Deroy Murdock wrote a column detailing the terrorist preference for the next american president. Which candidate do the terrorists favor ? Hillary. Actually, the terrorists would prefer any Democrat. Here are a few samples of the terrorist's reasoning:
"I hope Hillary is elected in order to have the occasion to carry out all the promises she is giving regarding Iraq", said Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a Palestinian terror group.
"We see Hillary and other candidates are competing on who will withdraw from Iraq", said Abu Jihad of Al Aqsa's Nablus unit. "This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world…"
Al Aqsa's Nasser Abu Aziz, considered it "very good" that there are "voices like Hillary and others who are now attacking the Iraq invasion".
Islamic Jihad's Abu Ayman felt "emboldened" by Clinton's demands that America retreat from Iraq. He said: "It is clear that it is the resistance operations of the mujahideen that have brought about these calls for withdrawal".
"All Americans must vote Democrat", insisted Jihad Jaara, an exiled Al Aqsa agent who commanded 2002's siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity.
With such strong support among the Islamofascists, I expect the Democrats will introduce a resolution on the House floor any day now to give terrorists the right to vote. The Dems already support illegals, so this would only be one more little step in the wrong direction. The party of the donkey has already demonstrated that voting blocs trump any silly old laws on the immigration issue, and it looks like terrorists are a lock to vote Democrat. The terrorists hate Republicans so much that they want Giuliani dead, and Rudy's not even THAT conservative. Following are some of the terrorist's opinions of candidate Giuliani:
"If I had the occasion to meet him I would hurt him", said Ramadan Adassi, a West Bank Al Aqsa leader. "For the sake of the American people, Giuliani shouldn't be elected".
"Giuliani doesn't deserve to live or even to be mentioned", said Al Aqsa's Ala Senakreh. "He hates Palestinians and we hate him".
Al Aqsa's Abu Hamed said Giuliani "can hate Arafat and the Palestinians, but he knows that nobody is hated in the world more than his leadership, his party, his president, and his Zionist friends".
See, the terrorists would like america to ease up on the war against terrorism, and they know Rudy ain't gonna play dat, nor will the rest of the Republican candidates. The terrorists would like america to look more favorably on Islamofascism, and the placating Democrats are just the ticket. They are the terrorist's useful idiots. The Democrats have complained every step of the way about everything Bush has done to fight terrorism. They've twisted, turned, spun, folded, spindled, and mutilated Bush's every utterance regarding terrorism. If Democrats gave one thousandth the effort to fighting terrorists that they've given to fighting Republicans, I think I'd fall over and faint. Democratic politicians are the best hope the terrorists have in the Great Satan. The terrorists know it. So should you.
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
King, don't you think that printing these truths is a bit much for you to do to the people of the Dark Side? They do avoid all the truth that they can and printing what terrorists say in support of their candidates may make them rise up and try to drown your words out as Rev Red says they should in a democracy.
Now that I have finished my little venture into dreamland lets get serious. Great job of throwing in how terrorists feel about Hillary who the Dems in support of someone will no doubt nominate for the Big Chair. One could detect a conspiracy here if he wanted to and if he looked at things the same way as Hillary used to do. I wonder if she still does that.
I guess I shouldn't have written this piece about terrorists preferring Democrats, because I just found out yesterday from Paul Krugman of the al Times that Islamofascism isn't even real, and I quote:
"There isn’t actually any such thing as Islamofascism — it’s not an ideology; it’s a figment of the neocon imagination" – Paul Krugman, 10/29/07
Where do you think that statement ranks on the list of 'dumbest things ever said' ? Whatever they pay Krugman to write his goofy crap, it's too much.
I hear Krugman also believes there wasn't any such thing as the Nazis, and that he believes Homer Simpson is a real person
We all know that Krugman works as an opinion writer for a paper that supposedly prints everything worth printing and it does make me wonder how they judge much of what he writes. That same paper used to charge people to read his pieces along with some of the others in their "elite" group but now are back to allowing all of us to read their crap just as they do their guest editorialists. I wonder what changed? Do you suppose it is the fact that few people wanted to pay to read those "select" writers? That is what I thought happened.
Maybe someone needs to define the words that make up the term, Islamofascism, and maybe then he could understand that it isn't just those "neocons" he and his like to rant about.
The NY Times readership has been dropping, like a lot of newspapers. I think the only fair thing would be if the al Times PAID US to read their nonsense. People shouldn't have to pay hard earned money (or for a lib, OTHER PEOPLE'S hard earned money) to be subjected to the Times writers. That seems like cruel and unusual punishment to me. Krugman's columns should come with a warning label: BEWARE: WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ HAS NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE TRUTH, AND COULD BE SEVERELY DAMAGING TO YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS.