Left Wing Lunatics
Posted March 8th, 2008 by Da King
As we begin to see signs that the american left wing terrorism machine is ramping up again, I find myself longing for the days when all the moonbats did was shout down conservative speakers on college campuses and create elaborate loony consipracy theories. They are moving well beyond that now, as they adopt the tactics of some other infamous fascist groups, like Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Consider some recent evidence:
Several luxury homes in a Seattle suburb were burned to the ground. A left-wing environmental extremist group known as the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) left a banner at the scene. Link
The antiwar extremist group Code Pink has disrupted several venues, most notably in defacing a Berkeley marine recruiting office. The uber-liberal Berkeley city council sided with Code Pink in wanting the marine recruiting office removed from the city of Berkeley. Link
Following the bombing of a Times Square military recruiting station, an anti-war protester claimed responsibility by mailing many copies of a 20-page manifesto to the Capitol. Link
Granted, this current left wing terrorism is small potatoes compared to what it was back in the 60's and 70's, when people like Barack Obama's buddy William Ayers were setting off bombs for the Weather Underground. Ayers is unrepentent, and told the New York Times in September 2001, "I don't regret setting bombs…I feel we didn't do enough." Ayers now holds the position of distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois-Chicago. I kid you not. I'm sure he's really "educating" his students. Link
Over on the far left websites (Daily Kos, Democratic Underground), they are worried that these left wing terrorist acts will be used to smear the political left. Earth to Daily Kos - Pointing out the TRUTH is not a smear. In fact, over at the Democratic Underground (DU) website, there is a post called 'You Don't Need A Weatherman' that starts like this:
Do you support the right of the people of Iraq to fight back against a hostile foreign occupation? If so, why are you at peace, fat and happy and not risking your precious little life? Why are you not joining in the fight against the empire by striking violent blows in the homeland?
In case you have any doubt, the 'empire' is the U.S.A. This post is a complaint that today's peace movement isn't doing enough. Link. Buck up, DU, it seems your fellow left-wing lunatics have heard your message and are beginning to mobilize.
When Barack Obama says he wants people to get involved, I'm pretty sure arson and bombings aren't what he has in mind. One thing Mr. and Mrs. Obama both agree upon, however, is that america is one really screwed up country. It underlies all of Baracks's talk of hope and change, and Michelle Obama just comes right out and says it. Here's the essential part of that New Yorker article, where Mrs. Obama talks down the country that has given her so much:
{-MICHELLE-Obama begins with a broad assessment of life in America in 2008, and life is not good: we’re a divided country, we’re a country that is “just downright mean,” we are “guided by fear,” we’re a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents. “We have become a nation of struggling folks who are barely making it every day,” she said, as heads bobbed in the pews. “Folks are just jammed up, and it’s gotten worse over my lifetime. And, doggone it, I’m young. Forty-four!”}
Then consider Obama's relationship with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who has been Obama's pastor and advisor since the 1980's. Reverend Wright is a pulpit purveyor of anti-americanism, racism, and anti-semitism. Listening to Wright, you'd think america was responsible for all the ills in the world. Link. Here are a few samples of Wright's "preaching":
"Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run. No black man will ever be considered for president, no matter how hard you run Jesse [Jackson] and no black woman can ever be considered for anything outside what she can give with her body.”
"We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God."
"We do not care if poor black and brown children cannot read and kill each other senselessly."
"We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-semitic.”
"We started the AIDS virus, and now that it is out of control, we still put more money in the military than in medicine; more money in hate than in humanitarian concerns. Everybody does not have access to healthcare, I don’t care what the rich white boys in the Senate say. Listen up: If you are poor, black and elderly, forget it.”
"We are only able to maintain our level of living by making sure that Third World people live in grinding poverty. And fact No. 10: We are selfish, self-centered egotists who are arrogant and ignorant…"
Now, I can't get inside Obama's head, but if my minister and advisor started sounding like the black version of Adolph Hitler, I'd go find another minister and advisor, pronto. I sure wouldn't continue to attend his church and seek his counsel for twenty years, as Barack did.
The anti-semitic attitude of the far left isn't just some isolated incident either. Many have exhibited it in public, from Louis Farrakhan (Jeremiah Wright's hero) to Al Sharpton to Jesse Jackson. On another left wing website, the Huffington Post, where anti-semitic comments are routine, when they published a story about the senseless brutal slaughter of innocent Israeli students at the hands of Palestinians a couple days ago, Link, Huffington turned off the comments section to the post. I guess she knows her readers, and knew she'd be embarassed by the anti-semitism her far left lunatics would spew forth. I'd link you to that article, which I found on Huffington yesterday, but I couldn't locate it today. Perhaps it's been pulled.
I don't know about the rest of you, but unlike the Obamas, I WANT the far left lunatics to be lazy and complacent. The last thing I want is for them to become involved, energized, and active with all that venomous anti-american hatred they are carrying around. God only knows how much stuff would blow up or burn then. To paraphrase Yogi Berra, it could be deja vu all over again.
March 8th, 2008 at 10:19 am
Rene Nostradamus predicted an Obama presidency. The world will come to an end in four years.
March 8th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Is that four years from now, or four years from Obama's inauguration ? I need to know for my short term investment planning.
March 8th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Someone in the media is going to start the Obama - Ayers reporting. It will be interesting to see what happens then.
March 8th, 2008 at 11:20 am
Excellent post, King.
How the B. Hussein Obama sycophants hate these fact being brought to light — BO’s racist pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, BO’s warm relationship with anarchist Willie Ayres , BO’s connection to Louis Farrakhan (a.k.a., Calypso Louie), etc.
The Dims cannot argue these facts & relationships of Hussein Obama. Their main response will be to try and ignore them, and when that fails, to censor the message and/or smoother it in political correctness.
But let’s be fair. Comrade Hillary is not clean either on this score. Remember, as Bill was leaving office, he pardoned a number of FLAN Puerto Rican terrorists who were convicted of actual bombings so as to help Hillary get the P.R. vote in NYC. Nice, huh? That’s what the Dims call playing politics.
And didn’t Comrade Hillary also work to help the black Panthers when she came out of college? I‘ll have to research that.
And note, it is almost obligatory for those rising in the Dim Party to fawn of such pieces of human garbage as Fidel Castor and Hugo Chavez. You don't see the GOP leadership doing that, do you?
Why are the Dims and libs so sympathetic towards terrorists and dictators? Why must the libs always blame America first? Is their hate for their country that great? Must be, either that or they are truly deranged.
March 8th, 2008 at 11:32 am
Short term investment planning will be outlawed once the Chosen One fulfills his destiny, King.
March 8th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I was looking for substance in your post…..even read it twice….what's your point here?
If candidates are guilty and thus unqualified on the basis of what supporters and close aides think or say, then who in the hell would ever be qualified?
McCain is tight with Hagee, Bush, he knew Abramoff, Cheney, and the other proven GOP criminals in the White House and Congress. I mean WTF? Is McCain guilty by association?
Ditto with Clinton.
All I see in your post is guilt by association attempts.
Such guilt rules never existed while status quo imperialists were pillaging the earth….and I fully understand why that has been the situation. Militarist minded extremists, unlike Michelle Obama, think everything America does is God ordained and good, therefore, if America is doing the slaughtering and pillaging, it isn't a bad thing, but rather a good thing. No guilt there to be associated with. It's all depressing, really.
I still believe this is a form of mental illness.
March 8th, 2008 at 5:21 pm
You forgot the left-wing lunatics like Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, the anthrax mailer, and the like. Oh wait, they weren't on the left at all. And yet, I can make a compelling argument that Bush is the worst president in history on his own merits without linking him to terrorists. Any kind of violence is deplorable, no matter the cause or it's political intentions, but it's simple minded and disgusting to paint millions of American's with same brush you use to criticize an insane radical segment of a movement.
March 8th, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Timothy McVeigh? He was executed. And more to the point, McVeigh was not embraced by conservatives or Republicans the way Dims like Obama fall over themselves for the terrorists like Ayers and the Clintons for the FLAN terrorists and the way so many elected Dims embrace Fidel Castro.
The Dims also embrace white racists like Sen. Robert [KKK] Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, and black racists like Al Sharpton and Reverend Jeremiah Wright whereas the Republicans expell their racists like David Duke. Big difference here, don't you think?
To the point, Eddie, people are known by the company they keep, and if the Dims have a soft spot for terrorists, voters need to know why.
+++
"Any kind of violence is deplorable, no matter the cause or it's political intentions"
So Eddie, how do you stand on the violence of the abortion mills, the abortion mills that operate due to political support by the Dim Party? There are well over one million abortions a year in the U.S. Are you okay with that violence on unborn babies, Eddie, or is that somehow "different?" Comments, please?
++++
"I can make a compelling argument that Bush is the worst president in history"
Okay, Eddie, don't just run your mouth off, make your case … if you can. Let's hear it.
March 9th, 2008 at 3:28 am
I like how you group in these criminal arsonists in with left-leaning Americans, and how you group Obama in with his freakin' pastor, and then liken the guy to Adolf Hitler.
Not trying to be a jerk, but from reading your blog it seems as if you don't have the ability to view anything from a nuanced point of view.
It's all very Rush Limbaugh-ish.
March 9th, 2008 at 6:15 am
King–
Sometime in 2012. Sorry.
Obamabush.
March 9th, 2008 at 6:52 am
Rev,
Guilt by association ?
You mean like your immediate embracement of the phony NY Times sex/lobbyist story about McCain ? At least MY facts are true.
Eddie,
I didn't "paint millions of American's with same brush you use to criticize an insane radical segment of a movement." I don't know where you got that from. I just called the left wing lunatics - left wing lunatics, and there never seems to be a short supply of them. I don't include the Obamas as being in that group, but they certainly associate with a few. If I wanted to imply that all Democrats were in that group, I would have called the post 'Democrats'.
Graham,
I didn't see anything very nuanced about Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr's remarks, did you ?
And how does Wright's racial hate speech differ from Hitler's exactly ? But since Hitler IS a very divisive figure, perhaps I should have used another example and called Wright the 'black version of David Duke'. Either way, the point remains the same.
March 9th, 2008 at 6:55 am
And Rev, it takes some cojones for YOU to object to "guilt by association attempts" in the first place, since it is your stock and trade. Do you ever read your own posts ?
March 9th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Vince,
While there is a strong link between Obama-Wright, and Obama-Ayers are friends, the Obama-Farrakhan link doesn't appear very strong to me. That seems like more of a Wright-Farrakhan link, unless you know something I don't.
The other biggie, of course, is the Obama-Rezko link, but that doesn't belong in a 'left wing lunatics' post. It belongs in a post called 'how are we supposed to believe a smart guy like Obama had a 15 year relationship with Tony Rezko and didn't realize he was a gangster ? In Chicago, no less.' I might have to shorten the title if I write about that one.
March 9th, 2008 at 7:08 am
larry,
Thanks for pointing out the folly of my question about investment planning. I forgot that all my money will be taken away for the common good once the collectivists gain power. No more of that evil capitalism for me. I love Big Brother.
March 9th, 2008 at 9:04 am
Vince,
You said:
"So Eddie, how do you stand on the violence of the abortion mills, the abortion mills that operate due to political support by the Dim Party? There are well over one million abortions a year in the U.S. Are you okay with that violence on unborn babies, Eddie, or is that somehow "different?" Comments, please?"
Number one, abortion is not considered murder, per the interpretation of the Constitution by the United States Supreme Court. Number two, the political support of the dim party does not operate abortion clinics; they exist becasue the American public is allowed to have abortions. Number three, what has your dear R party done to outlaw abortion, other than provide lip service at election time? The answer is much like the contents of your head: nothing.
March 9th, 2008 at 10:13 am
King.
To get a better insight into B. Hussein Obama’s is coming from, please check out “Obama's women reveal his secret” from the Asian Times at:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JB26Aa01.html.
It really is worth the read. He is how it begins:
“Cherchez la femme," advised Alexander Dumas in: "When you want to uncover an unspecified secret, look for the woman." In the case of Barack Obama, we have two: his late mother, the went-native anthropologist Ann Dunham, and his rancorous wife Michelle. Obama's women reveal his secret: he hates America. “
+++
The piece goes on to make a strong case that, Obama's middle name notwithstanding, the man was less influenced by Islam during his informative years than good, old leftwing America bashing.
Associations and upbringing play a role in making the man, and in BO's case, they are all invariably bad.
To know BO's history is to understand why BO gravities naturally to a bigot like Rev. Wright for so-called spiritual advise & direction. It also perhaps explains his pampered wife's negative attitude towards this great country.
But rest easy, King. All this will come out if the Dims are foolish enough to nominate BO as their candidate. But of course, once they nominate him, it will be too late for them to do much about it except try to enforce a politically correctness blackout over BO's record.
McCAin will play along with that, but others won't. The bottom line is that America will learn about BO whether or not the libs and Dim want it.
March 9th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
King said
"The last thing I want is for them to become involved, energized, and active with all that venomous anti-american hatred they are carrying around."
I take a different approach. How can we expose these lunatics, without allowing them to reveal their natural instincts? Their bedfellows will surely never focus on the pure hatred, as I believe the liberal media's existence is fueled by anti-American sentiment. If this nation were to witness the anarchy, we could unite once and for all. Until that point in time, any links to hatred are swept under the rug in the hopes that the resistance will not materialize. The far-left, along with the media, know where mainstream resides and they are careful not to exceed the threshhold. They prefer to manipulate the population, rather than escalate suspicions.
If this election is to be based on the "guilt by association" factor, I feel very comfortable that McCain is as clean as they get in Washington. Should the libs prefer to join wonder twin powers, killing 2 birds with one stone even appears tasty.
Larry,
I'm glad you've come to your senses. When it comes to "your" hard earned money, where does being selfish get you?
da Truth,
Regarding abortion………………….we're one Ginsburg away from that victory. Maybe when abortion is overturned, individuals will be less careless. When those individuals have their social entitlements revoked, they'll be a little more responsible. Of course they'll be a messy transition period, but how else can we set the tone for the next generations?
And when you say abortion, don't you mean………"a woman's right to privacy"? Sounds awful nice when the libs play the word game for the naive public to follow. Some may actually believe it is something other than what it is. The change of verbage lessens the guilt, but not the reality. Next you'll probably convince us how illegal aliens are just "undocumented workers"?
March 9th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
for years I thought M. Savages's statement that liberalism is a mental disease was an absurd staement by an angry blowhard but finally I have come to the realization that he is correct.
March 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
da truth,
You said, "abortion is not considered murder, per the interpretation of the Constitution by the United States Supreme Court."
Then why was Bobby Cutts convicted of two counts of murder for killing Jessie Davis and her unborn baby ? It sure sounds like the fetus was a person in that case.
March 9th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
I think Mr. Savage is pretty far over the edge sometimes, but I suppose I sounded a little like him with this post. I just can't let the liberal extremism stand without calling it by it's name.
It all depends how you use the word 'liberal', I guess. A liberal democracy is a very good thing, but modern american liberalism (big government nanny statist, anti-capitalist, anti-american, freedom curtailing, etc) IS a mental disorder.
March 10th, 2008 at 7:11 am
Don’t get caught up in the semantics. Classical liberalism is basically today’s conservatism while today’s liberalism is socialistic & fascist in nature.
+++
As for liberalism being a mental disease:
It is, and the piece below shows part of the psychological basis of it. Hint: It’s envy avoidance.
See if this doesn't ring true.
WHY DEMOCRATS CANNOT DEFEND AMERICA
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Friday, 07 March 2008
A good place to start understanding why Democrats cannot defend America is the Amazon jungle. There is a tribe in the Amazon called the Yanomamo. When a Yanomamo woman gives birth, she tearfully proclaims her child to be ugly.
In a loud mortified lament that the entire tribe can hear, she asks why the gods have cursed her with such a pathetically repulsive infant. She does this in order to ward off the envious black magic of the Evil Eye, the Mal Ojo, that would be directed at her by her fellow tribespeople if they thought she was happy and her baby was beautiful.
So she is afraid to be happy, because of the fear of being envied by her fellow villagers.
From now on, whenever you think of a Liberal Democrat, I want you to think of that Yanomamo woman in the Amazon. For it is that primitive jungle fear that makes a Liberal.
This is most easily seen in the children of wealthy parents. Successful businessmen who have made it on their own normally have a respect for the effort and the economic system that makes success possible. Their children, with their unearned inheritance, are easier targets for guilt-mongering by the envious.
So they assume a posture of liberal compassion as an envy-deflection device: "Please don't envy me for my father's money — look at all the liberal causes and government social programs I advocate!" Teddy Kennedy is the archetype of this phenomenon.
Envy-appeasement explains why Hollywood is so liberal. The vast amounts of money entertainment stars make is so grossly disproportionate to the effort it took them to make it that they feel it is unearned. So they apologize for it. The Liberal strategy is to apologize for his success, his country's success, his civilization's success, in order to appease the envious.
Liberalism, the mind-set that dominates today's Democrat Party, is thus not a political ideology or set of beliefs. It is a psychological strategy to avoid being envied. Liberalism is the politicalization of envy-appeasement.
Thus, all Liberal Democrat passions are frenzies of masochism. What could be more idiotic and masochistic than to oppose missile defense? Democrats oppose it because they do not want their country defended.
The Democrats' hysterical belief in the "global warming" hoax is because they do not want their civilization to prosper.
The entire Political Correctness movement attacking America's culture is nothing but masochistic envy-appeasement advocated by those who do not want their culture to survive.
The pro-abortionists' crazed determination to prevent any attempt to stop mothers from murdering their children by the millions, or the equally crazed mission of the environmentalists to prevent DDT from saving millions of children from dying of malaria, means that they do not want their species to exist.
As the Amazon tribeswoman who says her baby is ugly, so the white male liberal says his gender, his race, his country, his civilization and even his entire species is ugly.
This is why liberals always root for those who hate America. Liberals are incapacitated from being able to defend America because of their primitive fear of the Evil Eye of America's enemies. Liberals are incapable of pride, deep pride, in being American. Instead they feel embarrassment.
You and I feel that pride. You and I think it is the coolest thing in the world to be American. But Liberal Democrats are embarrassed rather than proud to be American, they want to apologize for being American, to wallow in the goo of moral relativism and multiculturalism, because they have a compulsion to appease the envious.
So America's enemies from Islamofascist terrorists to mullahs in Iran to the Chicoms in Beijing are not the real problem. They are like wolves who smell weakness. The real problem is our weakness - our lack of civilizational confidence caused by liberal envy appeasement.
The fundamental primary job of conservatives, then, is to laugh at and reject the envy of America-haters, to expose liberal appeasement as a primitive jungle fear of envious black magic, and to promote and achieve civilizational confidence - genuine pride in the moral worth of the unmatched accomplishments of Western Civilization.
Do this, and America's enemies will scamper away like whimpering mongrels rather than coming after us like ravenous wolves. Conservatives are capable of this, liberals are not. That is why we can defend America and they can not.
March 10th, 2008 at 8:37 am
Alexander, you said:
"da Truth,
Regarding abortion………………….we're one Ginsburg away from that victory. Maybe when abortion is overturned, individuals will be less careless. When those individuals have their social entitlements revoked, they'll be a little more responsible. Of course they'll be a messy transition period, but how else can we set the tone for the next generations?
And when you say abortion, don't you mean………"a woman's right to privacy"? Sounds awful nice when the libs play the word game for the naive public to follow. Some may actually believe it is something other than what it is. The change of verbage lessens the guilt, but not the reality. Next you'll probably convince us how illegal aliens are just "undocumented workers"?"
I said "abortion" because I was responding to Vince, and he used the word "abortion." You are not one Ginsburg away from overturning abortion. The reason R politicians only talk about it at election time is because they know if it ever gets overturned, they will all be out of office, but they have to say those things to appease their base. Face it, if America (meaning the majority of Americans not you, vince, roy and king) didn't want abortion to be legal, it wouldn't be.
King, you said:
"Then why was Bobby Cutts convicted of two counts of murder for killing Jessie Davis and her unborn baby ? It sure sounds like the fetus was a person in that case."
I don't know why, king, since I was not on that jury. You'd have to ask them. If you are asking why killing a fetus is considered murder in that sense and not in abortion, you'd have to ask the R legislature that made that law. Then you'd have to ask the majority of Americans who accept that as being the way things are.
In the future, if you guys are going to respond to things I say, it would be nice if you could read what I actually say and try to stick to the topic I'm discussing instead of putting forth your own agendas. Or deciding what I say. Again, Alexander, I said "abortion" because Vince brought up "abortion." Now, go back to your liberal bashing. Sorry to get you off point.
March 10th, 2008 at 8:37 am
By the way king that is not a very good picture of you.
March 10th, 2008 at 9:57 am
Defense of abortion [killing of unborn babies] is the highest priority of the Dim Party.
Abortion rights defines today's Dims like nothing else.
Abortion even takes precedence over such things as idenity politics and blaming America-first in the Dim play book.
This is why the Dims have essentially purged all pro-life people from responsible positions in the party. The only notable exception seems to be Sen. Harry Reid, a Mormon.
Dim candidates for president, HC and BO — and even the ones that have dropped out like the "Breck Girl" Edwards, Joey Biden, Chris Dodd, etc. all dance to the murderous tune played by the abrotion industry.
So come on libs & Dims. Be proud of your pro-abortion stand. Don't hide it.
March 10th, 2008 at 10:09 am
Vince,
You forgot that other D, Sidney McCain, who was pro-abortion until he decided to become President. Such an omission is typical of your behavior.
You can say all you want about dims and libs being pro-abortion, but abortion is legal in America because that is how the majority wants it to be. You do believe in majority rule, don't you?
March 10th, 2008 at 11:36 am
I believe that the Demoncraps have two, "babies" as I call them. Abortion and Social Security are the two. You can't arouse a Dem with anything as easily as offering to change either of those two "babies".
I believe that the two "babies" have to be defended by Dems since they are about the only really defendable things they ever came up with, or at least, the only things they seem to believe were their ideas. It is hard for me to believe that no other really liberal ideas we have because of THEM are defended by them the way these two are but somehow it doesn't seem they are.
I do wonder if they won't want to uphold the workings of ELF in the future as something akin to the two "babies". I can't wait for ELF to get to "tornado city" Greensburg, Kansas, and burn down the whole town for trying to go green in their rebuilding. Surely they will try to do so based on their earlier attempts at destroying "green building".
BTW, King that is one good blog entry. The fact that THEY have really only used abortion as the "change the topic" subject proves it, to me.
March 10th, 2008 at 12:24 pm
There's that stupid canard, this time by Da King:
[quote Da King]other infamous fascist groups, like Al Qaeda and the Taliban. quote]
Quack, quack.
If you haven't figured out my point yet, Qaeda and Taliban are not fascist.
March 10th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Excuse the colorfulness but……man, this comment thread has turned into some kinda' wingnut circle jerk.
March 10th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Roys,
Please read the posts more carefully. Vince brought up abortion, not us. I believe he's on your side. So, the topic was changed by your own.
And yes, Rev, your comment, while a little too colorful, is right on point.
March 11th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
King,
Geraldine Ferraro, the woman who was Walter Mondale’s VP running mate, said yesterday that no one [Democratic primary voters, that is] would be talking about B. Hussein Obama if he was white.
What do you think the dim Dims who monitor your web site would say about that, King?
Is BO nothing but an affirmative action candidate for the Dims?
Could Ms. Ferraro correct?
Or, or the Dims, this time in the person of uber-feminist Ferraro, just letting their innate racism show through again????
Please advise.
March 11th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I wonder if anyone would be asking Ms. Ferraro what she thought if she weren't female.
March 11th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Hey Rev–
What's a "wingnut circle jerk"?
March 11th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Mr. Spitzer should resign. Regardless of whatever good he may or may not be able to do, his ability to govern has been compromised.
March 11th, 2008 at 6:49 pm
I heard at left-wingnut circle jerks they call him 'The Spritzer.'
March 12th, 2008 at 4:53 am
Wow, lots of crazy comments since I've been away for a couple days.
Tom,
You said Al Qaeda and the Taliban are not fascist. Sorry, but they are poster boys for fascism. Here's a definition of the word for you, which those groups fit to a tee:
Fascism - an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes.
Hello Tom, earth calling.
—-
da truth,
You completed avoided dealing with my question about why killing a fetus like Bobby Cutts did is ALWAYS considered murder, while abortion is not. Sorry you couldn't deal with that question honestly.
—
Rev,
You said nothing at all.
March 12th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
King, I did no such thing. Your R friends made that law, ask them. Or, better yet, ask them why they are afraid to outlaw abortion. I don't know why it is considered murder, I didn't make the law.
March 12th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Talk about left wing lunatics:
Geraldine Ferraro, former Dim VP candidate, resigned today from Comrade Hillary’s campaign over what some are calling Ferraro’s insensitive, if not overtly racist, remarks about B. Hussein Obama.
Boy-oh-boy, these Dims are more entertaining a barrel full of monkeys.
March 13th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
da truth,
What the heck are you talking about with that "your R friends made that law" stuff ? Killing an unborn fetus as in the Bobby Cutts case is murder anywhere in the country, and always has been as far as I know. If you can't explain why abortion is NOT murder, when any other time killing a fetus IS murder, then I'm not surprised, because it's illogical. Either the fetus is human or it's not (and saying it's not is even MORE illogical). You can't have it both ways.
March 13th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
King,
Rove v. Wade is illogical — and it is surely bad constitutional law.
Roe v. Wade was passed when the judges on the US Supreme
court were acting like philosopher kings instead of judges per the WRITTEN US Constitution.
March 13th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
Illogical? It's not murder because the person the thing is inside makes the decision. How much easier can it be to understand? And Vince, isn't it interesting that the idiots that passed Roe v. Wade can still see it being upheld today? Nice job getting that one undone, R party. Or at least pretending that you want it overturned….while all the time everyone knows no legit R politician wants anything to do with it for fear the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS who support legalized abortion would vote your dumb asses out of office. You guys kill me with this.
March 13th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Of course there is no right to kill a fetus in the Constitution. The Supremes made that one up out of thin air.
So da truth, you say that whether killing a fetus is murder or not depends on who does the killing. That's an interesting distinction you made there. I'm betting it doesn't make any difference at all to the murdered fetus. It's dead either way.
What about partial birth abortion ? Are you on board with that too ? Do you take the unscientific view that life begins the second the child passes through the birth canal ?
March 14th, 2008 at 6:03 am
Abortion is the highest sacrament in the Dim's secular religion.
The Dims will never abandon the right to allow unborn babies to be killed but instead will always excuse, if not promote, it.
Republicans do stupid things; that's why they're the Stupid Party.
Dims do evil things; that's why they're the Party of Evil.