Comments on: Why Would You Believe This Man ?

By: Da King

Da King — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:48:52 +0000

roy,
Are you sure Obama was bowing to the Japanese emperor ? I'm surprised Press Secretary Robert Gibbs hasn't explained yet that Obama was merely looking for a dropped contact lens.

I think it would have been more appropriate for Obama to bow to the Chinese. We need them to keep buying our debt. He could have groveled even.

By: Da King

Da King — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:47:02 +0000

Tory,
I voted for Hillary in the 2008 Democratic primary. I'd like to say I did it because I knew Obama was a liar, but I didn't fully know it then. I voted for Hillary because Obama didn't have any significant experience in anything relevant, had never run anything, had a thin resume, a less than stellar legislative record, and seemed like nothing but a public relations man who learned his talking points well. Style over substance. He hasn't changed my opinion, and now he's added dishonesty to the rest of his traits.

By: Da King

Da King — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:42:39 +0000

Alex,
It sounds to me like you are saying the lamestream media and the corrupt politicians in both parties detest Palin because she will call them out for what they are. Excellent point. These would be the same people who refer to non-coastal America as "flyover country."

By: Tory Bug

Tory Bug — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:19:17 +0000

At least with Bush, agree or disagree with his policies, you knew what those policies were. Obamarama contradicts himself so much that I find it hard to believe that anyone knows what he stands for.

Don't get me wrong, Bush said a lot of dumb things. I've been known to laugh at a few of his gaffes, but he never spoke out of both sides of his mouth like some other presidents I'm aware of. I hate saying it, but I think we would've been better off with Hillary Clinton. Same policies, but at least she represents herself accurately.

By: roysoldboy

roysoldboy — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:00:26 +0000

King, you just put too many of the gaffes of the BIC into that one post, and ,as you said, you didn't scratch the surface. In 10 months he has managed so many more of those things than Bush did in 96 months, so maybe that is the reason Rev has to keep bringing up the no President from 2001 to 2009.

By: roysoldboy

roysoldboy — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:57:09 +0000

Why don't I ever see Rev Red comment about our BIC? I guess old Rev doesn't understand that the man he calls our President is thought of all over the world as our Bower in Chief. I hope he never gets a chance to bow to Castro, because I fear he will do just that.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:07:09 +0000

For all her limitations Palin has a gift for cutting off Obama at the knees. When she points out he never drafted important legislation but has written two autobiographies, for instance, she is not only pointing out Obama's fraudulent character, she is pointing out the gullibility of Obama's lemmings, a group that fancies itself as some sort of intellectual elite. No one likes to be unmasked in such a way–it threatens their sense of identity, even–and that is why they hate and fear her so.

By: Alexander D.

Alexander D. — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:39:14 +0000

King: For the life of me, I can't see why they are so afraid of Palin.

She's "real" and doesn't walk on politically-correct eggshells. Most Americans can liken themselves to a Sarah, long before that of a Pelosi. She's also willing to take on the establishment, rather than fall in line…………….a threat to corrupt republicans and democrats alike.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:22:47 +0000

Alex,
I've been listening to one media nitwit after another calling Palin divisive for the last few days. I'm still trying to figure out what they are talking about. Is someone divisive now merely because they have their own opinion about things, one that differs from the Democratic establishment that the media represents ? It seems so. For the life of me, I can't see why they are so afraid of Palin. She's not that scary, but they bend over backwards to try to marginalize her. I exclude Oprah from that judgement. Oprah was respectful toward Palin.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:16:01 +0000

And though the Rev's words are content-free and not worth responding to, I'll just say this…

His response didn't have anything to do with anything. It ignored my entire post. Every time he does that, it means he doesn't have a response.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:12:09 +0000

Andrea says,

"His health care plan hasn't even been approved yet and you are already claiming YOU know how we will pay for it. To the best of my knowledge Obama hasn't raised anyone's taxes."

If you don't think Obama is going to raise taxes, then you just haven't been paying attention. All his major initiatives contain huge tax increases, and he raised taxes on cigarettes within days of taking office.

"And if you don't understand how any one can NOT be for abortion but be pro choice that is your problem."

I do understand that, because I am one of those people. But never in his career has Obama voted to restrict any kind of abortion. He didn't even vote for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, for god's sake. You'd also never hear me say I don't want my daughter punished with a baby, which is what I quoted. I'd try to talk my daughter into having the baby.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:04:30 +0000

dd20,
Great example of Obama's deception. Nothing the man says can really be believed. It changes from day to day, from audience to audience. He is the consummate politician who will literally say anything to further himself. That "full military trial" for KSM is exactly what I think should happen. Why doesn't anyone in the lamestream media ever call him on this stuff ? What I wrote is only the tip of the iceberg. I could write my entire blog just on his deceptions and inconsistencies.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:47:20 +0000

Come on you are sort of stretching the truth here on Obama and ignoring lie after lie Palin has said. The woman can't get ANY facts straight. She is a habitual liar .
His health care plan hasn't even been approved yet and you are already claiming YOU know how we will pay for it. To the best of my knowledge Obama hasn't raised anyone's taxes.
And if you don't understand how any one can NOT be for abortion but be pro choice that is your problem. One can be against smoking but at the same time Not want to ban cigarettes for others who want to smoke cant they ? Do you smoke King ? If you dont must mean you want to Ban cigarettes altogether then right or you are a liar ? YOur thinking

By: Alexander D.

Alexander D. — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:50:59 +0000

Rev: That's too bad, because now, when we have a legitimate leader who takes his responsibilities seriously, ….and is curious and intelligent…wingers not only can't recognize those leadership qualities for what they are, but also call this leader a liar because they don't agree with his policies.

?????? Rev,
I'm at a total loss for words and such spin I would only expect from MSNBC. Even in my days of staunch support for the GOP, common-sense always preceded partisanship. It is possible for a president to come along under the radar, get elected, and totally flop on his face……………….regardless of a Harvard education and regardless of party affiliation. And then there are some who totally outrule any possibility of such happening. Gotta get out of deep left field Rev……………..your view of the game is obscured. Couple of tea parties and you may snap out of it.

By: averagejoe5

averagejoe5 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:19:43 +0000

Rev, I believe we should give Obama a chance and I feel the press is detreoying him as they did Bush and Cheney, however Obama is a huge waffler on policy and a waffler on principles. He is an exellent sales person however his product never seems to be what was promised.

By: The Irreverend

The Irreverend — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:53:01 +0000

BTW – please explain how 57 states, with "one more to go", is intelligent.

By: The Irreverend

The Irreverend — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:51:16 +0000

Your leader doesn't even agree with his own policies. What you call curious and intelligent can be better characterized as misleading and narcissistic.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:34:11 +0000

Looks like a self-victimizing wingnut party today on King's blog.

I don't know what happened to wingers during Bush…..but it may just be incurable.

We were without a president from 2001-2009…and I guess, wingers forgot, or never really knew, what a true American leader was. That's too bad, because now, when we have a legitimate leader who takes his responsibilities seriously, ….and is curious and intelligent…wingers not only can't recognize those leadership qualities for what they are, but also call this leader a liar because they don't agree with his policies.

It's really quite amazing.

By: dd20

dd20 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:58:33 +0000

You'll never keep up… everyday presents an opportunity for contradictions. If you haven't seen it, here's the latest:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16902

The key is when President Obama says "Someone like KSM". Guess it doesn't apply to the actual KSM…

By: Alexander D.

Alexander D. — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:34:57 +0000

For a woman that is a "joke", according to the left, they sure have devoted an awful lot of resources in their attempts to demarginalize her? Based on their anxiety levels, it appears that she is the wooden stake for these vampires. If she would have had 5 abortions and favored pant suits……………the libs would have loved her.

King,
Not sure how you keep up with all the Obama gaffs, but don't expect the media to join your crusade anytime soon. The last of their credibility flew out the window last fall and the sheep seem to be their only captive audience. Future elections will be much more pleasurable with CNN, MSNBC, PBS, and others that have neutralized themselves from being relevant.

The lies will continue to flow while he is reassured by a majority of media incapable of calling his bluff. They're all in the same boat together…………………….and watching it sink will be our vengeance. They tied Bush to the war and economy and now society will easily connect the dots and tie the media to the Obama administration. They are inseparable.