This is not personal for me….and though imperfect in carrying it out…..I try not to make conservative commenters, or King, the issue by endlessly calling them names. We are all just regular Americans without power…..though I fail at times….I, at least, try to save my ammunition for the powerful.

AND….A lot of things do not "occur" to King.

Other words, however, like "illogical," "hyperpartisan," "hypocritical," "juvenile," "double standard," "biased," "fact-challenged," "anti-free speech," and "lacking self-awareness," along with many others, occur to me frequently as I read the Rev's posts. No offense intended.That's just usually what I'm thinking.

Simple. It's by reading this blog that I find out what Olbermann had to say last night. If you're so "complex," (congratulations?) why must you point out how "complex" you are?

Ha.

King often searches for equivalencies, like you do. Sounds plausible until one realizes that Bushes' tax cuts (enough to pay for a decade and a half of health care) were not vehemently opposed by Democrats…..many voted for it. All Democrats and most liberals supported Bush 100% after 9-11. So you are wildly off base. How are those GOP votes for Obama's agenda going?

If another attack (god forbid) happened under Obama (which some crazies want to happen) do you think Republicans and conservatives would stand behind the black president? I sure as hell don't. WorldNetDaily is calling for Obama's impeachment already.

The right, in their crazed state of mind, are dead wrong. Accept it.

Just so you know….I'm a very complex person, basically a contrarian who refuses to accept the, you know, simple, spoon-fed line from whore-media and corrupt politicians. Anyone who has read my material over time knows my take has proven to be the correct one more often than not. Not bragging, just sayin' it like it is. By all means, though…..feel free to call me whatever you would like.

And we had job losses under Bush (as we have under every president, you simpleton). We have more under Obama.

Perspective.

True, many conservatives want Obama to fail at everything. But then, many liberals wanted Bush to fail at everything. Perspective, again.

You really are a simple person. Incredibly simple.

The GOP will gain seats but not the majority.

Many conservatives want Obama to fail at everything…..even if America fails too. They weren't celebrating because Chicagoans didn't want the games…they were celebrating because Obama tried and lost. So did America.

Obama's approval ratings are at 56%, as of yesterday's polling….so you're wrong there too.

And…..the huge deficits and job losses began under Bush. That doesn't excuse Obama's performance….it puts it in perspective.

Au contraire. That has been covered extensively, though I haven't tuned into MSNBC for a week or so. Maybe they are busy putting down Rush and Beck instead, as you are.

I also hate to break it to you Rev, but the Bush administration conducted negotiations with Iran too.

I also hate to break this to you, but our talks with Iran haven't made ANY progress yet. See my latest post.

Your head will explode in a fit of rage and frustration next November. A real backlash is brewing. Write that down. Your daily pronouncements are getting more ridiculous and foolish as Obama's sub-50 approval rating continues to drop and deficits continue to pile up (by the trillions) and jobs continue to vanish.

Furthermore, I want the nuts to keep it up….please. Please, exercise all the free irresponsible speeech that can be mustered. Every day that this protected, yet traitorous speech, continues….is but another nail in the coffin of that Grand Old Dead Party. Thank you Rush, Glenn, Sean, Bill-o, National Review, and Fox. Opportunistic pricks to the end.