Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

What We've Been Witnessing

by The Reverend on July 27, 2009

in Barack Obama,fearmongering,intolerance,moral values

We witnessed it during the presidential campaign with the incessant profiling of voters by media along racial lines.

We witnessed it when repeatedly white teevee anchors wrung their hands over whether the black candidate could win the white vote. Surely, we were told, the Bradley effect would be operational.

We witnessed it when on day one of a new black president's taking office, a popular-with-conservative-white-guys, and obese radio talker called for the new black president to fail.

We witnessed it with the tea-bagger gatherings where only one theme was recognizable and coherent…..conservative whites dislike having a black president.

We witnessed it with all the phony accusations that this new black president is really a secret Muslim.

We witnessed it, and are still witnessing it, in the entirely phony fabrication that Obama isn't even an American citizen and should be deported.

We witnessed in during the media buildup to confirming a Latino woman to the Supreme Court. Pious pricks on the Senate Judiciary Committee took the opportunity to scold a highly qualified minority woman, wagging their fingers warning her she had better not be pre-biased against whites.

We witnessed it in the Ricci case when 5 conservative Justices basically declared that affirmative action was officially over….all judicial activist style.

We're witnessing it now with the Professor Gates imbroglio.

What is it it we're witnessing?

Misplaced fear by the majority. The disingenuous ginning up of fear that the 60% majority American whites are under attack by those conniving minorities.

Contrived, self-victimization in a land where majority whites have historically discriminated against minorities…and still do.

I'm not sure whether the battle for America's soul is already over and the dark forces have won….or whether there's still a chance for redemption…..but what we've been witnessing for the last year or so has been ugly…..and I'm not even including the Bush/Cheney regime in my estimation.

Pat Buchanan, the daily MSBNC spokesman for majority whites currently under siege by minorities, spews forth what many white conservatives in America actually believe. Whites wrote the Constitution, we're the ones who fought and died in the Civil War, and "probably" were "100 percent of the people who died at Normandy", and therefore, whites have earned the right to govern the country.

To listen to mainly white conservatives, the most imminent threat to America is the threat of white Americans losing their "earned" right to rule the country in some onslaught of "reverse discrimination."

It's nauseating.

I watched the black and white teevee in my youth when blacks were batoned and fire hosed and beaten like animals. I paid attention when in 1968 MLK was assassinated for being too uppity while black. I saw what those who Buchanan said have "earned" the right to govern America did to poor, defenseless blacks.

And now some 40 years later, I see what people like Buchanan, and Limbaugh and many, many other conservatives are doing. The message hasn't changed, even though, thankfully, the methods have.

A black president and a Latino woman on the Supreme Court, to these white conservatives, is evidence that whites are under seige in America. Whites, these conservatives continually tell us, are now the victims. Majority whites are the ones now being discriminated against.

What we're witnessing is simply modern American racism…..and it's pathetic.

  • Balkanize

    Good point. And, it will continue to get much worse.

  • Steve

    Rev., I wanted to start out with "people like you perpetuate racism in order to support a liberal agenda" , but I won't, that is how you would attack the right I'm sure. Since I am a "free-thinker" I will go along the lines of why is it if a minority does something dumb and gets questioned on it, it is racism? The Black Harvard Scholar, the Judge and BHO all did/said dumb things, so that makes white males racist? I remember years ago when a certain town in NE Ohio was known as "Caucasian Falls", when it was called that (which it was) people would laugh and say "yeah it is". But no one thought it was racist. But on the other hand when a certain local high school (known as the Big Blue) was referred to as the Big Black (which it was) we were all terrible racists and should be sorry and taught classes on respecting others. Seems a little one sided?

  • The Reverend

    I know the sides are entrenched on the issue of race. I also believe that there is common ground to be found in the area of personal responsibility….which is what Steve is getting at, and rightly so.

    The suburbs of America were a response to the passing of civil rights legislation. Whites moved out of urban areas. That's how we dealt with lingering racial differences.

    While the white/black thing is much better in America than it was when I was a boy, it's not where it should be. Race relations will change slowly, but at least the trend is in the right direction.

  • N. E. Frye

    Any comments on the group of black kids that attacked a white family shouting racial hate? It seems to me that the most rabid racists these days are blacks. And Ivy leaguers and black advocates don't seem to notice it.

  • Da King

    The Reverend uses the race card as a sledgehammer, hoping it will stifle political debate, hoping that it will stifle any opposition to the liberal cause, hoping that it will stifle the truth. It won't.

    The Reverend uses the race card because that's all he has as a weapon. If a discussion of the merits of the individual cases is done, then the Reverend has no argument. To wit – the only racism in the Gates case came from Gates. The obsese radio talker the Rev cites who said he wanted Obama to fail (Limbaugh), wanted Obama to fail because he thought Obama was a socialist. It wasn't because Obama was black. Sotomayor came under controversy FOR HER OWN RACIAL REMARKS. Ricci was discriminated against because he was white, and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ricci. Still, the Reverend obfuscates and ignores the facts of every single issue, and focuses solely on race instead.

    Whites obviously DID vote for Obama in large numbers. If they hadn't, Obama wouldn't be the President. That flies in the face of the Rev's racist mantra. Conservatives didn't vote for Obama because Obama is a liberal. Conservatives wouldn't have voted for a white liberal either. That's because they are Conservative, not, as the Rev would tell us, because they are racist. That's just a stupid distraction on the Rev's part. The GOP just elected a black man, Michael Steele, as the chairman of the Republican National Committee. Lots of Conservatives wanted Condi Rice, a black woman, to run for President. Lots of Conservatives wanted Powell to run for President before. Conservatives selected Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. Conservatives wanted to groom Miguel Estrada to be the first Latino Supreme Court nominee, but the Democrats blocked it. I could go on and on.

    The Reverend wants us to believe all Conservatives are racists, but the truth is, it's the Reverend himself who sees everything through a racial prism. It's the Reverend who judges issues based on the race of the parties involved, time after time (such as Riccia and Gates). Rather than being color blind (the true measure of equality), the Reverend sees nothing but color, and is blinded to everything else.

  • The Reverend

    I re-read my post.

    I'm sticking to what I said.

    Every one of those "witnessing" points are factual. Furthermore, every person involved with those "witnessings" is a white conservative or a group of white conservatives.

    There is diversity in the conservative movement, I admit, and not all conservatives are involved in those "witnessings" I mentioned.

    At the same time, there's no doubt that the folks involved in the events I listed are white conservatives.

    If this was reversed…you would be calling out the liberals, and rightly so.

  • Da King

    Some of the points themselves are factual. It's your underlying assumptions about racism being behind it all that are bullsh*t.

  • The Reverend

    It's the one common thread that runs through all these events.

  • Da King

    No, it is NOT the one common thread. It is you dishonestly attempting to make it appear so.

  • The Reverend

    "The Reverend uses the race card because that's all he has as a weapon. If a discussion of the merits of the individual cases is done, then the Reverend has no argument. To wit – the only racism in the Gates case came from Gates. The obsese radio talker the Rev cites who said he wanted Obama to fail (Limbaugh), wanted Obama to fail because he thought Obama was a socialist. It wasn't because Obama was black. Sotomayor came under controversy FOR HER OWN RACIAL REMARKS. Ricci was discriminated against because he was white, and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ricci."

    Setting aside "the magic Negro" talk for now…..all of what you say is a mischaracterization of the facts. Even though Soto never made racist remarks, did not discriminate against Ricci, 4 Justices loudly disagreed with the majority ruling, Gates was in his own home, and that Crowley lied on his police report,…you misconstrue those facts to bolster your preconceived viewpoint. I won't call you dishonest. Your take on all this stuff starts with your "reverse discrimination" viewpoint. Mine doesn't.

  • Da King

    How did "the magic negro" get into this conversation ? Besides, that phrase was coined by a liberal writer for the LA Times, so what's your point ?

    Soto did make racist remarks, Ricci was discriminated against, Gates used racist rhetoric against the cops, and saying Crowley lied on his police report is just what you want to believe. It is not factual.

    The thing is, I don't have a preconceived viewpoint. That's where you're wrong. I know racism exists. I see it. I judge each situation based upon the facts of the situation, not based upon the race of the parties involved. That's irrelevant. There is no such thing as reverse racism. There is only racism, whether it comes from whites, blacks, Latinos, or whomever. I treat everyone as equal. You're the one with the preconceived notions. You only see racism when it comes from whites (and you even see it when it's not there). You turn blind when racism comes from minorities, as it did from Gates.

  • The Reverend

    How often did I say that Gates should have not brought the black issue into it?

    That's right.

  • larry d.

    You are almost as bad a race-baiter as Obama and walter, Reverend.

  • The Reverend

    How so?

    Is raising the racial issue, itself, race baiting?

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).