<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Abandons Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>You first error is - REPUBLICANS don't have any problem regarding the DEMOCRATIC primary. Republicans have nothing to do with it. This is all the Democrat's ugly baby.

You ask how many Republican voters were disenfranchised when Romney dropped out ? That would be ZERO. The Republicans still held their primaries, genius. The voters could vote for anyone they liked. Romney is allowed to drop out if he wishes. What a silly non-argument. 

The voters are disenfranchised when their votes affect the outcome and their votes are suppressed. Hillary/Obama is the textbook case. The clearest case I've seen in my lifetime. The Democrats are NOT democratic. Ironic, isn't it ? How strange that you should attempt to defend it. Do you care about nothing other than your candidate winning ? 

2.5 MILLION DISENFRANCHISED...IN AMERICA...SHAMEFUL

Democrats - the alleged party of civil rights, sticking up for the little guy. LOL. Not even close. The Democrats use the little guy the way the carnival barker uses the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You first error is - REPUBLICANS don&#039;t have any problem regarding the DEMOCRATIC primary. Republicans have nothing to do with it. This is all the Democrat&#039;s ugly baby.</p>
<p>You ask how many Republican voters were disenfranchised when Romney dropped out ? That would be ZERO. The Republicans still held their primaries, genius. The voters could vote for anyone they liked. Romney is allowed to drop out if he wishes. What a silly non-argument. </p>
<p>The voters are disenfranchised when their votes affect the outcome and their votes are suppressed. Hillary/Obama is the textbook case. The clearest case I&#039;ve seen in my lifetime. The Democrats are NOT democratic. Ironic, isn&#039;t it ? How strange that you should attempt to defend it. Do you care about nothing other than your candidate winning ? </p>
<p>2.5 MILLION DISENFRANCHISED&#8230;IN AMERICA&#8230;SHAMEFUL</p>
<p>Democrats - the alleged party of civil rights, sticking up for the little guy. LOL. Not even close. The Democrats use the little guy the way the carnival barker uses the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>Here's the problem Republicans have on this topic.

How many REPUBLICAN voters were disenfranchised by Romney bowing out and McCain winning the nomination so early?

How many? 

Did all those Republican voters play ANY part in selecting the GOP candidate? No.  

Are conservatives crying crocodile tears for the disenfranchised GOP voters?

Didn't think so. Much to do about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s the problem Republicans have on this topic.</p>
<p>How many REPUBLICAN voters were disenfranchised by Romney bowing out and McCain winning the nomination so early?</p>
<p>How many? </p>
<p>Did all those Republican voters play ANY part in selecting the GOP candidate? No.  </p>
<p>Are conservatives crying crocodile tears for the disenfranchised GOP voters?</p>
<p>Didn&#039;t think so. Much to do about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>Okay, then never complain to me about disenfranchised voters again. Ever. 

As it stands now, the Dems disenfranchised 2.5 million this time. I wonder if Floridians would agree with your statement that "Florida doesn't count" ? I'm willing to bet they don't. Michigan voters either. Every American's voice should be heard in an election. That's the "end of story", not what you said. Nice example of depraved situational ethics though, Rev. 

Barack Obama - Yes We Can...Steal The Nomination. Catchy.

What's that Obama says about "fairness" ? LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, then never complain to me about disenfranchised voters again. Ever. </p>
<p>As it stands now, the Dems disenfranchised 2.5 million this time. I wonder if Floridians would agree with your statement that &#034;Florida doesn&#039;t count&#034; ? I&#039;m willing to bet they don&#039;t. Michigan voters either. Every American&#039;s voice should be heard in an election. That&#039;s the &#034;end of story&#034;, not what you said. Nice example of depraved situational ethics though, Rev. </p>
<p>Barack Obama - Yes We Can&#8230;Steal The Nomination. Catchy.</p>
<p>What&#039;s that Obama says about &#034;fairness&#034; ? LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3434</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3434</guid>
		<description>Hillary has NO case. Never really did. Your popular vote numbers are ridiculous. Florida doesn't count....end of story.

And Democrats see what Hillary is made of with her use of the word assassination yesterday. Good riddance.

President Barack Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has NO case. Never really did. Your popular vote numbers are ridiculous. Florida doesn&#039;t count&#8230;.end of story.</p>
<p>And Democrats see what Hillary is made of with her use of the word assassination yesterday. Good riddance.</p>
<p>President Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>Rev, 
Obama has a lead in the popular vote of just over 160,000 if you don't count Michigan (where Obama wasn't on the ballot, by Obama's own choice) and do count Florida (where Obama was on the ballot). The point is, by the time all the primaries are over, it is likely that Hillary will capture the popular vote if she stays in the race, even without counting Michigan.  Hillary also would have won an electoral college race against Obama, which is a significant indicator of who the stronger candidate in the fall would be. 

Obama is almost certain to be the Democratic nominee, because the Democrats want to unite to fight McCain, but it's disingenuous to say Hillary doesn't have a case. She does have one, and it's getting stronger and stronger, against all odds, with Hillary having won 7 of the last 11 primaries, with 5 of her 7 wins being blowouts. Hillary has done this while being vastly outspent by Obama, with many Democrats saying for months that she has no chance and should drop out of the race, and with the majority of the mainstream media not even feigning objectivity, by dissing Hillary and openly advocating for Obama. Hillary's comeback has been pretty remarkable in light of all that. Plus, the polls show her beating McCain much more handily than Obama would.

 The old saying about the Dems is that if there's any way to screw up an election, the Dems will find it. They may be doing it again this time, when they've never had a bigger advantage in a national election. The anti-Bush backlash should make this a cakewalk for the Dems, but they just might lose the White House by going with Barry the rookie, who has been making tons of mistakes lately (that I am happy to point out, even if the media isn't).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev,<br />
Obama has a lead in the popular vote of just over 160,000 if you don&#039;t count Michigan (where Obama wasn&#039;t on the ballot, by Obama&#039;s own choice) and do count Florida (where Obama was on the ballot). The point is, by the time all the primaries are over, it is likely that Hillary will capture the popular vote if she stays in the race, even without counting Michigan.  Hillary also would have won an electoral college race against Obama, which is a significant indicator of who the stronger candidate in the fall would be. </p>
<p>Obama is almost certain to be the Democratic nominee, because the Democrats want to unite to fight McCain, but it&#039;s disingenuous to say Hillary doesn&#039;t have a case. She does have one, and it&#039;s getting stronger and stronger, against all odds, with Hillary having won 7 of the last 11 primaries, with 5 of her 7 wins being blowouts. Hillary has done this while being vastly outspent by Obama, with many Democrats saying for months that she has no chance and should drop out of the race, and with the majority of the mainstream media not even feigning objectivity, by dissing Hillary and openly advocating for Obama. Hillary&#039;s comeback has been pretty remarkable in light of all that. Plus, the polls show her beating McCain much more handily than Obama would.</p>
<p> The old saying about the Dems is that if there&#039;s any way to screw up an election, the Dems will find it. They may be doing it again this time, when they&#039;ve never had a bigger advantage in a national election. The anti-Bush backlash should make this a cakewalk for the Dems, but they just might lose the White House by going with Barry the rookie, who has been making tons of mistakes lately (that I am happy to point out, even if the media isn&#039;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3424</guid>
		<description>tbomb,
I think you're missing the point. The story arose due to McCain KICKING THOSE PEOPLE OFF HIS CAMPAIGN. Obama tried to draw some political blood as McCain was trying to do the right thing, a thing he didn't have to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tbomb,<br />
I think you&#039;re missing the point. The story arose due to McCain KICKING THOSE PEOPLE OFF HIS CAMPAIGN. Obama tried to draw some political blood as McCain was trying to do the right thing, a thing he didn&#039;t have to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3423</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3423</guid>
		<description>Yes Rev, I know Obama's campaign workers were FORMER lobbyists. I said so in my post, which you'd know had you read it. The two McCain campaign workers Obama was referring to in the article were also FORMER lobbyists. Nice try.

Also, I'm sure Obama appreciates your support of his wasting of taxpayer dollars on frivolous earmarks. I'm willing to bet the american people will view this issue differently than you do. I'm also willing to bet that if Obama was the one with zero earmarks and McCain was the one with 100 of them, your opinion would be completely the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Rev, I know Obama&#039;s campaign workers were FORMER lobbyists. I said so in my post, which you&#039;d know had you read it. The two McCain campaign workers Obama was referring to in the article were also FORMER lobbyists. Nice try.</p>
<p>Also, I&#039;m sure Obama appreciates your support of his wasting of taxpayer dollars on frivolous earmarks. I&#039;m willing to bet the american people will view this issue differently than you do. I&#039;m also willing to bet that if Obama was the one with zero earmarks and McCain was the one with 100 of them, your opinion would be completely the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>tbomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>McCain has had 5 lobbyists resign from his campaign[Loeffler,Goodyear,Davenport,Burgeson and Shirley].Only Shirley[head of an anti Hillary 527] did not work for a major lobbying outfit.....some straight talking maverick that guy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain has had 5 lobbyists resign from his campaign[Loeffler,Goodyear,Davenport,Burgeson and Shirley].Only Shirley[head of an anti Hillary 527] did not work for a major lobbying outfit&#8230;..some straight talking maverick that guy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>I keep wandering why this kind of information is in many blogs but never in the press.  My thoughts are that the press decided Who should be the frontrunner.  Candidates may talk about change but as long as the press runs this country it will be hard to have real change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep wandering why this kind of information is in many blogs but never in the press.  My thoughts are that the press decided Who should be the frontrunner.  Candidates may talk about change but as long as the press runs this country it will be hard to have real change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/2008/05/21/obama-abandons-reality/#comment-3413</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/da_kings_men/?p=167#comment-3413</guid>
		<description>Lucky for Obama he kept his name off that Michigan ballot. It's a good way to keep the votes in Florida from counting, too. The 'new' politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky for Obama he kept his name off that Michigan ballot. It&#039;s a good way to keep the votes in Florida from counting, too. The &#039;new&#039; politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
