<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All-Star &#8220;Weak&#8221;end</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/</link>
	<description>George Thomas on the Cavs</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-422</guid>
		<description>I'm not arguing with anybody.  I was just a bit sickened by the entire display.  The NBA has turned into a marketing Caligula.  And in that light, anybody with any common sense knows it's going to take a helluva lot more than Gilbert buying Maverick Carter a new badass Rottweiler puppy on his birthday to keep James from going to New York when the time comes.  That's where the NBA wants him, that's where the NBA's billionaire corporate partners want him.  And you thought there was peer pressure in high school?  



A literal STAGE to introduce players at an all-star game?  Normally a "stage" is merely a figurative term.  Not anymore.  Just for comedy relief, I was half-expecting David Stern and Elton John to circle the introduced players like missiles, powered only by the jet packs strapped onto their backs.  Rocket Man, indeed.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing with anybody.  I was just a bit sickened by the entire display.  The NBA has turned into a marketing Caligula.  And in that light, anybody with any common sense knows it&#8217;s going to take a helluva lot more than Gilbert buying Maverick Carter a new badass Rottweiler puppy on his birthday to keep James from going to New York when the time comes.  That&#8217;s where the NBA wants him, that&#8217;s where the NBA&#8217;s billionaire corporate partners want him.  And you thought there was peer pressure in high school?  </p>
<p>A literal STAGE to introduce players at an all-star game?  Normally a &#8220;stage&#8221; is merely a figurative term.  Not anymore.  Just for comedy relief, I was half-expecting David Stern and Elton John to circle the introduced players like missiles, powered only by the jet packs strapped onto their backs.  Rocket Man, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Alan who are you arguing with exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan who are you arguing with exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Lord, did anybody see that exercise in wretched excess formerly known as the NBA All-Star game "player introductions?"  Holy cow.  Literally a freakin' entire symphony orchestra playing while they're being introduced against a background that resembled something from Cirque du Soleil of the 24th century.  I can just imagine Ilgauskas having to stand up there with his seven-rebound average as a God-like representative of a spectacular civilization of pasty white Cyborgs sent from the future to destroy all that might one day oppose them.  Siegfried &#038; Roy had their over-the-top production with fireworks and explosions and white tigers flying high in the sky, the NBA has their over-the-top production with LeBron James and Dirk Nowitzki shooting fireworks and firing explosions out of their ass.  LITERALLY. And to think next year's event will be in Las Vegas.  I can't wait.



If anybody with any semblance of a business IQ does not believe the NBA and its powerful corporate partners are not going to do everything in their power behind the scenes to manuever James to the blinding bright lights of the center of the marketing universe, then I *strongly* urge you to find somebody who recorded this game's player introductions.  It was absolutely obscene and was an amazing indicator of the direction where they want the NBA to go.  Only a fool would say James is not a part of that business plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord, did anybody see that exercise in wretched excess formerly known as the NBA All-Star game &#8220;player introductions?&#8221;  Holy cow.  Literally a freakin&#8217; entire symphony orchestra playing while they&#8217;re being introduced against a background that resembled something from Cirque du Soleil of the 24th century.  I can just imagine Ilgauskas having to stand up there with his seven-rebound average as a God-like representative of a spectacular civilization of pasty white Cyborgs sent from the future to destroy all that might one day oppose them.  Siegfried &#038; Roy had their over-the-top production with fireworks and explosions and white tigers flying high in the sky, the NBA has their over-the-top production with LeBron James and Dirk Nowitzki shooting fireworks and firing explosions out of their ass.  LITERALLY. And to think next year&#8217;s event will be in Las Vegas.  I can&#8217;t wait.</p>
<p>If anybody with any semblance of a business IQ does not believe the NBA and its powerful corporate partners are not going to do everything in their power behind the scenes to manuever James to the blinding bright lights of the center of the marketing universe, then I *strongly* urge you to find somebody who recorded this game&#8217;s player introductions.  It was absolutely obscene and was an amazing indicator of the direction where they want the NBA to go.  Only a fool would say James is not a part of that business plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Andress</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Andress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Brian,



I'm glad you've noted recently the weak strength of schedule the Cavs have left after the break. Last year, I tracked SOS all year, and the Cavs had a remarkably easy schedule until the break. It is reasonable to expect that they'll finish much more strongly this year with this schedule. (As a corollary, it was reasonable to conclude that they were overvalued at this point last season.)



Also, don't you think the improved depth this year has helped alleviate the kinds of problems that hurt last year's team? Injuries totalled that team. Thus far, they haven't badly damaged this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;ve noted recently the weak strength of schedule the Cavs have left after the break. Last year, I tracked SOS all year, and the Cavs had a remarkably easy schedule until the break. It is reasonable to expect that they&#8217;ll finish much more strongly this year with this schedule. (As a corollary, it was reasonable to conclude that they were overvalued at this point last season.)</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t you think the improved depth this year has helped alleviate the kinds of problems that hurt last year&#8217;s team? Injuries totalled that team. Thus far, they haven&#8217;t badly damaged this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Karl scale</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Karl scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Fair enough on the use of home/road differential as an evaluative mechanism when teams haven't played the same number of home and road games.  But home wins - road losses gives us the exact same number as the "Karl Scale".  And, most of all, why in the world should he get credit for it?  Because it was his only contribution as an announcer.  Bah, humbug. 



Admittedly, I would have less of a problem if it was called the Wooden Scale.  Or even the Wilkens Scale.  (or the Windhorst Scale!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough on the use of home/road differential as an evaluative mechanism when teams haven&#8217;t played the same number of home and road games.  But home wins - road losses gives us the exact same number as the &#8220;Karl Scale&#8221;.  And, most of all, why in the world should he get credit for it?  Because it was his only contribution as an announcer.  Bah, humbug. </p>
<p>Admittedly, I would have less of a problem if it was called the Wooden Scale.  Or even the Wilkens Scale.  (or the Windhorst Scale!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Windhorst</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Windhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Karl Scale is meant to give an evaluation projection.  Not all NBA teams have played the same amount of road games and sometimes the number is quite askew, it is a way to better judge just where a team ranks.



Forget about dropping it to 7 feet, make it like a high jump and have the players keep raising it to see how high they can go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Karl Scale is meant to give an evaluation projection.  Not all NBA teams have played the same amount of road games and sometimes the number is quite askew, it is a way to better judge just where a team ranks.</p>
<p>Forget about dropping it to 7 feet, make it like a high jump and have the players keep raising it to see how high they can go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-416</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  If people actually knew how math works, then there would not be a scoreboard "diff" thing.  That diff thing must have cost no less than 10 billion dollars.  Coincidentally, 10 is also the combined IQ of the brains at Cavs Marketing Central that gave the green light to the scoreboard builder for including such an ingenius statistical innovation.  



My uncle was a statistics professor in the mathematics department at the University of Buffalo for 35 years, and even he could never have devised such a revolutionary formula as the "diff."  



Yes, the Karl Scale is absolutely brilliant.  The Greeks never thought of it, and the great mathematician Euclid would be in complete awe.  Far more importantly, what would NBA assistant coaches do without a Karl Scale and room service to occupy their valuable time?  But that diff thing puts both the brilliant Karl Scale and Euclid's stylish Armani toga to utter retardation shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  If people actually knew how math works, then there would not be a scoreboard &#8220;diff&#8221; thing.  That diff thing must have cost no less than 10 billion dollars.  Coincidentally, 10 is also the combined IQ of the brains at Cavs Marketing Central that gave the green light to the scoreboard builder for including such an ingenius statistical innovation.  </p>
<p>My uncle was a statistics professor in the mathematics department at the University of Buffalo for 35 years, and even he could never have devised such a revolutionary formula as the &#8220;diff.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Yes, the Karl Scale is absolutely brilliant.  The Greeks never thought of it, and the great mathematician Euclid would be in complete awe.  Far more importantly, what would NBA assistant coaches do without a Karl Scale and room service to occupy their valuable time?  But that diff thing puts both the brilliant Karl Scale and Euclid&#8217;s stylish Armani toga to utter retardation shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Karl scale</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Karl scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Why in the world does George Karl get any credit for the "George Karl scale"?  You get exactly the same numbers if you calculate other measures of home success and road success.   He says home losses (-7) and road wins (+12) gives a +5 rating.  Well so does home wins (+19) and road losses (-14).  It's how math works.   For that matter, any team that is 10 games over .500 and has played equal numbers of games at home and on the road always comes out with a +5.  So, at the end of the year Karl's scale does nothing but take number of games a team finishes over .500 and divides it by 2.



 What Karl is saying is that good teams have great success at home and they have decent success on the road.  Yeah, and?  And now he gets credit for inventing a scale?   Totally bogus.  At least NBA commentary improved since Denver hired him.



Rant over - and this is not meant as bashing you, Brian!  Love your postings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the world does George Karl get any credit for the &#8220;George Karl scale&#8221;?  You get exactly the same numbers if you calculate other measures of home success and road success.   He says home losses (-7) and road wins (+12) gives a +5 rating.  Well so does home wins (+19) and road losses (-14).  It&#8217;s how math works.   For that matter, any team that is 10 games over .500 and has played equal numbers of games at home and on the road always comes out with a +5.  So, at the end of the year Karl&#8217;s scale does nothing but take number of games a team finishes over .500 and divides it by 2.</p>
<p> What Karl is saying is that good teams have great success at home and they have decent success on the road.  Yeah, and?  And now he gets credit for inventing a scale?   Totally bogus.  At least NBA commentary improved since Denver hired him.</p>
<p>Rant over - and this is not meant as bashing you, Brian!  Love your postings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-414</guid>
		<description>The only reason I watch All Star Saturday night is to watch Barkley and K. Smith make fun of everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I watch All Star Saturday night is to watch Barkley and K. Smith make fun of everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/2006/02/17/all-star-weakend/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/cavs/?p=40#comment-413</guid>
		<description>I think they should lower the rim to 7-feet and have a media skills night.  All the teams' beat writers and broadcasters would be required to compete.  Unfortunately, some team broadcasters would be immediately disqualified before the competition even starts.  Media and skills.  Without naming any names, an egregious contradiction in terms.  Disqualified.



Just randomly pitching ideas here, but in the Beat Writers Slam Dunk Contest, as they soar majestically upwards (or, far more likely than not, horizontally and then plummeting like a rock), each beat writer would be required to signal in American Sign Language an analogy, a simile and a metaphor as they and their spaghetti-stained sartorial splendor slam the biscuit in the basket and royally rock the Houston house.  My dream matchup in the finals would be a creative dual to the death between the Miami Herald's Israel Gutierrez and the Akron Beacon Journal's Brian Windhorst.  No disrespect to the whimsical white scribe up north, but I must give a decisive edge to the youthful Hispanic wordsmith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should lower the rim to 7-feet and have a media skills night.  All the teams&#8217; beat writers and broadcasters would be required to compete.  Unfortunately, some team broadcasters would be immediately disqualified before the competition even starts.  Media and skills.  Without naming any names, an egregious contradiction in terms.  Disqualified.</p>
<p>Just randomly pitching ideas here, but in the Beat Writers Slam Dunk Contest, as they soar majestically upwards (or, far more likely than not, horizontally and then plummeting like a rock), each beat writer would be required to signal in American Sign Language an analogy, a simile and a metaphor as they and their spaghetti-stained sartorial splendor slam the biscuit in the basket and royally rock the Houston house.  My dream matchup in the finals would be a creative dual to the death between the Miami Herald&#8217;s Israel Gutierrez and the Akron Beacon Journal&#8217;s Brian Windhorst.  No disrespect to the whimsical white scribe up north, but I must give a decisive edge to the youthful Hispanic wordsmith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
