In Vino Veritas
Posted August 2nd, 2006 by Chip Bok
Click Image to Enlarge.
Christopher Hitchens, on Slate, has the low down on Mel's melt down.
Posted August 2nd, 2006 by Chip Bok
Click Image to Enlarge.
Christopher Hitchens, on Slate, has the low down on Mel's melt down.
Bokbluster is proudly powered by
WordPress
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
Bad Behavior has blocked 589 access attempts in the last 7 days.
August 2nd, 2006 at 2:24 pm
"his twistedly homoerotic spank-movie The Passion of the Christ"
Only Hitchens could float out a line like this and not get stoned by
an angry mob on his way to the corner pub.
If I had said this, the vein on Sam's forehead would have looked like a possessed nightcrawler.
August 3rd, 2006 at 12:25 am
"If I had said this, the vein on Sam's forehead would have looked like a possessed nightcrawler."
Wrong. There goes your meagalomania again.
It didn't take too long ro learn to just ignore your nonsense.
August 3rd, 2006 at 3:47 am
Great job of ignoring it Sam.
August 3rd, 2006 at 6:58 am
I did not post in this cartoon and yet you elected to take a shot a me. Therefore I responded. Why don't you try just posting your opinions and not make reference to the other posters.
August 3rd, 2006 at 7:41 am
I have to agree. Theres no call for initiating a post by taking a shot at a commenter. Why the deliberate trolling?
August 3rd, 2006 at 8:10 am
Why the deliberate trolling ? Because otherwise this blog would
be bereft of any comments other than " good one" or "way to
go Chip". I've told Chip several times that I'll bow out if he so
requested. I'm still here. Draw your own conclusions.
Sam, I believe you've called me a "maniac" and "sick and twisted"…. Follow your own advice. I don't recall calling
you names.
August 3rd, 2006 at 1:13 pm
No I did not call you a maniac. I called you a megalomaniac which specifically refers to a huge ego. Whatever, hopefully you will refrain from referring to me in your future posts.
August 3rd, 2006 at 1:43 pm
Sam, you have a picnic in a ballpark, you get hit with the ball.
August 3rd, 2006 at 2:27 pm
Ones position on an issue can be stated without the auto-snark button on.
If its your intention to convince others that your way of thinking is correct/better/whatever, being bitter and nasty to other commenters is a quick turn-off. Not just to the ones you're attacking but to all readers.
On the other hand, if you're looking for drama just for the sake of drama and attention, I guess that's your perogative.
I dont think its really important enough for Chip to care.
August 3rd, 2006 at 2:58 pm
Thank you Father Mick.
Here we go again.
Chip makes a good living sticking his ink-stained finger in people's eyes. I do the same thing here for considerably
less compensation. Correct me if I'm wrong Mick, but I thought
my exchanges with you were pointed but civil. Sam got off on the wrong foot by clipping SOMEONE ELSE"S horribly written and moronic post from another site; which quite frankly is the first time I've ever seen anybody stoop that low on this site. Surprise, surprise… I called him on it.
I checked on my previous posts, and although I've poked Sam in the ribs a couple of times for just sending links, I've never called him a name. It's a little tough having a dialogue with a link. All I'm really pressing Sam to do is speak his own mind.
And pardon me while I let my inner-meglomanical side out here, but when I don't post, attendence tends to drop off precipitiously.
Anything else ?
August 3rd, 2006 at 9:28 pm
Nope. You've pretty much confirmed what I suspected.
August 4th, 2006 at 3:41 am
You know guys, there's always eHarmony.com.
They ask you about your political slant up front so that you never have deal with people that aren't possible soulmates.
August 4th, 2006 at 8:01 am
I know! Isn't it great?