<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Port Securty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/</link>
	<description>Chip Bok Editorial Cartoons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-424</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bare feet&lt;/strong&gt;

hot legs beautiful feet sexy feet spread legs face sitting long legs 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bare feet</strong></p>
<p>hot legs beautiful feet sexy feet spread legs face sitting long legs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Uh Auggie, I&#039;m quoting the Department of Defense and you&#039;re quoting the NY Times?  Has the universe turned upside down?

That Times article cites the opinions of foreign port operators .... what would you expect them to say ? 



Irony is the driving force here. That Bush, who has done nothing but play the fear factor and the security issue in the last four years clumsily gets caught passionately defending something he was completely unaware of only days earlier is just reactionary and sloppy on his part.

All the opposition is saying (on both sides of the aisle) is to take a look at this deal a little more closely before making a decision. If it were up to guys like you, the Dubai deal would have been just waved through without a second thought. I just don&#039;t know how we&#039;re well served by that attitude. And by the way, now that you consider the Times a valid news source, that can and will be used against you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh Auggie, I&#039;m quoting the Department of Defense and you&#039;re quoting the NY Times?  Has the universe turned upside down?</p>
<p>That Times article cites the opinions of foreign port operators &#8230;. what would you expect them to say ? </p>
<p>Irony is the driving force here. That Bush, who has done nothing but play the fear factor and the security issue in the last four years clumsily gets caught passionately defending something he was completely unaware of only days earlier is just reactionary and sloppy on his part.</p>
<p>All the opposition is saying (on both sides of the aisle) is to take a look at this deal a little more closely before making a decision. If it were up to guys like you, the Dubai deal would have been just waved through without a second thought. I just don&#039;t know how we&#039;re well served by that attitude. And by the way, now that you consider the Times a valid news source, that can and will be used against you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auggie Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Auggie Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-422</guid>
		<description>mencken, from your own beloved NY Times:



&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/25/business/worldbusiness/25terminal.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/25/business/worldbusiness/25terminal.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mencken, from your own beloved NY Times:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/25/business/worldbusiness/25terminal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/25/business/worldbusiness/25terminal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-421</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cite your source if you want to be credible.&quot;



Start with Department of Defense Press Briefings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Cite your source if you want to be credible.&#034;</p>
<p>Start with Department of Defense Press Briefings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Cite your source if you want to be credible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cite your source if you want to be credible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Auggie: Read the following and you tell me who benefits and why Bush immediately threatened to veto any congressional

oversight of the deal. 



– The UAE was one of three countries in the world to recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.



– The UAE has been a key transfer point for illegal shipments of nuclear components to Iran, North Korea and Lybia.



– According to the FBI, money was transferred to the 9/11 hijackers through the UAE banking system.



– After 9/11, the Treasury Department reported that the UAE was not cooperating in efforts to track down Osama Bin Laden’s bank accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auggie: Read the following and you tell me who benefits and why Bush immediately threatened to veto any congressional</p>
<p>oversight of the deal. </p>
<p>– The UAE was one of three countries in the world to recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.</p>
<p>– The UAE has been a key transfer point for illegal shipments of nuclear components to Iran, North Korea and Lybia.</p>
<p>– According to the FBI, money was transferred to the 9/11 hijackers through the UAE banking system.</p>
<p>– After 9/11, the Treasury Department reported that the UAE was not cooperating in efforts to track down Osama Bin Laden’s bank accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auggie Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Auggie Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Mencken said:Auggie, FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHO BENEFITS ? 



Ok I&#039;ll play your silly game. Who? But if you say the Bush adminisration, I&#039;ll regurgitate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mencken said:Auggie, FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHO BENEFITS ? </p>
<p>Ok I&#039;ll play your silly game. Who? But if you say the Bush adminisration, I&#039;ll regurgitate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's me, T.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>It's me, T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-417</guid>
		<description>The port thing isn&#039;t new.  This has been going on a for a long time.  Decades.



Take China for instance, they operate a LOT of stateside ports.



I don&#039;t trust China.  Do you?  



This is a media stunt of some sort that is causing this controversy.



I just don&#039;t know who actually wanted to start it.  



The democrats or the media.  Maybe both.



later...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The port thing isn&#039;t new.  This has been going on a for a long time.  Decades.</p>
<p>Take China for instance, they operate a LOT of stateside ports.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t trust China.  Do you?  </p>
<p>This is a media stunt of some sort that is causing this controversy.</p>
<p>I just don&#039;t know who actually wanted to start it.  </p>
<p>The democrats or the media.  Maybe both.</p>
<p>later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mencken</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>mencken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-416</guid>
		<description>&quot;Libs bad-mouthing the President....&quot; You mean those chablis

drinkin&#039;, Volvo drivin&#039;, Michael Moore lovin&#039; guys Frist and 

Hastert ? 

Is what you&#039;re saying that in the greatest economy on earth, we can&#039;t come up with an American company to run these ports? Apparenty we&#039;re dependent on foreign toil as well. 

Auggie, FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHO BENEFITS ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Libs bad-mouthing the President&#8230;.&#034; You mean those chablis</p>
<p>drinkin&#039;, Volvo drivin&#039;, Michael Moore lovin&#039; guys Frist and </p>
<p>Hastert ? </p>
<p>Is what you&#039;re saying that in the greatest economy on earth, we can&#039;t come up with an American company to run these ports? Apparenty we&#039;re dependent on foreign toil as well. </p>
<p>Auggie, FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHO BENEFITS ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auggie Fields</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/2006/02/port-securty/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Auggie Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/bok/?p=108#comment-415</guid>
		<description>&quot;Auggie, Scott McClellen said that President Bush found out about

the port deal from the media. Does that concern you at all ?&quot;

Not at all. The treasury Dept did what it was supposed to do by law. 

When will you libs stop bad mouthing the President, as you have since the 2000 election, and come up with a solution of your own. What do you propose the USA do about the management of cargo handling at the 6 ports since the sale of the London company to a Dubai company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Auggie, Scott McClellen said that President Bush found out about</p>
<p>the port deal from the media. Does that concern you at all ?&#034;</p>
<p>Not at all. The treasury Dept did what it was supposed to do by law. </p>
<p>When will you libs stop bad mouthing the President, as you have since the 2000 election, and come up with a solution of your own. What do you propose the USA do about the management of cargo handling at the 6 ports since the sale of the London company to a Dubai company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

