Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Huckleberry

by The Reverend on July 15, 2009

in fearmongering,GOP,intolerance,moral values

The Huckleberry

It's the white man's right, once he has extended his hand of "equality" to non-whites, to openly and ruthlessly try to humiliate the non-white so he or she doesn't get too, you know, uppity.

The thinking is ugly, naturally, but then think about what white men have done on the earth……quite a few ugly things stand out.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is a white man. He is not only a white man, but also a conservative Republican white man, and not just a conservative Republican white man, but a conservative Republican white man from South Carolina. It's been a tough period for white men who are conservative Republicans. The nation they once ruled the way they wanted has changed and continues to change. All things being equal, whites in the U.S. will slip into minority status sometime this century. Women and people of color are rising up to leadership positions more than ever before.

White men, like Lindsey Graham, have become bitter about changing America. White men now consider themselves to be victims of an unjust society that discriminates against them, the majority.

Watch Huckleberry condescend to Judge Sotomayor as he spits out his bitterness towards the "Latina" woman…..

Graham knew that the context of Sotomayor's comment about a "wise Latina woman" was racial and gender discrimination. The Reverend gave the clear and indisputable context of Sotomayor's "wise Latina woman" in it's context here. Huckleberry knows that context full well. But he's, you know, a white conservative Republican male, living in tumultuous times of change, when a black man can become president and a Hispanic woman can be nominated to the Supreme Court.

Even though Graham knows the context of the "wise Latina woman" comment, he misconstrues it anyway and acts as if he cannot even hear Sotomayor's response. That's because he doesn't want to hear it. What Graham is doing is extracting the bitter conservative white man's pound of flesh from Sotomayor.

Graham may as well have said this…."We bitter white-male, conservative Republicans realize we can't block your confirmation. What we can do though is seek to please other bitter white-male conservative Republicans by openly humiliating you and misconstruing your words and your life so that those bitter dead enders can praise me later and say, 'ole' Lindsey told that uppity Latino woman, didn't he?'"

Here's some proof of the dishonesty and double standard of bitter white conservative Republicans who realize their future as the dominant ones is slipping away. When it's a white conservative man up for confirmation, like Sam Alito in 2006, then according to Huckleberry, all is right in the universe…..

Republicans are destroying their own political party with their bitterness, their own self-pity party of imagined victimization. Having lost black voters because of the "southern strategy" which appealed to southern racist voters….now it seems that Republicans are intent on losing the Hispanic vote as well. Hispanics are the largest minority in the country and the fastest growing voting block…..yet all Huckleberry Graham can do is toss a few bitter and snide bones out for the sake of his bitter white conservative base.

Truly, today's Republicans are pathetic.

  • Da King

    Wow. If the Reverend thinks Lindsay Graham was bullying Sotomayor there, I really have to question the Rev's sanity, not to mention his memory. That was about as mild as can be. Apparently, the Rev has never watched a Democrat question a Republican Supreme Court nominee. Does the Reverend remember Ted Kennedy bringing Alito's wife to tears when he was calling her husband a racist ? Does the Rev remember the Bork or Thomas hearings ? Sotomayor is being treated with kid gloves by comparison.

    If anyone is truly pathetic here, it's YOU. You occupy a parallel universe.

  • End the Electoral

    Eh, consider the source, DaKing. It comes from a guy that uses the title "Reverend". Have you ever seen an inner city phone book? Every other person is a "Rev.". Mainly because they will never see "PhD or Dr." in front of their names.

  • Steve

    Splain to me Rev…. oh I'm sorry I'm stealing tomorrows blog, and you'll probably tell us that isn't funny.

  • The Reverend

    The parallel universe I live in is showing 60+% approval ratings for Lord Obama….and sensitively low, low approval numbers for Republicans.

    Let's call it the majority parallel universe, shall we? Then, we're cool.

  • Steve

    I watched some Hannity last night and he kept saying how BHO 's approval ratings are way down. Everything I see they are still sky high for him personally but down for his policies. Which again goes back to he will get anything he wants as long as he fixes the economy first.

  • Fred

    When the GOP was in power, the Democrats cried and played dirty. Now that the Democrats are in power it is the Republicans turn to play dirty and cry. Now I know why George Washington wrote many years ago to beware of political parties.

  • rayy

    Maybe "Lucky Lindsay" thinks that a closeted gay male Senator from SC would make better decisions?

  • Minuteman

    Of course, if we enforced our laws, hispanics would not be the largest growing minority. "Third world immigrants make third world countries".

  • averagejoe5

    Truer words were never spoken minuteman.

    Good one Rayy. You Libs never let us down when talking about the issues and then slamming someones character that gives an opposing view,LOL. Beautiful. You act like being gay is bad? It is your party that thinks it is natural, using one dolphin touching another dolphins private with his nose as proof that gayness is a natural form of sexual expression.

  • Da King

    Rev says, "The parallel universe I live in is showing 60+% approval ratings for Lord Obama….and sensitively low, low approval numbers for Republicans."

    Because the subject was whether or not Lindsay Graham was bullying Sotomayor, your response is irrelevant, but I can definitely see why you changed the subject. The facts are….inconvenient. The Republicans were respectful to Sotomayor even as she lied to them and told them what they wanted to hear.

    However, since you brought it up, George W. Bush had over 80% approval ratings following 9/11, after 8 months in office. According to your judging technique, I guess Bush was right about everything back then. How'd that work out ? Both Obama and the Democrats numbers have been dropping steadily, deservedly so, just as the Republicans deserve their low ratings. If you haven't noticed, both parties have been driving the country into the dumper. Obama is just speeding up the process, and I take it you agree with him as long as he can continue to fool America into thinking he's cool.

  • The Reverend

    Last November's election was, in part, a rejection of conservative intolerance. Most Republican senators questioning Sotomayor, in spite of that electoral rejection, continued to flaunt that intolerance.

    Conservatives would have our nation return to the days when minorities, women, and gays are kept in their place in subservience to hetero, white males.

    Those days are long over.

  • pdt1420

    "Last November's election was, in part, a rejection of conservative intolerance. "

    It was? It must be very convenient that you can turn the election victory into any, in part, evidence you need to support a stupid theory.

  • pdt1420

    Oh, and when push comes to shove, play the Republicans are old white guys who hate minorities and women card… I mean, you can tell how much we all hate Palin.

  • The Reverend

    Republicans ARE mostly white men. While Republicans are certainly not all haters of minorities……the party's platform and policies over the years have turned off women and minorities.

    Republicans do not have any blacks representing them in Congress and have no women in congressional leadership roles. Bashing the "wise Latina" is a continuation of the Republican party's non-inclusive policies.

    Republicans not hating Sarah Palin is similar to Republicans not hating Clarence Thomas. Palin and Thomas endorse the GOP's non-inclusive policy.

  • pdt1420

    Let's link these two together and see if they make sense…

    While Republicans are certainly not all haters of minorities… Conservatives would have our nation return to the days when minorities, women, and gays are kept in their place in subservience to hetero, white males.

    Palin and Thomas endorse not including themselves? What?

  • larry d.

    From what I've seen this past year you seem to hate white men, mexicans and Jews, Reverend.

    Out of curiosity, which group do you hate worst and why? And how do you feel about 'Orientals'?

  • The Reverend

    That would be Asians, larry, not Orientals.

    And let's be clear….I hate everybody.

    pdt….

    Palin, with her extra special "real Americans" and Thomas, with his bitterness exuding out against regular Americans in every court case…..both embrace the GOP's viewpoint of intolerance towards anyone who isn't white, hetero and Christian…oh yeah, or rich.

  • pdt1420

    So Palin hates white women?

    Thomas hates black men?

    Really?

  • Minuteman

    If there were more wise Latinas, maybe they would be actually be able to build a country worth staying in, instead of coming here. Hispanic and African nations are nothing but derelict states that have been that way for thousands of years. It is not in the genetics for them plan or build anything, just like we can't play basketball.

  • The Reverend

    Larry Bird.

  • The Reverend

    pdt…..Palin pretends she is a feminist while willing to deny women choice.

    Thomas hates himself. He's a self-loather. He knows that Republicans picked him as a token and he hates himself because of it. He's a very twisted guy.

    Michael Steele, the buffoon that he is, is being used similarly.

  • pdt1420

    pretends…. because feminism hinges on abortion.

    Thomas hates black men?

  • The Reverend

    Feminism includes abortion…not "hinges on."

    Thomas hates himself because he's black and was chosen to be a Supreme because he is black. That fact has really messed with ole' Clarence's head. Read some stuff about him. Read what he writes.

  • pdt1420

    I'll read that he hates black men?

    If feminism doesn't hinge on abortion, then Palin can be a feminist without sharing that view. So she's not pretending… she is.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).