Last fall, when I kept hearing that the Obama presidential campaign would accept fraudulent campaign donations, I decided to test it out for myself. I tried to donate $15 to the Obama campaign using my credit card and a phony name. The name I used even signaled my fraudulent intentions. It was 'Campy Aignfraud,' (as in 'Campaign Fraud'). Not only did the Obama campaign accept my donation, but six months later, they haven't returned the money, and 'Campy' still receives e-mails and literature from them. Here's an e-mail I (Campy) received this morning from Obama's activist arm, which is called Organizing For America:
Campy –
It makes you wonder whether they see the same thing we do.
Advocates for the status quo are calling for President Obama to fail while millions of families struggle. They're playing the same old political games and offering the same failed policies at a time of crisis.In the coming days, opponents will do everything they can to destroy the President's proposed budget, a bold plan to help fix our broken economy and healthcare system and finally make energy and education the priority we all know they must be.
Americans…deserve better than the kind of divisive politics we've seen year after year. They deserve a truthful debate about real issues and a budget that will turn this economy around so that they can turn their lives around.
The e-mail went on to ask for a donation of $25 or more.
I'd like to say this in response to Obama's e-mail – No, I DON'T see things the same way you do, Mr. President, and I object to you "playing the same old political games" even as you complain about others doing the same. Just because I disagree with your enormous unfunded spending plans that will skyrocket the deficits and debt, it doesn't make me an "advocate for the status quo." In fact, those calling for fiscal responsibility from their government are the real advocates for change, not you, Mr. Obama. I also think it's pretty pathetic that you keep lumping everyone who disagrees with you in with radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh, by saying your critics are "calling for President Obama to fail while millions of families struggle." If that isn't "playing political games," I don't know what is.
First, Obama said that if his enormous and unprecedented stimulus package didn't pass, it would be "catastrophic" for America, that we'd plunge into another Great Depression. Then, Obama said the same thing about his bloated, pork-filled Omnibus spending bill, the largest in history. Now, he's playing the exact same tune about his budget, the largest budget in the history of the country, about $500 billion larger than any other budget. Obama beats the fear drum over and over, and at the same time he has the nerve to talk about ending "divisive politics," and calls for a "truthful debate about real issues." Give me a break already. The government spending our country into third world status and printing trillions of dollars out of thin air IS a real issue. It's the ultimate real issue. It would be nice if our President would engage in a "truthful debate" about it. But he won't. Instead, he demonizes his dissenters. Post-partisan, my butt. Obama's vauge buzzwords and phrases have become very tired. His talk about the "failed policies of the past" about makes me want to throw up. The biggest failed policy of the past I can think of is the endless red ink our government runs up, and Obama is DOUBLING the rate of the red ink. Obama embodies the failed policieis of the past, but this time on steriods.
I did a little checking about where the donations for Obama's Organizing For America group go. It turns out they go directly to the Democratic National Committee. As the Washington Post reports:
The [Organization For America] brought Obama's massive campaign e-mail and address list under the umbrella of the DNC, which is run by Obama's handpicked chairman, Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine…DNC financial filings give little indication of the contours of OFA, since the project's expenditures are not separated from the committee's overall operations.
So, in essence, the Organization For America IS the Democratic National Committee, yet the Obamans make the OFA appear to be an independent grassroots movement. There's your hope and change, folks. It's the same old cynical partisan politics as ever.
And did any of you notice that in his April 12th e-mail to 'Campy', Obama is calling for donations to HELP PASS HIS BUDGET, when that budget has ALREADY PASSED IN BOTH THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE ???? All that's left is for the two chambers of Congress to reconcile the two versions. Obama doesn't need any money to help pass a budget that has already been passed. That's just misdirection on Obama's part, more smoke and mirrors. He's just trying to raise money for the DNC. The budget has nothing to do with it. Obama is being dishonest and playing political games to fool the rubes.
As for Obama's call for "truthful debate about real issues," the Republicans offered an alternative to Obama's budget that would have resulted in $4.8 trillion LESS in spending over the next 10 years. It was voted down in the House along party lines. While Obama was quick to point out a few weeks ago that the Republicans didn't have an alternative budget, did you ever hear him mention it again once the Republicans proposed one ? No, you didn't.
Obama disproves his own rhetoric time after time. Obama didn't want to consider any alternative budget. Obama just wanted to play partisan politics during his endless campaign.
P.S. – Speaking of Obama's budget, it will be interesting to see how Obama's "tax cuts for 95% of all Americans" fares. In the House version, those tax cuts EXPIRE IN 2010. Yes, that's right. They expire NEXT YEAR. They'd be ONE YEAR tax cuts. What a great help to the middle class, a one time $400 tax cut. Suckers. In the Senate version, they expire in 2012. I guarantee you that none of Obama's spending and tax increases will expire.
Wake up, America. You're being played.


{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }
"Campy" I forgot about you experimenting with the Obama campaign. That is funny and it should tell everybody something about how much they check their contributors. Did your credit card company pay the bill? They must have since the Obama campaign/DNC are till after more.
Campy, you just exposed too much of what goes on in political games and you are even included, even if fictitiously.
Rev, must have attended Easter festivities or certainly he would have answered with one of his most scathing comments about you talking about The Man, Tom Kaine, and their party.
Yes, my credit card was charged.
I can't focus on politics right now. I'm too pumped up after watching Lebron and company thrash the Celtics. One more win and the Cavs have the home court advantage throughout the playoffs. Go Cavs !
Let's see, what was the subject ? Oh yeah, Obama's deceitful fundraising attempt for the DNC. Obama shot an airball with that last e-mail he sent me. I wonder how many Obamaheads will fall for it.
Those Obamaheads! Why can't they just see things so clearly…like Rush's Dittoheads. It's all so simple.
I didn't use the term 'Obamahead' by accident. Obamaheads do see things simply. Obama say, Obamahead do. Any criticism of their hero is met with resistance and diversion by the Obamaheads.
fair and BALANCED, cynical and DELUSIONAL is more like it.Your a smart person it's too bad your so filled with hate. Join the real world your little rants aren't going to change anything.The rich and powerful are going to run things, always have always will.
I thought you were a Libertarian….but it looks like you're a Hooverite.
If ever there was a time…..NOW is the time for the federal government to spend money.
MThomas,
"Fair and balanced ?" What do you think this is, Fox News ? It isn't. It's MY opinion.
And ME, "filled with hate ?" Au contraire. I am propelled by love – for my country, for my constitution, for the founding principles, for liberty, and for the truth. It's true I'm cynical, that comes from years of following politics, but I don't hate. I just disagree with many Obama policies and political spin. That's still allowed, isn't it ? Or should we repeal freedom of speech, so you don't have to become so angered by my little rants ? Come to think of it, we don't have to repeal free speech at all. Your participation in my little rants is entirely YOUR choice, it's voluntary. Nobody is forcing you.
Rev,
You lost me on that one. Hoover DID spend money. He erected tariffs and raised taxes too. I am a Libertarian, therefore I don't believe in spending our country into generational poverty to bail out a bunch of politically connected fat cats who screwed up and lost money (with Washington's help). Not to mention the rest of The One's plans to spend us into oblivion and double the debt. No thanks.
You story made me start thinking, you know, what kind of person would fall for that kind of stupidity. Then, I realized. Why do telemarketers have a job? Why do I constantly get offers for credit cards with interest rates so exorbitant I'd have to sell a child to pay my bill?
Because some people really are that foolish. They really will fall for anything. And they are horribly offended when others point out such stupidity. As long as people believe that Obama is going to pull off all the gradiose promises he made while campaigning (some of which he reneged on in his stinkin' acceptance speech), Campy will be getting those e-mails. There are some fools out there who can't afford to feed their kids a decent dinner who will send $20 for that ridiculousness.
Let's face it. You are like me, you're a hater. I hate being deceived and ripped off by people who are much better off financially than myself. I hate being lied to, and I really hate open discussion of what our country should do to be silenced by people who are afraid that open discussion might lead me to disagreeing with them. I am such a hater, lol. I hate people who don't want me to think for myself.
It was okay to criticize Bush, and in many cases, he deserved criticism. And it's ok to criticize Obama, too. It's ok to have a different viewpoint than someone else. It's actually guaranteed by the First Ammendment. I'm no constitutional scholar, but "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and TO PEITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES," seems pretty clear that we're allowed to disagree with our government.
Tory,
You're clearly a radical wingnut to believe in all those Constitutional principles. How dare you have an opinion that is contrary to Lord Obama. I guess you must be a mindless disciple of Faux News.
That's pretty much how the Obamaheads see it. They don't realize that it's actually people like yourself who are the independent thinkers. They only think in two-way black-white terms: Either you're 1) for Bush and therefore a mindless dittohead, or 2) for Obama. There is no in-between. Their minds are too narrow to comprehend anything else. You either have to believe 1) Everything is Bush's fault, or 2) Everything is Bush's fault. The historic Obama is president now, and you BETTER agree with him, or else.
Somehow, I have a problem with that, crazy as it seems.
King,
I bet I can sum up your domestic policy in two sentence. Cut taxes. Reduce government. Sounds like the failed policies of one Republican party. Yes, I agree that the federal bailout of banks is way too large, but the problem is not the supply side of the supply and demand equation. The problem is the demand side. Someone or something has to start buying things so that companies quit laying off employees so the employees start buying things. If you don't get money flowing people will not be able to buy anything because there will be no marketplace.
The reason that the New Deal took so long to work was that Roosevelt was too fiscally conservative. He tried to raise taxes too soon and caused the fire under the economy to be lowered. I hope Obama learned from this history lesson and does not do the same things.
Did you ever notice right wingers preach hate pretty evenly across the board,whereas left wingers usually just hate right wingers?