<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Will, The AB Journal, &amp; Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8632</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8632</guid>
		<description>Okay, Rev, I get your definition of liberal now. 

Nationalization of industry. Repeal of the Bill of Rights. No religion. 

By liberal, you mean communist. 

No wonder you think everybody is a right winger, even liberals like E.J. Dionne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Rev, I get your definition of liberal now. </p>
<p>Nationalization of industry. Repeal of the Bill of Rights. No religion. </p>
<p>By liberal, you mean communist. </p>
<p>No wonder you think everybody is a right winger, even liberals like E.J. Dionne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quidpro</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8628</link>
		<dc:creator>Quidpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8628</guid>
		<description>Do you even read the words you post, Reverand?  The readers can make their own decision as to whether I have mischaracterized your bleatings.

&quot;Conservatives hated each and every one of those liberal policies.&quot;  Wrong on two counts.  Remember that it was the Party of Lincoln that, at enormous cost to this nation, freed the slaves over the oposition of the &quot;liberal&quot; Democratic Party.  It was the Southern Democrats (Remember the &quot;Dixiecrats&quot;, Reverand?) who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  It passed only because those &quot;mean conservatives&quot; in the GOP joined in a bipartisan coalition and voted for it.  And it was Wyoming and those other conservative Western States that celebrate the freedom and individualistic values of America that lead the way on women&#039;s suffrage.

Liberals can claim &quot;credit&quot; for the holocaust of abortion, the abomination of same-sex marriage, and the canibalization of human embryos.  Have they no shame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you even read the words you post, Reverand?  The readers can make their own decision as to whether I have mischaracterized your bleatings.</p>
<p>&#034;Conservatives hated each and every one of those liberal policies.&#034;  Wrong on two counts.  Remember that it was the Party of Lincoln that, at enormous cost to this nation, freed the slaves over the oposition of the &#034;liberal&#034; Democratic Party.  It was the Southern Democrats (Remember the &#034;Dixiecrats&#034;, Reverand?) who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  It passed only because those &#034;mean conservatives&#034; in the GOP joined in a bipartisan coalition and voted for it.  And it was Wyoming and those other conservative Western States that celebrate the freedom and individualistic values of America that lead the way on women&#039;s suffrage.</p>
<p>Liberals can claim &#034;credit&#034; for the holocaust of abortion, the abomination of same-sex marriage, and the canibalization of human embryos.  Have they no shame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8626</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8626</guid>
		<description>And thank you Quid...for mischaracterizing each and every point. I&#039;m thinking the reason you did that was because you knew that I was right. Liberal policies are rarely considered, just like I said. But the history of America proves that we eventually embrace these liberal policies.....it just takes 50 years or so.

Blacks are considered equal, women can vote, abortions are legal, gays can marry in 6 states, embryonic stem cell research continues, and we still have Social Security. Conservatives hated each and every one of those liberal policies....but they eventually were accepted. 

Conservatives, by definition, by creed, are always behind the times on freedom and justice. Liberals get impatient, you understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thank you Quid&#8230;for mischaracterizing each and every point. I&#039;m thinking the reason you did that was because you knew that I was right. Liberal policies are rarely considered, just like I said. But the history of America proves that we eventually embrace these liberal policies&#8230;..it just takes 50 years or so.</p>
<p>Blacks are considered equal, women can vote, abortions are legal, gays can marry in 6 states, embryonic stem cell research continues, and we still have Social Security. Conservatives hated each and every one of those liberal policies&#8230;.but they eventually were accepted. </p>
<p>Conservatives, by definition, by creed, are always behind the times on freedom and justice. Liberals get impatient, you understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quidpro</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8602</link>
		<dc:creator>Quidpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8602</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Reverand.  Clarity is a virtue and you have enunciated your position on what constitutes true liberalism with bracing clarity.  According to you, &quot;Liberalism&quot; would require the abolishment of private property. the repeal of the Bill of Rights, and the imposition of fascism.  You are right.  These &quot;liberal policies are never given serious consideration&quot;.  Thank God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Reverand.  Clarity is a virtue and you have enunciated your position on what constitutes true liberalism with bracing clarity.  According to you, &#034;Liberalism&#034; would require the abolishment of private property. the repeal of the Bill of Rights, and the imposition of fascism.  You are right.  These &#034;liberal policies are never given serious consideration&#034;.  Thank God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8600</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8600</guid>
		<description>The actual problem we&#039;re having communicating here is over your comprehension of the word, &quot;liberal&quot;. 

You see guys like Dionne and so-called think tanks, like Brookings, as liberal, when they are, in reality, moderate....centrist. The reason we didn&#039;t take control of our energy problems in the 80&#039;s (and probably aren&#039;t going to now), is because liberal policies are rarely ever considered.

Liberal would be a country with non-profit, single payer health care for all. Liberals would have ended all faith-based programs and kept church separate from state.  Virtually all of the media and the majority of elected officials are against single payer and keeping church and state separate.

Liberals, if they were dominating power, either in media or government, would interpret the 2nd amendment like it was intended. 

Gay marriage, trade, corporate regulation.....all of it....liberal policies are never given serious consideration....because, you know, they&#039;re liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual problem we&#039;re having communicating here is over your comprehension of the word, &#034;liberal&#034;. </p>
<p>You see guys like Dionne and so-called think tanks, like Brookings, as liberal, when they are, in reality, moderate&#8230;.centrist. The reason we didn&#039;t take control of our energy problems in the 80&#039;s (and probably aren&#039;t going to now), is because liberal policies are rarely ever considered.</p>
<p>Liberal would be a country with non-profit, single payer health care for all. Liberals would have ended all faith-based programs and kept church separate from state.  Virtually all of the media and the majority of elected officials are against single payer and keeping church and state separate.</p>
<p>Liberals, if they were dominating power, either in media or government, would interpret the 2nd amendment like it was intended. </p>
<p>Gay marriage, trade, corporate regulation&#8230;..all of it&#8230;.liberal policies are never given serious consideration&#8230;.because, you know, they&#039;re liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da King</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Da King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 11:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>Rev says, &quot;E.J. Dionne is a centrist villager...not really a liberal&quot; 

LOL. Brother, you are just gone with the wind.

In addition to his WaPo job, Dionne is a member of the liberal Brookings Institute, a contributor to liberal NPR, and a columnist for Commonweal, a liberal Catholic publication. Prior to working for WaPo, he worked for the N.Y. Times, the leading liberal newspaper in the country. His books were  - &quot;Why Progressives Will Dominate the Next Political Era,&quot; &quot;Stand up Fight Back: Republican Toughs, Democratic Wimps, and Politics of Revenge,&quot; and &quot;Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right.&quot;

Is that &quot;reality-based&quot; enough for you ?

Btw, Sunday&#039;s Beacon Journal had four articles on the commentary page - one by liberal Eugene Robinson, one by liberal Paul Krugman, one by local liberal Tom Allio, and one by conservative Charles Krauthammer. 

Between friday and sunday, that makes the tally: seven op-eds by liberals, and one by conservatives for the ABJ. 

And I bet the Reverend is all pissed off about that one by conservatives. How could the ABJ be sooooo biased against liberals ??? LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rev says, &#034;E.J. Dionne is a centrist villager&#8230;not really a liberal&#034; </p>
<p>LOL. Brother, you are just gone with the wind.</p>
<p>In addition to his WaPo job, Dionne is a member of the liberal Brookings Institute, a contributor to liberal NPR, and a columnist for Commonweal, a liberal Catholic publication. Prior to working for WaPo, he worked for the N.Y. Times, the leading liberal newspaper in the country. His books were  &#8211; &#034;Why Progressives Will Dominate the Next Political Era,&#034; &#034;Stand up Fight Back: Republican Toughs, Democratic Wimps, and Politics of Revenge,&#034; and &#034;Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right.&#034;</p>
<p>Is that &#034;reality-based&#034; enough for you ?</p>
<p>Btw, Sunday&#039;s Beacon Journal had four articles on the commentary page &#8211; one by liberal Eugene Robinson, one by liberal Paul Krugman, one by local liberal Tom Allio, and one by conservative Charles Krauthammer. </p>
<p>Between friday and sunday, that makes the tally: seven op-eds by liberals, and one by conservatives for the ABJ. </p>
<p>And I bet the Reverend is all pissed off about that one by conservatives. How could the ABJ be sooooo biased against liberals ??? LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry d.</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>larry d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>That one was actually a little funny, frank!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one was actually a little funny, frank!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8581</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8581</guid>
		<description>By the way...E.J. Dionne is a centrist Villager. Nice man and all, but not really a liberal.

The ACLU defends the Constitution of the U.S.   I&#039;m not sure how that is strictly a liberal quality. Don&#039;t conservatives and moderates want to defend the Constitution from all threats?

The NY TImes is the paper of record and the paper of Judith Miller and her &quot;Curveball&quot; Cheney propaganda. Not sure how promoting a war of aggression can be considered liberal.

In truth, there are very few true liberals in Congress. And there are even fewer true liberals printed or aired by corporate media. We are graced with a stable of conservatives, neo-conservatives, and moderates.....but rarely does a liberal break through the Village gates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way&#8230;E.J. Dionne is a centrist Villager. Nice man and all, but not really a liberal.</p>
<p>The ACLU defends the Constitution of the U.S.   I&#039;m not sure how that is strictly a liberal quality. Don&#039;t conservatives and moderates want to defend the Constitution from all threats?</p>
<p>The NY TImes is the paper of record and the paper of Judith Miller and her &#034;Curveball&#034; Cheney propaganda. Not sure how promoting a war of aggression can be considered liberal.</p>
<p>In truth, there are very few true liberals in Congress. And there are even fewer true liberals printed or aired by corporate media. We are graced with a stable of conservatives, neo-conservatives, and moderates&#8230;..but rarely does a liberal break through the Village gates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reverend</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8580</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8580</guid>
		<description>&quot;If enacted, the EFCA would change the currently existing procedure to require the NLRB to certify the union as the bargaining representative without directing an election if a majority of employees signed cards.[1] The EFCA would take away employers&#039; present right to decide whether to use only the card-check process or to hold a secret-ballot election among employees in a particular bargaining unit, and instead give the right to the employees to choose a secret-ballot election in cases where less than a majority of employees has chosen to unionize through card-check.[3][4] The proposed legislation would still require a secret-ballot election when at least 30% of employees petition for an election.[3][5]&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act

Are we clear?


Apparently, blue takes exception to the blog....

&quot;Rev you are puffed full of the rightgeous weakness of mankind. I believe in people, as Americans &amp; individuals. 

Have you ever been proud of yourself when no one is clapping? Are you at peace as a socialist? Do you read what you write?&quot;

The &quot;righteous weakness of mankind&quot;?? 

We all believe in people, blue. What&#039;s not to believe in?

Did someone clap? blue, I know who I am, I&#039;m not a socialist, I owned several capitalistic ventures over my working years. My editing process is extremely thorough....and the last thing I do before publishing is reread the post. 

I&#039;m thinking, blue, that it&#039;s not about me....it&#039;s about the material I write. I respect your right to disagree with the substance of each posting. I actually encourage it. 

Finally, blue...I&#039;ve been a pastor, you know, in real life. I use &quot;The Reverend&quot;  with a sense of irony....because I now am an atheist. That&#039;s what that&#039;s about. G-Mann is an independent thinking and intelligent person whose comments I appreciate....even when we disagree. And, after all, they&#039;re only names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;If enacted, the EFCA would change the currently existing procedure to require the NLRB to certify the union as the bargaining representative without directing an election if a majority of employees signed cards.[1] The EFCA would take away employers&#039; present right to decide whether to use only the card-check process or to hold a secret-ballot election among employees in a particular bargaining unit, and instead give the right to the employees to choose a secret-ballot election in cases where less than a majority of employees has chosen to unionize through card-check.[3][4] The proposed legislation would still require a secret-ballot election when at least 30% of employees petition for an election.[3][5]&#034;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_Free_Choice_Act</a></p>
<p>Are we clear?</p>
<p>Apparently, blue takes exception to the blog&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#034;Rev you are puffed full of the rightgeous weakness of mankind. I believe in people, as Americans &#038; individuals. </p>
<p>Have you ever been proud of yourself when no one is clapping? Are you at peace as a socialist? Do you read what you write?&#034;</p>
<p>The &#034;righteous weakness of mankind&#034;?? </p>
<p>We all believe in people, blue. What&#039;s not to believe in?</p>
<p>Did someone clap? blue, I know who I am, I&#039;m not a socialist, I owned several capitalistic ventures over my working years. My editing process is extremely thorough&#8230;.and the last thing I do before publishing is reread the post. </p>
<p>I&#039;m thinking, blue, that it&#039;s not about me&#8230;.it&#039;s about the material I write. I respect your right to disagree with the substance of each posting. I actually encourage it. </p>
<p>Finally, blue&#8230;I&#039;ve been a pastor, you know, in real life. I use &#034;The Reverend&#034;  with a sense of irony&#8230;.because I now am an atheist. That&#039;s what that&#039;s about. G-Mann is an independent thinking and intelligent person whose comments I appreciate&#8230;.even when we disagree. And, after all, they&#039;re only names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quidpro</title>
		<link>http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2009/05/28/george-will-the-ab-journal-truth/ID=5974/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Quidpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/?p=5974#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Please read the actual statute, Reverand.  Otherwise people might suspect that you are merely uttering noises to fill the void in your brain wherein the faculty of judgment should lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read the actual statute, Reverand.  Otherwise people might suspect that you are merely uttering noises to fill the void in your brain wherein the faculty of judgment should lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

