<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Long Weekend, Fall Pilots, Desmond Dekker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/05/30/a-long-weekend-fall-pilots-desmond-dekker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/05/30/a-long-weekend-fall-pilots-desmond-dekker/</link>
	<description>Movies, TV and Popular Culture with Rich Heldenfels</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich Heldenfels</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/05/30/a-long-weekend-fall-pilots-desmond-dekker/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Heldenfels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 01:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=557#comment-345</guid>
		<description>You've got it, above. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;ve got it, above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/2006/05/30/a-long-weekend-fall-pilots-desmond-dekker/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/heldenfiles/?p=557#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to a not-review of Studio 60.  I thought that two shows that were pretty similar couldn't succeed on the same network, only I was betting that Studio 60 would be the one that would be significantly better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to a not-review of Studio 60.  I thought that two shows that were pretty similar couldn&#039;t succeed on the same network, only I was betting that Studio 60 would be the one that would be significantly better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
