<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ain&#039;t That Tough Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:44:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11130</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11130</guid>
		<description>Plus, Clinton was impeached and disbarred. Only because he was the President of the United States was he not convicted of the perjury he so obviously engaged in. Can&#039;t believe you brought that up as an example. I could point out lots more about Clinton, but I really don&#039;t want to rehash all that again. You lost all those arguments with me the first time around. I don&#039;t want to subject you to it all over again. I&#039;m merciful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus, Clinton was impeached and disbarred. Only because he was the President of the United States was he not convicted of the perjury he so obviously engaged in. Can&#039;t believe you brought that up as an example. I could point out lots more about Clinton, but I really don&#039;t want to rehash all that again. You lost all those arguments with me the first time around. I don&#039;t want to subject you to it all over again. I&#039;m merciful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11129</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11129</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, Rev. This should be pretty easy. You have the entire history of Fox News to pick from. They must have gotten something wrong, yet the first story you pointed out was something YOU got wrong (and MSNBC reported wrong). 

This is fun. You are proving the opposite of what you intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#039;mon, Rev. This should be pretty easy. You have the entire history of Fox News to pick from. They must have gotten something wrong, yet the first story you pointed out was something YOU got wrong (and MSNBC reported wrong). </p>
<p>This is fun. You are proving the opposite of what you intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11128</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11128</guid>
		<description>FYI - You didn&#039;t point to any other alleged bogus Fox News stories. I disproved the one you did point to. What else ya got ? You got nothing so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; You didn&#039;t point to any other alleged bogus Fox News stories. I disproved the one you did point to. What else ya got ? You got nothing so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11127</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11127</guid>
		<description>&quot;.. by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool.&quot;

&quot;That&#039;s a falsehood. An outright piece of manufactured news. Didn&#039;t happen.&quot;

Like hell. It&#039;s the White House that attempted to lie it&#039;s way out of that. The media said they wouldn&#039;t be at the press conference unless Fox News was also allowed. 

http://www.examiner.com/x-22564-Des-Moines-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m10d24-CBS-exposes-Obama-administration-lies-about-blocking-Fox-News</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;.. by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool.&#034;</p>
<p>&#034;That&#039;s a falsehood. An outright piece of manufactured news. Didn&#039;t happen.&#034;</p>
<p>Like hell. It&#039;s the White House that attempted to lie it&#039;s way out of that. The media said they wouldn&#039;t be at the press conference unless Fox News was also allowed. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-22564-Des-Moines-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m10d24-CBS-exposes-Obama-administration-lies-about-blocking-Fox-News" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/x-22564-Des-Moines-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m10d24-CBS-exposes-Obama-administration-lies-about-blocking-Fox-News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11068</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11068</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re correct, larry. Bush and Cheney have yet to be charged or convicted. And yeah....I got it. 

Nothing about &quot;getting&quot; it, however, changes or explains what I said about Village media. Village media, the vast right wing conspiracy, did exactly what I said they did during Clinton. During Bush, the same media knelt down and kissed Republican ass.....refusing to acknowledge the open and defiant criminality of a rogue administration. Now that Bush is gone....the media conspiracy is back from their 8-year sleep......and, following FOX&#039;s treasonous lead, are returning to their 1993,....let&#039;s f*ck the Democrats.....posture.

Quid....facts, really, are not stubborn. Facts, really, have no personality traits at all. To modern conservatives, facts are optional, malleable. Conservatives, stubbornly, twist those facts....they&#039;ve been doing it ever since Rushbo and FOX and Fiends became the Republican Party leaders.....into propagandistic slogan &quot;breaking news&quot; bullsh*t in the hopes of damaging or bringing down yet another Democratic president. It&#039;s what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re correct, larry. Bush and Cheney have yet to be charged or convicted. And yeah&#8230;.I got it. </p>
<p>Nothing about &#034;getting&#034; it, however, changes or explains what I said about Village media. Village media, the vast right wing conspiracy, did exactly what I said they did during Clinton. During Bush, the same media knelt down and kissed Republican ass&#8230;..refusing to acknowledge the open and defiant criminality of a rogue administration. Now that Bush is gone&#8230;.the media conspiracy is back from their 8-year sleep&#8230;&#8230;and, following FOX&#039;s treasonous lead, are returning to their 1993,&#8230;.let&#039;s f*ck the Democrats&#8230;..posture.</p>
<p>Quid&#8230;.facts, really, are not stubborn. Facts, really, have no personality traits at all. To modern conservatives, facts are optional, malleable. Conservatives, stubbornly, twist those facts&#8230;.they&#039;ve been doing it ever since Rushbo and FOX and Fiends became the Republican Party leaders&#8230;..into propagandistic slogan &#034;breaking news&#034; bullsh*t in the hopes of damaging or bringing down yet another Democratic president. It&#039;s what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quidpro</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Quidpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>Facts are stubborn things, Reverand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facts are stubborn things, Reverand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11063</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11063</guid>
		<description>Uh, Bush was never convicted of anything, Reverend. Got that? Neither was Cheney. Got that, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, Bush was never convicted of anything, Reverend. Got that? Neither was Cheney. Got that, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11062</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11062</guid>
		<description>&quot;.. by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool.&quot;

That&#039;s a falsehood. An outright piece of manufactured news. Didn&#039;t happen. 

Since Clinton was never convicted of anything...got that?...anything, virtually all of the stories manufactured about Clinton were bogus. The GOP had absolutely nothing on Bill, but the right wing conspiracy media took it to feverish levels anyway.....just as the same folks are doing to Obama now.

Question. Was Bush impeached? Kucinich tried ....but Village media, the same Villagers who drooled over salacious gossip about curved penises and semen-stained dresses....couldn&#039;t be bothered to report and investigate a rogue, Constitution shredding president. The Village couldn&#039;t get all worked up over the brand new American traditions of torture, wars of choice, illegal wiretapping of Americans, extraordinary rendition, and the fraudulent leading of America into a pre-determined invasion of Iraq.....media couldn&#039;t be bothered with little stuff like that. But now media is back....and did you know that this dastardly president said that FOX is not a news organization? Grab the smelling salts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;.. by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool.&#034;</p>
<p>That&#039;s a falsehood. An outright piece of manufactured news. Didn&#039;t happen. </p>
<p>Since Clinton was never convicted of anything&#8230;got that?&#8230;anything, virtually all of the stories manufactured about Clinton were bogus. The GOP had absolutely nothing on Bill, but the right wing conspiracy media took it to feverish levels anyway&#8230;..just as the same folks are doing to Obama now.</p>
<p>Question. Was Bush impeached? Kucinich tried &#8230;.but Village media, the same Villagers who drooled over salacious gossip about curved penises and semen-stained dresses&#8230;.couldn&#039;t be bothered to report and investigate a rogue, Constitution shredding president. The Village couldn&#039;t get all worked up over the brand new American traditions of torture, wars of choice, illegal wiretapping of Americans, extraordinary rendition, and the fraudulent leading of America into a pre-determined invasion of Iraq&#8230;..media couldn&#039;t be bothered with little stuff like that. But now media is back&#8230;.and did you know that this dastardly president said that FOX is not a news organization? Grab the smelling salts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11058</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11058</guid>
		<description>Rev says, &quot;FOX is so embarassingly propagandistic…something needed to be said. Good on Obama for telling it like it is. In the 90&#039;s, the same Village became obsessed with total bullsh*t stuff about Clinton, then it was promoted privately by Schaife and a few others. Now it&#039;s FOX news trying to bait the other media into running their bogus stories&quot;

Which bogus stories would those be, Rev ?

And I noticed you skipped right over the Bush administration, when, of course, liberals did absolutely nothing to bring about the demise of Bush, ha ha. This whole subject is laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev says, &#034;FOX is so embarassingly propagandistic…something needed to be said. Good on Obama for telling it like it is. In the 90&#039;s, the same Village became obsessed with total bullsh*t stuff about Clinton, then it was promoted privately by Schaife and a few others. Now it&#039;s FOX news trying to bait the other media into running their bogus stories&#034;</p>
<p>Which bogus stories would those be, Rev ?</p>
<p>And I noticed you skipped right over the Bush administration, when, of course, liberals did absolutely nothing to bring about the demise of Bush, ha ha. This whole subject is laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/10/22/aint-that-tough-enough/ID=8429/comment-page-1/#comment-11057</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=8429#comment-11057</guid>
		<description>Rev says, &quot;Obama is not excluding a viewpoint they don&#039;t like...&quot;

Um, that&#039;s exactly what Obama has been trying to do, by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool. I don&#039;t know why you are trying so hard to spin something that is this obvious. Are you vying for a job as David Axelrod&#039;s assistant or something ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev says, &#034;Obama is not excluding a viewpoint they don&#039;t like&#8230;&#034;</p>
<p>Um, that&#039;s exactly what Obama has been trying to do, by not making White House officials available to Fox News, and by trying to exclude Fox from the media pool. I don&#039;t know why you are trying so hard to spin something that is this obvious. Are you vying for a job as David Axelrod&#039;s assistant or something ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
