Um, nobody enjoys them losing. Don’t know what your talking bout.

Oh, really, Mike? Explain this:

billy Says:
January 4th, 2008 at 11:37 pm

what happen to usher and his promise of a big show at the “Q” and he was not talking about the cavs, well it is all good, im glad this team sucks, but do not expect them to do anything untill they lose contracts, then by then hopefully they will have a gm who knows how to evaluate talent

Plus, Mike, that doesn’t even include alan t who takes obvious delight in the plight of this franchise, but I’m not sure if he considers himself a fan or not. Billy for one repeatedly talks about how glad he is this team “sucks”. There’s plenty of people in here who share that outlook, and I think it’s pathetic.

What about dogs wearing headsets trying to sell mortgages? That would be kind of cute.

I’m torn about the recurring Bibby rumor. First, is it just more hooey to make Ferry look like he’s doing something? Second, if it’s true, would such a trade be a good idea?

Having Bibby and Gibson out there with LeBron is intriguing, but the Cavs would probably have to rely on the return of the mysteriously injured Donyell Marshall, hoping he plays well.

Then, in a year and a half, the Cavs would possibly be losing Bibby, Varejao and all those terrible veterans, plus Z would be getting up there in age.

I suppose Ferry could trade expiring contracts for some players in the meantime, but does anyone have confidence that he’ll do that well at this point? It’s entirely possible that Ferry will have to find two big men, a scorer and a bench within a year or two to keep LeBron interested.

It could be the same thing all over again–sign whoever happens to be available, overpaying out of desperation.

I frankly wouldn’t care if they didn’t have them at all, but they aren’t a reflection on the owner’s willingness to pay. Pay what? Top dollar for dogs with frisbees? Please tell me that no one is buying this load of dung.