<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cavs have NY hangover in Chicago</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/</link>
	<description>George Thomas on the Cavs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-55056</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-55056</guid>
		<description>also biff , i agree with the seattle part of the deal being the one decent part of the trade . you can see what wally can give you over the last 20 games and if he continues shooting like he has , you can trade his expiring contract this summer or during next season . so there was not risk in that . in delonte , you get a young guard (although not an nba starter imo) who can defend and hit the mid range jumper , but most of all , he&#039;s def. an upgrade over shannon brown and eric snow . but that new depth that you speak of is going to be a curse for mike brown . he already shown that he struggles to put the right line up on the floor in certain situations and he&#039;s not so great in making in game adjustments , so can you imagine when boobie, sasha , and z are healthy ?? will he be able to find minutes for those guys along with devin brown ,joe smith , anderson v , and delonte west ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also biff , i agree with the seattle part of the deal being the one decent part of the trade . you can see what wally can give you over the last 20 games and if he continues shooting like he has , you can trade his expiring contract this summer or during next season . so there was not risk in that . in delonte , you get a young guard (although not an nba starter imo) who can defend and hit the mid range jumper , but most of all , he&#8217;s def. an upgrade over shannon brown and eric snow . but that new depth that you speak of is going to be a curse for mike brown . he already shown that he struggles to put the right line up on the floor in certain situations and he&#8217;s not so great in making in game adjustments , so can you imagine when boobie, sasha , and z are healthy ?? will he be able to find minutes for those guys along with devin brown ,joe smith , anderson v , and delonte west ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-55053</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-55053</guid>
		<description>biff , i think an athletic scorer who can create scoring oppurtunities for himself and others can absolutely work with lebron .just think of jordan and pippen . i always thought from day 1 larry would be a bad fit to play with lebron because throughout his career , he struggled shooting the ball , and at the time larry was obtained , lebron was a bad outside shooter(not great now , but a much better outside shooter than before) . so right then i knew that was a bad combination , plus the fact that larry has never really created offense for others . but i look at a joe johnson type , he&#039;s athletic/he can shoot the rock/he can create his own offense off the dribble /he can create offense for others , he&#039;s a perfect compliment for lebron . i wanted cavs to get him so bad back then over redd (one dimensional) , allen (aging) , and hughes (we all know his shortcomings) , but phoenix made it clear that they would match any offer and the cavs had to get someone . in the right system and a coach who understands the type of players he has , an athletic scorer/facilitator at the 2 guard spot who can consistantly give you 18-20 per night can play along side lebron and be very successful .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>biff , i think an athletic scorer who can create scoring oppurtunities for himself and others can absolutely work with lebron .just think of jordan and pippen . i always thought from day 1 larry would be a bad fit to play with lebron because throughout his career , he struggled shooting the ball , and at the time larry was obtained , lebron was a bad outside shooter(not great now , but a much better outside shooter than before) . so right then i knew that was a bad combination , plus the fact that larry has never really created offense for others . but i look at a joe johnson type , he&#8217;s athletic/he can shoot the rock/he can create his own offense off the dribble /he can create offense for others , he&#8217;s a perfect compliment for lebron . i wanted cavs to get him so bad back then over redd (one dimensional) , allen (aging) , and hughes (we all know his shortcomings) , but phoenix made it clear that they would match any offer and the cavs had to get someone . in the right system and a coach who understands the type of players he has , an athletic scorer/facilitator at the 2 guard spot who can consistantly give you 18-20 per night can play along side lebron and be very successful .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-55045</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-55045</guid>
		<description>I still believe the Cavs need a top notch power player more than a point guard or wing-type player. They should try and trade Varejao, Gibson and expiring contracts for Elton Brand when he&#039;s healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still believe the Cavs need a top notch power player more than a point guard or wing-type player. They should try and trade Varejao, Gibson and expiring contracts for Elton Brand when he&#8217;s healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-55042</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-55042</guid>
		<description>Nick:

You&#039;re right about this offense (or absence of offense).  It needs a point guard.  Without a system, you need someone that can facilitate movement and passing.

As for your other proposal, I just don&#039;t know if another athletic wing player is really the right fit for this team.  The problem is that when you have a guy like Lebron, athletic slasher scorer types probably aren&#039;t going to fit in very well.  Its very difficult to just duplicate what you already have and win because can&#039;t define their roles.

If you look at the really good teams in the NBA over the last few years, they&#039;ve all had several really good players but that each do something very different.  Take the following groups for example:  Parker, Duncan Ginobli....Billups, Hamilton, R. Wallace...Nash, Marion, Amare...Shaq, Wade...Garnett, Pierce, Allen.

Every single player in these groups does something different.  I just think for chemistry and role playing purposes, you need that.  We went the athletic slasher/scorer type one with Larry Hughes, and even though in truth, he was neither althetic or a slasher/scorer, you could tell that such a player would never really fit with Lebron.

As for this trade being the best deal out there....I believe it absolutely was.  Not so much the Chicago part which I think was apples for apples, but when Seattle came into it, it became a great deal.  My guess is we could&#039;ve had any GM in the NBA at the deadline this year and he would not have been able to do any better.  If anything, I give Ferry credit for being creative enough to pull this one off.  He drastically improved the depth of his rotation without changing the Cavs cap flexibility.  That could not have been easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about this offense (or absence of offense).  It needs a point guard.  Without a system, you need someone that can facilitate movement and passing.</p>
<p>As for your other proposal, I just don&#8217;t know if another athletic wing player is really the right fit for this team.  The problem is that when you have a guy like Lebron, athletic slasher scorer types probably aren&#8217;t going to fit in very well.  Its very difficult to just duplicate what you already have and win because can&#8217;t define their roles.</p>
<p>If you look at the really good teams in the NBA over the last few years, they&#8217;ve all had several really good players but that each do something very different.  Take the following groups for example:  Parker, Duncan Ginobli&#8230;.Billups, Hamilton, R. Wallace&#8230;Nash, Marion, Amare&#8230;Shaq, Wade&#8230;Garnett, Pierce, Allen.</p>
<p>Every single player in these groups does something different.  I just think for chemistry and role playing purposes, you need that.  We went the athletic slasher/scorer type one with Larry Hughes, and even though in truth, he was neither althetic or a slasher/scorer, you could tell that such a player would never really fit with Lebron.</p>
<p>As for this trade being the best deal out there&#8230;.I believe it absolutely was.  Not so much the Chicago part which I think was apples for apples, but when Seattle came into it, it became a great deal.  My guess is we could&#8217;ve had any GM in the NBA at the deadline this year and he would not have been able to do any better.  If anything, I give Ferry credit for being creative enough to pull this one off.  He drastically improved the depth of his rotation without changing the Cavs cap flexibility.  That could not have been easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54998</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54998</guid>
		<description>hey biff , i was  one for suggesting  that the cavs don&#039;t need a point guard in the traditional sense (john paxson/jason kidd/steve nash) if they had another player who can create for himself off the dribble as well as for teammates at the 2 guard spot (who&#039;s athletic and  young enough to play with lebron for years) . but if you go that route (which i believe is the best route considering top flight point guards like nash,paul ,and williams don&#039;t grow on trees and come around often) , you have to have a creative offense that dosen&#039;t rely on point guard play (like the triangle). the way cleveland&#039;s offense (i&#039;m being way generous by saying cleveland has offense) is &quot;designed&quot;, it begs for point guard play and there is no natural point guard on this team or in the mike brown era. that&#039;s why i do not think brown put his players in the best position to succeed , he can&#039;t make the proper adjustments to the roster he has.ultimately , i do not think he will be the coach to get lebron his championship , he has a sound defensive game plan , but that&#039;s it .i agree with what you said about the trade in the contract sense(dumping one bad contract for another) , but was this the best deal that was out there ? i also still believe this trade was made to show lebron and fans that they are not sitting idle , even if it&#039;s not a trade that makes them that much better than before .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey biff , i was  one for suggesting  that the cavs don&#8217;t need a point guard in the traditional sense (john paxson/jason kidd/steve nash) if they had another player who can create for himself off the dribble as well as for teammates at the 2 guard spot (who&#8217;s athletic and  young enough to play with lebron for years) . but if you go that route (which i believe is the best route considering top flight point guards like nash,paul ,and williams don&#8217;t grow on trees and come around often) , you have to have a creative offense that dosen&#8217;t rely on point guard play (like the triangle). the way cleveland&#8217;s offense (i&#8217;m being way generous by saying cleveland has offense) is &#8220;designed&#8221;, it begs for point guard play and there is no natural point guard on this team or in the mike brown era. that&#8217;s why i do not think brown put his players in the best position to succeed , he can&#8217;t make the proper adjustments to the roster he has.ultimately , i do not think he will be the coach to get lebron his championship , he has a sound defensive game plan , but that&#8217;s it .i agree with what you said about the trade in the contract sense(dumping one bad contract for another) , but was this the best deal that was out there ? i also still believe this trade was made to show lebron and fans that they are not sitting idle , even if it&#8217;s not a trade that makes them that much better than before .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54993</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54993</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll get worse before it gets better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll get worse before it gets better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeHoops (President, AlanTuckerFanClub.com)</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54987</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeHoops (President, AlanTuckerFanClub.com)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54987</guid>
		<description>When the Cavs are on offense, watch Ben Wallace.  He is running around out their like a junior high third stringer.  He doesn&#039;t seem to know what he&#039;s doing.

And Andy needs to make a few layups!!

I hope the Cavs have TIME to get the new players into the flow of the game.  I sometimes wonder if these late season trades EVER work out.  I mean come on, Detroit has got to have a big time advantage since their same core group of guys have been playing together for years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Cavs are on offense, watch Ben Wallace.  He is running around out their like a junior high third stringer.  He doesn&#8217;t seem to know what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
<p>And Andy needs to make a few layups!!</p>
<p>I hope the Cavs have TIME to get the new players into the flow of the game.  I sometimes wonder if these late season trades EVER work out.  I mean come on, Detroit has got to have a big time advantage since their same core group of guys have been playing together for years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54981</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54981</guid>
		<description>Nick:

You make some good points but allow me to respond to some of them.  First, this wasn&#039;t a trade just to make a trade.  I highly doubt Dan Gilbert would put up the kind of extra cash that this deal commands just to make a trade.  My guess is that Ferry and Gilbert decided that they needed to get rid of Hughes (so that a fan didn&#039;t come out of the stands at the Q and choke him) but that they couldn&#039;t do it without getting some guard help to replace him.  They also knew that his contract was so bad that they could only move it for something equally bad.  Thus, the Bulls became an obvious first team to involve in the trade with Wallace&#039;s remains under a ridiculously bad contract.  They probably figured they could dump Hughes and actually get more polished depth at the 4 in Wallace and Smith (as opposed to the decidedly unpolished Drew Gooden).  Then, Seattle comes in looking to give away a free backcourt, allowing us to replace some of Hughes&#039; scoring and upgrading the point and a logical deal is born.  Plus, keep in mind that Ferry probably doesn&#039;t sneeze without Lebron&#039;s permission.  What I mean by that is that when Ferry told Lebron he was going to trade Hughes, we can gather from the resulting trade that Lebron didn&#039;t exactly picket outside of Ferry&#039;s office to protest the deal.  

In regard to the point guard talk, West is certainly not a great point guard but the truth of the matter is that those guys don&#039;t hit the market very often.  A lot of the really good guards like Paul, Williams, Parker, etc. are with the teams that drafted them.  After Boston, Toronto, and Minnesota all gave away Billups, Golden State gave away Arenas, and Dallas parted with Nash, I think teams have gotten a little gun shy about letting franchise PGs walk.  The ones that hit the market now are usually on the market for a reason.  See Kidd, Jason or Bibby, Mike.  Even on a team looking to rebuild and shed salary, the franchise point guard is the last guy they&#039;re going to give away.  So, either the Cavs are going to have to get lucky, draft the right guy, or just make do without.  The franchise point guard you are looking for probably isn&#039;t just going to show up on the market next year.

I&#039;m torn on the coach thing.  Brown is really a doofus on offense and I wonder sometimes if you can win a title with a guy like that.  But, at the same time, do you remember how bad the Cavs were on defense before he go there?  Almost as bad as they&#039;ve been since the trade!!!  Also, if the Cavs fired the guy who was at the helm when the one man band made it to the NBA finals, they would have a lot of explaining to do.  If the new coach didn&#039;t do better, and only 1 team a year does better, they would be crucified.  It&#039;s a tough spot for them to be in.  Truthfully though, none of this talk matters because I think Brown has at least 2 more years before he has to worry about his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick:</p>
<p>You make some good points but allow me to respond to some of them.  First, this wasn&#8217;t a trade just to make a trade.  I highly doubt Dan Gilbert would put up the kind of extra cash that this deal commands just to make a trade.  My guess is that Ferry and Gilbert decided that they needed to get rid of Hughes (so that a fan didn&#8217;t come out of the stands at the Q and choke him) but that they couldn&#8217;t do it without getting some guard help to replace him.  They also knew that his contract was so bad that they could only move it for something equally bad.  Thus, the Bulls became an obvious first team to involve in the trade with Wallace&#8217;s remains under a ridiculously bad contract.  They probably figured they could dump Hughes and actually get more polished depth at the 4 in Wallace and Smith (as opposed to the decidedly unpolished Drew Gooden).  Then, Seattle comes in looking to give away a free backcourt, allowing us to replace some of Hughes&#8217; scoring and upgrading the point and a logical deal is born.  Plus, keep in mind that Ferry probably doesn&#8217;t sneeze without Lebron&#8217;s permission.  What I mean by that is that when Ferry told Lebron he was going to trade Hughes, we can gather from the resulting trade that Lebron didn&#8217;t exactly picket outside of Ferry&#8217;s office to protest the deal.  </p>
<p>In regard to the point guard talk, West is certainly not a great point guard but the truth of the matter is that those guys don&#8217;t hit the market very often.  A lot of the really good guards like Paul, Williams, Parker, etc. are with the teams that drafted them.  After Boston, Toronto, and Minnesota all gave away Billups, Golden State gave away Arenas, and Dallas parted with Nash, I think teams have gotten a little gun shy about letting franchise PGs walk.  The ones that hit the market now are usually on the market for a reason.  See Kidd, Jason or Bibby, Mike.  Even on a team looking to rebuild and shed salary, the franchise point guard is the last guy they&#8217;re going to give away.  So, either the Cavs are going to have to get lucky, draft the right guy, or just make do without.  The franchise point guard you are looking for probably isn&#8217;t just going to show up on the market next year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m torn on the coach thing.  Brown is really a doofus on offense and I wonder sometimes if you can win a title with a guy like that.  But, at the same time, do you remember how bad the Cavs were on defense before he go there?  Almost as bad as they&#8217;ve been since the trade!!!  Also, if the Cavs fired the guy who was at the helm when the one man band made it to the NBA finals, they would have a lot of explaining to do.  If the new coach didn&#8217;t do better, and only 1 team a year does better, they would be crucified.  It&#8217;s a tough spot for them to be in.  Truthfully though, none of this talk matters because I think Brown has at least 2 more years before he has to worry about his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54976</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54976</guid>
		<description>from day 1  , i said i was never a fan of this trade . this trade was made just to make a trade but the cavs never addressed their need for an athletic scorer who can create his own shot as well as shots for others . next year , you have to trade wally or even in the summer , his expiring contract is great bait . delonte is not an nba starting point guard , cavs keep getting career backups (mcinnis ,snow ,west) to play starting point guard .cavs also need a coach who is more than a one trick pony and who can put their players in the best position to succeed on the offensive end of the floor . also a coach who is not in complete awe of the star player and has the balls to actually coach the star player .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from day 1  , i said i was never a fan of this trade . this trade was made just to make a trade but the cavs never addressed their need for an athletic scorer who can create his own shot as well as shots for others . next year , you have to trade wally or even in the summer , his expiring contract is great bait . delonte is not an nba starting point guard , cavs keep getting career backups (mcinnis ,snow ,west) to play starting point guard .cavs also need a coach who is more than a one trick pony and who can put their players in the best position to succeed on the offensive end of the floor . also a coach who is not in complete awe of the star player and has the balls to actually coach the star player .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aymaida duty</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/comment-page-1/#comment-54973</link>
		<dc:creator>aymaida duty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2008/03/06/cavs-at-bulls/#comment-54973</guid>
		<description>Yo, can you blame Lebron for being &#039;un-Lebron-like&#039; or whatever?  You can make the sweetest passes in the world, and if no one makes a shot/layup, then no assist for you!  Eventually you&#039;re gonna stop passing for a little while, especially when you score what, 76 points in 6 quarters leading up to it.

No one shot well last night, but Wallace needs to not get schooled by the likes of Noah.  Someone needs to make him angry or something.

The people who were dissin&#039; Z this year should look at the stats and the last few games and realize that we&#039;re lucky to have him, he is an underrated component on the Cavs.  Alan got mad at me for saying that Z &#039;bleeds Cleveland&#039; earlier in the season, but I maintain that Z is a loyal Cavalier and always has been, and he overcame his early injuries and has had a great career for us.  I can&#039;t wait for him to come back, Andy to be 100%, and Pavs and Gibson to get back too.  

I don&#039;t think many remarks on here qualify as &#039;fatalism&#039;, folks are just analyzing the moves and it&#039;s a little painful to watch the incontinuity with the new guys and the injuries to boot.  We all have faith in the King, else we wouldn&#039;t bother reading.

I will say BW makes a lot of typos, gotta watch that man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, can you blame Lebron for being &#8216;un-Lebron-like&#8217; or whatever?  You can make the sweetest passes in the world, and if no one makes a shot/layup, then no assist for you!  Eventually you&#8217;re gonna stop passing for a little while, especially when you score what, 76 points in 6 quarters leading up to it.</p>
<p>No one shot well last night, but Wallace needs to not get schooled by the likes of Noah.  Someone needs to make him angry or something.</p>
<p>The people who were dissin&#8217; Z this year should look at the stats and the last few games and realize that we&#8217;re lucky to have him, he is an underrated component on the Cavs.  Alan got mad at me for saying that Z &#8216;bleeds Cleveland&#8217; earlier in the season, but I maintain that Z is a loyal Cavalier and always has been, and he overcame his early injuries and has had a great career for us.  I can&#8217;t wait for him to come back, Andy to be 100%, and Pavs and Gibson to get back too.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think many remarks on here qualify as &#8216;fatalism&#8217;, folks are just analyzing the moves and it&#8217;s a little painful to watch the incontinuity with the new guys and the injuries to boot.  We all have faith in the King, else we wouldn&#8217;t bother reading.</p>
<p>I will say BW makes a lot of typos, gotta watch that man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
