<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listening, learning from the 1 percenters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/</link>
	<description>George Thomas on the Cavs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Hey, I have a question:  Our ubiquitous blog host has directly and emphatically declared that all other sportswriters and sports talking heads are total idiots and complete morons for saying that James' Nike contract includes a provision for a pay increase if he plays in a major market.   You have written, in no uncertain terms, that this is completely false.  But yet, this is PRECISELY what Brandon Wright has now expressly contradicted and asserts is indeed absolutely true.



So which one is it?  Let's put it this way...combined with all of your recent rumor-mongering and your admitted fabrication of non-existent trade possibilities, if Wright's purported confirmation of that Nike contract is indeed 100% true, then your repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated statement is the sports equivalent of Bush's unwavering bombastic declaration of imaginary non-existent stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.   



Which one is it, Brian?  You can't both be correct.  It's either one, or it's the other.  If Wright is indeed right, then much like Elvis, your credibility has left the building.



We await your response with bated breath.   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I have a question:  Our ubiquitous blog host has directly and emphatically declared that all other sportswriters and sports talking heads are total idiots and complete morons for saying that James&#8217; Nike contract includes a provision for a pay increase if he plays in a major market.   You have written, in no uncertain terms, that this is completely false.  But yet, this is PRECISELY what Brandon Wright has now expressly contradicted and asserts is indeed absolutely true.</p>
<p>So which one is it?  Let&#8217;s put it this way&#8230;combined with all of your recent rumor-mongering and your admitted fabrication of non-existent trade possibilities, if Wright&#8217;s purported confirmation of that Nike contract is indeed 100% true, then your repeated and repeated and repeated and repeated statement is the sports equivalent of Bush&#8217;s unwavering bombastic declaration of imaginary non-existent stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.   </p>
<p>Which one is it, Brian?  You can&#8217;t both be correct.  It&#8217;s either one, or it&#8217;s the other.  If Wright is indeed right, then much like Elvis, your credibility has left the building.</p>
<p>We await your response with bated breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Are the Cavs exploring a trade up to get Marcus Williams?  Have they at least looked at him?  Having spent the last few years at Uconn, I thought many times how well he would fit the Cavs.  He's quick, drives to the hoop, but can make a jump shot.  His passing is excellent and in particular, feeds big men well.  He would take some pressure off James, but also assist guys like Gooden and Varejao.  Of course, coming from Uconn, he's also able to run and gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the Cavs exploring a trade up to get Marcus Williams?  Have they at least looked at him?  Having spent the last few years at Uconn, I thought many times how well he would fit the Cavs.  He&#8217;s quick, drives to the hoop, but can make a jump shot.  His passing is excellent and in particular, feeds big men well.  He would take some pressure off James, but also assist guys like Gooden and Varejao.  Of course, coming from Uconn, he&#8217;s also able to run and gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Brian. Means a lot coming from the hardest working man in the NBA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Brian. Means a lot coming from the hardest working man in the NBA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-911</guid>
		<description>In Mark Eaton's defense, no pun intended, he was pretty darn decent for a giant white oaf.  Ilgauskas has never even figured out that holding up his arms on defense just might be a prudent idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Mark Eaton&#8217;s defense, no pun intended, he was pretty darn decent for a giant white oaf.  Ilgauskas has never even figured out that holding up his arms on defense just might be a prudent idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiDC</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>JiDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-910</guid>
		<description>What's with the bold-face names?  What is this, Page Six?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the bold-face names?  What is this, Page Six?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-909</guid>
		<description>The more I think of it the more it makes sense to me--the Cavs should trade Z for Carlos Boozer.



With LeBron on the roster, one of the Cavs' highest priorities when evaluating big men these days should be hands--whether the player can catch a bullet pass in heavy traffic then convert. Boozer is very good in this area while it seemed to me that Gooden rode the bench against the Pistons because he is not.



If Boozer were to come to Cleveland contrite and highly motivated, fans would forgive him quickly, I believe. Not many NBA players admit to mistakes (even after choking coaches or raping hotel clerks), so it would make a pretty good story. It's really the only way Boozer can fully restore his reputation and could actually be a good move for him.



The current Cavs regime has no axe to grind with Boozer and there aren't even that many players left from his time here. I'm sure they all understand the temptation of a ludicrous contract anyway.



With Boozer in tow, the Cavs could make a sign and trade involving Gooden, maybe for the Buck's Magliore, though I think I remember our resident blog host/rumor-monger  admitting he pretty much made that one up. In any case, the Cavs should look for a platoon-type center; Varejao needs minutes but shouldn't start. 



The trade would possibly tempt the Jazz. That's a team intent on keeping oafish white giants around--Ostertag was there forever even though the coach seemed to hate him. And a frontline with Z, Kirilinko and Okur would have to be one of the tallest in the NBA and one of the best at blocking shots. Kirilinko's quickness might even help mask some of Z's slow-footed defense.



By the way, league executives very close to this situation tell me this move is very close to happening. I believe AJ Adande's doing a story as well, with me as his primary source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think of it the more it makes sense to me&#8211;the Cavs should trade Z for Carlos Boozer.</p>
<p>With LeBron on the roster, one of the Cavs&#8217; highest priorities when evaluating big men these days should be hands&#8211;whether the player can catch a bullet pass in heavy traffic then convert. Boozer is very good in this area while it seemed to me that Gooden rode the bench against the Pistons because he is not.</p>
<p>If Boozer were to come to Cleveland contrite and highly motivated, fans would forgive him quickly, I believe. Not many NBA players admit to mistakes (even after choking coaches or raping hotel clerks), so it would make a pretty good story. It&#8217;s really the only way Boozer can fully restore his reputation and could actually be a good move for him.</p>
<p>The current Cavs regime has no axe to grind with Boozer and there aren&#8217;t even that many players left from his time here. I&#8217;m sure they all understand the temptation of a ludicrous contract anyway.</p>
<p>With Boozer in tow, the Cavs could make a sign and trade involving Gooden, maybe for the Buck&#8217;s Magliore, though I think I remember our resident blog host/rumor-monger  admitting he pretty much made that one up. In any case, the Cavs should look for a platoon-type center; Varejao needs minutes but shouldn&#8217;t start. </p>
<p>The trade would possibly tempt the Jazz. That&#8217;s a team intent on keeping oafish white giants around&#8211;Ostertag was there forever even though the coach seemed to hate him. And a frontline with Z, Kirilinko and Okur would have to be one of the tallest in the NBA and one of the best at blocking shots. Kirilinko&#8217;s quickness might even help mask some of Z&#8217;s slow-footed defense.</p>
<p>By the way, league executives very close to this situation tell me this move is very close to happening. I believe AJ Adande&#8217;s doing a story as well, with me as his primary source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Cuban automatically won my respect a few months ago.  I went to a Mavericks game in Dallas.  The arena sound was outrageous...actually, not all that different than the phony orchestrated Spinal Tap audio sphincter bombastic atmosphere at Gund...uh, I mean the Q, but that's neither here nor there.  So what the hell, I figured...why don't I e-mail Mark Cuban about it?  Hell, he's not going to respond, right?  



But sure enough, the very next morning, the guy HIMSELF (I could tell the writing style, yep, it was him) e-mailed me back asking what the problem was, where I was sitting, tell him more, etc.  Evidently he thought I was a season-ticket holder, but still...Why the hell a millionaire/billionaire, or whatever he is, would take any time at all to hack out a few lines to a lowlife nobody like me...well, I thought that was pretty classy.  Time is money, and even though it only took him two to three minutes, that's still his time.     



Maybe I'm wrong, but to compare and contrast, I can't imagine that Gilbert would have personally responded.  If anything, he would have forwarded my e-mail and had one of his very junior lackeys write me form BS three weeks later, if at all.



With respect to Gilbert's business philosophy at Quicken, yes, it's been highly successful.  And I'll give all the well-deserved credit to Gilbert, but far more aside credit to Gilbert's keen recognition that 20-somethings are unbelievably naive idiots that will buy into all that corporate rah-rah bullsh*t hook, line and sinker.  They're like children, really.  Particularly the virgins straight out of college.  Don't know any better.  By the time they realize they've been used and duped, they're in their 30s, cynical and much, much wiser, working for a different company, and Gilbert has parlayed the profits he's made from naive youngsters into other businesses, such as a deal for the Milwaukee Brewers...uh, I mean the Cleveland Cavaliers.



Nothing against Gilbert, he's a shrewd guy.  20-somethings are bloody fools.  I wish I thought of it before he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cuban automatically won my respect a few months ago.  I went to a Mavericks game in Dallas.  The arena sound was outrageous&#8230;actually, not all that different than the phony orchestrated Spinal Tap audio sphincter bombastic atmosphere at Gund&#8230;uh, I mean the Q, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there.  So what the hell, I figured&#8230;why don&#8217;t I e-mail Mark Cuban about it?  Hell, he&#8217;s not going to respond, right?  </p>
<p>But sure enough, the very next morning, the guy HIMSELF (I could tell the writing style, yep, it was him) e-mailed me back asking what the problem was, where I was sitting, tell him more, etc.  Evidently he thought I was a season-ticket holder, but still&#8230;Why the hell a millionaire/billionaire, or whatever he is, would take any time at all to hack out a few lines to a lowlife nobody like me&#8230;well, I thought that was pretty classy.  Time is money, and even though it only took him two to three minutes, that&#8217;s still his time.     </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but to compare and contrast, I can&#8217;t imagine that Gilbert would have personally responded.  If anything, he would have forwarded my e-mail and had one of his very junior lackeys write me form BS three weeks later, if at all.</p>
<p>With respect to Gilbert&#8217;s business philosophy at Quicken, yes, it&#8217;s been highly successful.  And I&#8217;ll give all the well-deserved credit to Gilbert, but far more aside credit to Gilbert&#8217;s keen recognition that 20-somethings are unbelievably naive idiots that will buy into all that corporate rah-rah bullsh*t hook, line and sinker.  They&#8217;re like children, really.  Particularly the virgins straight out of college.  Don&#8217;t know any better.  By the time they realize they&#8217;ve been used and duped, they&#8217;re in their 30s, cynical and much, much wiser, working for a different company, and Gilbert has parlayed the profits he&#8217;s made from naive youngsters into other businesses, such as a deal for the Milwaukee Brewers&#8230;uh, I mean the Cleveland Cavaliers.</p>
<p>Nothing against Gilbert, he&#8217;s a shrewd guy.  20-somethings are bloody fools.  I wish I thought of it before he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/06/20/listening-learning-from-the-1-percenters/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=65#comment-907</guid>
		<description>I am man enough to say I'm sorry.  I didn't see the article you wrote on the draft until after I called you a liar ... good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am man enough to say I&#8217;m sorry.  I didn&#8217;t see the article you wrote on the draft until after I called you a liar &#8230; good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
