A two-year government commissioned study proposed that federal gasoline taxes should be increased up to 40 cents per gallon over five years. The purpose of the massive tax increase would be to fix aging bridges and roads, and reduce traffic deaths.

Calling for immediate action, the congressionally created panel warns that "applying patches" is no longer acceptable, saying the nation risks tens of thousands of highway casualties each year and millions of dollars lost in economic growth.

"The crisis is now," the report states.

Among the recommendations, which are expected to cost $225 billion each year for the next 50 years:

—Work to cut traffic fatalities in half over the next 17 years by urging states to embrace new strategies to improve safety.

—Ease traffic congestion by expanding state and local public transit systems and highway capacity.

—Protect the environment by smoothing traffic flow, encouraging alternative commute options such as carpooling and public transit and promoting energy-efficient construction and lighting in transit systems to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

—Seek to develop new energy sources with new research programs costing $200 million annually over the next decade

Nobody wants our nation's infrastructure to deteriorate and/or collapse like the Minneapolis bridge, and maintaining our infrastructure IS a valid area for government to undertake (unlike so many others where they waste our money), but being the skeptical fiscal conservative that I am, I decided to investigate how our current gasoline taxes are spent. It seems to me that we already pay an awful lot in taxes on every gallon of gas. It also seems to me like virtually all that money should go toward maintaining our roads and bridges. Where else would it go ?

Where indeed. According to research by the National Center For Policy Analysis (NCPA), gas taxes are as follows:

- The federal government imposes a gasoline tax of 18.4 cents per gallon.
- States levy additional gas taxes at rates ranging from a low of 8 cents per gallon in Alaska to a high of 44.4 cents per gallon in California.
- Combined federal and state gas taxes now average about 45 cents per gallon.

The 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act established the Highway Trust Fund and stipulated that 100 percent of the [federal] gas tax be deposited into this fund. The trust fund finances highway building and maintenance across the nation.

Well, in theory that's what the Highway Trust Fund does. In reality, only about 60% of the money goes toward highway building and maintenance. Why only 60% ? Need you even ask ? It's due to politicians, naturally. They divert the rest of the money into mass transit and pork barrel projects. The NCPA breaks the spending down:

- Only 60 percent of federal gas taxes goes to the construction and maintenance of highways and bridges.
- Thirty percent goes to subsidize construction and maintenance of public transit facilities, such as bus terminals, light rail and subway systems.
- The remaining 10 percent is diverted to other projects — currently 6,000 projects — including bike paths, museums, nature trails, historic building repairs and so forth.

Since the DOT says 12% of the nations nearly 600,000 bridges are structurally deficient, before we saddle all americans with a huge tax that would hit the poorest among us the hardest, and impact most of us in a substantial manner, would it be too much to ask of Congress that all of the Highway Trust Fund money go to highway and bridge construction and repair ? Let the states and cities that want mass transit improvements and bike paths pay for it themselves. Put it on the ballot. Eliminate the pork. (Can we eliminate Congress ? No, I suppose not).

You know what I'd like to see for once, instead of the easy jump the pols always make to saddle the citizens with constantly greater and greater burdens to pay for constantly increasing government ? A two-year study in how to eliminate all the useless government programs, reduce waste, and cut spending. Now, there's a study I'd happily pay for, since it would more than pay for itself. I bet each one of us, regardless of our political allegiances, could review the federal budget and find that extra $225 billion to spend on highways without slamming the poor working man one more time. As almost always, the real answer is in LIMITING GOVERNMENT. Then we'd have plenty of money for roads and bridges, plus a lot more money in our pockets. That's what the movement is all about. And, as almost always, the real answer is, vote for very few Democrats (none of the liberal, big government variety), and vote out any wasteful Republicans as well (replace them with Libertarians or other third party candidates). Then we'd get somewhere, without stepping our citizenry step by step down the path towards insolvency, as we've been doing for decades and decades.

Or, we can just pay a lot more money for gas and complain.

Reason.tv tells us about government licensing for every occupation under the sun. From the article:

Do you want to be a fortune teller in Maryland? Your future better include a license from the state. How about being a hair braider in Mississippi? You'll need 300 to 1,500 hours of training and government permission. Want to sell flowers in Louisiana? Only licensed florists can do that. And almost every state requires certification if you want to move furniture and hang art while calling yourself an interior designer.

Naturally, there is always a fee required to get your license to sell flowers or braid hair, payable to Uncle Sam. Naturally. The state DFO (Department Of Floral Oversight) doesn't run for free, you know. If not for our intrepid government licensing watchdogs, we'd have unlicensed flower sellers and hair braiders running amok all over the country, selling unlicensed flowers and braiding unlicensed hair. Talk about anarchy. It's a public safety issue. Just imagine an unlicensed fortune teller operating in Maryland. Why, we could end up with some fortune tellers who were frauds, instead of the authentic fortune tellers we have now, because the authentic ones will pony up for the $75 licensing fee, whereas the frauds won't. Sounds like a foolproof government plan, doesn't it ?

I've always wondered about all this government licensing (taxation), even apart from occupational licenses. For instance, what is the point of paying $55 for that little automobile registration sticker we put on our Ohio license plates every year ? I mean, once your car is registered, it's registered, right ? The yearly renewal strikes me as a tad arbitrary, and more than a tad revenue-driven. And have you noticed the price for that little sticker goes up EVERY SINGLE YEAR ? That must be due to those high sticker production costs. Heck, those stickers could cost almost a tenth of a cent to manufacture. Maybe, just maybe, the license plate itself could serve as car registration and save us all some dough. What WAS the license plate supposed to represent prior to the sticker anyway ? I always thought maybe it was LICENSING, which IS REGISTRATION.

Another one is fishing licenses. What's the point of those ? It's not like you have to go through training on how to fish to get one (and I hope I'm not giving some bureaucratic dork an idea here). All you have to do is cough up the dough, and voila, you're a licensed fisherman, sanctioned by the state. Whoop-de-flippin'-do. I wonder how long it's going to be before some government genius gets the bright idea to tax the fish we catch. I'm surprised they haven't thought of it yet. They tax everything else, other than the air we breathe, and believe me, they're working hard on that one too. Global warming will be the excuse there. Thanks, Algore.

And if I hear one more politician complain about the high cost of gasoline, when the government tax on gasoline averages over a dollar per gallon, I'll, I'll…..

Probably just complain.

Where did this idea come from that the government has to stick their grubby little mitts into absolutely everything ? Even worse, where did the idea come from that the government has to get a piece of absolutely everything ? They're like the freaking mafia, except the mafia was less expensive and didn't have nearly as much power as the government does. No wonder the government cracked down on organized crime. They wanted to eliminate the competition.

You'll have to excuse me now, because I have to run down to the Ohio Department Of Internet Control (O-DIC) and pay my $150 blogger licensing fee, after I complete the mandatory blogger diversity and sensitivity training, of course.