Hudson does next, I&#039;m really curious about what Scorsese does to follow his Oscar. The pressure is supposedly off now, so he doesn&#039;t have to think about winning the big one. Eastwood &#8212; and I&#039;ll still take him in the argument about best living American director &#8212; has done great stuff since he won (and won again in the process). We&#039;ll see where things go with Scorsese.</p>
<p>And finally, before I sleep, Peter O&#039;Toole. In a fair world, he has an Oscar. Don&#039;t worry about &#034;Lawrence of Arabia.&#034; Take a look at &#034;The Stunt Man,&#034; &#034;My Favorite Year,&#034; &#034;The Ruling Class.&#034; He&#039;s owed. But he&#039;s also old, almost sadly so. I wasn&#039;t sure if he could even hear the Oscars ceremony, including when he was being talked about. Sure, he has an honorary award. That&#039;s not the same. I hope he&#039;s got some more good work in him.</p>
<p>And now I have to sleep, if I hope to find some more good work in myself. Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/more-oscar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Night</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/oscar-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/oscar-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/25/oscar-night/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISASTER. Something ate almost all my first 3 hours of blogging, and now I have to file. I&#039;ll try to reconstruct some notes later.

The red carpet, currently on E!, is not so interesting to me &#8212; although I did chuckle at Ryan Seacrest&#039;s trying to talk fashion with Rachel Weisz and noting that &#034;there&#039;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>DISASTER. Something ate almost all my first 3 hours of blogging, and now I have to file. I&#039;ll try to reconstruct some notes later.</p>
<p><span id="more-980"></span></p>
<p>The red carpet, currently on E!, is not so interesting to me &#8212; although I did chuckle at <strong>Ryan Seacrest&#039;s </strong>trying to talk fashion with <strong>Rachel Weisz </strong>and noting that &#034;there&#039;s a lot of Wang here &#8230; a couple of Wangs so far.&#034;<br />
And the bride is having an excellent time looking at the outfits and saying &#034;No, no, no &#8230;&#034;</p>
<p>And Ryan Seacrest just flashed his underwear while <strong>Helen Mirren </strong>waited to be interviewed. Is this classy or what? And bless Mirren for augmenting Seacrest&#039;s movie fawning with the reminder that she did some good TV, too.</p>
<p>Loved <strong>Alan Arkin </strong>being Mr. Crankypants with Seacrest. (It&#039;s even better considering that he won later.)</p>
<p>Ryan drops Ricky Gervais&#039;s name to Kate Winslet. And mispronounces it. And is corrected by Winslet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/oscar-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikki Finke Is Giving Me a Headache</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/nikki-finke-is-giving-me-a-headache/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/nikki-finke-is-giving-me-a-headache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/23/nikki-finke-is-giving-me-a-headache/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And its name is Oscar. Possible Sunday-night spoilers, after the jump &#8230;

On Sunday night, I will be watching the Academy Awards, and blogging, and writing a piece for Monday&#039;s Beacon Journal. Not sure exactly what I will be writing about &#8212; there is some unpredictability to live events, even carefully stage-managed ones &#8212; but I&#039;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>And its name is Oscar. Possible Sunday-night spoilers, after the jump &#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-979"></span></p>
<p>On Sunday night, I will be watching the Academy Awards, and blogging, and writing a piece for Monday&#039;s Beacon Journal. Not sure exactly what I will be writing about &#8212; there is some unpredictability to live events, even carefully stage-managed ones &#8212; but I&#039;ve been gathering string, including a couple of recent reports by the acidic and well-connected entertainment reporter <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/">Nikki Finke.</a></p>
<p>And why is she causing me pain? Because, under the best of conditions, an Oscar telecast is overlong, the occasional bright spots surrounded by dead zones. And Finke&#039;s reporting has indicated this year will not include the best of conditions. One example:</p>
<p><em>Sunday night&#039;s Academy Awards telecast could end up the longest on record. That&#039;s the prediction I&#039;ve been given by one VIP who helps oversee this 79th Oscars and is therefore in a position to know. Sad but probably true, since this year&#039;s producer is Laura Ziskin (Spider-Man) who was responsible for bringing in the 74th show at what was then a record 4 hours and 23 minutes. Yikes, is the Academy trying to drive away TV viewers? But I&#039;ve also received a phone call tonight from an insider working on the show assuring me that today&#039;s rehearsal clocked in at only 3 hours, 41 minutes long. &#034;Right now, the show is cutting, cutting, cutting.</em></p>
<p>Even 3:41 feels way long, especially for those of us staring at a deadline or an early rise. But wait, there&#039;s more. Here&#039;s a tidbit from her column of 8 Oscar telecast spoilers:</p>
<p><em>I&#039;m told that there&#039;s a big change in the order that the awards will be presented. The Best Supporting Actor and Actress awards will NOT be presented in the up-front portion of the show, as in previous years. Instead, none of the acting awards will be given out until the last third of the telecast. The Academy is doing this, I understand, because Oscar viewership starts out strong and then wanes. Ziskin is hoping that this will keep the audience glued to the entire broadcast hour after hour. But I understand this decision was hotly disputed because it breaks with tradition. All I can say is that now there&#039;s not much reason to watch the beginning of the show, either</em>.</p>
<p>I hope that &#034;hotly disputed&#034; means they could yet change their minds. It&#039;s tough enough going through that long wait between the early acting awards and the big finish. It will be that much more difficult if there are no significant awards to talk or write about. I can say only so much about fashions. So I&#039;m hoping that Ellen DeGeneres has some great things planned. (Finke also has some spoilers about that, which you can find on the link above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/02/nikki-finke-is-giving-me-a-headache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movies for the AARP Crowd?</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/movies-for-the-aarp-crowd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/movies-for-the-aarp-crowd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No mockery here. We&#039;re talking about movies that have won kudos from AARP. Here&#039;s the press release:
AARP The Magazine, the world’s largest circulation magazine, today announced the winners of its sixth annual Movies for Grownups Awards.  From Best Movie to Breakaway Accomplishment to Best Actor and Actress, AARP The Magazine’s Movies for Grownups Awards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>No mockery here. We&#039;re talking about movies that have won kudos from AARP. Here&#039;s the press release:</strong></p>
<p>AARP The Magazine, the world’s largest circulation magazine, today announced the winners of its sixth annual Movies for Grownups Awards.  From Best Movie to Breakaway Accomplishment to Best Actor and Actress, AARP The Magazine’s Movies for Grownups Awards honors a range of cinematic accomplishments in 13 categories, all of which are featured in the March/April issue, available February 1, 2007. </p>
<p>Top honors went to <em>The Last King of Scotland</em>—an unblinking look at the rise and brutal reign of Uganda strongman Idi Amin—which was named this year’s Best Movie for Grownups.  &#8230;</p>
<p>Donald Sutherland was awarded Best Actor 50 and Over for his role as a defiant Parkinson’s patient in Aurora Borealis. And Helen Mirren, starring as Queen Elizabeth in the days surrounding the death of Princess Diana in <em>The Queen</em>, was named Best Actress 50 and Over.  Clint Eastwood took the top honor as best director for his two-part World War II saga, <em>Flags of Our Fathers </em>and <em>Letters from Iwo Jima.</em></p>
<p>The 2007 Movies For Grown-Ups Award winners will be presented with the coveted La Chaise d’Or trophy—The Golden Chair—a whimsical trophy in the shape of a Barcalounger, at a private gala awards dinner held at the Hotel Bel-Air in Los Angeles on February 6, 2007.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/movies-for-the-aarp-crowd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Morning, Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/good-morning-oscar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/good-morning-oscar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ For years I&#039;ve been talking about the Chamber of Commerce theory of entertainment awards. Basically it says that organizations issue awards based on what they think makes them look good &#8212; socially responsible, politically aware, far-ranging &#8212; instead of what actually is good. Of course, other factors can also come into play, among them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p> For years I&#039;ve been talking about the Chamber of Commerce theory of entertainment awards. Basically it says that organizations issue awards based on what they think makes them look good &#8212; socially responsible, politically aware, far-ranging &#8212; instead of what actually is good. Of course, other factors can also come into play, among them sentiment and the need to honor previously overlooked careers, but when in doubt, the Chamber of Commerce theory explains a lot.<br />
 I&#039;m still scanning this morning&#039;s Oscar nominations but there appears to be a lot of Chamber of Commerce action &#8212; the bump for &#034;Blood Diamond&#034; in the major acting categories, for example; the overlooking of &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; for best picture and director; the nodding to independent film with &#034;Little Miss Sunshine&#034; and &#034;Half Nelson,&#034; the acknowledgment of the international importance of film.<br />
  A few more notes: Mark Walhberg was very good in &#034;The Departed&#034; but Alec Baldwin stole the movie. </p>
<p>Jennifer Hudson may have been submitted as a supporting actress but let&#039;s be real: &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; is her movie. Let me say it again: &#034;Dreamgirls&#034; is her movie.</p>
<p>Never underestimate Clint Eastwood.</p>
<p>You&#039;ve got a fair number of Oscar contenders on DVD or headed that way, including &#034;Little Miss Sunshine,&#034; &#034;An Inconvenient Truth&#034; and &#034;Jesus Camp,&#034; with the anticipated post-Oscar bump making the likes of &#034;The Queen&#034; and &#034;Babel&#034; more accessible in theaters.</p>
<p>I planned to add more to this as I took a closer look at the nominations, but ended up writing up those notes for Wednesday&#039;s Beacon Journal. You can find that piece <a href="http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/entertainment/columnists/rd_heldenfels/16532403.htm">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/01/good-morning-oscar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Night of the Living Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/night-of-the-living-podcast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/night-of-the-living-podcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the link to the podcast George Thomas and I did after the Oscars ended:
http://www.ohiomm.com/podcasts/movies/oscars2005/post_oscars.mp3
It was a fun chat, if one tainted by a lack of sleep. At some point in our conversation it felt as if I had used the words &#034;I mean&#034; at the beginning of, oh, just about every sentence. And I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Here&#039;s the link to the podcast George Thomas and I did after the Oscars ended:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ohiomm.com/podcasts/movies/oscars2005/post_oscars.mp3">http://www.ohiomm.com/podcasts/movies/oscars2005/post_oscars.mp3</a></p>
<p>It was a fun chat, if one tainted by a lack of sleep. At some point in our conversation it felt as if I had used the words &#034;I mean&#034; at the beginning of, oh, just about every sentence. And I suspect there is enough overlapping dialogue &#8212; I also remember saying &#034;Go ahead&#034; a lot &#8212; to make this sound like our own little Robert Altman homage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/night-of-the-living-podcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summing Up</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/summing-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/summing-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I give Jon Stewart about a C minus as host. Not a strong monologue, and he seemed determined not to venture too far from his lectern. Too many better-on-paper jokes.
Having had a moment to think about it, I&#039;m a little surprised that the political content was as muted as it was, given the Iraq war [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I give Jon Stewart about a C minus as host. Not a strong monologue, and he seemed determined not to venture too far from his lectern. Too many better-on-paper jokes.</p>
<p>Having had a moment to think about it, I&#039;m a little surprised that the political content was as muted as it was, given the Iraq war and the way a lot of Hollywood feels about President Bush.</p>
<p>Relatively efficient telecast, coming in at 3 1/2 hours.&nbsp; But you have to wonder why the movie academy keeps claiming that it will finish in three hours.</p>
<p>Good stuff: Opening sketch, Clooney&#039;s acceptance, Ben Stiller, Lily and Meryl, Reese&#039;s acceptance, the &#034;Pimp&#034; acceptance.</p>
<p>Bad stuff: Three high points were in the first hour. Misspelling Will Ferrell&#039;s name. Lauren Bacall. &#034;Pimp&#034; overly edited for broadcast. (Make that &#034;Pimp&#034; edited for broadcast, period. If the words scare the academy, then put some content rules in the nomination process.) Cutting off the best-picture producers.</p>
<p>Preshow: Thank goodness for Keira Knightley. Should have been more finery on view. Wish I had recorded Joan Rivers&#039;s chat with Ludacris.</p>
<p>Look later for a podcast from me and George Thomas. You&#039;re a beautiful audience! Goodnight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/summing-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars Continue, 10 p.m. to the Best Picture Winner</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscars-continue-10-pm-to-the-best-picture-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscars-continue-10-pm-to-the-best-picture-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I so hope Jon Stewart wasn&#039;t kidding about running out of film clips.
I like Lily and Meryl making affectionate fun of Robert Altman&#039;s directing style. It&#039;s better than his acceptance speech, although the old fox manages to get in plugs for his latest play and movie. Of course, I also love a lot of Altman&#039;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I so hope Jon Stewart wasn&#039;t kidding about running out of film clips.</p>
<p>I like Lily and Meryl making affectionate fun of Robert Altman&#039;s directing style. It&#039;s better than his acceptance speech, although the old fox manages to get in plugs for his latest play and movie. Of course, I also love a lot of Altman&#039;s movies. (Memo: See if &#034;Brewster McCloud&#034; is on Netflix.) I also know that Altman&#039;s career has included stretches in television &#8212; the wonderful &#034;Tanner &#039;88, a nifty &#034;Caine Mutiny Court-Martial&#034; &#8212; but you don&#039;t get to hear about that on the movie industry&#039;s night.</p>
<p>But we did get more film clips!</p>
<p>And yes, they have held &#034;Pimp&#034; for late in the East-Coast evening.</p>
<p>Ludacris introduces the song. At least he&#039;s in &#034;Hustle &amp; Flow.&#034; And what was that, 3 seconds before we got an audio drop? Toned-done lyrics. But THIS is a real Oscar song performance, thanks to the cheeseball Vegasy choreography and costumes. OK, now go rent the movie and see how it should be done. </p>
<p>IT WINS THE OSCAR!!!!! And the acceptance speech comes not only with a bleep but a really boisterous expression of joy from the accepters. Now you really have to see the movie. Stewart nails it, saying that&#039;s how you accept an Oscar.</p>
<p>Oh, no, not another attack-ad parody. Time to see if &#8230; yup, Cavs won.</p>
<p>Best things about the Oscars at this point: It&#039;s moving along, so we may finish at a reasonable hour. And that &#034;Hard Out Here for a Pimp&#034; win has energized Stewart; good line about Martin Scorsese.</p>
<p>Philip Seymour Hoffman, shielding his eyes with the award announcement. It&#039;s almost as if his character in &#034;Magnolia&#034; won the Oscar. (And Hoffman&#039;s been owed one since that movie, and before.) Extra points for citing Van Morrison.</p>
<p>John Travolta had a little trouble with the word &#034;memoirs.&#034;</p>
<p>Reese Witherspoon. (I hate those voice-overs offering tidbits about the winners.) Oh, she&#039;s such a sweetie. The camera&#039;s on her husband &#8212; AND she remembers to thank him! Nice line: &#034;I&#039;m just trying to matter.&#034;</p>
<p>Adapted screenplay. Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana, &#034;Brokeback.&#034; McMurtry is one of my writing gods, so I am glad to see him win, well, anything, even a movie that recalls &#034;Lonesome Dove&#034; &#8212; and pales next to it. But it&#039;s good to hear him remind the people watching television to read, too.</p>
<p>&#034;Crash&#034; for original screenplay. Paul Haggis gets an Oscar. Could this please, please lead to the release of &#034;EZ Streets&#034; on DVD &#8212; and maybe a revival of it?</p>
<p>This ceremony is now longer than it was last year, but still within reasonable Oscar limits. (The record is apparently 4 hours and 16 minutes.)</p>
<p>Ang Lee wins. Not a bad acceptance speech, but not one for the ages.</p>
<p>Nicholson has his fun. And ends up out of sync with the nominee clips for it.</p>
<p>Oh, gosh, &#034;Crash&#034; wins best picture. The people are almost as excited as the guys who won best song. It&#039;s an amazing movie, by the way &#8212; and, I have to say it, better than &#034;Brokeback.&#034;</p>
<p>And now that Paul Haggis has won another Oscar, the &#034;EZ Streets&#034; DVD is mandatory.</p>
<p>The loud music is cutting off the best-picture acceptance. THE BEST PICTURE ACCEPTANCE. For pete&#039;s sakem, it&#039;s the biggest award of the night, and this telecast is not setting a record for length unless the acceptance goes another hour. And they sure had time for some more commercials.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscars-continue-10-pm-to-the-best-picture-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Continues, 9 p.m. to 10 p.m.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-continues-9-pm-to-10-pm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-continues-9-pm-to-10-pm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stewart&#039;s joke about the Oscar statue and democracy was a little funny. Or I had just saved up a sympathy chuckle.
Best supporting actress. Memo to self: Time to take the shrink wrap off that &#034;Constant Gardener&#034; DVD and finally watch it. Or get that old paperback of the novel off the shelf and finally read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Stewart&#039;s joke about the Oscar statue and democracy was a little funny. Or I had just saved up a sympathy chuckle.</p>
<p>Best supporting actress. Memo to self: Time to take the shrink wrap off that &#034;Constant Gardener&#034; DVD and finally watch it. Or get that old paperback of the novel off the shelf and finally read it.</p>
<p>Coming up; the second nominated song. Dare we hope for &#034;It&#039;s Hard Out Here for a Pimp&#034;? Or will ABC hold that back for after 10 p.m. (still 7 p.m. on the West Coast).</p>
<p>Commercials. Cavs up 3 in the third.</p>
<p>I love Lauren Bacall&#039;s old movies. So sad to see her labor through this &#034;film noir&#034; segment. But in a show that usually runs long, I don&#039;t get the point of this segment, except to drive a lot of people to Netflix. And for a genre known for its pace and urgency, the piece feels slow.</p>
<p>I think the Stewart material is coming off as too writerly. I can see the attack-ads parody looking good on paper. Not so good onscreen.</p>
<p>Terrence Howard. Give him an Oscar. I don&#039;t care if he won one. Just give him one. Take that talkative makeup guy&#039;s. This is Terrence Howard, folks. He&#039;s a great actor. Look at his movies &#8212; and look how dull he seems here. That&#039;s how great an actor he is.</p>
<p>&#034;March of the Penguins&#034; wins. The guys are carrying penguin dolls. What is this, prop night? And it&#039;s amazing what a bum&#039;s rush the recipients get &#8212; Jennifer Lopez is coming onstage as they&#039;re still heading off.</p>
<p>Not the &#034;pimp&#034; song yet. But a good one, from &#034;Crash.&#034; Kathleen York&#039;s a decent actress (&#034;The West Wing&#034;) but obviously a strong singer, too. Remember her as Naomi Judd in the &#034;Love Can Build a Bridge&#034; TV-movie?</p>
<p>A series of clips from issues movies makes sense this year, I suppose, And I welcome any excuse to see a clip from &#034;To Kill a Mockingbird.&#034; On the other hand, it brings us back to what George Clooney was talking about in his acceptance speech &#8212; and reminds us how very long it has been since he made his remarks.</p>
<p>First good comment from Stewart in some time &#8212; looking at the clips and saying &#034;and none of those issue was ever a problem again.&#034; But Stewart has me thinking of Tiger Woods at Doral today &#8212; going to the last hole, knowing that he can bogey and still win the thing. Stewart does not have that luxury. He needs a whole bunch of birdies to turn around his performance.</p>
<p>Stewart&#039;s line is even better now that the Academy guy is being windily self-righteous about Hollywood, And it would have been great if Stewart had saved it until after this guy gave his speech. (And what was that whole go-to-the-theaters plea? Don&#039;t the studios make tons of money from the DVD&#039;s, too?)</p>
<p>Jake Gyllenhaal introduces a segment on epics. And takes ANOTHER shot at watching movies on DVD. Dude, there are movies I would never see if it weren&#039;t for DVD. And with a decent-sized set and the lights out &#8212; the way we watched &#034;Walk the Line&#034; on Saturday night &#8212; it&#039;s still a very involving experience. Moreover, I didn&#039;t have to ask anyone to be quiet, wonder if my shoes would come unstuck from the floor and remember to bring my debit card in case we wanted popcorn.</p>
<p>And on that rant, we end the second hour.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-continues-9-pm-to-10-pm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Begins For Real.. To 9 p.m.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-begins-for-real-to-9-pm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-begins-for-real-to-9-pm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Show opens with just the sort of fancy tech that this year&#039;s best-picture nominees are a reaction against.
Good opening gag with Billy Crystal and Chris Rock (and first &#034;Brokeback&#034; joke of the night), followed by a nice recap of previous hosts. Stewart with Halle is a good gag, too. We&#039;re off to a decent start.
Stewart&#039;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Show opens with just the sort of fancy tech that this year&#039;s best-picture nominees are a reaction against.</p>
<p>Good opening gag with Billy Crystal and Chris Rock (and first &#034;Brokeback&#034; joke of the night), followed by a nice recap of previous hosts. Stewart with Halle is a good gag, too. We&#039;re off to a decent start.</p>
<p>Stewart&#039;s struggling with the monologue, though. By the Dick Cheney joke, he&#039;s getting sympathy applause. I&#039;m sitting at home, and still found myself giving him a sympathy chuckle. The &#034;gay westerns&#034; clip reel had possibilities, but still fell flat.</p>
<p>And now .. the first award. Best supporting actor. George Clooney. &#034;All right, so I&#039;m not winning director,&#034; he says, admitting what all the Oscar strategy-analysts in the audience are thinking. And he gives a pretty good speech, setting the bar early for the other acceptances.</p>
<p>Tom Hanks is a very funny man. But not in the acceptance-speech bit.</p>
<p>I was going to get some cake for the visual-effects award, only I had to stay when Ben Stiller came out in the green suit. And the effects-that-isn&#039;t-there gag is kind of amusing.</p>
<p>Blah, blah. The bowties on the Wallace &amp; Gromit guys are cute but the adding them to the Oscars is forced.</p>
<p>Ooh, ooh, best song! Do horrors await? Well, there is whatever has happened to Dolly Parton&#039;s face. But the song itself is bland, and blandly presented.</p>
<p>I am losing track of how many times the camera has shown Jack Nicholson. Surely someone was clapping along to Dolly&#039;s song without looking either awkward (like Jack) or uncomfortable.</p>
<p>Chicken Little. Find a picture of &#034;American Idol&#039;s&#034; Kevin Covais, See how apt is Heather Cox&#039;s comparison of the two.</p>
<p>All right, around the best-costume stuff, I began to fade. Went elsewhere online for a moment. Cavs trail at the half by two.</p>
<p>Russell Crowe. He may have a bad rep in some circles, but he cleans up for the Oscars.</p>
<p>Want proof that comic actors have trouble getting respect from the movie industry? The Oscar graphic misspelled Will Ferrell&#039;s last name, Unfortunately, the makeup joke &#8212; with Steve Carell &#8212; didn&#039;t offer much reason to correct the spelling.</p>
<p>And we have gotten through the first hour &#8212; ending with a long acceptance speech from some makeup guy,</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-begins-for-real-to-9-pm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Countdown continued</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-countdown-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-countdown-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RD Heldenfels</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Felicity Huffman chats. Which, of course, gives ABC an excuse to show off other actresses from &#034;Desperate Housewives.&#034; Felicity gets teary at the sight, tells ABC flack that &#034;you ruined my makeup.&#034; Fair enough. This show is ruining my evening.
The clip from &#034;Good Night, and Good Luck&#034; is messed up. David Strathairn is terse, opening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Felicity Huffman chats. Which, of course, gives ABC an excuse to show off other actresses from &#034;Desperate Housewives.&#034; Felicity gets teary at the sight, tells ABC flack that &#034;you ruined my makeup.&#034; Fair enough. This show is ruining my evening.</p>
<p>The clip from &#034;Good Night, and Good Luck&#034; is messed up. David Strathairn is terse, opening up for a question about the smoking he has to do in the movie. I&#039;ve been a Strathairn fan going back to his years in the John Sayles repetory company.</p>
<p>Wow, Jake Gyllenhaal is noting that redundant questions lead to stock answers! No doubt he has stocked up for the night.</p>
<p>ABC is devoting a lot of promo time to &#034;Miracle Workers.&#034;</p>
<p>Ah, more honesty: Rachel Weisz admits that she has no answer to a question about what advice her obstetrician gave her. (She&#039;s pregnant.) Then says, &#034;I was about to make something up.&#034;</p>
<p>Fashion overview &#8212; only the few gowns involved are ones that we saw earlier in the preshow.</p>
<p>Eric Bana, asked what he hopes to see: &#034;I hope to see a lot of blood spilled.&#034; If they let the actors cut loose tonight, this might be fun after all.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/03/oscar-countdown-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
