<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Marbury question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/</link>
	<description>George Thomas on the Cavs</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: One Destination For Online Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-55201</link>
		<dc:creator>One Destination For Online Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-55201</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Cosmetics Shopping...&lt;/strong&gt;

Raging Bull is a branded name in the sports arena for its quality sports wears. it caters a large variety of products like leisure wear, complimentary kit, training wear, team kit, accessories, underwear, gym wear and swim wear for both men and women....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Cosmetics Shopping&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Raging Bull is a branded name in the sports arena for its quality sports wears. it caters a large variety of products like leisure wear, complimentary kit, training wear, team kit, accessories, underwear, gym wear and swim wear for both men and women&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-23990</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-23990</guid>
		<description>I hear all of you when you talk about Hughes and AV problems, but they at least have some value when they play. Granted, that aint happening right now, but hopefully it will. Marbury's only value when he plays will to selfishly put up bricks and made LBJ less effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear all of you when you talk about Hughes and AV problems, but they at least have some value when they play. Granted, that aint happening right now, but hopefully it will. Marbury&#8217;s only value when he plays will to selfishly put up bricks and made LBJ less effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britney Asbourne</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-20963</link>
		<dc:creator>britney Asbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-20963</guid>
		<description>Good defense by the Minnesota Timberwolves drama boys, if only we could patch up the difference, this will be a Minnesota good season. They are running, switching in defense, rebounding see those efforts. We don't have yet the Timberwolves team down. 

I which I could see some Timberwolves games live. I was looking for tickets all the good seats on ticketmaster were taken I had to check broker. And man you don’t want to do that especially for the Minnesota Timberwolves. Thanks god  there sites like Ticketwood which work as comparators here is the site
 &lt;a href="http://www.ticketwood.com/nba/Minnesota-Timberwolves-Tickets.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Timberwolves Tickets&lt;/a&gt;
http://www.ticketwood.com/nba/Minnesota-Timberwolves-Tickets.php. 

I like slam dunks that take me to the hoop my favorite play is the ally-hoop,
I like the pic n roll,i like the given goal its basketball yo, yo lets go!
Go Timberwolves Go!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good defense by the Minnesota Timberwolves drama boys, if only we could patch up the difference, this will be a Minnesota good season. They are running, switching in defense, rebounding see those efforts. We don&#8217;t have yet the Timberwolves team down. </p>
<p>I which I could see some Timberwolves games live. I was looking for tickets all the good seats on ticketmaster were taken I had to check broker. And man you don’t want to do that especially for the Minnesota Timberwolves. Thanks god  there sites like Ticketwood which work as comparators here is the site<br />
 <a href="http://www.ticketwood.com/nba/Minnesota-Timberwolves-Tickets.php" rel="nofollow">Timberwolves Tickets</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ticketwood.com/nba/Minnesota-Timberwolves-Tickets.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.ticketwood.com/nba/Minnesota-Timberwolves-Tickets.php</a>. </p>
<p>I like slam dunks that take me to the hoop my favorite play is the ally-hoop,<br />
I like the pic n roll,i like the given goal its basketball yo, yo lets go!<br />
Go Timberwolves Go!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert c</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19872</link>
		<dc:creator>robert c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19872</guid>
		<description>he's a cancer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s a cancer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19666</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19666</guid>
		<description>I can't see Marbury fitting in with the Cavs, though I could see him playing well again in a different situation.

The distressing part to all of this is the salary-cap driven philosophy many fans are accepting so easily. 

First, there's no way the Cavs should be worried about creating salary cap space two years down the road. LeBron is young but he could blow out his knee at any time. They will contend as long as he is healthy so they need to think about championships every year. Plus, is he going to want to be part of a rebuilding project when his contract is up in a couple years? 

Second, from what I understand from BW's post, the Cavs are thinking they can trade long bad contracts for short bad contracts then trade the short bad contracts for star players who don't make too much money. 

That sounds like a difficult task, one that will depend on a few lucky situations in other cities to pull off. Plus, it seems Ferry might not be all that popular with other GMs, let alone agents, which might make it even more difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see Marbury fitting in with the Cavs, though I could see him playing well again in a different situation.</p>
<p>The distressing part to all of this is the salary-cap driven philosophy many fans are accepting so easily. </p>
<p>First, there&#8217;s no way the Cavs should be worried about creating salary cap space two years down the road. LeBron is young but he could blow out his knee at any time. They will contend as long as he is healthy so they need to think about championships every year. Plus, is he going to want to be part of a rebuilding project when his contract is up in a couple years? </p>
<p>Second, from what I understand from BW&#8217;s post, the Cavs are thinking they can trade long bad contracts for short bad contracts then trade the short bad contracts for star players who don&#8217;t make too much money. </p>
<p>That sounds like a difficult task, one that will depend on a few lucky situations in other cities to pull off. Plus, it seems Ferry might not be all that popular with other GMs, let alone agents, which might make it even more difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Personal Blog &#187; The Marbury question</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19654</link>
		<dc:creator>My Personal Blog &#187; The Marbury question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19654</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Marbury question November 14th, 2007 By the time I got home from Denver this afternoon, my e-mail inbox already had several queries about Stephon Marbury with the news of his sudden and bizzare departure from the New York Knicks. Then things kicked up a notch when one of my close friends in the business, ESPN’s Chris Sheridan, wrote a column where he listed the Cavs as Marbury’s potential No. 1 trade destination as part of a sign-and-trade package for Anderson Varejao. Thanks for the extr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Marbury question November 14th, 2007 By the time I got home from Denver this afternoon, my e-mail inbox already had several queries about Stephon Marbury with the news of his sudden and bizzare departure from the New York Knicks. Then things kicked up a notch when one of my close friends in the business, ESPN’s Chris Sheridan, wrote a column where he listed the Cavs as Marbury’s potential No. 1 trade destination as part of a sign-and-trade package for Anderson Varejao. Thanks for the extr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan t.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19633</link>
		<dc:creator>alan t.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19633</guid>
		<description>jmoe, seriously, are you Rageaholic Rick Lite?  Stop the name-calling and grow up, how 'bout it?  

You're absolutely right, it's Wednesday afternoon boredom activity.  It will never happen, it's total fantasy league trade stuff.  But you will note that some senseless people were filling the beat writer's e-mail box with the possibility, and I was not one of them.

Besides, why not have fun and talk about Ricky Davis or Marbury on the Cavs?  Davis is going to be on his best behavior this season, he's playing for a new contract.  And Marbury is a damn good player, and right now the Cavs only have one, and his name is not Larry Hughes.

Besides, precisely what "chemistry" are we talking about here?  Damon Jones flaps his lips about playing time and has expressed his unhappiness to the media.  Hughes has his own publicist in Gilbert Arenas, and that will get even louder when Pavlovic starts taking minutes away from him.  Sideshow Bob hasn't reported.  Shannon Brown has been told to hit the road.  Apparently "good guy" Snow now wants out.   James is seen on the court getting frustrated and barking at his teammates.  Oh, wait a minute, that's not frustration, that's "leadership."  

Bottom line is it's all harmless fun to talk about, and even if total fantasy came to fruition, I don't see any possible competitive downside.  Marbury doesn't wear out his welcomes for at least two years, and Cleveland will never sign a premier unrestricted free agent, whether it's 2008 or 3008. 

Cleveland will always be competitive so long as James is on the roster and healthy.  Period.  It's going to take a substantial risk via a trade to have a shot at beating the best teams from the Western Conference, and right now the real and the sole concern in the front office seems to revolve around the possibility of paying the luxury tax this season and next.  In the meantime, the LeBron window may be closing.  Can any Cavs fan consider this to be a good thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jmoe, seriously, are you Rageaholic Rick Lite?  Stop the name-calling and grow up, how &#8217;bout it?  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, it&#8217;s Wednesday afternoon boredom activity.  It will never happen, it&#8217;s total fantasy league trade stuff.  But you will note that some senseless people were filling the beat writer&#8217;s e-mail box with the possibility, and I was not one of them.</p>
<p>Besides, why not have fun and talk about Ricky Davis or Marbury on the Cavs?  Davis is going to be on his best behavior this season, he&#8217;s playing for a new contract.  And Marbury is a damn good player, and right now the Cavs only have one, and his name is not Larry Hughes.</p>
<p>Besides, precisely what &#8220;chemistry&#8221; are we talking about here?  Damon Jones flaps his lips about playing time and has expressed his unhappiness to the media.  Hughes has his own publicist in Gilbert Arenas, and that will get even louder when Pavlovic starts taking minutes away from him.  Sideshow Bob hasn&#8217;t reported.  Shannon Brown has been told to hit the road.  Apparently &#8220;good guy&#8221; Snow now wants out.   James is seen on the court getting frustrated and barking at his teammates.  Oh, wait a minute, that&#8217;s not frustration, that&#8217;s &#8220;leadership.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Bottom line is it&#8217;s all harmless fun to talk about, and even if total fantasy came to fruition, I don&#8217;t see any possible competitive downside.  Marbury doesn&#8217;t wear out his welcomes for at least two years, and Cleveland will never sign a premier unrestricted free agent, whether it&#8217;s 2008 or 3008. </p>
<p>Cleveland will always be competitive so long as James is on the roster and healthy.  Period.  It&#8217;s going to take a substantial risk via a trade to have a shot at beating the best teams from the Western Conference, and right now the real and the sole concern in the front office seems to revolve around the possibility of paying the luxury tax this season and next.  In the meantime, the LeBron window may be closing.  Can any Cavs fan consider this to be a good thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmoe</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19534</link>
		<dc:creator>jmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19534</guid>
		<description>Stephon Marbury is a trash talking ball hogging team chemistry
destroying intern screwing junk tennis shoe selling gold toothed bald headed idiot. I dont care how much he makes
or how good he is if the Cavs trade for him they are finished.

There are only two players the Cavs should be interested in
regarding free agency. Arenas and J O,Neal period. Either
one could win us a championship. I would give up any four
players besides Lefreethrow for these two.

Any other moves are counterproductive. All this talk about
high priced LOSERS is Wednesday afternoon boredom activity
by Rosen and Tuck Tuck Suck Suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephon Marbury is a trash talking ball hogging team chemistry<br />
destroying intern screwing junk tennis shoe selling gold toothed bald headed idiot. I dont care how much he makes<br />
or how good he is if the Cavs trade for him they are finished.</p>
<p>There are only two players the Cavs should be interested in<br />
regarding free agency. Arenas and J O,Neal period. Either<br />
one could win us a championship. I would give up any four<br />
players besides Lefreethrow for these two.</p>
<p>Any other moves are counterproductive. All this talk about<br />
high priced LOSERS is Wednesday afternoon boredom activity<br />
by Rosen and Tuck Tuck Suck Suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19517</guid>
		<description>How did this slip through the cracks? http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2007/11/deshawns_beardgrowing_contest.html

My money's on Drew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did this slip through the cracks? <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2007/11/deshawns_beardgrowing_contest.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2007/11/deshawns_beardgrowing_contest.html</a></p>
<p>My money&#8217;s on Drew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2007/11/14/the-marbury-question/#comment-19455</guid>
		<description>I agree with SUD.  A trade for Marbury would really be a trade to get rid of the headaches that are Larry Hughes and Anderson Varejao.  Yes, the Cavs would have to take on an entirely new headache in Stephon Marbury, but it would be a headache they would be rid of in 18 months or less.

There's no doubt that Marbury would be a problem.  But would he really be a bigger distraction than Hughes and his constant whining about how it's the offense, or the pace, or the scheme, or any other excuse that is causing his lack of production?  Would he cause more problems than Anderson Varejao and his ridiculous contract negotiations?  The answer might be yes, but it's definitely close.  And the ability to get rid of those problems relatively soon has a lot of value.

Go Cavs.

Mike C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with SUD.  A trade for Marbury would really be a trade to get rid of the headaches that are Larry Hughes and Anderson Varejao.  Yes, the Cavs would have to take on an entirely new headache in Stephon Marbury, but it would be a headache they would be rid of in 18 months or less.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that Marbury would be a problem.  But would he really be a bigger distraction than Hughes and his constant whining about how it&#8217;s the offense, or the pace, or the scheme, or any other excuse that is causing his lack of production?  Would he cause more problems than Anderson Varejao and his ridiculous contract negotiations?  The answer might be yes, but it&#8217;s definitely close.  And the ability to get rid of those problems relatively soon has a lot of value.</p>
<p>Go Cavs.</p>
<p>Mike C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
