<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Jones Bypassed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/</link>
	<description>Movies, TV and Popular Culture with Rich Heldenfels</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5423</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5423</guid>
		<description>One might say her essay is part of being open and honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might say her essay is part of being open and honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rheldenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5397</link>
		<dc:creator>rheldenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5397</guid>
		<description>To claim that you've become newly open and honest, and then refuse to be open and honest with reporters because you've cut a deal with a magazine -- a deal. by the way, that you only admit to after repeated questioning -- still strikes me as hypocritical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To claim that you&#039;ve become newly open and honest, and then refuse to be open and honest with reporters because you&#039;ve cut a deal with a magazine &#8212; a deal. by the way, that you only admit to after repeated questioning &#8212; still strikes me as hypocritical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5376</guid>
		<description>Uh, she didn't want to scoop the story she was paid to write for Glamour Magazine, which she admitted to at the end of her fascinating newsconference with your very good friend, Alan Sepinwall. How is that hypocrisy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, she didn&#039;t want to scoop the story she was paid to write for Glamour Magazine, which she admitted to at the end of her fascinating newsconference with your very good friend, Alan Sepinwall. How is that hypocrisy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Star Jones Bypassed&#160;by&#160;diet.MEDtrials.info</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Star Jones Bypassed&#160;by&#160;diet.MEDtrials.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2007/07/31/star-jones-bypassed/#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>[...] her ducking weight-loss questions during the TV critics&#8217; tour &#8230;   article continues at rheldenfels brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] her ducking weight-loss questions during the TV critics&#039; tour &#8230;   article continues at rheldenfels brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
