Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

The Man Behind The Curtain

by Da King on September 4, 2010

in freedom,Uncategorized

Certain of my readers might think I'm a right-wing zealot, or maybe they think I'm just a mean old greedy white guy. They don't understand why I'm against so many liberal ideas. After all, liberals are the benevolent ones who only want to help people, right ? I mean, who could be against benevolent beliefs such as…..these ?:

- A better world is possible — a world where people come before profits.

- We need to build a [peace] movement that continues to organize for a complete withdrawal of troops and private contractors from Iraq and against the war in Afghanistan. A new kind of peace movement is needed to cut military spending, close US bases around the world, compel a nuclear weapons convention to eliminate all nuclear weapons and to begin to repair the damage done by US imperialism in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam and worldwide.

- Our collective efforts since 2001 have had a huge impact in strengthening the role of labor and communities of color in coalescing grassroots and national peace coalitions…

- Demilitarizing the economy, demilitarizing foreign policy is prerequisite for radical reform…Peace is necessary to meet human needs and sustain life on the planet.

- We need a new New Deal…united action of the peace movement, labor and social and economic justice movements on urgent issues of the day.

- We need a movement to move the money from wars to our communities. In Congress and at the grassroots, there are several new projects reflecting the reality that militarism is a roadblock to meeting human needs.

- [We have] championed the struggles for democracy, labor rights, women’s equality, racial justice and peace for ninety years….an unparalleled history in the progressive movement of the United States, from the struggle against Jim Crow segregation, the organizing of the industrial unions, from the canneries of California, to the sweatshops of New York City.

- People and nature before profits.

- Capitalism combines formal equality with economic social inequality.

- Equality before the law is not necessarily equality in fact.

- a decent and rising standard of living, peace, justice, equality, a sustainable environment, gay rights, health care, education, affordable housing, the needs of seniors, democracy, and a fulfilling life for everyone.

- The principles of democracy, equality, justice, and class self-interest require a joint fight against all expressions of racism and gender oppression. We fight for full equality for all who suffer from racial, national, and gender oppression as an essential aspect of the unity that is basic to all social progress.

- all racially and nationally oppressed groups, women, and youth—can build a movement that also includes the many streams of our working people—such as family farmers, small business owners, and the self-employed—who united together have the power to make fundamental progressive change.

- The pursuit of world domination to further enrich capitalists has resulted in destructive wars, environmental devastation, and massive poverty.

- [We strive] to build the broadest unity against global capitalist imperialism now headed by U.S. imperialism, for immediate gains and reforms that benefit working people, and for a progressive democratization of the government, the economy, and society of our country.

There you go. Good ideas one and all, am I right liberals ? All these ideas represent positive social change, correct ?

Well, maybe you think they do, but I pulled all the principles quoted above directly from the CPUSA website. CPUSA is short for Communist Party USA. Some of the quotes come from such luminaries as Marx, Engels, and Lenin. There also happen to be a few "minor" catches on the way to their utopia. The socialist paradise described above comes with a few prerequisites, namely…the subjugation of the individual to the state, the abolishment of private property, the abolishment of a free press, gulags and executions for political dissidents….minor little things like that. It worked out so well in the 20th century that 100-120 million people were slaughtered on the way to that totalitarian workers paradise, and then the remaining workers all ended up living in poverty under totalitarian regimes. That's what the Communists call "progress." That's the endgame behind their anti-capitalist, government-controlled, so-called progressive change. The "benevolent" principles outlined here by CPUSA are actually nothing more than propaganda to fool the useful idiots into following the Communists into bondage.

That's the man behind the curtain.

No thank you. I'll stick with liberty and take my chances. I'll stick with my country, one that stands against the dictators and totalitarian regimes of the world. I'll stick with free market capitalism too. I'll stick with opportunity being enough, because opportunity is non-existent under dictators and totalitarian regimes. That's why you don't see people flocking to North Korea, Cuba, etc. That's also why I'll continue to resist the trend toward a bigger, more controlling centralized government here. If we lose our freedom, it won't happen with one massive revolution, as it did elsewhere. It will happen step by step, with our liberties being gradually stripped away until one day we wake up and wonder what the hell happened to our free country. As George Washington said, "Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." It is our patriotic duty as a free people to resist the expansion of the government's power over us, regardless of what tricks the Communists have up their sleeves to fool us into giving up the very thing that made this country so great – individual liberty.

  • walter

    so…."The pursuit of world domination to further enrich capitalists has resulted in destructive wars, environmental devastation, and massive poverty."

    sounds like something Ron Paul would say

    I guess Ron Paul is a communist now

  • Da King

    wally,
    Are you pretending to be a Libertarian now ? Or are you still pretending to be a conservative ?

  • Da King

    And the thing you don't seem to get is, the Communists are pursuing world domination too. If an ideology is going to dominate the world, I want it to be ours.

  • larry d.

    Enriching capitalists has enriched us all. Without rampant capitalism, no television, no computers, no refrigeration, no wall-to-wall carpeting, no leisure time, etc., etc. Most of us would be riding horses, burning wood for heat, and eating whatever cattle or sheep could be raised on the clear cut land within 50 miles of where we live. The environmental consequences of that would be worse than carbon-based fuel we currently use.

  • Da King

    That reminds me of a story I read about 19th century New York City. It said the reason the brownstones were all built so elevated above street level was that the horse manure was piled several feet high on the sides of those streets. The people had to be above it. Can you imagine the environmental consequence of that ? Not to mention the smell. The subways and cars were a great environmental improvement.

  • barackem

    We won't have to worry about it. There won't be all those yucky people to make such a mess. Most will die of starvation or malnutrition or disease or genocide.

  • barackem

    If we could get the social engineers to craft a zero child policy at the same time we bring the life expectancy to 30 years, maybe even 40 years, we would be able to become a sustainable society within this century.

  • N. E. Frye

    Actually a productivity rate of 2.0 would be fine with me.

  • The Reverend

    Once again, I'm either not getting it….or your post is about some straw man.

    Communism? Communists?

    King dismissively raises Korea, Cuba…..as if there is some international threat still coming from communism.

    This one sounded just like a Glenn Beck screed. I'm worried that this Tea Party stuff is eating King's brain. Only out of concern, mind you.

  • Andrea

    Things are not always black or White. There are some good things about communism – America will never be a Communist country . But to take some of their good ideas might actually be smart – and to reject their bad is also smart. Capitalism isn’t always as generous like Communism can be. The main complaint found in communist countries was the lack of democracy. They did not feel they had any real say in the way their country was run. We will never have that here. We elect our officials , we have checks and balances and a constitution. But there were other things people who lived in Communist countries valued which was the welfare states the little unemployment , the health care that all would be covered for all the fact if you were down and out , the government would look after you . You would not find a homeless person . Those were things people actually liked .

  • Andrea

    I also should tell I know about the communist regime not only from what was told to me in school here but from my parents’ and grandparents’ who lived in Communist controlled country and by people who suffered under the communist regime. I have heard about how my relatives lost their business when taken over by the communists. So I know there is bad – but I also heard what was good. The good was the things the democrats want for America.

  • larry d.

    Communist regimes have elites who hoard all the money, leaving the rest of the population to live in abject poverty, Andrea. There's nothing generous about it.

  • barackem

    Andrea, there are really only two basic differences between a free country and a communist country.

    The first difference is that in a free country anyone is free to start a commune, they just aren't forced into it. There is nothing to stop you and a few friends or a couple thousand friends or every Democrat in the country from putting all into a shared pot or some prearranged partial sharing system. You can sign your property rights away to the commune. You can make work requirements in order to stay in your commune. Until Obamacare kicks in, you can even go to an individual insurance company and work out a group health policy of your own choosing. In a free country, there is nothing stopping you. In a communist country, there is nothing allowing you. You have no choice.

    The second difference is that in a free country, if you get sick of living in the commune, you can leave of your own free will. Nobody tells you that you can't. They don't put up walls to keep you in or arrest you for sedition or treason or some other crime if you decide to leave. You don't disappear into the middle of the night. In a free country you walk out the door, say goodbye and in most cases still can return and visit those who choose to stay behind.

    If you want communism, go for it and do it on your own terms. If it works out well for you, you may even convince other free people to join your commune. Just don't put up a wall so others can't leave or try to put them in jail for leaving or for not continuing to put their paycheck into the pot. Don't make them disappear into the night. If you follow a few basic rules of polite communism you will be just fine.

    Bottom line, people don't care what you do as long as it isn't forced on them. If the Dems can work within those parameters they are free to take all the good things you talk about, leave out the bad and create heaven on earth for anyone who wants it .

    When you succeed in real life, rather than forcing untested theories on all others, you will undoubtedly gain many converts. Your commune might become a megacommune. Da King might even come knocking at your commune door. If he does, you can make him beg a little bit or make him walk around town all day wearing a stupid costume with a sign that says " Da King's a fool, peasants rule" as an initiation into your commune. That is how a free country works. We should all be very thankful for that.

    You go, girl!

  • averagejoe5

    Communism won't come to us through a war Rev. You know that. It will come to us through our govt and political correctness. Do you favor communist beliefs Rev? Some of your followers here do.

    King there is no use in trying to explain to them. Now we have a communist supporter, Andrea telling how communism isn't all bad. I guess she needed to talk to my grandparents and their dead family in Yugoslavia where millions were slaughtered in the name of communist paradise. Or maybe the families of the Bougios and prolitariats in russia that were murdered. Or the take over's in China and Vietnam and Korea and the millions murdered there.
    Communism turns the peoople into the slaves of the govt with some minimal benefits. I guess they don't understand the devistating poverty that communism causes for the common man. Just look at the commoners in Vietnam. Russia, Cuba, Korea, China etc and see the sh*t holes they live.
    Obama primed us for the communist coming when he gave us these gems: We can't eat what we want , drive our SUV's or keep our heat on 72 and still be respected by the world. Or this gem: it doesn't matter hpw much money you make as long as you enjoy your work. Plus a myriad of other hints in his books. The libs / progressive followers (if you call going backward progressing. Trains? WTF) seem to want to keep their heads in the sand and ignor the facts and just have faith in their god and leader.
    Just like they won't listen to anything Beck says and still they comment. Just like they continue to persecute Palin over lies and distortions made by their leader led media. They will never understand until it happens and then when they give it all to the govt they will bitch and moan that this isn't what they signed up for with that big eyed stupid look in their eyes and the drool dripping from the sides of their mouth.
    Sad thing it is getting harder and harder to trust either side.

  • walter

    or is Ron Paul pretending to be a communist?

  • Da King

    You must be right, Reverend. There aren't any more Communists….except for the most populated country in the world…and about 25% of the world's population still live under Communist rule.

    Some straw man.

    I'm also curious. Do you disagree with ANY of these planks of the Communist Party USA that I laid out ???

  • Da King

    Andrea,
    I'm guessing your parents fled their Communist country to come here, just as my grandparents fled Nazi Germany to come here.

    I think you made my point. As barackem said, it's about freedom.

  • Da King

    I'm always surprised how many able-bodied people who live here are willing to become slaves to the government, as long as the government gives them a few scraps (which is all the government ever gives).

  • Da King

    No comment. Too easy.

  • barackem

    It's doubtful we will move to full fledged communism. Our political Washington insiders have grown too used to the perks to break up the Fed/Treasury/Goldman Sachs Wall Street bankers/political lawmaking cabal. They like their vacations and tropical excursions and big campaign chests and private business partnerships with the insiders that enrich them , their family, and friends. They don't want to be communists. They are elitists who want to support their elitist friends.

    We are moving more and more toward big government crony capitalism. They are finally talking about working with small business only because we are entering an election where they are going to get creamed after spending the last two years demonizing business and the Chamber of Commerce.

    What they would really prefer are a few very big businesses that they can control. They don't know how to run a successful business and don't really care as long as they share power at the top of the food chain. Having to deal with millions of successful small businesses is messy. It is much harder to overlord and manipulate the population if tens of millions of small businesses have economic power and independence. It's much easier to deal with a few big players to pass and execute legislation. If a few powerful Washington politicians can sit at a table with a few big business owners and a few union bosses it largely has the same effect of old style communism in a new style public/private partnership.

    However it is sold, it shifts power from millions of individuals to a few at the top. Individuals lose their incentive to work hard or to innovate. Instead we get alot of worker bees 'working for the good of society' as dictated by our new world paradigm. But that is ok. Look at what all that innovation got us. A bunch of rich people and a country that got way too big for it's britches that is killing the planet. We must put all the innovators in their place and learn to live with much, much less. At least the little people have to live with much much less. Not them. They are way too important and smart.

  • Andrea

    Your suggesting that the Democrats want communism is ridiculous . Obama health care is not socialist healthcare anyway. Funny how you like to compare it to communism instead of saying Obama and the liberals would like to have healthcare similar to Switzerland,Sweden's or even our own Massachusetts. Now won't that sound a whole lot less scary? But instead you try to link it to communism . Voodooo scary communism

    barackem Nobody wants us to become a communist country. I was not saying that. But when government can put together social programs to help the people of the country it can usually be done cheaper and more affordable . How much of our insurance premiums go toward company profits, lobbyists, huge salaries for executives and advertisements Barackem ?
    Not only that but a government program can provide a healthy competition to private sectors.

    Actually da king my father fled (escaped) because he was a prisoner of war – and he didn't come here he went to (socialist ) England . Later we came here. Because England has socialized health care does that mean they are a communist country ? What are you guys saying? We already have some forms of socialist programs many which most of you or atleast myself would not want to eliminate.

    But Republicans have developed a indirect tactic for attacking social programs – Tax cuts. The idea is simple: We keep cutting taxes, eventually there won’t be enough money to spend on these social programs medicare , public school education etc.
    and they will have to be reduced , then they will say they don't work well and be eliminated – And will call them socialist and try to link them to being communist programs because they don't need them -they send their kids to private schools – they don't need medicare or social security and they really do not care about those of us who do .
    But we really cannot be a communist country when we are a democracy. It will never happen here – we can only become more like a Norway (ranked best country to live in )
    Now wont that be scary

  • roysoldboy

    I think you sound like a firm supporter of Agenda 21, barackem. You do know that that is, don't you? If not I bet that Reverend Red could tell you.

  • roysoldboy

    The Muslim Brotherhood would be very happy for us to establish that zero population growth since we are too near that now and they are only having an average of 8 kids per family. Well maybe a family has more than one wife but one Muslim man is responsible for that many kids.

  • roysoldboy

    We have fallen too low below 2.0 to ever recover, even with Mexicans streaming into our country.

  • roysoldboy

    We have known for years that the Reverend Red agrees with all those planks from the Communist website. Right?

  • roysoldboy

    When will you be leaving for Norway, Andrea?

    Why do you accept the progressive message that taxing the rich is the way to go since someday the rich will be reduced to the level of those they are being taxed to help?

    Cutting taxes is not what will kill Medicare. Cutting the money that is available at $50 million per year as Obamacare calls for is what will kill it and all we old people.

    Raising taxes will do more to alienate most workers especially when TheWon promised that it wouldn't happen. Obamacare has a provision in it that almost forces employers to provide medical insurance but will tax the amount they pay for that insurance as income for each worker. Tell me how that is going to work and if you don't believe me look at your W-2 form next January. Oh yes, this is all grand for those who say they can't afford insurance but it is so socialistic that it is just one more step toward what communists believe.

    I won't go off on one of my rants about what it was like for farmers in the Soviet Union in 1977 but I can tell you that as peasants they finally tired of being forced to be peasants and had a lot to do with the final death of that nation.

  • N. E. Frye

    I don't think the dems want communism as suggested above. They really don't know what they want, and the only part of the party with any plan at all is the extreme left. I would even concede that our glorious leader may not actually be a communist ( a mere fellow traveller aka useful idiot) but I don't really think he's in charge. Some of his appointees probably have higher party standing than he. In a chaotic environment a small well disciplined organization has the advantage. Lenin managed to take over with far less than a majority.

    As to the advantages of communism, when Gorbachev was disconnecting the ruling party from life support there were signs waving in Moscow that said, "70 years on the road to nowhere." That 70 yrs was the beginning – nowhere near the end – of the period called by Marx the Dictatorship of the proletariat. It was supposed to fade into the classless society. There was a target year according to the grand plan when the classless society would be achieved. As it drew closer it became one of the politically incorrect subjects of writing or speaking. The new rulers were content with the existing situation. If you think we have corruption with a two party system, what must it become if there is a. a single party, and b. a controlled press?

  • walter

    roybot…..how's that socialistic Medicare working out for you? Still keeping you alive I see

  • The Reverend

    Post irony.

    Just a reflection on larry's comment.

    "elites who hoard all the money"

    Not like in the Great U.S.A.

  • The Reverend

    How does what you describe about current U.S. conditions….in any way resemble communism?

    The dissonance is getting so loud, even I can't hear myself think.

    The U.S. economy is controlled by oligarchs. These oligarchs write our laws and dictate our policies. And that's what Reaganistic economic policies have installed, apparently permanently, into our once competitive and capitalistic society.

    How any of that resembles communism……only Beck's devotees can rightly comprehend.

  • The Reverend

    roy continues the silliness…

    "taxing the rich is the way to go since someday the rich will be reduced to the level of those they are being taxed to help?"

    From a 90% tax rate to 35% in just 40 years. Considering our march to help the richest over the last 40 years……could you tell us when that "someday" might happen?

  • The Reverend

    To look clearly at today's American economic situation and not realize that our political process IS controlled by one party…..the party of the wealthy whose representatives dominate both the R's and D's……I think, is to have rose colored glasses on.

    The same is true of our "controlled press". Sure, the unwashed have the intertubes, etc…..but our national media is dominated by corporations for the sake of corporations.

    I'm not sure if the straw man of communism…..so often constructed when Democrats have a majority…..is built to ignore, or whitewash the fact that the top 3% actually control the U.S…..or whether those constructing a straw man, say, like King here……are simply oblivious to reality.

  • Da King

    Reverend longs for the good old days of 90% tax rates, and at the same time says there's no Communism being preached by the leftists.

    Andrea can't see how socialist government-run healthcare would resemble Communism in any way.

    Useful idiots IRL. You couldn't make this stuff up. Nobody would believe it.

  • Da King

    Sur-right !

  • Da King

    Have you ever checked out what Communist countries pay their workers, Reverend ?

    It's not at all like the Great U.S.A., in case you haven't noticed.

    But the Communists appreciate your support.

  • Da King

    I assume the Reverend has never heard about these groovy things we have called "elections," which are a groovy expression of another thing we have called "free speech." We can vote anyone in or out of office, and we can expose corruption via things like….the Tea Party movement, which sprang up as grassroot resistance to the crony capitalism (bailouts) and big government takeovers. The Reverend hates the Tea Parties, ironically enough, which unmasks his rhetoric about the top 3%. The Reverend is fine with oligarchs as long as he thinks they are HIS oligarchs.

    Doubly ironic is the Rev's statement that I'm "oblivious to reality" about the crony capitalist/big government power cabal when I'm one of the Tea Partiers out there protesting against it. The Reverend has been fooled by his favored big government/media cabal into thinking I must be nothing more than a stupid racist. The term 'useful idiot' returns to my mind regarding the Rev's thinking.

  • N. E. Frye

    Rev., I would say that the American media are not all that controlled, although their thinking is highly subject to the current wind from the New York Times, a controlled press if evger there was one. The reporters who come out of journalism school are five times more likely to be liberal than conservative (although the majority of them make an effort to be even handed – subject to the above wind.).

  • N. E. Frye

    As to the degree of control of the media, might that not be something both Rev & DAK agree on? I'd swear I've heard you both lament the media bias. There was a black officer I knew back when there weren't all that many. Some of the whites in his command complained that they thought he was prejudiced against them, so the Colonel, described to me as a Southern aristocrat conducted an inquiry and when he was hinished he called in the officer and told him that the whites all thought he was too hard on them and the blacks also all thought he was being too hard on them; therefore, concluded the colonel, " You seem to be doing a pretty good job." True story.

    There are times I thuink the media spins things wrong (what do I know?) but they must be doing something right if they have everybody on both wings p-o'd at them.

  • Da King

    I don't think the mainstream media is controlled, per se. I believe it is just biased and looking for sensationalist material for ratings. On political matters, most of the mainstream media is biased to favor the Democrats. Fox News is biased to favor the Republicans.

    Sounds like that Colonel was a wise man.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).