Long Night, Short Takes: "The Office," "Grey's Anatomy," "Survivor" (Some Spoilers) (Now With "CSI" Added)
Posted September 21st, 2006 by RD Heldenfels
Update: "Grey's" outdrew "CSI" in the overnight ratings…
We wait months for new episodes of our favorite shows, so it's not easy to approach their return without feeling a little overamped. Will it be as good as we remember it? Will we love it the way we did before? Tonight: A mixed reaction.
"The Office," for starters, was sheer genius. The payoff to Jim and Pam was well done, with both actors wonderful in their longing looks. (And we even were forced to feel sympathetic toward Pam's now-ex-fiance.) Michael's struggle to appear sensitive about Oscar was hilarious while making us entirely aware of how uncomfortable events were for all the characters. It was a terrific half-hour.
"Grey's Anatomy," not such an unambiguous success. Some good things: Sara Ramirez, both at the door and in the kitchen scene. Izzie's meltdown. Kate Walsh in just about everything. James Pickens Jr. and Loretta Devine, working so well together. And, of course, Chandra Wilson as Bailey, who can take even some overwrought business and sell it. (Ditto on that score for guest star Steve Harris.)
Not so good: The labored use of the flashbacks (although I did grin when I saw whom Alex left the party with). McDreamy's speech to Meredith. Meredith generally. Chris O'Donnell, whose fatal flaw — as a character and as an actor — is that he's kind of a bore. The baby storyline, which the bride — who has done a lot of volunteer work in hospitals — noted was implausibly drawn out. Especially when we saw which character was the mother; hard to accept that someone that young and small went through the extended interrogation period without noticeable pain or bleeding. Basically, though, I think this episode faltered because it was the first of the season, and it felt dual weight of starting well and setting things in motion for later in the year; it just couldn't manage to do it all.
I've got "CSI" in the DVR and will get to it at some point, but I did manage to catch most of "Survivor" including the pivotal stuff at the end. I was infuriated, though not by the racial design, which hasn't added up to much so far.
Rather, I have never liked the idea of throwing a challenge, and it felt really stupid tonight. It's too early to be jettisoning people, for one thing, even if you feel that the one to be dumped — Billy tonight — is useless. And, as a viewer, I resented the distasteful sham involved. When another tribe has a chance to celebrate a victory, the members should be able to feel it was a legitimate win — and that their joy is honestly achieved. The contempt a challenge-throwing tribe has for the other groups is disgusting; the smug comments that followed it tonight made it even more so. And that's not a matter of race. That's about general human decency.
I caught up to "CSI" this morning and right off the bat it reminded me of something that had struck me during "Grey's Anatomy": the perils of improved TV technology. I watch shows on my HD set for the most part, and last night's "Grey's" was absolutely brutal about Ellen Pompeo's skin. "CSI" reminded me of that because it was visually dazzling (the sound's pretty great, too) in that Cirque du Soleil opening and beyond. The attention to lighting, the sharpness of the picture — I kept having to pull myself back into the story because I would be admiring the visuals.
Beyond that, it was clear at a "CSI" press conference this summer that the show was ready to rumble with "Grey's," and it sure did tonight. The Cirque stuff. John Mayer. The Danny Bonaduce stunt. Setting up two more storylines for continuation. How good Marg Helgenberger was in that last series of scenes. Brass's tattoo.
And, for everyone still amazed at the end of last season, the show is gleefully playing with the audience regarding Sara and Grissom. Nothing explicit said by either but they're sure hitting the notes, not only in the meal business but in that "bye" scene. It's not exactly sexual tension — since we know they've crossed that bridge — but it sure is tension, and great fun to watch.




September 22nd, 2006 at 1:51 am
There's not a single show on TV that has me literally crying with laughter every week except The Office. I agree, there's no other word for the premiere episode other than "genius." I make sure to tape it each week, just so I can watch it again to catch the nuances I may have missed, and it's always just as funny the 2nd time. Michael's comments, Dwight's faces (and trying to kiss Oscar)…everything was absolutely hilarious.
September 22nd, 2006 at 4:14 am
"it felt really stupid tonight … I resented the tasteful sham involved … the smug comments that followed made it even more so … That's about human decency"
Where have you been the last five years? "Survivor" has always been a tasteless, stupid sham and why anyone would watch and review the show is beyond me.
September 22nd, 2006 at 4:54 am
Those comments are about throwing the challenge, Larry, not about the show overall. Beyond that, I've watched "Survivor" from the beginning and it has often been solid entertainment, sometimes even more than that. ("Survivor: Palau," with Tom Westman winning and the saga of Stephenie LaGrossa, comes immediately to mind.)
September 22nd, 2006 at 5:04 am
The Office was great. I was laughing and cringing at how uncomfortable it was at the same time. The fact that the Gaydar bit was simply tossed in at the end as an afterthought has to have you feeling really good about the writing on that show that they can have that bit as a simple throw-away.
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:33 am
I guess seeing "Survivor" as solid entertainment is one of the hazards of watching so much TV, Rich. That show is a pox on our culture.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:49 am
Steve Carell was at his creepiest last night (I'm having to bite my cheek every time I think about him being sensitive because he watches "Queer as F***" on Showtime). Michael was within inches of becoming David Brent, but as always he managed to pull back from the brink.
Last night in particular got me thinking about all those great Internet battles of years gone by (Kirk vs. Picard, Joel Hodgson vs. Mike Nelson, etc.). I'm sure last night's episode would be great ammunition in the David Brent vs. Michael Scott battle that no doubt is brewing out there somewhere.
My wife was telling me that on her message boards many people were complaining about how "uncomfortable" last night's show made them. Frankly, I've always thought that was the point of The Office.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:55 am
We'll just disagree, Larry. And Gus, you're on the money. Both versions of "The Office" have deliberately made viewers uncomfortable by being merciless about the flaws and verbal excesses of their central characters. The U.S. version has occasionally let us recognize that Michael has some ability — that he is a very good salesman, for instance, and that he can charm women — but it has never let that hide the fact that he is a terrible office manager. And, as we saw again last night, terrible in so many ways.
September 22nd, 2006 at 9:26 am
Let's not forget the hilarious throwaway lines, like Michael's dissing of poor Phyllis (amazed she was engaged), Jim's co-worker girl mimicking his eye-expressions to the camera ("What IS that?"), Crede's priceless confession that he had lots of sex outside in the mud during the 60s and that "a man could've slid in there…there'd be no way of knowing"; oh man, I could go on and on. The show lived up to its Best Comedy Emmy in every way.
September 22nd, 2006 at 1:56 pm
Did anyone else notice Michael mutter "I did it" after he kissed Oscar? I didn't, but producer Greg Daniels pointed it out during a live-blog/chat on NBC.com last night.
For me, the best show on TV, easily.