Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Mitt Romney At CPAC

by Da King on March 2, 2009

in Uncategorized

Mitt Romney was my first choice for president in last year's elections. Alas, it was not to be. Romney's message was basically ignored by the media, which attempted (successfully) to marginalize him by focusing on the odder tenets of Mormonism. Funny how the odder tenets of Obama's church didn't marginalize him. Oh, I forgot, Obama wasn't in church on any of the occasions that Rev. Jeremiah Wright went on his racist, anti-american tirades.

In any case, Romney recently appeared at CPAC, the conservative conference. With the Republican party is such disarray, I think his speech is worth reading. Here are a few excerpts:

"The President has already moved to stop our economy’s downward spiral. Parts of the stimulus will, in fact, do some good. But too much of the bill was short-sighted and wasteful. Every single Republican in Congress voted in favor of a better stimulus plan, one that focused on creating jobs immediately. But Congressional Democrats couldn’t restrain themselves from larding up their bill with tens of billions of dollars for their political friends. Republicans wanted to stimulate the economy, Democrats wanted to stimulate the government. Conservatives in the House and Senate stood their ground and voted no—and they were absolutely right."

"So far, the Administration has been unclear on what it will do to address the huge decline in the pool of risk and investment capital. These losses will be felt in businesses that don’t start-up and grow, and in jobs that don’t get created. To grow the pool of investment capital, the last thing you’d do is to raise taxes on investment, as the President has proposed. The surest, most obvious course is to rule out higher taxes on investment. I would propose going one step further. For all middle-class Americans, we ought to abolish the tax on interest, dividends and capital gains."

"For years, Washington politicians did nothing to prevent the abuses at Fannie and Freddie, and in some cases they encouraged those abuses for political gain. Let’s be clear on this point: conservatives favor clear, streamlined and up-to-date regulations and laws that let the economy work, but we will vigorously oppose those politicians who are poised to use their own failures as an excuse to undermine the free enterprise system."

“President Obama was awfully vague about some of his plans, but I think I heard him say that government is responsible for educating a child from birth—from birth—to its first job. Universal pre-school and universal college. And there were hints as well of universal healthcare and a universal service corps. It all sounds very appealing, until you realize that these plans mean universal government. That model has never worked anywhere in the world. America is great because our society is free and the power of government is limited by the Constitution.
For the last several years, we’ve heard liberals moaning about the 700 billion dollars that have been spent over six years to win freedom in Iraq. They have now spent more than that in 30 days. And with a government almost 12 trillion dollars in debt, any unnecessary spending puts at risk the creditworthiness of the United States. If the world loses confidence in our currency, that could cause a run on the dollar, or hyperinflation that would wipe out savings and devastate the Middle Class. President Obama says he hopes to cut the deficit in half after four years—does that mean a deficit in 2012 of 600 billion dollars? No president should accept such a staggering deficit, much less hold it up as a national goal. This is the time to pare back government spending. It is not the time to fulfill every liberal dream and spend America into catastrophe…
America voted for change. America did not vote for a boat-load of new government spending programs that would guarantee higher taxes and high deficits as far as the eye can see and that would threaten our currency, our economy, and our future. We must be the alternative course. We can’t be that if all we say is no.”

"Congressional Democrats are gearing up to take over the health care system. We need to advance a conservative plan – one based on free choice, personal responsibility, and private medicine; one that doesn’t add massive new federal spending. I like what I proposed in Massachusetts when I was governor. And even though the final bill and its implementation aren’t exactly the way I wanted, the plan is a good model. Today, almost every Massachusetts citizen who had been uninsured now has private, free-market coverage, and we didn’t have to raise taxes or borrow money to make it happen. We may find even better ideas in other states. But let’s make certain that conservative principles are front and center. A big-government takeover of health care is the next thing liberals are going to try, and it’s the last thing America needs."

"We and the President agree that America must act to become energy independent. But his cap-and-trade proposal is exactly the wrong way to go about it. It would tax American citizens and employers and send businesses and jobs to high polluting and high emitting nations like China. Any carbon plan has to be worldwide in scope: they don’t call it America-warming, they call it global-warming."

Mr. Romney, please hang around for four more years.

  • da truth

    It will forever puzzle me how the R's picked McCain over this guy………but, I will say, based on the current climate with R's, there is no way he gets picked in 4 years. It's JINDAL/PALIN or LIMBAUGH/ANYBODY!

  • The Reverend

    Color me unimpressed.

    Here's what Romney says….

    "Every single Republican in Congress voted in favor of a better stimulus plan, one that focused on creating jobs immediately."

    That would be the 100% tax cut plan. That is simply part of the old failed policies of the past. The Bush tax cuts failed to create jobs in 8 years, let alone, "immediately". More of the same.

    "But Congressional Democrats couldn’t restrain themselves from larding up their bill with tens of billions of dollars for their political friends. Republicans wanted to stimulate the economy, Democrats wanted to stimulate the government."

    Empty and hollow rhetoric and a bit dishonest as well. Sounds just like Boehner and Cantor.

    "To grow the pool of investment capital, the last thing you’d do is to raise taxes on investment, as the President has proposed. The surest, most obvious course is to rule out higher taxes on investment. I would propose going one step further. For all middle-class Americans, we ought to abolish the tax on interest, dividends and capital gains."

    Clinton raised taxes…. investment capital was everywhere in the 90's. This is more of the same Bush model of cutting taxes for the rich.

    "conservatives favor clear, streamlined and up-to-date regulations and laws that let the economy work, but we will vigorously oppose those politicians who are poised to use their own failures as an excuse to undermine the free enterprise system."

    Any regulation, to Romney, would undermine the free market. Deregulation, particularly of investment banks, led directly to our current depression.

    "Congressional Democrats are gearing up to take over the health care system. We need to advance a conservative plan – one based on free choice, personal responsibility, and private medicine; one that doesn’t add massive new federal spending."

    Totally ridiculous. Free choice has nothing to do with the health care problem. Health care is unaffordable because free market health care isn't working. Obama will drive down health insurance costs.

    Finally, this…

    "This is the time to pare back government spending."

    Romney offers more of the same. Under the previous administration the national debt more than doubled, the effects of deregulation collapsed the economy…..but according to Romney, now is the time when government should quit spending. Totally ridiculous.

    Romney is a nice man. Romney is a tall handsome guy. But he has no new ideas. He wants to take us backward not forward. The Republicans MUST come up with new ideas. The old ones are rotting in their tombs.

  • Andrea

    I find it rather off that Romney is suggesting he is against universal health care and government involvement when he signed into law a plan in his own state that mandates that every Ma. resident must obtain health insurance or face a fine and was for a UNIVERSAL plan very much resembling Obama's plan. While he saying he didn't raise taxes well he raised fees. Fees that effected everyone. SO in a way he cost everyone in his state more money. It all came out of the residents pocketbook.

    While the republicans cry about the stimulus package we know they really didn't want to be involved. They wanted it to be past so they had a few of their own sacrificial lambs vote for ..then they moan against it … it is all Politics. A game they been playing. If they are really so much against it, heck refuse to take any of the funds! No they are glad to get the money to fix roads etc.

  • averagejoe5

    Rev Clinton raised cap gains taxes and then cut them.

  • Tbomb

    Republicans prefer malleable candidates.Romney is phony enough but probably too smart to be their guy.

  • rayy

    Romney belongs to a cult, that excluded black people entirely until about 1980. It was founded by a huckster who was exploiting several fads and manias in the early 1800's in New York state.

    Obama's minister was nuts, not his whole religion–just the one guy.

  • averagejoe5

    rayy – Obama went to school and studied and belongs to a religion that blew up the twin towers in NYC. (remember the Stephanopolis slip). Your point?

  • roysoldboy

    Reverend Red, can you point out two more used talking points than the ones you and others of your class continually use? I challenge you to point out one of your posts that doesn't include the old favorite of Dems, failed policies. I don't remember it, but maybe you do.

    Also, rev you used cutting taxes for the rich so often that I wonder what party you really belong to. It seems, the way Obama is having so much getting a government appointed, that Dems don't mind raising taxes because they don't pay them, anyway.

    Well, now, Dems don't do a lot about taxes like cap and trade since they don't understand that producers will just raise their prices so the rest of us can pay their share of that one. Really it is hard to understand how you people can't understand the truth about that one.

  • The Reverend

    Well roy….I know that you've already capitulated to the Monied Interests Who Run Our Country.

    For you, taxes can never be raised on the rich and powerful, only cut….because those same powerful and rich people will simply hold us all hostage to their higher pricing.

    It's blackmail…and you're willing to pay the ransom

    Not me.

  • Da King

    Rev,
    You act like the government owns us all, as if the money we earn belongs to the government, and the government is being "nice" when they allow us to keep some of "their" money (that we worked for). What can you be thinking ? It's as if you WANT to be a slave, begging for scraps from the all-powerful government table.

    Obama is going to blast business with one tax after another, spend us into oblivion, and you think it's perfectly fine, that it won't have any effect on wages, jobs, the middle class, or anyone other than your enemy "the rich." That's simply willful ignorance. The economic pie is only so big. Obama's policies will give government a much larger slice of it, with all levels of government taking nearly half the pie, unprecedented in American history. In addition, Obama's policies will shrink the pie by penalizing producers and investment. How can you possibly think that will make us wealthier ? It doesn't compute. Obama is an economic dunce.

  • Da King

    Andrea,
    Explain to me how you can implement universal health care without it costing money. Maybe you believe in Obama's magic wand, but I don't. There's no such thing as free health care, unless you think doctors, nurses, and other hospital personnel are all going to work for nothing. I'm doubtful.

    The point is, Romney accomplished universal health care in his state when he was governor, without the government taking over, and without massive tax increases on the public. I really have no idea what you can possibly be complaining about, since I assume you are FOR universal health coverage.

  • rayy

    "remember the Stephanopolis slip"?

    I don't think Baptists blew up the twin towers, but I guess it is possible.

  • rayy

    Sorry, United Church of Christ.

  • averagejoe5

    My point exactly rayy. Read your post. Does what others did in someones faith make them an example of the rest of their faith? Was Romney a black hater? Maybe I should have used Obama's church as an example and how racism and hatred for white people was preached weekly. He went to a muslem school when he was a kid. Either way doesn't it sound ridiculous?

  • rayy

    Well, Obama denounced Wright's remarks. Romney has done nothing to indicate that he questions any of his religion's crazier beliefs, to which he is entitled, as an American, but which I think would be inappropriate for a President (you may disagree).

    I think people should educate themselves in what Mormons believe before they give support to such a person.

    The school Obama attended as a kid was a secular school, and he probably did not have a lot of choice in the matter anyway.

    I don't think Wright was preaching "hatred for white people" anyway, just that there is injustice, that we should fight it when and where we can, and the fact that our government doesn't always do the right thing.

  • averagejoe5

    Believe what you want rayy. I suppose the words about blaming white people for creating AIDS is okay? If you want I can't send the Youtube videos to you.

    The mormons of yesterday are different than today. Their are different factions of them just like other religions. He can be any religion he wants as long as he keeps the 2 separated.

  • Da King

    Any religion can be scrutinized and be found to have crazy beliefs. When I was in Catholic school in my youth, they told us that all non-Catholics were going to hell. I consider that to be a crazy belief. I don't see how going to that Catholic school long ago would make me unfit for public office today.

    What's important is the beliefs of the man himself. Here's what Romney said about religion when he was on the campaign trail in 2008:

    "If I am fortunate to become your president, I will serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause and no one interest. A president must serve only the common cause of the people of the United States."

    "Let me assure you that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions….Their authority is theirs, within the province of church affairs, and it ends where the affairs of the nation begin."

    "Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree."

    And Mitt Romney only has ONE wife, to whom he's been married for 40 years. No Big Love for Mitt. There's no reason to deny him anything because of his religion, which is Christian, after all.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).