Comments on: A Steaming Pile Of The Village

By: pdt1420

pdt1420 — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:37:54 +0000

Which rule was changing the subject? #3?

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:06:50 +0000

Like those WMD's in the Barney White House fiasco…..that "evidence" must be around here somewhere.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:51:26 +0000

But there's no evidence, Reverend. I've already said I'm all in if you find some.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:08:26 +0000

One man's demonization is another person's "pointing out the facts."

I could care less what Cheney's motivation was. That has no significance to the fact that he wilfully broke numerous laws.

If I rob a bank to feed my family….I still go to court and get convicted for bank robbery.

What's an insult is arguing for amnesty for all elected officials (except Clinton, of course) when they violate the law. I think we rejected the idea of a King awhile back.

You're double standard is showing.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:18:40 +0000

You and a good part of the left start any kind of look at a Cheney action under the assumption he has some kind of nefarious motivation, Reverend. It insults your readers if you deny it.

Whether it's Bush or Cheney, or a working schmoe like Joe the Plumber, or even a beauty pageant contestant, you've become the demonizer party. It's quite ugly.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:28:52 +0000

Come on, larry. The Plame case ALONE warranted a separate investigation into Cheney's orchestration of the Iraq fraud-up.

What do you do with Bush/Cheney ordering a second tier Justice Dept. hack like Yoo to "legalize" illegal acts of torture?

Even Fitzgerald talked about the "cloud" over the VP's office.

The "misguided assumptions" language…is….misguided.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:03:37 +0000

I've read lots of stuff about Cheney including this Greenwald fellow for Salon and have never seen any actual evidence, Reverend. Just a lot of repeated speculation made under misguided assumptions.

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:05:42 +0000

I figured you were doing the vacation thing.

Obama won't allow Holder to go after Cheney. I'm a layperson…and I could prosecute Cheney myself, there's so much evidence. But it wouldn't be prudent.

The nation will simply limp along until a new Nixon-Bush comes along and finishes the place off. Glad it won't be in my lifetime.

By: larry d.

larry d. — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:55:48 +0000

I've been gone a week and still nothing on Cheney?

By: pdt1420

pdt1420 — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:44:48 +0000

No, by definition, it doesn't. There is a difference between operational and implemented… words matter.