Comments on: Pants Wetters

By: Da King

Da King — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:25:29 +0000

WTF ? What part of 'prisoners of war' don't you comprehend ?

First you complain that we are holding detainees indefinitely, and then you turn around and complain when we release them.

You're just a nutball.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:18:43 +0000

750 detainees were released after being held without charges.

That's not American.

American neo-cons…..are at war with America. I didn't stutter when I typed it before.

By: Da King

Da King — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:57:09 +0000

You didn't respond to what I wrote. I'll take that as an admission that I'm correct.

And I'm pretty certain that "American neo-cons," as you call them, are at war with Al Qaeda, not America.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:34:33 +0000

Hundreds of "terrorists" already have been tried, convicted..and are currently serving their sentences out in prisons on "U.S. soil."

Were all those cases done foolishly…or…is what neo-cons are suggesting now foolish?

It seems like American neo-cons are at war with America. Why?

By: Da King

Da King — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:44:29 +0000

Rev asks, "So it's not unAmerican to hold people indefinitely witout a trial?"

This is a false question. All five of the terrorists coming to New York for trial were already scheduled to be tried by military commissions.

Al Qaeda declared war against the USA in 1996. They've been trying to attack us and others for over a decade now. They think it's a war, whether you do or not.

And go ask the families of the 9/11 victims or other terrorist attacks if they think those attacks were "symbolic."

By: Roy

Roy — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:14:43 +0000

Calling someone a cracker is racist. I thought we had moved beyond race with our new president but liberals just can't stop being racists.

Calling the 9/11 hijackers anarchists is just plain stupid. They were anything but anarchists.

By: angry conserv

angry conserv — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:38:53 +0000

Now that we have reduced everything to its most basic denominator—if you are disagree with Obama it is because you want him to fail, does it follow that if you agree with him it is because you want him to succeed?

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:34:29 +0000

So whats your solution, besides bashing Bush, send a cop out to the camps in the Bekka Valley, or Tora Bora, and arrest the terrorists? How'd that work at Ft Hood?

Terrorism by its nature, does not stop because the victims roll over.
Just the opposite, every time a terrorist succeeds, and is not found and killed, they gain in power.

And contrary to your, and your foolish followers beliefs, Saddam Hussain, was a terrorist, a criminal, and a danger to the USA. After the first Gulf War, he did, have contact with Al qaeda, he supported and financed terrorism against the USA, he also changed Iraq from the secular nation, before the first Gulf War, to a much more muslim and fundamentalist nation after the war. Hussain and his government ignored and violated UN resolutions left and right, but you leftist want to ignore the facts, in order to revise your history. One of the WTC bombers returned to Iraq (at the behest of Jordan, who thought they could use him as a double agent).

In order to defeat terrorism, you must defeat the terrorist, and to defeat them, you must kill them, you can not negotiate with someone that is irrational. In order to prevent the terrorists from promulgating their lies and hatred, one must also bring freedom and truth to the people, but then again, freedom and truth are two things the left can not accept, even here in the USA.

By: bzzzzp

bzzzzp — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:10:54 +0000

I've said it before, libs just don't understand the difference between prosecuting a war and prosecuting criminals.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:42:34 +0000

What would be the evidence that Obama's approach was the wrong one? Would ANY Islamic attack ANYWHERE demonstrate that Obama is wrong?

What I'm asking is, in the war criminal, Don Rumsfeld's words, what are the metrics?