Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
All Da King's Men -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Buying Your Vote

by Da King on October 12, 2007

in Uncategorized

politician shaking hands

If Hillary Clinton was elected president and all her campaign promises were enacted, it would cost the taxpayers an additional $724 billion during her first term, and that's only if you are naive enough to believe Hillary's health care plan will only cost $110 billion per year, as Hillary claims. Analysts say it will cost much more. Government programs invariably cost far more than the advertised price tag. That's part of the come-on. You can find a breakdown of all Hillary's new spending here.

Plus, the election is over a year away and she is coming up with new ways to spend your money nearly every day. The Hillary quote of the week is this: "I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all". Amen to that, Mrs. Clinton. Amen to that.

In case nobody has noticed, our country is $9 trillion in debt, and we are facing exploding future costs with the unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare. Now might not be the best time to go on an enormous new government spending spree (major understatement). We haven't paid for the last spending sprees yet. The government is like a family who has maxed out all their credit cards going out and getting MORE CREDIT CARDS to pay the bill for the last ones. That's the last thing they need. What they need is some financial discipline. So does our government, and that's a pretty rare commodity in Washington D.C., at least during my lifetime. The Democrats don't even make any pretense at controlling spending. Instead, they just seek eternal new sources of tax revenue to pay for all their spending schemes. Talk about a prescription for disaster. The Republicans cut taxes but keep right on spending, which sure isn't much better.

I just read that the federal deficit is down to $168 billion for 2007. The deficit is falling, which is at least a positive trend, maybe even impressive since we are at war. Without the Iraq war, we'd have the same sort of fake tiny surplus that we had during Clinton's last couple years in office. I call it a fake surplus, because 35% of payroll tax revenue is generated by stealing our Social Security money, so I don't get too excited about it. In reality, we'd still have a deficit, just like we did back during Clinton's fake 'balanced budget' years. The government has rigged the numbers to hide the truth from us poor rubes. The thing that struck me the most during the fake Clinton balanced budget was how fast the politicians in Congress fell all over each other trying to spend the 'surplus' money that they thought was coming for the next decade (as if !). After 35 straight years of deficits, they got one theoretical surplus, and they were all acting like kids on Christmas morning. If anything ever revealed the true nature of big government politicians, that was it. Pathetic.

It's said you get the government you deserve, and if we are dumb enough to keep electing these politicians who hold out a carrot and pretend they are going to give us all kinds of free goodies, then we deserve to lose our place as the world's pre-eminent country. I never have figured out this fascination certain of our elitists seem to have with European socialism. Why should we emulate that, when it was the free market capitalist structure of our country that allowed us to surpass them so quickly in the first place ?

Limited government and low taxes is the only way to go in this free society (is it still free ?). The challenge is to find politicians who really believe in it and act accordingly. We can turn this ship around before it's too late, but only if we wake up.

Or, we can continue to enjoy the party as the US Titanic heads toward the iceberg and keep electing these pandering non-leader politicians. Who knows, maybe next week Hillary will promise to give us all brand new shiny Cadillacs if we vote for her. Yippee ! Party on, dudes !

  • roysoldboy

    If, indeed, an election can be bought by a pandering politician with promises of money spending she should be a shoo in with all the promises she has made. I believe that her promises concerning health care has really bought man votes and there is no telling how many more that one promise will buy. The saddest part of her health care program is the fact that it will hasten socialized medicine in our country by a number of years. From what can be seen by the debate over S-CHIP it becomes very obvious that her party is willing to go with her toward that socialized medicine as fast is needed to get the votes needed to win absolute control of the national government.

    I surely do hope that some of the people of this nation open their eyes and see what is going on with the politicization of the health care problem. If not we will soon have long waiting lists for surgeries that now come about as emergencies when they really are emergencies. I wonder how long it would take to completely break all the tobacco users to pay for what they want us to pay for with tobacco taxes.

  • http://ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/ The Reverend

    "The Democrats don't even make any pretense at controlling spending. Instead, they just seek eternal new sources of tax revenue to pay for all their spending schemes. Talk about a prescription for disaster. The Republicans cut taxes but keep right on spending, which sure isn't much better."

    "..isn't much better…"? Look at what you just said. Dems spend, so do GOP'ers, GOP'ers cut taxes, which means even less revenue and that's…."better"? How is that better? How is a Republican who cuts taxes, like say Junior Bush, which leads to lifting the national debt ceiling 5 times in 7 years…better? Makes no sense.

    "I never have figured out this fascination certain of our elitists seem to have with European socialism. Why should we emulate that, when it was the free market capitalist structure of our country that allowed us to surpass them so quickly in the first place ?"

    "..surpass them…"? What? What are you talking about? Surpass them in what….working more for less? It sure as hell ain't standard of living. Western European countries, for the most part, have a higher standard of living than the U.S.
    Health care, child mortality rates, vacation time, family benefits….human rights, number of people in prison, violence….in all this America lags behind Western Europe.

    So what are you referring too? Nuclear missiles? Percentage of budget spent on militarism?

  • Da King

    Rev, I clearly stated that the $9 trillion debt and continual deficits were a very bad thing. Not sure how you missed that. That is failure from both parties, Bush included. What you skipped right over was the entire point of my post, which is that even with a $9 trillion debt and massive future unfunded liabilities, the Democratic presidential candidates are proposing boatloads of brand new federal spending. That is absolute fiscal insanity. I'm not surprised you didn't address it.

    The USA is the biggest economy in the world. We are the acknowledged number one and only superpower. We have more immigrants who want to come here than any other country. Yeah, it must really stink here. And we did it all in less than 200 years, due to our political structure. What planet have you been living on ?

  • roysoldboy

    I find it very interesting that Red manages to leave your original point to play his game. It seems to me that his desire for socialism is so great that he doesn't see any of those Democrats trying to buy the nomination with new programs. Somehow he doesn't manage to see that those programs will take new taxes or at least higher rates of the ones that exist. How he fails to see that Hillary will have to use all of the "excess" oil company profits plus the cigarette tax increase and probably a raise in income tax rates to get her universal healthcare plan paid for.

    I don't think that Red can see them trying to use socialist programs to buy votes. Maybe it is the old forest and trees thing with him.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).