Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Gay Prostitution Ring Inside Vatican

by The Reverend on March 10, 2010

in corruption,health care,intolerance,moral values,religion


What did Pope Benedict know and when did he know it?

From Reuters

One of Pope Benedict's ceremonial ushers and a member of an elite choir in St Peter's Basilica have been implicated in a gay prostitution ring, in the latest sexual scandal to taint the Vatican.

Ghinedu Ehiem, a Nigerian, was dismissed by the Vatican on Wednesday from the Giulia Choir after his name appeared in transcripts of police wiretaps, published by an Italian newspaper, in an unrelated Italian investigation.

Balducci is also a member of an elite group called "Gentlemen of His Holiness," ushers who are called to serve in the Vatican's Apostolic Palace on major occasions such as when the pope receives heads of state or presides at big events.

"Gentlemen of His Holiness" carried the coffin of the late Pope John Paul at his funeral in 2005.

Excerpts of the wiretaps and police documents published in the Italian newspaper La Repubblica showed that Ehiem, 40, had been in regular contact with Balducci before Balducci's arrest last month and the subject of their conversation was gay sex.

A police document prepared for magistrates and published in part by La Repubblica said Balducci was in contact with Ehiem and an Italian who were part of what the police called "an organized network … to abet male prostitution."
……

Wiretap transcripts published by La Repubblica showed that among the men Ehiem allegedly procured for Balducci were seminarians. In one, Balducci is quoted as asking Ehiem: "At what time does he have to return to the seminary?"

The BBC reports….

The case has made front-page news in the Italian media.

The transcripts suggest that Mr Ehiem procured at least 10 contacts for Mr Balducci, including a male model and a rugby player.

The question now is: who inside the Vatican knew about this and who inside the Vatican was participating in this "organized network" of "male prostitution?"

The BBC says Pope Benedict XVI…."was aware of the matter." That doesn't tell us much. Some are asking the question, 'What did the Pope know, and when did he know it?' Indeed.

To add a bit of perspective to this ugly story from inside the Vatican, I think it's important to consider the American Catholic Church's response recently after Washington D.C began issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples….

Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, facing a new District of Columbia law mandating health coverage for partners of gay employees in agencies that take taxpayer dollars, has decided to drop coverage for all spouses of Catholic Charities employees rather than be forced to insure same-sex couples.

Catholic Charities, not acting very charitably, but instead, vindictively, ended all spousal health coverage, rather than cover gay spouses. Some charitable organization, huh?

Cutting all Catholic Charity employees' spouses, gay or straight, from the roles of health coverage isn't the only vindictive action the Catholic Church has taken recently in their crusade of hate against the gay…..

The announcement follows last month's decision by Catholic Charities to end its longstanding foster care and adoption program because the new statute would have compelled the agency to place children with qualified gay applicants.

These two examples of Catholic Church bigotry towards 'the gay' is made all the more toxic in light of the uncovering of the Vatican's own gay prostitution ring.

Don't forget….Religion poisons everything. In this case, Catholic religious teachings have led directly to open discrimination and actions of bitterness and hate towards our "fellow man"….and, at the same time that close associate "gentlemen" to the Pope inside the Vatican were operating an organized male prostitution service.

This story's poison is especially potent.

This Guardian article is also worth reading on this topic.

Also relevant here is my February blog reviewing Benedict's version of condom reliability as it relates to the spreading of HIV-AIDS.

  • larry d.

    It seems like a stretch to call it "the Vatican's own gay prostitution ring," Reverend. It's not like the Pope is running the ring out of his apartment, a la Barney Frank, or handing out tax dollars to promote a human slavery/child prostitution/human smuggling ring a la Barry Obama.

  • averagejoe5
  • Jacquie

    So Joe… why is 'men having sex with men' not 'a okay'?

  • averagejoe5

    I didn't say it wasn't okay. I wouldn't do it, but whatever floats your boat. If you choose that sexual fetish then that's your choice. It all depends on your beliefs and if having sex with the same sex is enjoyable to you than by all means do it. I said the Catholic church doesn't approve of it. My personal opinion is that I don't care how people have their orgasms. It's not for me to say, just as legislation shouldn't be made in support of one sexual lifestyle over another.

  • The Reverend

    larry…we have no information to exclude the Pontiff at this point. Perhaps the Vicar dealt with this in the same manner he and his predecessor Intercessors dealt with the boy molestation problems…..covered it up. That's a possibility.

    The question I have is……why would anyone support such an organization?

    average….the church has to do whatever it thinks it should do….yes, but how bitterly hateful can a religious group be? The church wants to discriminate against gays. Now, in D.C., the church can no longer discriminate against gays and do it legally….and not be cut off from federal funding. Rather than including spouses of gay employees in the health insurance coverage benefit…..they go all-in on their hate statement and cut health coverage for spouses of heterosexual employees. That's some visceral hate.

    These are the people who are the closest to god.

  • averagejoe5

    "These are the people who are the closest to god."
    Nothing against Catholics, but Rev you know that you and I feel about the same when it comes to leaders of the church. Even though I consider myself a Christian.

    They aren't being bitterly hateful Rev. It is against their beliefs to support that particular lifestyle. Maybe there is another reason, like blaming the gays just so they can drop the spouses to save cash. You know they are in fiancial trouble. Maybe they should be taxed on their income maybe at a lower rate and of course with 100% deductions on their contributions. They should pay to contribute to the healthcare situation. Afterall the church of 2000 and beyond has become a wealth building tool that has made many preachers and rich.
    You know that I am a capitalist. I believe in profit, however when a church is making so much profit that it's leaders can justify a half million dollar house and 2 BMW's in the drive, something needs to be looked at.This isn't all churches and if they live like regular people and donate all but a reasonable amount, which I feel would equal the average income of all the people that attend that church thats cool. But these people are telling their parishoners that unless they give money hand over fist they are going to lose salvation and go to hell. Then dine at the finest restaurants in the city. Many times with their special friends (wink). Hmmmm… reminds me of the 72 virgins. Reminds me of our govt.

  • http://www.cleveland.com bzzzzp

    If you are so evolved, why do you use gay as a slur?

  • Tom B

    The Catholic Church is definitely a unique entity. I think recent history has shown a pattern of “don’t’ look and you won’t have to tell”. It’s convenient to look the other way and ignore wrongs being done in your institution and triumph the good things happening. The Vatican has an issue with taking these issues head-on. It’s about admitting you have a problem which they have no interest in doing. Who wants to air your dirty laundry in public? I just don’t see change happening for a long, long time in this denomination.

    Their actions in D.C are truly a political stunt that is designed to strike fear into voters and residents. It’s that conservative mode of selling fear to get your way and influence people. Take a look at the actions of denying benefits to same sex partners. At the same time, do they deny benefits to those who support abortions or have had an abortion? Do they grant benefits to those who have been divorced or are having extramarital affairs? The answer is obviously “no”. So, they are in effect saying we only kinda sorta want to base our benefits on our doctrine. It is truly an attempt to influence voters with fear and intimidation. Nice, isn’t it! Such a Christian and Catholic thing to do in the name of the Virgin Mary. Oh wait, she wasn’t married. Would she be denied benefits for that unplanned pregnancy?

  • Da King

    Rev says, "we have no information to exclude the Pontiff at this point."

    We also have no information to exclude the possibility that Obama was performing gay sex acts with Eric Massa, but that isn't any reason to bring it up.

  • The Reverend

    Yes, Tom B…..spot-on.

    King…the male prostitution ring was operating INSIDE the Vatican. That's the facts….whereas, there are NO facts coupling Massa and Obama in some gay sex action.

    Deal with it.

  • larry d.

    Massa's gay sex action was happening INSIDE Washington D.C., Reverend. That's the facts.

    The Vatican is a city-state, you know.

  • Da King

    Rev says, "King…the male prostitution ring was operating INSIDE the Vatican. That's the facts….whereas, there are NO facts coupling Massa and Obama in some gay sex action."

    And the Massa sex scandal was happening INSIDE Washington. That's the facts…whereas there are no facts coupling the Pope with gay sex action.

    Thanks for entirely missing the point. Besides, according to your latest post, we aren't supposed to wallow around in gay sex scandals, correct ?

    Do you even think about what you write ?

  • Da King

    Oops, sorry larry. I guess I said the same thing you did.

  • The Reverend

    The Pope said he "was aware of the matter." When did he become aware of the matter? After the matter was exposed by the cops….or before?

    Here's King's response to that…

    "Rev says, "we have no information to exclude the Pontiff at this point."

    We also have no information to exclude the possibility that Obama was performing gay sex acts with Eric Massa, but that isn't any reason to bring it up."

    Seriously now, WTF?

  • Da King

    Because the Vatican story is being told by the media, how would the Pope NOT be aware of it ?

    The point was, and I'm repeating it for the third time, you have no information to hint that the Pope was involved in, or was covering up, the Vatican sex scandal. None. That's why you shouldn't bring it up and act like he's hiding something. It's the difference between reporting and slander.

  • The Reverend

    And you my friend, have no information that the Pope is NOT connected to this scandal…..so, there we are.

  • Da King

    Damn, this is like pulling teeth. The Pope doesn't HAVE to defend himself against things there is no evidence he did, and you don't have the right to accuse him WITHOUT evidence.

  • averagejoe5

    Here King. I understand what you are going through. You may want to use one of these however I don't know if they would even help.

    http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Navigation?storeId=10051&categoryID=501347&langId=-1&catalogId=10053

  • The Reverend

    Good one average. Always liked a good Estwing, myself.

    "The Pope doesn't HAVE to defend himself against things there is no evidence he did, and you don't have the right to accuse him WITHOUT evidence."

    You mean like the Clinton impeachment?

    Here's another ugly story about Ratzinger and his brother….it just keeps getting better and better….

    http://www.ohio.com/news/world/87554377.html

  • Da King

    Thanks, joe. I think it will take a hammer to get through to the Reverend, especially after he used Clinton as an example, which puts us back on Planet Loon.

    Not to put too fine a point on it, Rev, but there was ALL KINDS of direct evidence that Clinton was guilty. Clinton even admitted he perjured himself, and he was disbarred. That should have given even you a clue.

    There is no evidence against the Pope. Keep grabbing at those straws.

  • The Reverend

    For 6 years Clinton was hounded. One investigation gave way to another….all coming up emptyhanded, until a civil suit deposition, concerning itself with consensual sex between adults, was latched onto by dishonest conservative witchhunters. The civil suit in which Clinton allegedly lied, was later thrown out of court.

    That was the basis, such as it was, for impeaching a U.S. president.

    Bush-Cheney committed rampant fraud against Congress and the American people resulting in the deaths of 4000 U.S. soldiers and a couple hundred thousand Iraqis.

    Catholic Church leaders committed crimes against humanity…..unless young boys aren't human…..then secretly covered-up the crimes. Catholic priests and nuns abused Irish children on a regular basis in the 1990's…with police protection. Now, we find that a gay prostitution ring is/was active inside the Vatican.

    Benedict knows a lot……and he's guilty of a lot.

  • Joan Heatherington

    Remember, homosexual pedophilia has corrupted and marred EVERY branch and corner of society and religion; Fathers, mothers, step fathers and mothers, foster parents, older siblings, lawyers doctors, cops, child welfare staffers, it has occurred among protestants, Jews, Mormons, Jehovah's witnesses, Greek and Russian orthodox. And the top dog abusers are (Look at the statistics) PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS.
    Why, i wonder, hasn't the president been called on this one? After all he is the head of the Department of Education after all, why aren't people calling for HIS arrest?
    Of course the president, must be aware of each individual abuse and surely knew about it the whole time, what happened, when and where.

    Oh, that’s right; such a busy man cannot be expected to know all of this… And neither can Our Holy Father.

    But one question more; why hasn’t he visited the victims and apologized like the Holy Father did?

    Joan.
    J.M.J

    God bless the Holy Father!
    Viva il Papa!

    PS. Keep it up Da King.

  • Anonymous

    As opposed to heterosexual pedofilia that is a staple of cultures all over the world, since girls in a family have always been seen as the property of the father, which is different to the boys, who are seen as helpers and providers, right?

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).