Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Dems Say…Fear Bush In 2010

by Da King on August 22, 2010

in Democrats,Uncategorized,voting,White House administration

Democrats appear to be staking their 2010 midterm election hopes on running against their favorite punching bag…George W. Bush. Funny, but I don't see his name on any ballots this year. To my knowledge, Bush has been keeping a pretty low profile, hanging out in Crawford, Texas. I can't really blame the Democrats for running against Bush. After all, it worked in 2006 and 2008, and it's a lot easier than the Democrats defending their own policies, which are unpopular with the American people.

Here's the first midterm campaign ad from the Democratic National Committee (DNC). It plays to the Dems 'Don't-Vote-For-Scary-Bush-Who's-Not-Running-Anyway' strategy:

There ! Did you see that ? That was Bush in that there ad ! Uh, oh ! Run for the hills ! He's coming ba-ack !!! Unless you vote for Democrats this fall. Be afraid, be very afraid ! Boo !!!

Beside the obvious fact that Dubya isn't coming back, Democrats have another problem, according to the National Journal:

The advice from Democratic consultants and strategists is almost unanimous: Run away from the president, and fast. A prominent Democratic pollster is circulating a survey that shows George W. Bush is 6 points more popular than President Obama in "Frontline" districts – seats held by Democrats that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee sees as most vulnerable to Republican takeover. That Bush is more popular than Obama in Democratic-held seats is cause for outright fear.

Ouch. And that comes from a Democratic pollster ? Not good news for the Dems. No wonder Maureen Dowd of the New York Times and other liberal journalists were calling for Bush to come out in favor of the Ground Zero mosque. He has more street cred than Barry.

In order to illustrate to my liberal critics that I am not a shill for the GOP, I strongly advise all voters – if you see George W. Bush on any ballot this november, DO NOT VOTE FOR HIM.. There libs, how do you like me now ? I'm doing your bidding.

Obama's low approval rating on issues led former DNC Chairman Howard "The Scream" Dean to say Obama's advisors have misled him:

"I think the people around the president have really misjudged what goes on elsewhere in the country other than Washington, D.C.," Dean, also the former governor of Vermont, said on CNN's State of the Union. "I don't think this is true of the president, but I do think his people, his political people ought to go out and spend some time outside Washington once in a while."

This is actually a bit ironic, because Dean believes the problem with Obama is that he hasn't been progressive enough. If Obama took Dean's advice, he be even MORE out of touch with the American public. The only ones who think liberals represent the thinking of America are liberals themselves, like Dean. The facts are, liberals represent about 20% of America. The rest of us are mostly normal, myself excluded. I don't know whether I'm normal or not. I'm too close to the subject.

The Gaffemaster General, VP Joe Biden, tried to bucks up his troops, providing his own spin on the upcoming elections:

“On Nov. 3, the day after the election, there will be a Democratic majority in the House and a Democratic majority in the Senate,” Mr. Biden said. “If it weren’t illegal, I’d make book on it.”

“When we have the American people focus on our differences, I think we are going to do just fine in November,” Mr. Biden said, speaking over applause from a few hundred attendees. “The choice is not between Democrats and the Almighty, it’s between Democrats and the Republican Tea party.”

It would be quite an earthquake if the Dems lost the House and the Senate so soon after The One soared to victory on the wings of angels two years ago, but I notice the Gaffemaster didn't dispute that the Dems were going to lose ground come november. I do congratulate Gaffy for conceding the Democrats were not superior to the Almighty. That's the first sign of humility I've seen from this White House since Obama bowed to the Saudi prince.

I wonder…if the Dems were running against the Almighty, would there be DNC negative ads about the Almighty's failed policies of the past, like the Black Plague ? The DNC might also point out that the Almighty has a God complex. Such an ego, that one. All messianic and stuff. Could we trust the Almighty with the nuclear football ? Think about it, America. Who do you want leading your team…

God…or Harry Reid ?

  • Tbomb
  • B

    If I was in their shoes, I'd do the same thing. Because the alternative is defending themselves on their record. "Blame Bush" is the least worst option.

    As far as I can tell, their argument will be :1) its not our fault; and 2) it could be worse.

    If unemployment is still around 10% at election-time, there's not a lot the Dems will be able to do to avoid getting clobbered. And the "Blame Bush" thing is a matter of diminishing returns. Its pretty much worn itself out with the public by now. But, again, what is the option?

  • larry d.

    If Obama were heading home to Chicago, the comparison between Bush's trips to Crawford would be a little more persuasive, Tbomb. Several presidents have had retreats, such as Truman in Key West, where they'd go to work away from D.C. But Obama's trips seem like pure vacations. Add in the fact that he seems so out of touch in general, and it's a bad mix.

  • larry d.

    That commercial is typical of the topsy-turvy, sky is green grass is blue world the Dems want their lemmings to believe in. The opening shots of pastoral farmland are of course the backwards "flyover" land Democrats actually despise. That America, of course, is run by Republicans. The cesspool city scenes they want viewers to connect to Republicans are of course areas run by Democrats and the machine politics Obama employs.

    I doubt that anyone's going to be buying it. They are still sorely out of touch.

  • Da King

    I'm strongly in favor of Obama taking vacations. The longer the better. Get him a condo next to a golf course and let him go at it. If any national security issues arise, Hillary can oversee them. She can text Barry when the problem has been resolved, then he can go on television and take credit (or blame Bush if the situation turns out badly).

  • Da King

    I LOVE the "it could be worse" argument the Obama hacks put out there. It is always true, (things can always be worse), therefore inarguable and timeless. It's the perfect political argument, containing no substance whatsover.

  • Da King

    After that comment, I should give you my job. I wish I'd thought of the pastoral/cesspool contrast and incorporated it into my post. Well said.

  • walter

    this from the Washington Post……..

    "Among all Americans, the Republican Party is viewed a little less favorably than the Democrats — 38/53. Among tea partiers, it has a 54/43 favorable rating.

    - Among all Americans, George W. Bush has 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among tea partiers he's viewed favorably, 57/27.

    - One explanation for that: Among all Americans, the Bush administration takes the largest share — 39 percent — of the blame for the "current federal budget deficit." Only 6 percent of tea partiers blame Bush, while 24 percent blame President Obama and 37 percent blame Congress."

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/poll_tea_partiers_miss_bush_li.html

    tying the republican tea party to Bush is probably a good idea

  • Andrea

    Actually compared to the republicans now – bush wouldn't be so bad.
    Your choice is a tea party member or a republican obstructionist who will bring congress to a halt and America will slide backwards and spend the next 4 years with nothing accomplished .
    This commercial could have showna whole lot worse than Bush – a wacko tea party member for instance with their wacko signs, while the republicans go up to vote against unemployment insurance one by one.

  • B

    Gosh, how I wish the DNC would take your advice.

  • B

    I mean doing ads insulting the Tea Party folks. What a winning strategy.

  • B

    Actually, I think that most Dems agree with you about the Tea Party. But they can't tell the truth in any ad because it would be an election day catastrophe. The house and senate would be gone.

    There will be no ads denigrating the Tea Party, as you suggest. Darn it. I wish they would listen to you, Andrea. Is there anything you can do? Call and demand those ads!

  • larry d.

    I think the Dems should pick a couple issues in which there's a 70-30 consensus, then smear those Americans who fall within the 70 percent portion as ignorant, violent, racist Nazis.

  • walter

    the dems could do a "larry"

    a "larry" is lying about what somebody says…..you know, like you lying about me saying something filthy about Mexicans to try to make me out a racist

    Andy Brietbart did a "larry" and Dave condemned him

    larry does a "larry" and…………..nothing

    Ron Paul would refer to Dave as a “sunshine patriot”

  • walter

    from the "sunshine patriot" Dave….."In order to illustrate to my liberal critics that I am not a shill for the GOP, I strongly advise all voters – if you see George W. Bush on any ballot this november, DO NOT VOTE FOR HIM.. There libs, how do you like me now ? I'm doing your bidding."

    shorter Dave….don't vote for Bush but please vote for those republican tea partiers(like John Boehner) that supported Bush and those that view Bush's big government big spending policies favorably(like the 57% of the tea party)

    yeah, that's not shilling for the republican tea party

    just sayin'

  • larry d.

    What are you blabbering and whining about now, walt?

  • roysoldboy

    For some reason, Walter, I saw da King referring to the fact that ballots with Bush's name on them would be left overs, probably in Democrat run states trying to save money and therefore using leftovers from days gone by. If he isn't even running it appears that the time to blame him is drawing to a close but Dems can't see that, can they. If you have a horse that rides so well you need to ride him until he drops and I think they have done that already.

  • Da King

    I second that motion. KEEP insulting the Tea Party, Democrats. PLEASE.

  • Da King

    Smearing the 70% majority is pretty much what the Dems have been doing. I hope they keep it up.

  • Da King

    Like I said, it's easier than the Dems defending their unpopular policies.

    I agree, the horse is dead, but the Dems are going to keep beating it anyway.

  • walter

    larry….here I am trying to pay you a complement……..when it comes to smearing somebody you are the best even if you have to lie. You are even better than Brietbart.

    You're so good Dave is afraid of saying anything to you about it…….Dave certainly wasn't afraid of critisizing Brietbart

    and you call it blabbering and whining

  • walter

    was that Dave sayin' that or was that Glenn Beck………you know, I can't tell them apart anymore

  • larry d.

    Don't cry walt. It's unbecoming of a troll.

  • walter

    it appears that repeating the thing about me crying is along the same lines as repeating your lie about me saying something filthy about Mexicans

    about right?

  • larry d.

    Face it, walt. You're a bit of a whiner.

  • sunklhammer

    There's a lot of things you can't tell apart, wally-poo….like which one to sit on, and which one to comb.

  • walter

    a lair saying I'm a bit of a whiner…..now that just breaks my heart

  • walter

    let me think about this for a moment……..I should sit on Dave and comb out Glenn Beck or should I sit on Glenn Beck and comb out Dave?

    that's a tough one

  • sunklhammer

    You could sit on your head and put a hat on your ass, and no one would be able to tell the difference. You sure can't, wally-poo.

  • walter

    I'm sure Dave thanks you for rephrasing your previous post

  • The Reverend

    "I wonder…if the Dems were running against the Almighty, would there be DNC negative ads about the Almighty's failed policies of the past, like the Black Plague ? "

    I'm not that sure I speak for all Democrats when I say ….you're damn right.

    If god is in charge, and he's running against a Democrat…..he has a lot of stuff to account for. Americans need answers.

  • Da King

    Don't you like your life ?

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).