I guess from the looks of what he wants to do he must think that he can spread the wealth out to that equality of condition that he learned so much about back in Hawaii with Frank and in Chicago with Saul. I wonder if he really thinks the wealthy people can be made equal to the poorer people in just 4 years. He may well be the best Spreader the world has known. However, I see him as more of a manure spreader than a wealth spreader.

Biden STILL thinks partitioning Iraq into three countries is the right way to go.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRPbCSSXyp0

"To actually save an America in decline…..it will take a generation long effort of voting for more and better Democrats"

That sounds like a combination of a pre-emptive excuse for Obama and a call for socialism. Not far enough left for ya yet, eh ?

Keep hooked up to that AOL lifeline.

NBC/WSJ poll, fresh last night…..Obama up by 10%

The press doesn't find that covering Biden is very, you know, ratings enhancing. Main media gets better ratings when they present the pretty Sarah Palin as often as possible.

Of course, that's all okay with conservative Republicans, as long as Biden doesn't get away with any "gotcha" moments in the process. That's what Ben and average's complaint is about…..they don't want to see and hear more of Biden….only the gotchas.

They can't afford to let him out. He is the Quayle wannabe of this election, not Palin. He is so lucky he has a sympathetic press. LOL have you heard his latest remarks about the US being challeged if Obama wins?

Sometimes I think he is trying to help out his old friend and comrade, John McCain.

Obama will win this election only on economic issues. The press and his camp know that, that is why the only focus of this election is the economy. If they bring up foreign policy and defense, Obama is doomed.
People may trust him with their cash, but not the lives of them or their families.

Speaking at a rock concert or a photo op in London or growing up in what ever country he decides is convenient at the time he is speaking, does not make a candidate a leader in world politics.

The latest gaffes and mistakes by both Dems have hurt them. Starting with Obama and the Plumber and then the investigation of the plumber by the press. (Are you kidding me? The Dems talk about Nazi tactics? They are "projecting" again. Investigating a regular citizen for asking a question. It was Obama's fault the way he answered, not the plumbers). Then Bidens fear mongering and the way the press tried to cover it up, nice try MSNBC. LOL, even though he is right. (They really are going to test him. Do you trust him? Really?) It's like putting lipstick on a pimple. You just don't need to emphasize certain things. Especially his lack of any kind of emergency high pressure life or death leadership situations, we just went through this.

The AOL poll has gone to crap for Obama/Biden. They didn't recover this week, even though there are almost 150,00 votes. This week there are 0 undecided voters and McCain is up by 12 points.

Plumber Sam came to an Obama event…..where he cornered Obama for the FOX gotcha moment.

Obama didn't come to Plumber Sam's neighborhood.

And another thing…..I mentioned the Blue Dogs because they dilute any tidbit of, you know, liberalness, that just might, by accident, seep out in any legislation. I mentioned them to negate your silly comment about the scary liberal Congress to come.

To actually have a liberal Congress, Democrats would need to replace a good third, if not more, of their current members with, like, liberal Democrats.

To actually save an America in decline…..it will take a generation long effort of voting for more and better Democrats.

Well, I suppose….if that brings comfort to sore and bruised consciences.

No way is it a sure thing. The polls inflate B. Hussien Obama's support.

Watch and see.

And this must be the first time in history that it was somehow considered racist to use a candidate's actual name (Hussein).

And the Blue Dogs are the Dem minority, not the liberals. How can you not know that and still write a political blog ?

If you keep trying to act like the comments of a couple people at a McCain or Palin rally represent the sentiments of the entire GOP, I'll keep calling you a bigot. Does Ward Churchill represent the entire Democratic party ? No, I don't think so. Same thing here.

Just for the record, Obama DID pal around with a terrorist, not that the actual facts mean anything to you. I don't think that is necessarily an indictment of Obama, and I think it's a stupid issue for McCain/Palin to be talking about, but it is true. It's sorta like the Dems always talking about how McCain's campaign manager used to be a lobbyist, or the NY Times doing that hit piece on Cindy McCain. It doesn't mean a thing, but I don't see you condemning that stuff. Why is that ?

I think you should watch FoxNews, because your comments indicate that you don't. FoxNews always presents both the Republican and Democratic viewpoints on issues, unlike your hero Olbermann, who only presents HIS side. I get the feeling that what you really object to is that the Right's viewpoint is presented at all. That's my opinion of what Obama means by "unity" and "post-partisanship" – eliminate the opposition (Fairness Doctrine, Employee Free Choice Act). And you would go along with it. Thanks for showing us your inner fascist, Rev. It's enlightening.

Every tv station except FoxNews is in the tank for Obama. 90% of newspapers are in the tank for Obama. And you offer talk radio as a rebuttal ? Please. You prove my point.

And what on earth is all this nonsense about how the McCain campaign didn't "vet" Joe the plumber ? That doesn't have anything to do with anything. Joe wasn't working on behalf of the McCain campaign. Joe isn't the issue. All he did was ask a question. Obama saying he wants to "spread the wealth around" is the issue. The response to Joe's question offered an insight into Obama's mindset.

It is he and you Dims who don't like to see it used.

How come? Explain — if you can.

Hell, if names were such a good depiction of character Washington would never have been president. (You know because our oppressive leader's name was George, how ironic).

King. Where is that magical gallup poll that shows a 44-42 outcome? All polls I see have Obama ahead above the margin of error. And to say Fox calls it straight down the line is akin to saying that the circa 1970 Moscow Daily News fair and well rounded. I suppose you just did the typical conservative move and said well somebody told me that's how it was (there are WMD's in Iraq) so went with that.

Example: You're racist for using Obama's middle name — Hussein. But note, there is hardly a peep out of these hypocrites when a true bigot like the raving mad, Rev. Wright, who is/was B. Hussein Obama's spiritual advisor for 20-years shouts his anti-White, anti-Jew, anti-America hatred.

Oh no, to the Dims, the racist Wright is just a justifiably angry Negro from Chicago letting off steam.

Kept it up Dim. The more you shout your false accusations of 'racist,' the less effect it has. Your ugly political correctness as a mean of thought control is dying.

BO would have been another sad joke like the others of his ilk — Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.

If he hadn't had this kind of money coming in he would be 30 pts down.

He is still way down in the AOL poll.