Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

This Week In Leftness

by Da King on February 26, 2008

in Democrats,liberalism,presidential race,Uncategorized

donkey

Now that the NY Times phony sex/lobbyist scandal about John McCain has been exposed for the fraud it was, the left is on to it's next attempt to undermine McCain's candidacy, which has caused one of my favorite political standup comedians, Howard Dean, to return to the news this week. Dean is most remembered as the 2004 Democratic presidential frontrunner for about 10 minutes, until people realized he was insane. Upon discovering his lunacy, Democrats did the logical thing, and made him the head of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). You can go here for some classic dumb Dean quotes. Here's a sample of Howie's brilliance :

"The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong."

Very patriotic, Howard. Now that I think about it, Barack Obama holds the same belief.

Anyway, as DNC head, Mr. Dean has currently decided that the only fair way to conduct this year's presidential elections is for John McCain to be forbidden from raising any more money at all between now and november, while Barack Obama is allowed to raise all he wants. I kid you not. That is exactly what Dean is attempting to bring about. You see, back when McCain's presidential chances were looking pretty slim and he wasn't raising any money, McCain filed his intention to accept federal funds. If a candidate accepts federal funds, there is a limit to the amount of money he can spend, and McCain is almost to the limit. However, McCain never accepted the federal funds, because, as we all know, his presidential campaign turned around. Now McCain doesn't need the federal funds and doesn't want them. That doesn't work for Howie. He wants to hold McCain to the spending limits for the federal funds that he never took. I kid you not. That's our crazy old Howie, alright. There are a couple ironies here. The first one is that Howard Dean pulled the exact same switcheroo on federal funds in 2004 that he is objecting to McCain doing now. The second irony is that McCain is attempting to get around the rules that he himself imposed with McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. We told you it was a bad idea, John. You'd think the fact that RUSS FEINGOLD was the co-sponsor of the bill would have tipped you off that it was bad legislation. Read about the campaign finance flap here.

***

The Clinton campaign apparently forwarded a photo of Barack Obama dressed in traditional Somali garb (read: looking like a Muslim) to the Drudge Report. The implication is that Barack is a secret Al Qaeda operative who will blow up the country once he tricks us into making him president. Classy move, Clintonistas. Obama has declared the photo's release to be the 'worst example of man's inhumanity to man in all of recorded human history', or something like that. Hillary denies all knowledge, as usual. You can see the photo here if you care about this non-story.

***

Hillary also mocked Obama's superfluous rhetoric and Jesus-like hold over his acolytes, by saying the following at a Providence rally:

“I could just stand up here and say ’Let’s just get everybody together, let’s get unified. The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing and everyone will know we should do the right thing and the world will be perfect. Maybe I’ve just lived a little long, but I have no illusions at how hard this is going to be. You are not going to wave a magic wand and have the special interests disappear.”

The video is actually pretty funny. For the first time ever, Hillary made me laugh. You can watch it here.

***

Ralph Nader has entered the presidential race, causing conservatives to yawn and liberals to cry 'oh no, not again !'. Apparently, Barack Obama isn't far enough to the left for Ralph. He calls Obama a "corporate Democrat". Hmmm. And here I thought only Republicans were allowed to be called "corporate". Does this mean that some Democrats have jobs too ? Obama had the following dismissive reaction to Nader's candidacy (this is from The Australian):

On the Nader candidacy, Senator Obama said: "My sense is that Mr Nader is somebody who, if you don't listen and adopt all of his policies, he thinks you're not substantive. He seems to have a pretty high opinion of his own work." He also speculated that Mr Nader's "few percentage (points) of the vote" would not influence the election outcome.

Ouch. Saint Obama says thou shalt not pretend to the throne, Mr. Nader.

Nader refers to such reactions to his candidacy as "bigoted", and refers to Washington D.C. as "corporate occupied territory". You can read the entire Australian article here.

***

Back to you, liberal media.

  • da truth

    King, unfortunately Nader is right about the "corporate Democrat"…..as loony as he has become, he gets some things right once in awhile. Having said that, you know how I feel, if a D is to win it has to be Obama. He's the only one with a chance.

  • da truth

    I was waiting for you to bring up Feingold. I suspect the once the D nomination is secure, the whole point you made there will become an issue for McCain. I was surprised Romney didn't make more out of it, but as you said, perhaps he's setting up to be VP.

  • Ghost of Vince Foster

    King,

    This is a bit off topic, but I think you'd like it as you commented more than once on David Walker.

    There is a movie out that was presented at the Sundance Film Festival in January 2008. It's entitled I.O.U.U.S.A. It’s about how we, as a nation, are going bankrupt with all the unfunded liabilities that comes with government entitlements.

    See: http://www.agorafinancial.com/iousa.html Excerpt from the web site:

    "This film follows U.S. Comptroller General David Walker as he crisscrosses the country explaining America’s unsustainable fiscal policies to its citizens.

    "With surgical precision, the film interweaves archival footage and economic data to paint a vivid and alarming profile of America’s current economic situation. The ultimate power of I.O.U.S.A. is that the film moves beyond doomsday rhetoric to proffer potential financial scenarios and propose solutions about how we can recreate a fiscally sound nation for future generations."

    +++

    The film has limited showings but hopefully that will be increased down the road.

  • da truth

    You guys may already know this but Walker has been talking about this for awhile.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-14-fiscal-hurricane-cover_x.htm

  • Da King

    da truth,
    To me, Ralph Nader talking about corporate Democrats and corporate Republicans is sort of like Noam Chomsky talking about foreign policy. They sound pretty good for a few minutes, and then you begin to realize there's a screw loose somewhere. I was a big fan of Nader's early work, but when Ralphie starts referring to Obama as a corporatist, you know he's gone off his nut.

  • Da King

    Thanks for the link, Vince. Kudos to the Sundance Film Festival for showing this movie. Maybe the mainstream media will catch on and start reporting some of this information. After 20 Democratic debates, including last night's waste of time in Cleveland, I still haven't heard the entitlement crisis or government irresponsibility really addressed in the way it should be.

  • Ghost of Vince Foster

    And you won't hear anything about the entitlement crisis, King, from either Comrade Hillary or B. Hussein Obama or any other Dim.

    The only crisis they perceive is that there aren't enough entitlements and that government promises must expand.

    The Dims are pandering to the underachievers in society by saying they will grant more entitlements, giving the impression that the evil "rich" will pay for it, while knowing full well that it is the middle class that has to get the tab.

    But to the Dims, the ends justify the means, and the ends of course is getting themselves elected.

  • da truth

    Cmon Vince,

    "But to the Dims, the ends justify the means, and the ends of course is getting themselves elected."

    Which makes them no different than any other party.

    King, I couldn't agree more about Nader. It makes me sad what he has become. Funny chomsky line by the way.

  • The Reverend

    King, you are entirely incorrect about the McCain connection to federal campaign funds. Completely wrong.

    McCain used the promise of federal funds as collateral for a loan to his campaign.

    Dean did nothing of the kind.

    Nader has seen his better days. Michael Moore and Nader couldn't get along. Nader thinks he alone has all the answers. Stubbornly clinging to all those answers that he has, gave us George W. Bush. Nothing else needs to be said.

    Politicos from both sides who serve the corporatists….that's the largest threat to America. In this, Nader is correct. Not one gosh darned thing can be done to stop this problem UNTIL more and better Democrats are put into the Congress by the people. An Obama presidency will aid that cause.

    If you don't think this problem can be reformed, I direct your attention to Lieberman's current non-Democratic status, as well as Al Wynn from Maryland getting booted a few weeks back.

    The netroots has a two-pronged attack. Reduce the number of Republicans WHILE removing corporate Democratic asshats. It will take time, but eventually the netroots will have an assembly line process of raising funds and targeting corporatists.

  • Tom

    5) "The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong." –Howard Dean

    We let Shrub run it the way he's wanted to for five years. How's that working out?

  • Da King

    Rev,
    McCain didn't take any federal funds. That's what I said, and that is correct.

    I didn't know about that loan when I wrote my post, so thanks for the additional info. That does make it a little different than what Dean did. Not much, but a little. McCain doesn't need federal funds to back that loan.

    It would be a complete travesty to do as the Dems propose, and forbid McCain from raising any more money, while Obama can raise as much as he wishes. I hope we can agree that the process should be fair for both eventual candidates.

  • Ghost of Vince Foster

    King,

    Isn't it somewhat ironic that McCain is getting his tail tangled up in campaign financing when his great reform [McCain-Finegold] was suppose to solve all those problems.

    Below is an excerpt from George Will's column that's on the editorial page of today's Akron Beacon Journal:

    "Perhaps McCain did nothing corrupt, but he promiscuously accuses others of corruption, or the 'appearance' thereof. And he insists that the appearance of corruption justifies laws criminalizing political behavior — e.g., broadcasting an electioneering communication that "refers to" a federal candidate during the McCain-Feingold blackout period close to an election.

    "McCain should thank the Times also because its semi-steamy story distracted attention from an unsavory story about McCain's dexterity in gaming the system for taxpayer financing of campaigns."

    +++

    But still, you are correct in saying "It would be a complete travesty to do as the Dems propose, and forbid McCain from raising any more money, while Obama can raise as much as he wishes. "

    But fear not. What the Dims and that "screaming" Howard Dean want here, they won't get.

  • da truth

    Vince,

    You said…."But fear not. What the Dims and that "screaming" Howard Dean want here, they won't get." Interesting that you think John Sidney McCain is allowed to have it both ways, as did the R congress from 2000 to 2006 when they shut D's out in many ways, but when it comes back to bite him the playing field has to be fair. And don't worry about us dims, we will get what we want come November; and that is that the war mongerer John Sidney McCain will not be president. You forgot to put in Mr. Dean's middle name, by the way.

  • The Reverend

    King: You prove you are a righteous guy with your comment.

    I don't think, however, that the Dems are trying to force McCain to have limited public funding. I think all the bluster is about McCain sticking to the rules concerning how he gets out of that collateralized loan thing.

    It's true that the FEC currently doesn't have a quorum, but all McCain would have to do is show that he acknowledges his responsibility to rules and regulations and I'm sure he will be released from any further obligation to use only public funding.

    Small potatoes, really.

  • Da King

    Vince,
    It is ironic to watch McCain try to squirm out of a situation he created himself with McCain-Feingold. That's what he gets for attacking the First Amendment. Like so much of what Congress does, McCain-Feingold was another example of doing the wrong thing for the right reasons. In another irony, this year's presidential campaigns are the most expensive in history, by far.

  • Da King

    Rev,
    You've brought up another irony here. The FEC doesn't have a full board because the Dems have been stonewalling Bush's nominees for the last two years. The Dems, like McCain with his campaign finance reform, fell face first into their own political soup. Oops. That's the reason the Dems probably won't be able to stop McCain from spending the money he wants. Howie Dean would certainly like to stop McCain though, and make that playing field as unlevel as possible to favor the Dems. You were disingenuous about that part. You know full well that was Dean's intention.

  • Ghost of Vince Foster

    King: "In another irony, this year's presidential campaigns are the most expensive in history, by far."

    But maybe the response to this spending is "so what?"

    Consider this from "Ballots and Wallets" in Portfolio magazine (March 2008). The article says that the GOP and Dims combined will spend about $1 billion in this election cycle, a one-in-four year event.

    And here is what some of those evil corporations are spending to peddle their products & services.

    Procter & Gamble spent $3.3. billion on media ads in 2006 to get us to buy their detergents, tooth paste, etc.

    Microsoft is "shelling out $500 million to promote its new Vista operating system."

    AT&T spent $2.25 billion on advertising from October 2006 to September 2007.

    Wendy's spent $0.3 billion from October 2006 to September 2007 .

    "The Simpsons Movie" spent $32 million from July 2007 to September 2007 to promote this cultural flick.

    Now just imagine what the auto companies, the pharmaceutical industry, Coke & Pepsi, etc., etc. spend on advertising each year.

    With this in mind, one has to wonder if $1 billion in advertising for the presidency isn't a bargain.

    McCain-Finegold was clearly wrong. The best way to improve campaign financing is with strong full disclosure laws, not by limiting free speech.

  • Da King

    You got me thinking, when did we reach the point when a billion dollars doesn't really sound like THAT much money anymore ? You know what I mean ?

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).