If thinking that Obama, a relative unkown on the national stage four years ago, is not fit to be POTUS is racist, I sure am one. There are all kinds of black people in this country that I would gladly vote for this year, but Obama just isn't one of them. Why is it racist to vote against a man who one doesn't want or trust. Would it not be racist to vote against McCain using the same reasoning you use? I guess since you want to vote for a black man against a white man you are certainly just as racist as I am. Whoops, I forgot that all racism is white against black and can't go the other way. In your definition maybe, but not mine.

And that bilge about the law already being on the books is laughable on it's face. Obama's original comment was that he thought Born Alive would impinge on Roe v Wade, which is unbelievably wrongheaded thinking.

I fail to see what's "dangerous" about citing the facts.

Oh yeah, I forgot, citing the facts about Obama is racist.

Gimme a break.

You've been reading my blog long enough to know better than to say something like that.

I read a few days ago that more white males are voting for Obama than for any Democratic presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter in 1976. I'm wondering how that squares with your theory of massive racism being a factor in the election, not to mention how Obama could possibly be leading in all the polls if it were true.

Contrary to what you are implying, I would never vote either for or against a presidential candidate because of his race. I wonder how I voted for Ken Blackwell for governor of Ohio in 2004 if I'm such a big racist. I guess I forgot to check his photo first.

It's over, Larry. All the petty crap, all the hate and fear, all the my way or the highway bs your party has spewn for decades now…..it's over. We woke up.

The current incarnation of the Republican party is not what Mr. Goldwater and Mr. Reagan had in mind. I hope, after the slaughter you are about to experience on election day, you people can get back to the principles those two tried to instill in you.

Who cares who the Times endorses? Apparently you do, thus we have to read this drivel from you. I couldn't care less; but the Rs sure seem to be closely watching the endorsements slip away.

As this historic election in our nation's history unfolds, I am reminded of Crispus Attucks. Our country is about to come full circle. President Obama's time in office won't heal the racial divide this country suffers from; but it's a real fine place to start….it's time we learned, this world was made for all men.

Forget the New York Times. That leftwing rag is dying. The day the Times endorsed B. Hussein Obama, the rag got a junk status from S&P rating serive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzJmTCYmo9g

I love it; soon the rag will be gone.

Now to more important issues:

Check out this video. You'll love it, coming as you do from the banking industry. It's a comedy sketch by two English comics on the sub-prime mess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzJmTCYmo9g

Nice, huh?

Surely, you know better.

The Born Alive Infant Protection Act was, as Obama has explained in detail, a gotcha kind of bill set out to be a trap for Democrats. The facts state that laws already existed to protect babies in these situations. I would think that you already knew that…maybe you do. That makes it even worse.

"He has never run so much as a Dunkin' Donuts shop."

For a guy who couldn't run a donut shop….he sure as hell has run a tremendously successful campaign for president.

I will say that I agree with you about the New York Obama Times completely. I wonder why they waited so long to give what they have given for years without the actual comment.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9595

When you are in a war and when you are helping to get the economy back on track with bail outs this isnt the time for tax cuts. Sorry if you were in a country club that was falling apart you have to pay your dues. You won't go and make membership free. The rich have more money so they pay more ..only fair. What do you want the middle class to no longer have homes and to live on the street? Someone has to pay for the war which by the way was Mccains great idea too. So was deregulation another Mccains idea.

Here's some facts for ya, estimated that extending the Bush tax cuts would cost more than $700 billion in the next five years.
And McSame plans to also cut the corporate income tax rate and plans to give everyone 5k for health care whether they make a billion dollars or 10k .
You end the war and that frees up a whole lot of money . You don't give tax cuts to the wealthy and you got more money to spend. Simple math . Obama is much more likely to balance the budget before Mccain.
We have tried the trickle down voodoo economics and they didn't work.

YOU give the big CEOs who many got us into this financial mess another tax cut . They have the money to lose when the country is hurting , maybe its about time they start living like the rest of us.
Mccain current economic plan would create a huge deficit nothing more..