Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Village People

by The Reverend on March 11, 2010

in disinformation,GOP,media

Congressional representatives are usually careful when they talk about the national media. If elected officials complain too loudly about the state of our corrupt, corporate media….then they face the prospects of being constantly pilloried by that same corrupt, corporate media….whether they deserve it or not. That's why it was refreshing to see this coming from Patrick Kennedy (D-RI) yesterday….

Kennedy is yelling about the nonsensical blanket coverage by corporate media of a little-known, FIRST term, House Democrat from New York, Eric Massa…..when vital, important stories, like Afghanistan, are given very little, if any, attention.

Massa is resigning his office after 14 months….yeah, 14 months….because of ethics problems involving the groping and tickling of male subordinates.

For some reason, most of our corporate-whore media has been enamored with Eric Massa's story. I was particularly incensed last night to watch MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell bash gays with reckless abandon for most of his hour long program. Think I'm joking?….Take the 6 minutes and try to stifle your embarassment, or anger, over highly paid Village assh*les, like O'Donnell, gleefully rolling around in the Massa story like a dog does in sh*t.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I often refer to the modern American corporate media as The Village….an insulated, incestuous, place where narcissistic, opportunists all agree amongst themselves what's a Serious story and what's not a Serious story. O'Donnell's vulgar, embarassing, yuk-it-up orgy……over a nobody-congressperson, who has already resigned, is yet another reminder that what the Village considers to be Serious and worthy of ample, valuable teevee time….rarely parallels what average Americans regard as important.

And that brings me to the second half of today's blog post. Today's Akron Beacon Journal headline reads…"Voters Want Less Politics, More Jobs." One of my favorites, (not), Liz Sidoti of the Associated Press co-authors the piece under that bold headline.

Words like "gridlock", "partisan games", "contempt for lawmakers", "angry voters", "furious with Washington" and the mandatory, "Democrats in danger"…. are strewn about the article….I guess, in an attempt to inform readers how American voters are just fed-up with their elected officials, wanting them to stop all the nonsense and pass legislation that does something to help their lives.

What's not mentioned in Sidoti's article, at all, is the record number of GOP filibusters carried out in the Senate, ever since the GOP lost the majority. Seems odd, doesn't it?…..that a piece moaning about D.C. paralysis, you know, "gridlock"…..didn't mention, not even once, the fact that obstructionistic, 'minority should rule'-minded Republican Senators have recently doubled the previous total-number-of filibuster record….a filibuster prevents any bill from even being debated in the Senate, and only takes 41 GOP votes out of 100 total Senate votes to maintain.

Sidoti's column, a column all about how Americans are worn out, disgusted, over Washington's inability to do anything…..is entirely silent about why there is gridlock and who is responsible for it.

Even though Obama's administration has passed a stimulus bill to prevent a further deepening of the economic catastrophe created under the Bush administration, even though Democrats have fought, consistently, to maintain unemployment checks and COBRA coverage for those unemployed, even though Democrats have been trying for over a year to pass job-creating, health care reform, even though Congress just passed a new jobs bill…..according to the five or six people Liz Sidoti talked to…Washington isn't doing anything, and Washington needs to be more bipartisan.

While Lawrence O'Donnell's segment was despicable, Village assh*lery of the highest order….Liz Sidoti's "all politicians are guilty" and "Washington can't get anything done" and "Democrats are in trouble", bullsh*t spreading….. is standard-issue, Village propaganda of the highest order.

O'Donnell and his producers ignored many more important news stories in order to revel in a story that 6th grade boys would laugh at…..and the AP's Sidoti writes an entire column about Washington gridlock and NEVER ONCE mentions the historic number of GOP filibusters in the Senate.

Such is the Village.

  • larry d.

    So I take it Massa isn't Catholic.

  • Da King

    Right. Who would want to wallow around in a gay sex scandal…………….like the Reverend did in his last blog piece.

    Have you ever met yourself, Rev ?

  • Jacquie

    Seems like hypocrisy and the punishment of innocent people were the point of Rev's last blog piece.

    There are no facts that Massa had any gay sex, as far as I know. The man is guilty of talking like a trucker or a sailor or a construction worker. Hell, I myself have said worse than Massa to some sheets of plywood. Maybe the news should do a piece on the shocking language your basement walls were subject to while being built. The media and congresspeople spending time condemning him is a waste of time.

  • averagejoe5

    Rev if you get a chance and can find it, you need to look at Beck's interview with Massa from last night. What an f'd up interview. He ruined Beck's day I'll tell ya. You can find it on youtube.com. Type in Beck interviews Massa. It's in 6 parts otherwise I would have put the links here.
    Jacqui, He didn't say he had gay sex, but he did tickle a guy until he got sick. Watch the videos.

  • The Reverend

    I saw Beck's interview. Beck got punked.

    I don't care anything about gay sex. I don't care anything about what humans do with their junk, as long as it's consensual and doesn't involve minors.

    Massa has already resigned….something that Vitter and Ensign, still refuse to do. As far as I know, no sexual harassment suits have been filed….so what's the reason for all the media segments, when Vitter and Ensign are still treated as Very Serious people?

    This post was on the disgraceful corporate media. If conservatives don't care that corporate media is so disgraceful and propagandistic, then, so be it.

    With the Vatican…it's the hypocrisy and the blindness of people who still support such an organizaton.

    With the Massa thing, as Jacquie said, there's no evidence of any gay sex…..Massa resigned…..and he was an insignificant freshman member of the House. There's no story there…except for the Village members 6th grade jocularity contest on who could be the stupidest while coming up with a way to tell very, poor gay jokes.

    With Sidoti….she's simply making sh*t up and omitting a whole bunch of stuff, I'd say, on purpose. The media rarely tells us anything other than what this Republican said and what that Democrat said. Their role is not to search out and tell us ignorant viewers what the truth is. It's not their job….odd, because I thought it was. In Sidoti's piece, it's simply that Americans are mad about government. So what? People are always mad about government. Leaving out the GOP filibuster numbers in a piece about how angry people are about the "gridlock" in Washington, is not telling the truth.

  • larry d.

    "Hell, I myself have said worse than Massa to some sheets of plywood."

    Keep that kinky stuff coming, Jacquie. Love it!

  • The Reverend

    Cursing at a sheet of plywood is "kinky"?

  • larry d.

    Making comments that are deemed sexual harassment isn't really the same as run of the mill 'cursing,' Reverend.

  • Da King

    If Massa didn't do anything wrong, why did he resign ?

    The Rev's logic – sex scandals are big news if they involve Catholics or conservatives, but when they involve Democrats, the media is to blame.

  • The Reverend

    Nowhere in my post or comments have I defended unwanted 'groping'. Massa, to the best of my knowledge has never declared, unlike Catholic and conservative leaders, that he was the morality spokesman for all good and proper behavior. In other words, Massa, despite his obviously unacceptable behavior, isn't a poster child for hypocrisy….and after-freaking-all, Massa is resigning. Catholic leaders, on the other hand, are…..well….Catholic leaders.

    Tell me, oh wise and moral conservatives, why does the media still bash away at Clinton, Spitzer, Edwards, and now Massa…..for their sexual sins, while at the same time they are basically silent on Senators, Vitter and Ensign? Would it be because Republican officials represent the, you know, oh-so-moral right?

    What explains this double standard in the media?

  • Jacquie

    I went and watched that interview, Joe. That… was fairly amazing. Beck really didn't have a clue what to do.

    Well, Larry, the spirit of the remarks to the plywood was hateful rather than sexual, but far be it from me to interrupt your fantasies.

  • Da King

    What are you saying, Rev ? That Democrats don't have any morals, so it's okay for them to be immoral ? Pretty bizarre standards you have there, to say the least.

  • Da King

    But I do recognize how difficult it is for you to defend your hypocritical doubletalk. Grasp away at those straws.

  • The Reverend

    Republicans…..god love 'em because I can't….have been consistently hypocritical for the past three decades. They suck up to moralists like Falwell, Dobson, et al, to get votes…pretending they are the political party of 'moral values'…..and then they hard-heartedly defend their own immoral actors…Vitter, Ensign (who are still in the Senate)…..when they make a mockery of those same 'moral values.

    Democrats…..don't preach about how 'moral' they are….and don't try to impose their version of 'moral values' on everyone. Democrats may be hypocritical about other stuff…..but when it comes to the sexy thing….they are realists.

  • Da King

    If you are looking for perfect people, no doubt many in the Republican party (and everywhere else) will fall short of that goal. That doesn't mean their message is incorrect.

    And I don't know what country you are living in, but Democrats CONSTANTLY preach about how moral they are. They frame nearly every economic issue, as they have with health care reform, in moral terms. Of course, in the Democrats version of morality, they must forcibly steal someone else's money in order to achieve their ends, which is morally ambiguous at best.

  • Da King

    And that part about how Democrats don't push their version of moral values on everyone was downright hilarious. The complete opposite of the truth. Ever heard of "social justice," and all that entails ?? Sometimes you scare me, Rev. I'm scared that you actually believe what you are saying.

  • The Reverend

    Do you not believe in social justice?

    To crystallize a bit more what I'm saying…..conservatives major on sexual morality…..set the parameters for what is acceptable and what isn't. Liberals are cognizant of the fact that sexuality is a complex-biologically-driven force in humans…..not that simple to understand or control.

    Whereas everyone understands what social justice is. What's fair and what isn't.

  • Da King

    The left-wing version of social justice entails stealing the fruits of other people's labor for oneself, instituting a socialist government, controlling the private economy in all aspects, and putting all aspects of American life under the despotic control of Big Brother.

    You're darned right I don't believe in that. I can't fathom how you do. It's the philosophy of totalitarianism. It's the road to serfdom, with all Americans reduced to begging for scaps from the government table. No thank you. I will never stop fighting against that.

    I don't agree with all of what conservatives say about sexual morality, mainly regarding gays, but is there something wrong with sexual morality ? What do you support – sexual immorality, adultery, indiscriminate engagement in random sex with as many partners as possible, or what ?

  • The Reverend

    Consensual sex between adults is none of my business.

    "The left-wing version of social justice entails stealing the fruits of other people's labor for oneself, instituting a socialist government, controlling the private economy in all aspects, and putting all aspects of American life under the despotic control of Big Brother."

    The left wants a safety net for those who are less fortunate. The right would take care of the less fortunate through hit and miss charitable giving. The left, understanding that the U.S. is the richest nation in history, think a more even, systematic government program specifically designed to aid the less fortunate is more desirable…and fair.

    When I was a young boy-Reverend, the tax rate on the richest Americans was 90%. America thrived. Our best years. So..please…spare me the socialist scaremongering. The most flush Americans now pay 36%…..unless they only recieve passive capital gains income…in which case they pay 15%.

    America needs to raise taxes on the wealthiest. Right now.

  • Jacquie

    ^^^What the Rev said.

    Might I add that 'the fruits of [one's] labors' are almost always gathered with the help of government invested resources. Can you read, write, and calculate? Nice of 'the government' to put funds into teaching you. Drive on any roads to get to work? Nice of the government to make sure the roads are available for the use of all. Eat any food lately? Make you sick? No? How much extra time do you have available to work because you don't get when you eat, and you don't have to evaluate every food vendor with a suspicious eye? How much is the safety and reliability of your food worth, in dollars or labor, to you? More than what you pay in taxes, yes?

    There are some services and products done most efficiently by public (government run) ownership, and some done best by private ownership. The government has to have the money to operate services. King, the fruits of "your" labors were not created all by yourself. Pay your help – the government. Do you really think all those "fruits" would even exist for you to have if the government didn't create and run the services it runs?

  • The Reverend

    Well said, Ms. Jacquie.

    Nobody loves the government…..but government exists for many reasons….and does do a better job than private enterprise in some areas, like the ones you mentioned.

    Or…

    We could carry around a "rotten and bacteria-infected" food-o-meter and test every item of food we come into contact with. I suppose some would call that "being personally responsible." I call it….crazy.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).