Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Balancing The Federal Budget Today

by Da King on February 27, 2009

in balanced budget,bureaucracy,congress,economics,federal spending,taxes,Uncategorized

Every American presidential administration comes up with a plan to balance the federal budget. The plan is almost always the same. It is a long range plan that will take many years to accomplish, usually ending after the administration proposing it is out of office. Then, when the balanced budget plan fails, the administration can say "hey, we had a plan in place," but the new administration (usually of the opposite party) ruined it."

I've been listening to this song and dance for decades, and only one administration ever achieved a balanced budget, Bill Clinton's. It took him six years to accomplish it, and even Clinton left a huge net federal debt, in the neighborhood of $1.5 trillion.

Thus, I think it's fair to say our leaders are nothing but a bunch of irresponsible, phoney-baloney, lying blowhards. The verdict of the last 75 years is in.

Now, Barack Obama has announced his 4-year plan, not to balance the budget, but to reduce it to ONLY $533 trillion. Obama's budget for this year projects a deficit of $1.75 trillion, with federal spending soaring to $4 trillion in 2010, increasing government spending as much in two years as Bush did in 8 years. Some change. Then Obama acts like he's concerned with fiscal responsibility. I can't listen to this nonsense any longer. Enough is enough. Running these endless deficits already has us blowing nearly $500 billion annually on debt interest that benefits nobody (except maybe China). We are following our so-called leaders into the seventh circle of economic hell.

So here's one plan (not necessarily the best plan) to balance the federal budget RIGHT NOW. I wouldn't be proposing some of these steps unless the situation was dire, but it IS dire:

1. Repeal Obama's stimulus package. It's a combination of tiny tax cuts that won't make much difference in people's lives, coupled with tons of unneeded spending. Savings – $787 billion.

2. Stop Obama's foreclosure and toxic asset bailout. We've given the banks enough already, and I'm sick of rewarding corporations and individuals for their bad behavior. Let's start rewarding responsibility instead, as it should be. Savings – $275 billion.

3. Eliminate the federal Department of Education. Washington D.C. doesn't teach kids, your local teachers do. The Department of Education is little more than a bunch of bureaucrats. The test scores of America's children have DECLINED since the Department of Education was created by the Carter administration. Savings – $63 billion

4. Cut Department of Defense spending by 10%. Savings – $54 billion
Note – this does not affect funding for the wars, which is a separate appropriation. We should save another $150 billion or so as the Iraq war draws down.

5. Reverse Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. This is not the end-all-be-all panacea it is painted to be by the left-wing spinmeisters. According to the Tax and Policy Center, reversing the Bush tax cuts for those making over $250,000, as Obama proposes, would generate an additional $350 billion in revenue over 10 years. Nevertheless, every little bit helps. Extra yearly revenue generated – $35 billion

6. Freeze the Omnibus spending bill for march through september at the level of last year's bill. Savings – $32 billion

Let me get out the calculator and see how much I've saved so far. 787+275+63+54+35+32 = $1.246 trillion. We're getting there, but we have a little ways to go. What else can we do ?

7. Raise the Social Security payroll tax ceiling to $190,000. I know this is immoral, and I'd only do it as a stopgap measure until I fixed the Social Security Ponzi scheme, but it will bring in some revenue and push back the day of SS reckoning (sorta). Yearly revenue generated – $ 58 billion

8. Eliminate home mortgage interest tax deduction. Also painful, but everyone has some "skin in this game," as Obama says. This also primarily affects higher level income persons. Extra revenue generated – $75 billion

9. End agricultural price supports. Savings – $20 billion

10. Cut Obama's proposed budget from $3.5 trillion to $3.4 trillion, a 2% cut. Savings – $100 billion

I think that just about gets us to a balanced budget, and if we add in the savings from ending the Iraq war, we are in budgetary surplus. Everybody will hate some of this, and I hate a lot of it, but anything is better than spending ourselves into oblivion. It took me about an hour of research to come up with this. I'm sure I could develop a far better plan if I had more time and energy to devote to it. I'm sure I could get us to a major budgetary surplus and start paying down that enormous debt if it was my full time job. So, why can't Congress and the President do this ? After all, it IS their full time job. They are not serving the interests of the American people in any way. Why do we let them get away with it ???? I'll never understand. All Republicans can talk about is tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts, and all Democrats can talk about is spend, spend, spend. A pox on both their houses. I'm all in favor of lower taxes and limited government, there's no doubt about that. That's a founding principle of liberty that should never be forsaken. But I'm even more in favor of not seeing my country go down the tubes, so lets jump off this partisan ship of fools to save our country. Time is running out. Balancing the budget is not some unattainable dream that might or might not happen 10 years from now. It's something that can be accomplished almost immediately. All it takes is the political will to do it, and therein lies the problem.

  • jimmy james

    Obama is actually telling the truth by putting the cost of the wars in the budget.

  • Da King

    Agreed. Good move by the prez.

  • Tory Bug

    It all sounds very good. As the parent of two private school students, I can say that the Department of Education's standards and failures are what led me to pay $5,000 a year to educate my daughters. I don't trust schools. Eliminating home mortgage interest deductions would really hurt us in that respect. How do you think we pay their tuition? Oh well, there's always homeschool.

    jimmyjames raised a point I'd never though of before. Was the cost of our ongoing wars not included in the federal budget under Bush? I know that there were many bills to fund the war, but he never set aside money for it in the budget? I'm sorry, I just made the assumption that the money was set aside in the budget, and Congress and the president were deciding how to spend that money. If that's the case, I'll have to say that Obama is actually being more honest with American citizens on that point.

  • The Reverend

    Tory….that most definitely is the case. Bush's wars were paid for entirely by what is known as supplementals. Hocus-pocus is really what it was. The reason he did it….is ironically reflected in your comment….you didn't know he did it, assuming the Bush budget was as it seemed. That was the intended purpose. To fool Americans into thinking he wasn't ballooning the budget….and deficit. And to some degree….this sleight of hand, or deceit, worked.

    King….while I can't agree with all the cuts you suggest….I do agree with the spirit of your post.

    If Obama's words mean anything, he kind of agrees with cutting budgetary items, just like you do. The arguments, obviously, are over which cuts to make.

  • Da King

    Yeah, eliminating the home mortgage interest deduction was a tough one for me to put on that list. I almost left it off. I think almost everyone will object to something I put there. I could come up with something better if I had the ability to dig through the budget and eliminate more pork and waste.

    You know where Obama has his kids going to school, right ? Not public school. They go to the exclusive private school Sidwell Friends, where Chelsea Clinton went.

    No, the cost of the wars wasn't included in the general budget. Bush kept it separate, and the appropriations process was separate too. Obama said in his speech the other day that he was going to put those costs back in the general budget, where they should be.

  • roysoldboy

    As you know I don't see public schools as the real problem. What the hey, my morning paper showed the pictures of the three highest scoring students in that county in the SAT and ACT tests this year, today. Three nice looking young men who scored in order, 36, 35 and 35 on the ACT and 2160, 2140, and 2020.
    Now I don't think that is too bad for public school educated boys, at all. I wonder if the courts, parents and others in the city had anything to do with what they did.

    I say that it is the courts that have allowed so many fool things the past 30 years that are to blame. I am against the Department of Education and also against the way the courts have taken control of the schools out of the hands of teachers and administrators forcing private schools to take on more kids than they can reasonably handle without turning down many. It is our society that I see to blame for so much of the weakening of what we do in education. Parents could help a bit, as mine did. My dad said get a paddling in school and get a worse one at home. How many do that today? How about zero since paddling is outlawed by the courts and the society. It really makes me unhappy to see people blaming public schools for everything when it is society that is to blame.

  • roysoldboy

    Now back to the topic of the blog entry. I have to agree with what you attempted, King. It could be done if we didn't allow politicians to try to do it. Professional politicians just can't ever accomplish what you suggest because they are more interested in getting re-elected than anything else and the people they serve keep on re-electing them so who is to blame. I say, once again, it is society, the people who keep returning those people to places of authority so they can do their tricks to fool us.

  • The Reverend

    I don't understand what roy is saying about courts having taken over public schools. How?

    The only problem with today's educational system is, oddly enough, that we've become so prosperous, mainly because of technological advance ments,…. and kids have way more distractions to involve themselves in.

    The both-parents-working thing also contributes to the problem.

    Paddling, contrary to roy's longings, however, is still…..child abuse.

    All in all….the kids are alright.

  • http://ohio.com Big Mac

    My personal thought is to remove the standardized testing and let quality teachers teach the subject not teach to the test.

  • The Reverend

    Word.

  • frank

    Mr. King,
    A worthy list. Let me add a few things. First, reinstate the Securities Transaction Excise Tax that was eliminated in 1966. A .5% tax on transactions would yield about $350 billion and tamp down the speculative nature of finance in favor of long term investment. Eliminate all income tax deductions over 20 years at a 5% decreasing rate per year. Reject "free trade" in favor of a system of tariffs based on production cost differences attributable to practices in other countries which are illegal in this country. Reduce our military footprint around the world by drastically reducing the number of overseas military bases. Stop equipping other countries with our latest weapons.
    Most of all, to balance the budget and bring some sense of sanity, we have to rid ourselves of the notion of American exceptionalism. We have acted for a long time as if the rules that the rest of the world operates under, do not apply to us. We are witnessing the economic manifestation of this hubris.

  • Da King

    frank,
    We have something like 500,000 soldiers in 450 military bases around the world. I couldn't quantify that into a dollar figure, so I just suggested a 10% defense budget cut instead. I agree with you in spirit. We have 57,000 soldiers in Germany still. Why ? I don't think we should be providing free military support for Europe at the American taxpayer's expense.

    How about we get rid of the entire 66,000 page tax code, and just implement the Fair Tax instead ?

  • Tbomb

    For what it's worth the folks at capitalgainesandgames.com have a good piece about the deficit. Using previous administration budget calculations, Obama's budget would actually project a 1.3 tril. def…..still a lot of jack but it's good to at least be honest.

  • Angry conserv

    King,
    You can forget politican as a future career choice. None of your choices benefit certain groups or promise that their will be no negative effects on anyone other than the rich.
    Here is the formula for being successful
    1. identify the problem
    2. identify the bad guy
    3. demonize the bad guy
    4.promise to undue what the bad guy did
    5.promise the public that they will not be negatively affected by your actions
    6.annouce that your actions are in the process of solving the problem
    7.congratulate your colleagues that were so instrumental in helping you set the corrective actions in motion

  • Da King

    I'd add:

    8. Be prepared to blame someone else when the solution fails.

  • Da King

    Tbomb,
    If Obama's deficit projection is lower, then I'm really proud of myself. My plan started paying down the debt immediately. Kudos to me. Too bad I'm not president.

  • The Reverend

    The Fair Tax is…umm…unfair. That's why it will never catch on.

  • Da King

    Thanks for the cutting analysis of the Fair Tax, Rev.

    I don't suppose you'd like to share exactly what is unfair about it ?

  • averagejoe5

    King – it is unfair because it doesn't penalize rich people for working hard to get ahead.

  • Tbomb

    While we're on the subject of economics,am I wrong in understanding that AIG as an international firm, should be receiving bailout $ from entities other than US taxpayers?

  • Da King

    AIG is in 130 countries. Maybe Obama could pass the hat.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).