Btw, has it ever been proven that Bush did cocaine ? To my knowledge it hasn't.

As for the SEC beating the Big 10, the SEC is in the south, and the south is MORE CONSERVATIVE than the north, remember ? da King shoots and scores, lol.

Hey, wait a minute, I'm a Buckeye fan. What am I saying ?Rats. Hoisted on my own petard.

And I won't venture a guess on Lebron. If he is a liberal, I'd just as soon not know…but he DOES calls himself The King, just like yours truly (though I had the name first)

Since we're bringing up things in people's pasts, how about talking about how George "cokehead" Bush ruined businesses because of his drug and alcohol abuse? Something like that would be more important than someone's middle name in terms of being qualified for President, wouldn't it? No, not to you, because as long as that big "R" comes after their name, you could care less what they stand for.

Vince, it's people like you that are what's wrong with America. Your closed-mindedness shows not only a lack of tolerance for other views, it shows an ignorance of the type of discourse inherent in this country's history. I will read the posts, you do the same. Maybe you'll notice how I am able to disagree with da king on things without either of us calling each other names or worrying about things that have no bearing on the discussion. You are exactly what is wrong with American political reality today.

Obviously. It shows.

+++

"… you should be careful, don't want to end up in the Clinton circle of murder, do you?"

No, I sure don't. But in that regard, wouldn't B. Hussein Obama have more to worry about than I? I think so.

+++

"Your pea brain can't see beyond Mr. Obama's race. "

"Pea brain?" How creative of you; how immature. But go ahead, throw you little pout if it makes you feel better.

++++

As to the use of Mr. Obama's middle name, it in no way implies his race.

But, his religion, that Obama was once a Muslim and he has a Muslim father, well yes, the use of Hussein does indicate that. But we can't expect some with as low a reading comprehension ability as you to understand that. So keep reading the posts, Chief, you'll get yourself an education, maybe even some polish, too.

Ok, so the party is godless, the people in it are not. I guess that would make sense…..if you were running for office. Excuse me for not realizing your linguistic skills. I didn't take reading comprehension 101 but I do know that if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's a duck. In other posts, and if you like I'll go get them, you have called all dims godless. You never distinguished between party leaders and the man on the street before, so why start now? They're your words, so stand by them. At least Mr. Bush does that, why can't you?

What I should have suspected is that this would all come back to the Clintons. We could have saved a few posts if you would have just said all of these things were their fault in the beginning. I would say, you should be careful, don't want to end up in the Clinton circle of murder, do you?

Unlike you, I could care less what some LA movie critic decides to call Mr. Obama. And it is interesting you use Mr. Kerry to defend your point, but I never mentioned him either. My question is, when you mention your beloved Republican candidates, you don't post their middle names? You know the answer. Your pea brain can't see beyond Mr. Obama's race.

Good point about Mr. Obama's ascendancy, though. Kinda reminds one of how a failed oilman riding on his family name became the head of the strongest political party in the nation and the leader of the free world.

In any event, does anyone know if LeBron is conservative or liberal? I mean, I know his race would lead us to believe one thing, but his tax bracket says the other. In any event, he still needs to work on his free throws………

Why?

Because liberals are smarter. Outsmarting the other team is so invigorating. Take for instance, this election cycle.

Plus, if liberals played football, they'd quit, go home, and declare it a loss as soon as the other team fought back.

'No, I don't think for a minute that all Dims are godless.

First of all, in prior posts on this blog, you have more than once called all dims godless. Now, in your same post, you said:

'But because you are in the godless Dim party…..'

++++

No, I am not a liar. Nor am I contradictory. It's your reading comprehension that's faulty.

It is my position that many — perhaps even most — of the run-of-the-mill Dims are NOT godless. But their party and their party's leading philosophy is. To put it another way, the run-of-the-mill Dim is not godless but he/she is a dupe of those that are.

When you read, you have to distinguish the context in which the writing is done. For example, when I say "Dims," do I mean the party leadership or the guy on the street who pulls the voting lever for the Dim on the ballot? The meaning is clear in the context; this is Reading Comprehension 101.

+++

What "veiled slur" are you referring to me using? Is it using "Mr. Obama" very own name that you find offensive? Why? As to B. Hussein Obama, perhaps you will recall it was former senator John Kerry (D-Neb) who, when endorsing Comrade Hillary, highlighted Obama's Muslim roots and actually said it was an asset for him. If that sounds contradictory or like a backhanded compliment, realize that is just one of the ways your Clintons deal the race/religious card off the bottom of the deck. They don't do it directly; they do it through their stooges

So the admiration you have for what you have wrongly construed as my "veiled slur," know where I got it from. No, not Bible class. Quite the opposite — the Clintons.

Or maybe your complaint is that I observed that the liberal LA Times call "Mr. Obama" the "magic Negro." Did I commit a faux pas here? Is "Negro" the dreaded n-word that I keep hearing about on the TV? Or is it just wrong for a conservative to repeat what liberals (and Dims) themselves say when analyzing a political phenomena such as the ascendancy of a two year U.S. senator to the position of competition for the presidential nomination of the Dims?

Brilliant. You said it better than I ever could have. Thank you.

I would point out to you that you are also a liar. You said:

"No, I don't think for a minute that all Dims are godless."

First of all, in prior posts on this blog, you have more than once called all dims godless. Now, in your same post, you said:

"But because you are in the godless Dim party….."

Sounds to me like someone isn't even reading his own posts!

As for your point on the other activities you cited as "legal", yes, those things were legal at one time. I can't speak to what Germany and Russia did, but as for slavery, it was the rule of law. When Lincoln and the North decided it should not be, they took action. What's your excuse? If the majority of Americans wanted abortion stopped, it would be stopped. If Republicans had wanted it stopped, they have had opportunities to put the issue before a conservative Supreme Court and have not done so, because they knew they would get hammered in elections if abortion was again illegal. So what's more important to you, Vince, the rule of law? The will of the people? The Unites States Constitution? Or your own pea-brained view on an issue that has likely never directly affected you?

If you're going to accept the U.S. Constitution, Vince, you have to accept it all. I don't interfere when republicans walk around shooting each other in the face on their hunting trips. You have your 2nd Amendment rights. But along with those rights come other rights.

By the way, I love the continuous veiled slur you throw at Mr. Obama. Genius! Did you learn that at bible school?

Now to a logic that's stupid even for you: You imply that since abortion is "legal" in America that it relieves its proponents of their guilt for it. Well you your edification, Chief, slavery was legal in the Democratic South before the Republican Abe Lincoln eliminated it. Did that make slavery legit? To your logic, I guess so.

Also, the extermination camps were legal in Nazi Germany as far as German law was concerned. So, did that make them okay?

And of course the tens of millions that communist/socialist Joe Stalin eliminated were "legal" murdered under what passed for law in the good, old USSR.

But because you are in the godless Dim party, you can't seem distinguish the difference between what is legal from what is right and/or moral. You are what is called a Positivist. God help you.

In any event, abortion is one of the defining characteristics of today's Dim Party, and it is a burden all Dims must share.

So let's hear your defense of abortion. B.Hussein Obama, Comrade Hillary and the rest of the Dims aren't shy of their voicing their unquestioning support for killing unborn babies; why should you be?.

When I read that I couldn't figure out, at first, who you were referring to….but now I understand…..it's all those Wal-Mart working capitalists in China. Yeah….that's sure some Commie country.

And Ghost….as usual….thanks for the laughs.

Truth, my bud,…..all those Christian women who get abortions
must do so because they are all being peer pressured, somehow, by devilish Democrats, to do so. See? It's not about choice…..it's about the Democratic terrorist war against Chrisitanity.

If it wasn't for the Democratic Party, all those Christian women wouldn't have had the choice in the first place. That choice would be in the hands of mostly white men, where the Christian god wants it. I mean, god is male, right?…..and everyone knows the Democratic Party is godless and anti-Christian. So by advocating for a woman's choice…..what the Dems are really doing is advocating for an anti-Christian platform. That's been the Dems plan all along….destroy Chrisitianity.

Something to do with the Baby Jesus ….or something.

Makes sense, huh?

You're right, damn dim murderers. The fact that it's legal in the USA has nothing to do with it………and I just read a study that says no Republican has ever had an abortion! Who knew?

I bet if you checked, you would see that most people who get abortions are christians, like the majority of Americans. How does that comport with your beliefs all dims are godless? You're the ones using the very right you say we gave you!

No, Byner fumbled on his own, however, he is likely a dim. Although dims did put the Browns in a prevent defense during THE DRIVE………..and it was dim policy that forced Hargrove to go to Mesa in Game 7……..

There is another pesky fact as well. A couple billion people still live under communist/socialist regimes, so I think it's still pretty relevant, though I can see why liberal Democrats would like to pretend it's not.

I THOUGHT SO !!!

Darn Dems. Did they make Ernest Byner fumble against the Broncos in '87 too ?

Okay, here's your due. More than anyone else, today's Dims are complicit in the killing of tens of million unborn babies due to their unwavering support for abortion rights. In fact, every Dim presidential candidate carries about him/her the stench of the abortion mills.

+++

"The Communist empire ended when the Soviets' moribund economy sputtered and expired in the 1980s."

Well, almost expired, Tom. Unfortuantely, remnants of the commie empire still exist in many of our colleges & universities and in the fringes of the Dim Party. And besides, Chief, if we don't learn from history, we'll be forced to repeat it.

But I fully understand why you Dims want to flush the ugliness and excesses of your soul-mates in the USSA, Red China, etc. down the memory hole. Sorry, it can't be done.

Considering that half of America is people who are 35 years old or younger, cannot you find topics that are more relevant to comment on? Your "last word on Communism" is as obscure as recounting political angles of the Civil War.

But there's more. The Commies also wanted to elimate God and religion from public life — just like the Dims of today do.

The Dims also believe in a big and all-intrusive government run by an 'educated' elite (bureaucrats) — just like their soul-mates in the USSR did.

And now that I think of it, it was the Dim administrations of Truman and FDR which harbored commie traitors in high government position. And it was the liberals who either a) turned a blind eye or 2) made excuses for all the murders that their "Uncle" Joe Stalin committed in trying to build his Utopia.

Yes, you're on to something alright, King. But watch out. The Dims won't take kindly to your exposure of them and their true agenda for America. Posting like yours will surely get the dogs barking.