Rely on your instincts, King. With the Palin pick, B. Hussien Obama is toast.

As to B. Hussein Obama's lying, what's the surprise? That's what the Lefties do. If they were ever truthful, they would never win elections.

Lying is second nature to Dim, like breathing air. It come natural.

Since the early 1970's, the Dim Party evolved based on lying — and ALWAYS blaming America first.

In this regard, BO is their perfect candidate. The Dims probably recruited him after learning of his 20-year attendence in the Rev. Wright's church of anti-Americanism.

Yes, that's true, Rev.

And they are also in the Democratic party.

Which is why McCain, who has crossed swords with his own party on numerous occasions, picked Palin, who has a proven record of reform and standing up to corruption, even within her own party. Barack Obama, on the other hand, never stood up to anyone within his party, EVER. He votes the straight party line EVERY SINGLE TIME. Only someone blinded by partisanship could avoid seeing this.

The good ole' boy network is in Palin and McCain's party. Or are they running as independents now?

This investigation started before Palin was picked. 10 R's and 4 D's voted unanimously to spend $100K to investigate.

But see…according to your gimmickry, roy…..I'm supposed to believe that both the D's and the R's were out to get her.

There's only so much crap I can walk through.

Sarah Palin is not going to be railroaded by the drive-by media or any of the leftwing twirps that post here and elsewhere.

Sarah's too strong to allow that to happen ….. and so is her consitituency base.

As usual, Rev, you are only considering the evidence that you want to consider, and ignoring the rest. I, on the other hand, am laying out ALL the facts for everyone to see. Sorry you find that embarassing.

Go read Mike Isikoff's material over at Newsweek. He's been up in Alaska for a bit and he has the goods.

This is obviously an example of abuse of power. I don't care that she fired the guy who wouldn't fire the guy she wanted fired…..but to deny that is what happened is embarassing for you guys. I thought better of y'all.

Fannie and Freddy IS a story for another day. Lots of cronyism at work in that whole mess, and, as you said, most of them are Democrats.

Two lawsuits have been filed, one by some Alaskan citizens who say the investigation is illegal, and another by a group of Republicans. In the Republican's suit, they point out the massive conflict of interest that Alaska state Senaotor Hollis French (D) has in this case. The Republican suit sums it up this way:

“Working with Sen. French, and contrary to directions from Governor Palin, Monegan had attempted to include items in the Alaska state budget appropriating funds for various items within the Department of Public Safety that Governor Palin had previously vetoed,” their suit said. “Afterwards, contrary to the instructions of the Governor and contrary to the Governor’s budgetary plan, Monegan attempted to travel to Washington D.C. at state Executive Branch expense, in order to request federal funding through ‘earmarks’ for line items from Alaska’s congressional delegation.”

http://townhall.com/columnists/AmandaCarpenter/2008/09/16/troopergate_investigator_sued?page=2

So, not only is Sen. Hollis French(D) a partisan who promised an october surprise before the Troopergate investigation was complete, he is also alleged to be involved with Moneghan in undermining Palin's authority on budgetary matters. This investigation is beginning to stink like a rotting fish.

In Alaska as in most states the good old boy network pretty well runs the state. It sure works that way iny my home state where we elected a Democrat woman 6 years ago to run a very Republican state. Now this little thing happened much because the Republicans have never nominated anyone of consequence to run against her. Anyway our little fight over a coal fired generator in which SHE is against it and the Republican good old boys are for it we have watched a veritable soap opera of the Legislature (healily Republican controlled) has tried and tried to pass a law overruling her. They just can't manage to override her veto.

Anyway, back to Palin. The poor woman, and there is the key to this whole thing she is a woman, managed to overcome two leaders of the good old boy net. She beat one of them in the primary and then kicked the butt of the incumbent, Murkowski i the general. Now the good old boys are going to get even with that woman for interfering with their game and even kicking some of there people around. The good old boys of both parties are working against her and when they manage to kick her out they will go back to fighting each other.

Partisan? Partisan as hell. Good old boys of both parties working together to get rid of that hateful woman who had the temerity to kick them around and must be punished for getting into a place where mothers just don't go.

It all started before McCain's nomination but at any rate French did say that they would have an October Surprise and it wouldn't be good. As King says, they haven't even really started their investigation and they already know the outcome. Now the Dems, of which French is one of the worst, see a chance to steal an election that Obama has lost because of Palin. They win two ways that way and sure enough will be rewarded for what they are trying to do.

Are there any women in the Alaska Legislature? If so , those that voted in that supposed unanimous vote to investigate should look into what they are doing unless they are jealous, which women manage quite easily.

Tell you what, good old boys, I think that once the drive by media runs out of gas and the real story gets out most voters will be laughing at the Alaska good old boys. Will you then cry about what the voters did to the Obama cause and be grinning at the new Governor of Alaska. I saw that youn man on TV the other night and was impressed with him. At least he doesn't wear a skirt to work and do his hair like Palin does.

McCain said today….Palin will not cooperate.

All anyone needs to know.

I stumbled across the following information this morning, from the Associated Press:

Among the e-mails released was one of farewell written by the public safety commissioner himself, Walt Monegan, when he was fired in July. In it, he suggested the governor had reason to believe she had lost his support, and urged his former colleagues to communicate better with her.

"For anyone to lead effectively they must have the support of their team, and I had waited too long outside her door for her to believe that I supported her," he wrote. "Please, choose a different path."

—

Even Monegan was attributing his dimissal to policy differences at the time, due to Moneghan's non-support of Palin. Big point in Palin's favor.

You're funny, Reverend.

As larry demonstrates, supporters of the McCain-Palin ticket justify Palin's actions because…..the Trooper was no good. Nothing like coming to conclusions before an investigation comes to any.

Kudos to King for at least attempting to address this issue.

However….

Palin tried for over 2 years to have Wooten axed. Moneghan wouldn't do it because there wasn't just cause. Palin fired Moneghan. That's no coincidence. Palin also fired the librarian, allegedly because the librarian was not "loyal", when the facts demonstrate the firing was over book banning issues. The librarian was reinstated the same day she was fired because of the uproar from citizens.

Sure looks like abuse of power tendencies to me.

It might look ugly but there is a moral dilemma most folks would understand.

Of course coming clean is the option of last resort in politics.