<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emmy Noms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/</link>
	<description>Movies, TV and Popular Culture with Rich Heldenfels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:52:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4915</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4915</guid>
		<description>I saw &quot;Smallville&quot; with a nod for something.  &quot;Smallville&quot; is good and deserves more nods for emmys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw &#034;Smallville&#034; with a nod for something.  &#034;Smallville&#034; is good and deserves more nods for emmys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Heldenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4914</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4914</guid>
		<description>With the &quot;box&quot; song nominated, they can do anything else they want in the music category. I am beyond content.
And I suppose it&#039;s an indication that I&#039;ve moved on, or I would have noticed sooner that &quot;Veronica Mars&quot; got donut for nominations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the &#034;box&#034; song nominated, they can do anything else they want in the music category. I am beyond content.<br />
And I suppose it&#039;s an indication that I&#039;ve moved on, or I would have noticed sooner that &#034;Veronica Mars&#034; got donut for nominations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4911</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4911</guid>
		<description>Nice to see a few nominations for HIMYM and 30 Rock.  I&#039;m guessing lack of competition in the musical categories, but I was surprised to see the number of nominations for the musical episode of Scrubs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a few nominations for HIMYM and 30 Rock.  I&#039;m guessing lack of competition in the musical categories, but I was surprised to see the number of nominations for the musical episode of Scrubs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rheldenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4907</link>
		<dc:creator>rheldenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4907</guid>
		<description>No argument that there are things to be happy about, including the &quot;30 Rock&quot; nods. But so many omissions. I&#039;ve noted in previous posts my fondness for what &quot;How I Met Your Mother&quot; did this year in writing, and would have liked to see it get a nomination. Looks like &quot;Gilmore Girls&quot; was shut out, again, and I think there was something there worth nominating -- especially in a universe that found a way to nominateo &quot;According to Jim&quot; and &quot;The Class&quot; ... And let me say it once again: Connie Britton...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument that there are things to be happy about, including the &#034;30 Rock&#034; nods. But so many omissions. I&#039;ve noted in previous posts my fondness for what &#034;How I Met Your Mother&#034; did this year in writing, and would have liked to see it get a nomination. Looks like &#034;Gilmore Girls&#034; was shut out, again, and I think there was something there worth nominating &#8212; especially in a universe that found a way to nominateo &#034;According to Jim&#034; and &#034;The Class&#034; &#8230; And let me say it once again: Connie Britton&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just happy for the Emmy love that is being shown for 30 Rock, though I would&#039;ve liked it even better had either Paul Reubens or Conan O&#039;Brien been nominated for Outstanding Guest Actor.  

I was also happy to see Ricky Gervais and Rainn Wilson get nominated in their categories.  I guess Supporting Actor nominations for either Stephen Merchant or Shaun (&quot;Barry from EastEnders&quot;) Williamson might&#039;ve been a bit too over the heads of the committee, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m just happy for the Emmy love that is being shown for 30 Rock, though I would&#039;ve liked it even better had either Paul Reubens or Conan O&#039;Brien been nominated for Outstanding Guest Actor.  </p>
<p>I was also happy to see Ricky Gervais and Rainn Wilson get nominated in their categories.  I guess Supporting Actor nominations for either Stephen Merchant or Shaun (&#034;Barry from EastEnders&#034;) Williamson might&#039;ve been a bit too over the heads of the committee, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Heldenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lost&quot; has six nominations, including for directing and two for supporting actor (Locke and Ben), so it could have done worse. &quot;FNL&quot; got two, one for directing and another I haven&#039;t found yet. I like &quot;2 1/2 Men&quot; but might have gone with Cryer instead of Sheen for lead actor. (Cryer obviously prefers to enter supporting actor, where he&#039;s nominated. And the Emmys call you what you decide you are -- hence Alec Baldwin being in lead comedy actor, when I have put him in supporting, as good as he is.)
 &quot;Boston Legal&#039;s&quot; Emmy love I have never understood. ... As for watching TV, as has been pointed out, the Emmy process is not designed to encourage voters to watch entire seasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Lost&#034; has six nominations, including for directing and two for supporting actor (Locke and Ben), so it could have done worse. &#034;FNL&#034; got two, one for directing and another I haven&#039;t found yet. I like &#034;2 1/2 Men&#034; but might have gone with Cryer instead of Sheen for lead actor. (Cryer obviously prefers to enter supporting actor, where he&#039;s nominated. And the Emmys call you what you decide you are &#8212; hence Alec Baldwin being in lead comedy actor, when I have put him in supporting, as good as he is.)<br />
 &#034;Boston Legal&#039;s&#034; Emmy love I have never understood. &#8230; As for watching TV, as has been pointed out, the Emmy process is not designed to encourage voters to watch entire seasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/emmy-noms/comment-page-1/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/19/emmy-noms/#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>No Lost?  No FNL?  No Matt Fox or &#039;Juliette&#039;?  Yet, 2.5 Men &amp; Boston Legal get multi-nods?  Emmys have become completely irrelevant.  So out of touch.  For years it was just head-scratching insanity, now it&#039;s just pathetic and laughable.  Those who actually *watch* TV know where the quality is, even if those blind voters don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Lost?  No FNL?  No Matt Fox or &#039;Juliette&#039;?  Yet, 2.5 Men &amp; Boston Legal get multi-nods?  Emmys have become completely irrelevant.  So out of touch.  For years it was just head-scratching insanity, now it&#039;s just pathetic and laughable.  Those who actually *watch* TV know where the quality is, even if those blind voters don&#039;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
