And there are also many unhinged liberals today and always, and they have been committing violence all along……….yet you NEVER hear me saying those liberals are representative of some wider "war" that DOES NOT EXIST, nor do you hear me saying those liberals should be censored.

At the end of the day, YOU are a LIAR. You take one or two incidents and try to pretend it's indicative of the whole of a political movement.

The vast majority of what you say if unquestionable FALSE, for the reasons I've stated previously.

And Glenn Beck is no more the leader of the Republican party than Keith Olbermann is the leader of the Democrat party. Your major problem is that you incapable of objectivity, and you cannot put anything in perspective. Instead, you are a purveyor of 100% bs propaganda.

The reason I write colorful and provocative blogs is because of the unhinged right. If Limbaugh, Beck, and all the rest can do it…..why can't I? Limbaugh and Beck are now mainstream conservative heroes…they are the leaders of the GOP. So, I figure what's good for the wingnut goose is…….well….you know.

Though I use exaggerated language…..what I'm saying is unquestionably true.

You know I'm correct about this. Naturally, not every conservative is a murderer. All TeaBaggers are not violent, etc, etc. But some are…..and those "some", when a Democrat is the president, will carry out acts of political violence.

Here's the point, one more time. If Sparkman was killed by a right wing nut, which is still unknown, it doesn't mean there is an army of violent right wing nuts ready to declare war, anymore than it means there is an army of left wing nuts ready to declare war because of the murdered anti-abortion activist. Trying to take isolated incidents like this and then link them to wider movements of the peaceful exercise of free political speech (i.e. Tea Partiers) is reprehensible. Those are the arguments of those who favor censorship.

You are in essence saying that if Timothy McVeigh thinks the government has overstepped it's authority, and Da King thinks the government has overstepped it's authority, then Da King is the same as Timothy McVeigh. The illogic of it is astounding. It's akin to that old example of faulty logic from Woody Allen – "A) Socrates is a man. B) All men are mortal. C) All men are Socrates"

Don't think so.

The Oklahoma bombing? Indicative of anything political?

How is my blog title any different from your buddy Glenn Beck…when he dedicates entire hour long programs to the coming revolution…that you know, could happen?

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that all your fondest dreams about what happened to Sparkman turn out to be 100% correct. Let's say some nut just got done watching the Glenn Beck show and then murdered the census worker when he came to his door. Let's even say the nut attended a Tea Party or two.

Does that mean "the war has begun ?" Or would it mean one unhinged person committed an act of unhinged violence, which isn't symbolic of any greater violence movement ?????

To assist you in answering the question, I'll propose a couple more questions for you to consider. Was the murder of the anti-abortion activist indicative of a war on pro-lifers ? Are pro-choicers inciting that violence ? Was the violence at the G-20 protests indicative of a war ? Should we blame Michael Moore for that ?

c'mon, Rev. THINK.

ACORN was dropped from any Census work the same day Sparkman was murdered. Do you think child prostitution enthusiasts at ACORN hightailed it down to Daniel Boone territory the same day?

Michelle Bachmann and the like provided all the motivation a typical unhinged wingnut would need to do this deed. That said……I've never stated unequivocally that this was an out and out political assassination…..but it sure as hell looks that way.

Nothing revealed so far discredits my post in any way. You may not like that….but it is what it is.