I See White People

http://www.pjtv.com/v/2263

I would like to see just a couple of teeny-tiny changes…..instead of Gates I would have liked to see Gerald Walpin explaining that he had with held evidence and why…..and then the dance of the dead….the 2 women dancers….naked except for a thong and high heels

I would leave the "God Bless Ya"…….that's where I cracked up

Very conservative of you, walter.

when I saw the bathroom scene the first thing that came to my mind was conservative Larry Craig………and certainly conservative David Vitter would have wanted to see the dancers dressed in diapers…..LOL

Speaking of Walpin and withholding evidence:

The White House and CNCS are STILL stonewalling congressional requests and withholding evidence.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/10/stonewalling-on-walpin-gate/

Just thought I'd mention it, since I know how much walter the conservative is against that sort of thing.

Walter the liberal that tries to act like a conservative now and then doesn't come off very much other than what he really is, does he? LOL LOL LOL

the WashingtonTimes editorial is dated July 10 fer crissakes

roybot…..so believing an I.G. should not with hold evidence is only a liberal value? That's crazy

would it be conservative Mark Foley pediphile or would it be conservative pediphile Mark Foley?

Walter, I guess you failed to see that as of July 10, nearly a full month after Congress critters had asked for info from those people they still didn't have it. I wonder how you think that exactly one month after the "firing" of an IG something should have come out of the White House.

I guess when they have long enough they can make up a story and even provide some evidence but seemingly they didn't have that at the time of the firing. Maybe the media needs to work with those who want to see something truthful come out of the White House.

Do you suppose this big deal about health insurance reform may be being used to cover up some other actions? I do.

roybot….this from the Washington Times opinion piece……."Mr. Walpin was fired on June 10 with no explanation and no warning to Congress, even though the act governing inspectors general says IGs can be removed only after the president gives Congress 30 days' notice and a reason for the firing."

already this opinion is garbage

walter, have you dropped that whole "conservative" act yet?

Walter,

If you had even the slightest education, it would be "pedophile", not pediphile. You must have that "natural athletic ability" that generally accompanies smaller brains.

Balk….are you having a bad day?

You don't think republican Mark Foley was a ped0file?

roybot….I e-mailed Grassley's office to see how the answers to his 12 questions on the Walprin firing came out…..no reply yet

walter,
I think you are forgetting what happened in the Walpin case. Originally, he WAS fired for no reason, just as the Washington Times stated. Only later did the White House create some reasons (and "withholding evidence" was one of the very last reasons they threw in, almost as an afterthought, because it's bogus).

And Grassley didn't get a response to his 12 questions from the White House. That was my point. You should be e-mailing the White House to ask why they haven't responded instead of e-mailing Grassley.

King sez….."And Grassley didn't get a response to his 12 questions from the White House."

show me that

King can't show a non-response, walt, because by definition a non-response doesn't exist. You'll have to show a response from the White House to win this one.

King, according to sactown Walprin admitted to with holding evidence and explained his reasons for doing it.

Walprin admitted it

still no reply from Grassely

walter, I already did show you that the White House hasn't responded to Grassley.

This site is awesome, please listen to our music,