Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping


"The Office"/"30 Rock"

Posted May 2nd, 2008 by Rich Heldenfels

Office

Of anger management, sweeps and sandwiches, after the jump …

Not a great night for either comedy, although I'd give a slight edge to "30 Rock." (Maybe "Earl" was good. I've been slower about watching it lately because the whole coma/sitcom plot left me cold. I know that it was wrapped up last week, but still didn't feel any need to lose sleep to catch up with it.)

"The Office" was interesting on paper, with three different elements involving anger: Michael's conflict with Stanley, Dwight's jealous determination to punish Andy and the Ryan/Toby alliance against Jim. But I kept feeling as if scenes were missing. Why wouldn't Michael have tried Daryl's suggestion for dealing with anger — and didn't you want to see a fluffy-fingers fight? (Also, loved Daryl's listing of gangs ending with Newsies. He obviously likes to see how gullible Michael is, but when he got to Newsies it was so clear that Michael will buy anything that there was no point in going on. And what would be next anyway? Wild Hogs? Fordham Baldies?)

In the Dwight-Andy duel, I thought there should have been some kind of intercession by Angela. Yes, she likes having the guys fighting about her, but this was a situation involving money and I don't think Angela would have let Andy get so thoroughly snookered. Then again, as we saw with Mad Libs, Angela is just too darn happy these days.

So while there were good bits in the episode, such as the way the staff knew that Michael had been pushed too far — and someone was going to pay — followed by his private question to Stanley. But overall I've seen better episodes, even recently. This one felt more like they had to build something around plot elements they're planning for the remains of the season — Dwight/Andy and Ryan/Toby/Jim in particular.

Obviously, "30 Rock" devoted a fair amount of time to setting up next week's season finale, with — as the promo warned — Jack working in Washington and Liz facing a big issue. And it pushed too hard for some jokes; the "Brady Bunch"/football/nose gag was a real reach. And even the drinking-with-the-Teamsters bit kind of drifted off; it was hard to imagine that the show wouldn't let the guys win, but the payoff was still kind of a letdown. Would have been much more interesting to see Jenna keep drinking. (And how about that reference to her drinking problem?) Even the Cleveland jokes weren't great. Why is it that nominally blue-collar towns are subjected to bowling alley jokes? I remember "The Odd Couple" dropping a similar gag about Buffalo 30-some years ago.

Still, Alec Baldwin playing Jack under pressure is almost as good as Jack triumphant. The stuff with his new boss was priceless in spots — loved the bathroom door bit — and Liz getting glammed up. But it wasn't as good as last week's show.

7 Responses to “"The Office"/"30 Rock"”

  1. Eric Says:

    Best line of the night:

    Jenna: "A drinking contest? What am I, 12 and at my boyfriend's frat party?"

    (And I cracked up at the football/nose/Marcia bit…and the Newsies)

    Stanley seemed way out of character attacking Michael so openly. And anything that stifles Jim's antics in the office is not good.

  2. Ann V. Says:

    Seriously - I screamed at the IKEA jokes. It's so true, I'm dying to get IKEA in Cleveland so I don't have to drive to sooty Pittsburgh for strangely appealing Euro-nonsense (at the very least, we deserve a Container Store). You might be right about the bowling alleys, but there are a lot of bowling alleys in NE Ohio. It's one of the reasons I love it here.

  3. Elizabeth Says:

    It was nice to see Stanley a little more. And nice to see Michael stand up for himself. However, I'm not sure about the Ryan/Toby vs. Jim thing: After last week with Ryan's "friend" having a drug problem, I thought we were in for the downfall of Mr. Howard and his return to Scranton (and for that matter - reality). I can buy Ryan & Toby ganging up on Jim, for their individual reasons, but I'm not sure Ryan has the pull he thinks he does. (And this of course does not reflect my own experiences at my job over the last 2 weeks :)

  4. Rich Heldenfels Says:

    Eric: I would have liked a reason for Stanley being so snappish, but one of the ways that "The Office" plays it real is by not explaining every character's motivation. And maybe he was just having a bad day. Ann: I probably should have given the IKEA joke more credit; after all, I work with people who made a pilgrimage to the IKEA in Pittsburgh. Elizabeth: I can see Toby and Ryan forming an anti-Jim alliance — there's been a lot of anti-Jim stuff this year — and can even imagine that Toby gave Ryan the ammo for it. But should I even ask what's going on at your job?

  5. Gus Says:

    I don't think Toby would stoop that low, since it's been established before that Toby had been one of Jim's better friends in the office (at least in the DVD deleted scenes), but maybe he's desperate at this point. What I'm thinking is that Jim went over Ryan's head (as noted last week), and then Ryan, in his drug-addled state, decided on his own to "warn" Jim, and made sure Toby was in there as the HR rep. At this point, Toby may just decide to add some fuel to the fire on his own.

  6. rheldenfels Says:

    I think Toby could stoop that low, especially after his humiliation in the episode last week.

  7. Elizabeth Says:

    Rich - thanks for the concern; Scranton would be a step-up from the freakshow I'm hanging out with.

Leave a Reply