Comments on: We're Having A Party

By: larry d.

larry d. — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:33:42 +0000

Obama may be a naive and disingenuous charlatan with Marxist leanings but the biggest red flag on him is quickly becoming his devoted followers.

Many of them seem very quick to drop their basic political morals and beliefs–from that corner we've seen blatant misogyny, the defense of voter disenfranchisement on a mass scale, the constant labeling of whites who don't vote for Obama as ignorant 'Appalachians,' etc., etc. It's fairly disturbing.

By: Da King

Da King — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:35:41 +0000

larry,
You're right. And abortion is against the tenets of the Catholic church, for whom Pfleger supposedly works.

By: Da King

Da King — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:34:11 +0000

Unbelievable hypocrisy from the Rev, who is talking out of both sides of his mouth and contradicting his previously held position against faith-based government funding due to the Separation clause.

Hey, no wonder he's an Obama supporter. Barack does that stuff too. "Iran is a tiny country and little threat", "Iran is a grave threat". Make it up as they go along.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:10:21 +0000

"Social services provided by Pleger's parish."

I'm shocked you'd think this is a good idea, Reverend. What if those social services include counseling pregnant young women on the evils of abortion? It's not a stretch at all.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:46:45 +0000

First off…the money went for social services provided by Pfleger's parish. Can we agree on that?

If I were a state senator, that's exactly what my constituents would want me to do.

The earmark was open and transparent and Obama didn't get anything out of it. There's no pay to play here.

So you're left with that same old smear by association thing because of Pleger's bodacious style of preaching.

Nothing much to see here….and listen, if there's something for real showing Obama's dirty…I want to see it.

By: Alexander D.

Alexander D. — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:25:38 +0000

As you wish, Rev. Here's a link through the Chicago tribune. In it you'll find earmark info to this kook's church.

http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/obamas_pastor_new_problem_apol.html

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:46:17 +0000

If, as you allege, Obama has personally earmarked something faith-based, please give me the source or the link. Seriously.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:03:31 +0000

Alex,
Never mind the Rev. He has Liberal Tourette's Syndrome.

Though as an atheist who thinks religion is a mental disorder, you'd REALLY think the Rev should be jumping all over Obama for his faith-based earmarks.

Which is evidence that you must be right about liberals' reversal on religion. One more example of liberals destroying history in their wake.

Maybe we should call the ACLU and let them know what Obama's up to

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:15:28 +0000

Do you mean "anti-American sentiments" like John Hagee espouses?

By: Alexander D.

Alexander D. — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:54:09 +0000

Alex, didn't liberals have a conniption when Bush funded such faith-based ventures ? Why are they quiet as churchmouses when Obama does the same thing ?

The separation of church and state was deleted from the far-left playbook and religion is now acceptable if it reinforces the anti-American sentiments of it's parishoners.