<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Their Own Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9980</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9980</guid>
		<description>Oops, I left a couple out. 

&quot;Secrecy&quot;

You&#039;ll have to explain how this has anything to do with conservatism. 

&quot;SS&quot;

Bush tried to fix SS. After my recent post about SS, I don&#039;t know how you even had the nerve to bring this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I left a couple out. </p>
<p>&#034;Secrecy&#034;</p>
<p>You&#039;ll have to explain how this has anything to do with conservatism. </p>
<p>&#034;SS&#034;</p>
<p>Bush tried to fix SS. After my recent post about SS, I don&#039;t know how you even had the nerve to bring this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9978</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9978</guid>
		<description>Rev, 
Most of what you cited isn&#039;t even conservative. 

&quot;Historic tax cuts primarily benefitting the wealthiest.&quot;

Aka, across the board tax cuts for all taxpayers. It&#039;s okay to admit it. Tax cuts are conservative, but not when they aren&#039;t paid for, and Bush&#039;s weren&#039;t. Running up deficits and debt isn&#039;t conservative.

&quot;Wars of aggression.&quot;

Wars aren&#039;t a conservative act, according to the true meaning of the word. That&#039;s why the term &quot;neo-con&quot; was invented. 

&quot;The Terri Schiavo embarassment&quot;

Did Bush get involved in that ? I thought it was only Congress. In any case, I&#039;m not sure that keeping the state from murdering an innocent woman is a particularly conservative idea either. That&#039;s more of a moral idea, as in, Thou Shalt Not Murder.

&quot;Further leverage deregulation for banksters&quot;

Hardly a conservative idea, but in any case, this was done to keep the banks from failing even earlier.

&quot;Refusing to fund any new embryonic stem cell research other than on existing stem cell lines&quot;

In other words, Bush funded stem cell research. 

&quot;Faith-based initiatives&quot;

Obama&#039;s doing the same thing, and he&#039;s no conservative.

I&#039;ll give you the two Bush Supreme court justices. They were conservative, thank god.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev,<br />
Most of what you cited isn&#039;t even conservative. </p>
<p>&#034;Historic tax cuts primarily benefitting the wealthiest.&#034;</p>
<p>Aka, across the board tax cuts for all taxpayers. It&#039;s okay to admit it. Tax cuts are conservative, but not when they aren&#039;t paid for, and Bush&#039;s weren&#039;t. Running up deficits and debt isn&#039;t conservative.</p>
<p>&#034;Wars of aggression.&#034;</p>
<p>Wars aren&#039;t a conservative act, according to the true meaning of the word. That&#039;s why the term &#034;neo-con&#034; was invented. </p>
<p>&#034;The Terri Schiavo embarassment&#034;</p>
<p>Did Bush get involved in that ? I thought it was only Congress. In any case, I&#039;m not sure that keeping the state from murdering an innocent woman is a particularly conservative idea either. That&#039;s more of a moral idea, as in, Thou Shalt Not Murder.</p>
<p>&#034;Further leverage deregulation for banksters&#034;</p>
<p>Hardly a conservative idea, but in any case, this was done to keep the banks from failing even earlier.</p>
<p>&#034;Refusing to fund any new embryonic stem cell research other than on existing stem cell lines&#034;</p>
<p>In other words, Bush funded stem cell research. </p>
<p>&#034;Faith-based initiatives&#034;</p>
<p>Obama&#039;s doing the same thing, and he&#039;s no conservative.</p>
<p>I&#039;ll give you the two Bush Supreme court justices. They were conservative, thank god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>To my Kansas buddy, roy....

Hasn&#039;t the dissonance cracked your skull yet? Capitalism in America, left deregulated and supercharged with greed, gambled away America&#039;s near term future.....and lost. That loss rippled downward resulting in massive layoffs. The layoffs started under Bush, and continue under Obama....though they have slowed slightly recently. Contrary to conservative ramblings.....the current almost-depression, complete with historic layoffs, was a direct result of capitalism at it&#039;s worse. Even Alan Greenspan agrees with me now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my Kansas buddy, roy&#8230;.</p>
<p>Hasn&#039;t the dissonance cracked your skull yet? Capitalism in America, left deregulated and supercharged with greed, gambled away America&#039;s near term future&#8230;..and lost. That loss rippled downward resulting in massive layoffs. The layoffs started under Bush, and continue under Obama&#8230;.though they have slowed slightly recently. Contrary to conservative ramblings&#8230;..the current almost-depression, complete with historic layoffs, was a direct result of capitalism at it&#039;s worse. Even Alan Greenspan agrees with me now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9924</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9924</guid>
		<description>Historic tax cuts primarily benefitting the wealthiest. Further leverage deregulation for banksters already under water. Wars of aggression. The Terri Schiavo embarassment. Refusing to fund any new embryonic stem cell research other than on existing stem cell lines. Starting a new Faith Based Initiative in violation of the 1st amendment. Appointing two extremist jurists to the Supremes. Secrecy, ala Nixon, Reagan, Bush I. An attempt to wreck SS. 

Shall I go on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historic tax cuts primarily benefitting the wealthiest. Further leverage deregulation for banksters already under water. Wars of aggression. The Terri Schiavo embarassment. Refusing to fund any new embryonic stem cell research other than on existing stem cell lines. Starting a new Faith Based Initiative in violation of the 1st amendment. Appointing two extremist jurists to the Supremes. Secrecy, ala Nixon, Reagan, Bush I. An attempt to wreck SS. </p>
<p>Shall I go on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9895</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9895</guid>
		<description>And while we&#039;re on the subject, what were Bush&#039;s big conservative accomplishments ?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we&#039;re on the subject, what were Bush&#039;s big conservative accomplishments ?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9894</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9894</guid>
		<description>walter, 
What&#039;s your point ? Am I supposed to be FOR big increases in government spending, FOR big increases in the national debt, FOR big tax increases ? Don&#039;t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>walter,<br />
What&#039;s your point ? Am I supposed to be FOR big increases in government spending, FOR big increases in the national debt, FOR big tax increases ? Don&#039;t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roysoldboy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>roysoldboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>Rev, did you go over to Pittsburgh to take part in the &quot;rally&quot; against capitalism the other evening?  I just wondered since you said:   &quot;No question, unbridled capitalism is a sin…..worse, with some capitalists it&#039;s an incurable disease. 6 1/2 million unemployed Americans agree.&quot;

You don&#039;t like capitalism and you tried to make all those unemployed the responsibility of the recent capitalist government when in the first month of our road to socialism, we are on now, over 700,000 people lost their jobs.  BTW, have we had a month without job loss in the past 8 months?  If so which one was it.

I have been wondering if the present President is a capitalist since the job losses have continued with him in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev, did you go over to Pittsburgh to take part in the &#034;rally&#034; against capitalism the other evening?  I just wondered since you said:   &#034;No question, unbridled capitalism is a sin…..worse, with some capitalists it&#039;s an incurable disease. 6 1/2 million unemployed Americans agree.&#034;</p>
<p>You don&#039;t like capitalism and you tried to make all those unemployed the responsibility of the recent capitalist government when in the first month of our road to socialism, we are on now, over 700,000 people lost their jobs.  BTW, have we had a month without job loss in the past 8 months?  If so which one was it.</p>
<p>I have been wondering if the present President is a capitalist since the job losses have continued with him in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roysoldboy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>roysoldboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>Walter sez,  &quot;First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending. &quot;  

Now Walter was talking about the expansion of government under the Bush administration.  Walter, how many new agencies have been proposed just to enforce the healthcare Pelosi that the &quot;bad&quot; town hall protesters were against?  Somehow I seem to keep hearing more than 50 agencies just to enforce the road to socialized medicine.  I don&#039;t think that any one bill passed during the Bush administration needed that much growth of government just to enforce IT.

Could you point out which ones did that?  Maybe I just missed it and I need to know about this because the elections of 2010 are just over 1 year off.  That is if I get to vote.  You do know that Ms. Napolitano has declared old vets, who are Republicans, are very dangerous as possible terrorists.  I fit every description she put in there and will believe that I will be allowed to vote when I am indeed making my marks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter sez,  &#034;First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending. &#034;  </p>
<p>Now Walter was talking about the expansion of government under the Bush administration.  Walter, how many new agencies have been proposed just to enforce the healthcare Pelosi that the &#034;bad&#034; town hall protesters were against?  Somehow I seem to keep hearing more than 50 agencies just to enforce the road to socialized medicine.  I don&#039;t think that any one bill passed during the Bush administration needed that much growth of government just to enforce IT.</p>
<p>Could you point out which ones did that?  Maybe I just missed it and I need to know about this because the elections of 2010 are just over 1 year off.  That is if I get to vote.  You do know that Ms. Napolitano has declared old vets, who are Republicans, are very dangerous as possible terrorists.  I fit every description she put in there and will believe that I will be allowed to vote when I am indeed making my marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9873</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9873</guid>
		<description>King sez.....&quot;walter, If you think I&#039;m a big Bush fan, you just haven&#039;t been paying attention.&quot;

just saying DAVID MICHAEL GREEN has your number.......again, from Counterpunch.....

Are all of these failings why regressives don’t think George W. Bush was one of them as president? Of course not. In fact, Bush did all of these things. In fact, he and his fellow-travelers fulfilled every single item on the regressive wet dream checklist during his presidency.

Except for two. First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending. And, second, because they were careful not to take any popular goodies away so that voters would experience the real pain of regressive politics, they paid for it all (and the tax cuts, and the wars) by borrowing. Future generations could pay for it. Plus interest, of course.

King....addressing  dishonesty with larry is an outright hoot. Nobody is going to forget larry&#039;s outright lie about me saying something filthy about Mexicans...except you of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King sez&#8230;..&#034;walter, If you think I&#039;m a big Bush fan, you just haven&#039;t been paying attention.&#034;</p>
<p>just saying DAVID MICHAEL GREEN has your number&#8230;&#8230;.again, from Counterpunch&#8230;..</p>
<p>Are all of these failings why regressives don’t think George W. Bush was one of them as president? Of course not. In fact, Bush did all of these things. In fact, he and his fellow-travelers fulfilled every single item on the regressive wet dream checklist during his presidency.</p>
<p>Except for two. First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending. And, second, because they were careful not to take any popular goodies away so that voters would experience the real pain of regressive politics, they paid for it all (and the tax cuts, and the wars) by borrowing. Future generations could pay for it. Plus interest, of course.</p>
<p>King&#8230;.addressing  dishonesty with larry is an outright hoot. Nobody is going to forget larry&#039;s outright lie about me saying something filthy about Mexicans&#8230;except you of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9869</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9869</guid>
		<description>I posted my previous comment before reading walter&#039;s clarification that those words were not his. It&#039;s all good now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted my previous comment before reading walter&#039;s clarification that those words were not his. It&#039;s all good now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9868</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9868</guid>
		<description>larry, 
I agree. walt has never been that eloquent before, and his dishonesty is well-documented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>larry,<br />
I agree. walt has never been that eloquent before, and his dishonesty is well-documented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>walter, 
If you think I&#039;m a big Bush fan, you just haven&#039;t been paying attention.

But the last I heard, Bush isn&#039;t the President anymore. 

What I can&#039;t figure out is, why do those like you and the Reverend always want to change the subject back to Bush (or even Reagan in the Rev&#039;s case) . Is it THAT hard to defend Obama ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>walter,<br />
If you think I&#039;m a big Bush fan, you just haven&#039;t been paying attention.</p>
<p>But the last I heard, Bush isn&#039;t the President anymore. </p>
<p>What I can&#039;t figure out is, why do those like you and the Reverend always want to change the subject back to Bush (or even Reagan in the Rev&#039;s case) . Is it THAT hard to defend Obama ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9866</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9866</guid>
		<description>So, Reverend is a Hugo Chavez fan. 

Add one more authoritarian left-winger to the count. Tyrants R&#039; Us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Reverend is a Hugo Chavez fan. </p>
<p>Add one more authoritarian left-winger to the count. Tyrants R&#039; Us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>dd20, 
I&#039;m on it. Read my latest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dd20,<br />
I&#039;m on it. Read my latest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9860</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9860</guid>
		<description>my apologies.....that was the money quote from the Counterpunch story &quot;Why the Right Wants to Erase Bush&quot;  Dumping Dubya 
By DAVID MICHAEL GREEN

again, my apologies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my apologies&#8230;..that was the money quote from the Counterpunch story &#034;Why the Right Wants to Erase Bush&#034;  Dumping Dubya<br />
By DAVID MICHAEL GREEN</p>
<p>again, my apologies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9858</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9858</guid>
		<description>A little too &quot;well said,&quot; if you ask me. Knowing his limitations, after reading that bit I have to conclude that walt is a plagiarist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little too &#034;well said,&#034; if you ask me. Knowing his limitations, after reading that bit I have to conclude that walt is a plagiarist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9857</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9857</guid>
		<description>Well said, walter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, walter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9855</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9855</guid>
		<description>sounds like someone we know....eh King?

Are all of these failings why regressives don’t think George W. Bush was one of them as president?  Of course not.  In fact, Bush did all of these things.  In fact, he and his fellow-travelers fulfilled every single item on the regressive wet dream checklist during his presidency.

Except for two.  First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending.  And, second, because they were careful not to take any popular goodies away so that voters would experience the real pain of regressive politics, they paid for it all (and the tax cuts, and the wars) by borrowing.  Future generations could pay for it.  Plus interest, of course.

Those are both important issues to the right, to be sure, but it is absolutely ludicrous to argue that those two items, stacked up against everything else he gave them listed above, remotely suggest that Bush was not a conservative.  Utter nonsense.

So what’s going on?

The obvious answer is that Bush was a total disaster as president who was hated by a country that couldn’t wait for the clock to run down on his nightmare.  Who wants to be associated with that?

The less obvious answer is even more telling, though.  It’s true the Bush folks were grossly incompetent, at least at the things they didn’t care so much about.  But the deeper and more profound reality is that this was far less a failure of one fool than it was the acid test for an entire ideology, which in fact failed the exam miserably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like someone we know&#8230;.eh King?</p>
<p>Are all of these failings why regressives don’t think George W. Bush was one of them as president?  Of course not.  In fact, Bush did all of these things.  In fact, he and his fellow-travelers fulfilled every single item on the regressive wet dream checklist during his presidency.</p>
<p>Except for two.  First, they expanded the size of the national government through reckless spending.  And, second, because they were careful not to take any popular goodies away so that voters would experience the real pain of regressive politics, they paid for it all (and the tax cuts, and the wars) by borrowing.  Future generations could pay for it.  Plus interest, of course.</p>
<p>Those are both important issues to the right, to be sure, but it is absolutely ludicrous to argue that those two items, stacked up against everything else he gave them listed above, remotely suggest that Bush was not a conservative.  Utter nonsense.</p>
<p>So what’s going on?</p>
<p>The obvious answer is that Bush was a total disaster as president who was hated by a country that couldn’t wait for the clock to run down on his nightmare.  Who wants to be associated with that?</p>
<p>The less obvious answer is even more telling, though.  It’s true the Bush folks were grossly incompetent, at least at the things they didn’t care so much about.  But the deeper and more profound reality is that this was far less a failure of one fool than it was the acid test for an entire ideology, which in fact failed the exam miserably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walter</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9853</link>
		<dc:creator>walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9853</guid>
		<description>King sez....&quot;I&#039;m sure glad Barry came along and fixed the character and cause of this nation after 232 years of American villainy, aren&#039;t you ?&quot;  Of course, only you and your fellow republicans would think that Obama was talking about the last 232 years

good thing the President has been reading Counterpunch

http://www.counterpunch.org/green09252009.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King sez&#8230;.&#034;I&#039;m sure glad Barry came along and fixed the character and cause of this nation after 232 years of American villainy, aren&#039;t you ?&#034;  Of course, only you and your fellow republicans would think that Obama was talking about the last 232 years</p>
<p>good thing the President has been reading Counterpunch</p>
<p><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/green09252009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.counterpunch.org/green09252009.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: averagejoe5</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9849</link>
		<dc:creator>averagejoe5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9849</guid>
		<description>I meant craching the economy in 2007. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant craching the economy in 2007. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: averagejoe5</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9848</link>
		<dc:creator>averagejoe5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9848</guid>
		<description>dd20 - I was thinking the exact same thing.  What does the Rev think?

Why do you blame capitalism on  unemployment? Unemployment is directly caused by our govt. And our current unemployment is caused directly by the Democrats. From Clintons villianous actions of signing NAFTA to the Dem congress crashing the economy in 1997.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dd20 &#8211; I was thinking the exact same thing.  What does the Rev think?</p>
<p>Why do you blame capitalism on  unemployment? Unemployment is directly caused by our govt. And our current unemployment is caused directly by the Democrats. From Clintons villianous actions of signing NAFTA to the Dem congress crashing the economy in 1997.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9844</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9844</guid>
		<description>Bush/Cheney were (and still are) a humiliating embarassment to the American people as their very low approval numbers at the end demonstrated. World opinion was even worse. 

Obama&#039;s UN comments put America back on the right track. Torture ended, Gitmo closing, etc.

Bill Maher wants stuff taxed...not prohibited. Prohibition is a conservative gig.

No question, unbridled capitalism is a sin.....worse, with some capitalists it&#039;s an incurable disease.  6 1/2 million unemployed Americans agree.

I wonder why it is that when people like R. Reagan and the Governator increase fees in various sectors so they won&#039;t be called taxers......conservatives, like King, don&#039;t call them taxers. Odd.

Chavez is popular with his people, actually provides benefits for his people....and basically minds his own business. Conservative faith-basers don&#039;t like Hugo because he dared to call Commander Guy out on his crimes. .....oh, and yeah....Chavez won&#039;t allow U.S. profiteers to exploit Venezuela&#039;s resources. What would conservatives do without a boogeyman to point to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush/Cheney were (and still are) a humiliating embarassment to the American people as their very low approval numbers at the end demonstrated. World opinion was even worse. </p>
<p>Obama&#039;s UN comments put America back on the right track. Torture ended, Gitmo closing, etc.</p>
<p>Bill Maher wants stuff taxed&#8230;not prohibited. Prohibition is a conservative gig.</p>
<p>No question, unbridled capitalism is a sin&#8230;..worse, with some capitalists it&#039;s an incurable disease.  6 1/2 million unemployed Americans agree.</p>
<p>I wonder why it is that when people like R. Reagan and the Governator increase fees in various sectors so they won&#039;t be called taxers&#8230;&#8230;conservatives, like King, don&#039;t call them taxers. Odd.</p>
<p>Chavez is popular with his people, actually provides benefits for his people&#8230;.and basically minds his own business. Conservative faith-basers don&#039;t like Hugo because he dared to call Commander Guy out on his crimes. &#8230;..oh, and yeah&#8230;.Chavez won&#039;t allow U.S. profiteers to exploit Venezuela&#039;s resources. What would conservatives do without a boogeyman to point to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd20</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2009/09/25/in-their-own-words/comment-page-1/#comment-9843</link>
		<dc:creator>dd20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=6313#comment-9843</guid>
		<description>King - unrelated topic but maybe in another post you could comment in detail on the differences in protests between the 9/12 and the G-20.  Watching the G-20 protesters clash with police who are forced to shoot rubber bullets and dispense tear gas is pretty much the definition of violent extremists, don’t you think?

While I have been told by our leaders that peaceful Libertarian / right wing demonstrations are racist domestic terrorists and violent riots of rock throwing, window breaking trash can burning left wingers are the displaying highest form of patriotism, I just can&#039;t get my head around that theory based on what I see and hear.

A post on this would be welcomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King &#8211; unrelated topic but maybe in another post you could comment in detail on the differences in protests between the 9/12 and the G-20.  Watching the G-20 protesters clash with police who are forced to shoot rubber bullets and dispense tear gas is pretty much the definition of violent extremists, don’t you think?</p>
<p>While I have been told by our leaders that peaceful Libertarian / right wing demonstrations are racist domestic terrorists and violent riots of rock throwing, window breaking trash can burning left wingers are the displaying highest form of patriotism, I just can&#039;t get my head around that theory based on what I see and hear.</p>
<p>A post on this would be welcomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

