<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is What We Want</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>"Returning the capital gains rate back to where it was only affects the richest"

Rev, can't you at least make some kind of effort to be informed ? You do everybody a disservice by making this stuff up out of thin air like you do.

The capital gains tax rate affects EVERYBODY, because it affects economic growth, investment, and thus wages. This is clearly illustrated by the fact that capital gains revenue went UP after the rates were slashed. The rate also affects stockholders, which are nearly 50% of the adult population. Here, read the following link to get a vague idea of the subject. You're education is no charge. I like to help the disadvantaged.

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/capgain/capgain.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Returning the capital gains rate back to where it was only affects the richest&#034;</p>
<p>Rev, can&#039;t you at least make some kind of effort to be informed ? You do everybody a disservice by making this stuff up out of thin air like you do.</p>
<p>The capital gains tax rate affects EVERYBODY, because it affects economic growth, investment, and thus wages. This is clearly illustrated by the fact that capital gains revenue went UP after the rates were slashed. The rate also affects stockholders, which are nearly 50% of the adult population. Here, read the following link to get a vague idea of the subject. You&#039;re education is no charge. I like to help the disadvantaged.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/capgain/capgain.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/capgain/capgain.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3671</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3671</guid>
		<description>Of course the capital gains tax will affect everyone, Reverend. Rentals will increase for a lot of lower income people, for just one example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the capital gains tax will affect everyone, Reverend. Rentals will increase for a lot of lower income people, for just one example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>Wrong and wrong...again.

You mean the 6 percent that make over 100K?

Returning the capital gains rate back to where it was only affects the richest. Mutual funds don't enter into this. And your, "probably will affect 100 million",  has no substantiation, that's why you said probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong and wrong&#8230;again.</p>
<p>You mean the 6 percent that make over 100K?</p>
<p>Returning the capital gains rate back to where it was only affects the richest. Mutual funds don&#039;t enter into this. And your, &#034;probably will affect 100 million&#034;,  has no substantiation, that&#039;s why you said probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Rev says,
 "Obama has stated for the record that only those making over a quarter million per year will have their taxes increased".

Thanks for pointing out Obama's lie, Rev. 

Obama wants to eliminate the Social Security cap, which is a massive tax increase on anyone making 97K and above, and he also wants to double the capital gains tax, which is another massive tax increase on the non-rich which will affect probably 100 million of us at one time or another.

Not to mention the fallacy in Obama's thinking that he can soak the rich and not have it filter down to the little guy. Happens every time, like clockwork. Higher prices, reduced wages, lost jobs, higher rents, etc. You name it. It's a fools paradise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev says,<br />
 &#034;Obama has stated for the record that only those making over a quarter million per year will have their taxes increased&#034;.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out Obama&#039;s lie, Rev. </p>
<p>Obama wants to eliminate the Social Security cap, which is a massive tax increase on anyone making 97K and above, and he also wants to double the capital gains tax, which is another massive tax increase on the non-rich which will affect probably 100 million of us at one time or another.</p>
<p>Not to mention the fallacy in Obama&#039;s thinking that he can soak the rich and not have it filter down to the little guy. Happens every time, like clockwork. Higher prices, reduced wages, lost jobs, higher rents, etc. You name it. It&#039;s a fools paradise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>larry,
No attacks on the homeland either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>larry,<br />
No attacks on the homeland either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3639</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3639</guid>
		<description>Mack says ""A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders!"

Standing ovation for Mack ! Outstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mack says &#034;&#034;A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders!&#034;</p>
<p>Standing ovation for Mack ! Outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>The report I looked at didn't count Iraq fatalities over the period in question, because those were deemed part of a civil war. 

It did say like global terrorism is down 40 percent. That's pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report I looked at didn&#039;t count Iraq fatalities over the period in question, because those were deemed part of a civil war. </p>
<p>It did say like global terrorism is down 40 percent. That&#039;s pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3627</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3627</guid>
		<description>roy: Mack's comparison should have then been, "A taxpayer making over 1/4 million"....but it wasn't.

Come on roy, you can tell me.....this Barack Obama guy is something, isn't he? Should make all of us proud to be Americans. I know you'll disagree with some of his ecomonic policy decisions....but I know you can see the uniqueness of this young guy. He'll be good for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>roy: Mack&#039;s comparison should have then been, &#034;A taxpayer making over 1/4 million&#034;&#8230;.but it wasn&#039;t.</p>
<p>Come on roy, you can tell me&#8230;..this Barack Obama guy is something, isn&#039;t he? Should make all of us proud to be Americans. I know you&#039;ll disagree with some of his ecomonic policy decisions&#8230;.but I know you can see the uniqueness of this young guy. He&#039;ll be good for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3626</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3626</guid>
		<description>Hey larry: On the 40 percent thing.

"In December 2007, new data released by NCTC revealed that the combined fatalities from Islamist and non-Islamist violence in Iraq had sharply declined by 55 percent. This decrease lowered the global fatality toll by 40 percent."

Now look at what we have. We go to Iraq, stir up a bunch of new terrorism, drive the new terrorism numbers up, then take a few years to get the new terrorist problem under control, somewhat. Then we count all of this as a decrease in global terrorism.

It's kind of bogus, the numbers thing....but I'm glad the numbers are down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey larry: On the 40 percent thing.</p>
<p>&#034;In December 2007, new data released by NCTC revealed that the combined fatalities from Islamist and non-Islamist violence in Iraq had sharply declined by 55 percent. This decrease lowered the global fatality toll by 40 percent.&#034;</p>
<p>Now look at what we have. We go to Iraq, stir up a bunch of new terrorism, drive the new terrorism numbers up, then take a few years to get the new terrorist problem under control, somewhat. Then we count all of this as a decrease in global terrorism.</p>
<p>It&#039;s kind of bogus, the numbers thing&#8230;.but I&#039;m glad the numbers are down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roysoldboy</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/06/03/this-is-what-we-want/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>roysoldboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=174#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>Well golly, Red I failed to see Mack say anything other than a taxpayer.  He didn't say rich taxpayer or poor taxpayer, just taxpayer.  I think that you are running out of things to hold out as the things Obama doesn't stand for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well golly, Red I failed to see Mack say anything other than a taxpayer.  He didn&#039;t say rich taxpayer or poor taxpayer, just taxpayer.  I think that you are running out of things to hold out as the things Obama doesn&#039;t stand for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
