Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Obama Rewards Organized Labor

by Da King on January 30, 2009

in Uncategorized

king obama

Our post-partisan president, Barack Obama, has continued to reward Democratic constituencies (as he did in his stimulus bill), this time by reversing executive orders issued by ex-president Bush that organized labor didn't like.

Yes, elections do have consequences, even if promises of post-partisanship do not. Despite Obama's dog and pony show meeting with the GOP to discuss the stimulus package, which resulted in Obama dismissing GOP concerns by saying "I won," the GOP had zero input into the stimulus package. It was written wholly by Democrats for Democrats, and that package was discussed for only one hour on the floor of the House before it was voted upon. Every Republican voted against it. Democrats and their pet media then accused the Republicans of playing politics because Republicans were against the largest spending bill in American history, which Republicans had nothing to do with. If this is post-partisanship, then Karl Marx was a capitalist. This is a pretense of post-partisanship, with a reality of uber-partisanship.

Now it's organized labor's turn to feast at the "post-partisan" buffet. Obama will reverse four executive orders. Here's one of them:

Among the Bush-era executive orders that Obama was to reverse was one that allowed unionized companies to post signs informing workers that they are allowed to decertify their union.

Say what ? Now companies are NOT ALLOWED to post signs telling workers they can de-unionize ??? Perhaps our new president hasn't heard about that whole "freedom of speech" concept we used to be so fond of in this country. Quick, somebody send him a copy of the Bill Of Rights. Call the ACLU (on second thought, DON'T call the ACLU. They only come in handy to suppress God.)

After this ruling, it will only be a matter of time until the Orwellian-named Employee Free Choice Act is implemented to remove the sacred secret ballot from union voting, opening the door to intimidating workers into unionization. Ah, can't you just smell the freedom ! 'Grab a bat, Cletus, thar's a non-unioner agitatin' over yonder !'

Here's another executive order Obama is to reverse:

A third Obama order would require federal vendors with more than $100,000 in contracts to post workers' rights under the National Labor Relations Act.

I see. And do those "worker's rights" include telling them they have the right to unionize ? Of course they do. So, on the one hand, Obama is BANNING the posting of information telling workers they can de-unionize, and on the other hand, he is FORCING the posting of information telling workers they can unionize. Whee-doggies ! What could be more fair than that ! Other than Soviet Russia, I mean.

Welcome to Obamaland, formerly known as the United States Of America.

Here's one piece of slightly HOPE-ful news. It seems the more the public finds out about Obama's Generational Theft Act (stimulus package), the less they like it (Knowledge IS power). A new Rasmussen poll has 42% approving of the package, and 39% disapproving. Those approval numbers are down from a week ago. Pay attention, America, and you'll be surprised at what you find.

  • da truth
  • The Reverend

    Two incorrect parts in your post.

    First….

    "which resulted in Obama dismissing GOP concerns by saying "I won," the GOP had zero input into the stimulus package."

    Obama had two portions of the bill jerked to calm the GOP'ers tender nerves. The National Mall rework and the family planning portion of the package.

    Second….

    "it will only be a matter of time until the Orwellian-named Employee Free Choice Act is implemented to remove the sacred secret ballot from union voting, "

    The EFCA, as I'm sure you know, doesn't remove the secret ballot option…it's still there. The change is the addition of card-check as another option. Say what you will about whatever impact card check will have…..the one thing it DOESN'T do is remove the secret ballot option.

    Finally, what is it that you have against workers, anyway? Don't you want workers to benefit from their work?

  • angry conserv

    Rev,
    I admit I am ignorant of the EFCA and the secret ballot option still being there. Please explain the details and clear up my misunderstanding of the proposal.

  • averagejoe5

    At least Obama recognized that those were BS programs and a waste of money.

  • larry d.

    Boondoggle!

  • The Truth

    With all due respect, reverend, the card-check option indirectly, yet quite effectively, removes the secret ballot option. When a couple of union goons can hand a card to a person and say, "you're going to sign the card, right? Right?," there is a very strong element of coercion in play. And the unions KNOW it. The fact is, their signature is or isn't on the card so, the union knows who voted and who didn't vote to organize. EFCA is not secret at all.

    Here's a fact: statistics show that the vote to unionize is far less likely to pass in a secret ballot. Why is that? No pressure to speak your mind and say, union memebership has no value to me or my co-workers.

    It does not matter in the end. Markets, and especially global markets, will decide if the card check is good for labor. The fact of the matter is that unions do not promote market values for labor. as they should. In fact, they price labor OUT of the market. Just ask the auto workers. It's inevitable.

    So, what's a hard core union memeber to do insuch a situation? Coerce and organize in a desperate attempt to save what has become obsolete … organized labor.

    I have nothing against workers. I do have something against workers that want something for nothing and workers that are constantly looking for more money and less work. I have personally seen non-union work forces work harder and compensated as much as union work forces. Now, of course this depends on the company taking care of their work force and there are plenty that don't. Those companies that don't treat their labor fairly, with or without a union, will also become extinct just like the unions.

    When the out flow of jobs surges after the EFCA passes because companies will refuse to pay inflated, non-market driven rates for labor, it will be too late for industry in the US.

    God help us if and when the EFCA passes.

  • roysoldboy

    da truth I used to think you were at least honest. Left handed but not dishonest. This bit of news you threw out Think Progress and from there to Media Matters told me something I didn't want to know. Any fool who accepts Think Progress as anything other than a far left pile of Pelosi doesn't seem very truthful to me. Also, we all know what the purpose of Media Matters is and that is just something that I don't like to see George Soros paying for.

  • Da King

    Rev asks, "Finally, what is it that you have against workers, anyway? Don't you want workers to benefit from their work?"

    Even though my post had absolutely nothing to do with being for or against workers, I'll try to answer you anyway.

    First, your question implies that you believe "union" = "workers". That's your first problem.

    Second, I'm totally for workers benefitting from their work. That's why I'm for low taxes (I'd abolish the personal AND corporate income tax if I could), and I'm also against the Ponzi-scheme nature of Social Security, which robs workers of their paychecks (though SS could be a decent program if it was run in a non-Ponzi fashion). I'd argue that it's actually you who is against workers benefitting, because you support ever larger and larger government, which forcibly takes an ever larger portion of the fruits of their own labor from workers and their employers. I'm against workers having to work half the year to payoff the huge government tax burdens that you favor. Lower taxes would also allow employers to create more jobs, so you are anti-worker on that score too.

    I have nothing against unions, but I am for freedom and fairness (which you and Obama apparently aren't), which is the real subject of my post.

    The government cannot micromanage the economy. It can only impose counterproductive dictatorial measures (socialist policies, which are historically proven failures), or allow liberty to the greatest degree possible. I'm for liberty. Why aren't you ?

  • Da King

    da truth,
    Are you kidding, or what ? Surely you can't be serious.

    Here are a few things ThinkProgress left out of it's headcount:

    It omitted all members of the Obama administration from it's so-called "statistical evidence," including Obama himself, who is a constant presence on television.

    It omitted the CONTENT of the media interviews. For example, when Rachel Maddow has a Republican Congressperson on and asks 'why are you so unamerican as to vote against Obama's stimulus package ?', ThinkProgress is calling that evidence of conservative media bias. Laughable.

    It conveniently only took THREE DAYS into account, when the story the media was reporting was – 'why did the GOP unanimously reject the popular Obama stimulus package ?' The actual intent of the media was to discredit the GOP.

  • averagejoe5

    Just off subject King. Do the Dems only pay their taxes if they know they are going to be picked for a staff position? How can we trust guys like Dashel and Geitner with our tax dollars when they won't pay their own taxes? This is pathetic. No wonder Obama appointed a Rep yesterday.

  • The Reverend

    average..contrary to The Truth, EFCA allows for card check signup until there's a majority and then there's a vote.

    The Truth is clearly anti-American worker and anti-American middle class. He's lost in his race to the bottom to find the cheapest starving civilizations to do the monkey work, leaving a handful of paper pushers back home deceptively marketing consumers and counting the beans.

    Unions created the backbone of America from the bottom up, not the top down. Slowly but surely, starting with Ronald McDonald, passing through Clinton's NAFTA, and on through the total maniac that just left……working Americans have been shafted. Part of that has to do with the reduction of union workers from 38% in the 1970's to 9% now.

    Anyone whining about the threat of unions in this environment has not one credible leg to support his argument.

  • Da King

    Rev,
    Why do you keep insisting this is about trashing unions ? It isn't. It's about fairness and freedom as opposed to government coercion. All Obama is doing here is to implement unamerican methods to get what one of his constituencies wants. I can't believe you are supporting such methods.

    The secret ballot should stay, card check should go, and both unionized and non-unionized companies should be able to post whatever signs they want. It's called freedom of speech. No government diktats allowed.

    Brownshirts ain't cool.

  • Da King

    Joe,
    Now I know why Democrats don't care about high taxes – they don't pay them.

    But it is funny how they keep "discovering" they haven't paid their taxes right when they want to be confirmed to a higher post. All innocent mistakes, of course.

    And that replacement for Republican Senator Judd Gregg will be picked by the Governor of New Hampshire, a Democrat. This move seems like a political calculation to me, so the Dems can get to that filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate. They only need one more seat. At the same time Obama makes a shrewd move to consolidate power, he can trumpet his "bipartisanship." Even if a deal is struck so Gregg is replaced by a Republican, that Republican seat will be very vulnerable in 2010.

  • roysoldboy

    King, Gregg's seat is very vulnerable in 2010 if he has to run for re-election, but at least by that time a few more people may have opened their eyes to what has been happening on The Hill in DC. Yesterday Brit Hume stated that this appointment is one of the shrewdest political ploys by the Obama administration up to now and I had to agree completely.

    Surely Obama wants this appointment to show more bipartisanship but what deeper motive may well be involved? IT gets better all the time and your Saint Barack of Hopenchange gets deeper in IT all the time.

    I have been making good use of your latest nick name for The One on my forum. Thanks.

  • Da King

    Now they have nominated a moderate Republican to replace Gregg, one who isn't too conservative or ideologicallly Republican.

    What a surprise.

    The way they let themselves be so easily manipulated, I think Republicans are too dumb to be the majority.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).