"(how we do that after pulling out of Muslim countries should be quite a trick, when we can't even get him when we're there)."

That's because we telegraph our strategy directly to Bin Laden so he can react. It's all very, very ignorant. Like I said, we have to be smarter than the enemy….and so far, no luck.

Finally, King and larry settle on pre-emption as the way forward. That's the Bush Doctrine. King uses the word "prevention"…..and seems to want to fight all political battles going forward on that basis. Bush and Cheney did not prevent 9-11, but they got a pass because, "how could anyone imagine such a thing?", thinking. They didn't prevent the anthrax attacks either. But Obama must prevent every bad person from getting on a plane, whether that bad person does any damage or not. Otherwise, he, as larry says, "suck."

What I really think is that neo-cons are sorry the Detroit bomber wasn't successful….I know Dick Cheney is.

This is stupid liberal talking point #23. Aren't the police usually called AFTER the crime occurs, or at best while the crime IS occurring ? Duh, Rev. Terrorism is a collaborative intelligence and prevention issue. Sometimes that requires military action, to kill or apprehend the terrorists BEFORE they carry out their plots (unless by "kill Bin Laden," you meant to kill him with kindness).

Well, gee whiz, why didn't you say so before ? It all sounds so simple. We withdraw from Muslim countries, broker the two-state solution that we've been trying to broker for 40 years, and then we kill Bin Laden (how we do that after pulling out of Muslim countries should be quite a trick, when we can't even get him when we're there).

Anything else you'd like us to implement, Rev ? How about world peace, like all the Miss America contestants favor, or an income of $100,000 for everyone on the planet ? How about running our automobiles on wind power or sea water ? Gosh, how did I ever miss such easily attainable goals ?

So, you're confirming what I said previously. You DO want more of an oligarchy, as long as it's YOUR oligarchy. Good job, Rev. You nullified your own previous point. You favor a oligarchical liberal totalitarian government of ONE viewpoint.

I sure hope I don't get purged if your revolution comes about.

I would have mentioned it, but I assume people already know that. Perhaps you should mention that we don't elect presidents by the popular vote. We use the electoral college, because our presidential elections are in reality 50 separate state elections.

But if you are a popular vote proponent, perhaps you might mention that more people voted for Hillary than Obama too, but Obama still won the Democratic nomination.

Or maybe your new rules only apply sometimes, and not others.

Never lauded Obama for ignorantly escalating troop numbers. And, I don't know why the blog format isn't shading my comments,…..but, don't much care about that, either.