Comments on: Terrorizing Children For Jesus

By: Da King

Da King — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:29:46 +0000

You are saying one moral failing means the Catholics have no right to express morality about anything. You just said it again, and you're wrong again. I've yet to meet any perfect people on this planet, but that doesn't mean we all sacrifice the right to express our opinion on morality.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:00:12 +0000

Of course, that's not what I'm saying at all.

I never said that Catholics are wrong about everything….they do good for the poor, for example. I said that with a child abuse and cover-up record like Catholics have, they have no business being taken seriously when authortitatively speaking about the "morality" of….anything.

Yet 5 Supremes and hundreds of lawyers sat at the feet of of one of Catholicism's "we define morality" proponents.

By: Da King

Da King — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:42:21 +0000

I don't know of many people who come out FOR child sexual abuse, except for Hollywood celebrities who defend Roman Polanski, NAMBLA, a few liberal judges, and Obama's School Safety Czar Kevin Jennings, so that's not a real big agreement. It's pretty basic morality.

But what you're saying is that if persons or institutions are wrong about one thing (as the Catholic church was to cover up sexual abuse by homosexual clergy. FYI – the abuse was directed at BOYS, not girls), they are wrong about everything. I don't agree with that. You are wrong about most stuff, but I still find some things to agree with you about.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:27:32 +0000

Quid….feel free to label me anyway you want. However, I would remind you that I've never said anything about the Boy Scouts…ever.

Furthermore, the Boy Scouts, as far as I know, do not have a rigid and corrupt ideology, like the Catholic Church does, lending itself to a predilection for child abuse. I believe religion, not just the Catholic religion, poisons everything. Most liberals are much more tolerant of religion than I am. So, there's that.

AND….homosexuality should not be confused with child molesting. Child molesters are pedophiles. To confuse the two is incorrect and could look like a bias against homosexuality.

King….it's, once again, the hypocrisy. An institution which has protected child abusers, an institution with up to five percent of it's priests who abuse children, has absolutely no business speaking about the morality of the unborn. There's simply no credibility left……that's what I was pointing out. By the way, thanks for agreeing with the indefensible sweeping nder the rug of the abuse. We do agree occasionally and that's a good thing.

By: Da King

Da King — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:24:51 +0000

Calling the Catholic church an "international child-terrorizing cult" is typical Rev hyperbolic inanity, but he does have a point here about the Catholics not properly addressing the issue of child sexual abuse committed by a small minority of homosexual clergymen. They tried to sweep it under the rug for far too long, and that is indefensible.

But when the Reverend tried to somehow conflate that with the abortion argument, he lost me completely. It's as if the Reverend is saying, "stop the child abuse, but killing them is okay." I don't understand.

By: Quidpro

Quidpro — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:46:45 +0000

The Revererand fits the classic profile of a liberal: One who attacks the Catholic Church for putting homosexual men in charge of young boys, while at the same time, attacking the Boy Scouts for refusing to put homosexual men in charge of young boys.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:43:15 +0000

jimmy…..just now looked at that video. More truth there than fiction.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:49:04 +0000

Is ACORN an organization of color? I thought those corrupt Obama cronies who run ACORN and skim the taxpayer subsidized profits are white.

By: bzzzzp

bzzzzp — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:39:33 +0000

Stay on him Larry.

Based on the response, he must think they are pissing on Reverse and his Deity Obama.

There is nothing that Reverse wont gloss over if they agree with his politics.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:27:15 +0000

Just for the record…are you referring to the totally fictitiousness entrapment of an organization of color by tolerance-challenged numbnuts?